journal article·2021-05

3D printing of RDX-based aluminized high explosives with gradient structure, significantly altering the critical dimensions

Xu Zhou, Yaofeng Mao, Dawei Zheng, Lin Zhong, Ruihao Wang, Bing Gao, Dunju Wang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

The vulnerability of weapon and ammunition has been attracting more and more researcher’s attention in order to improve their system survival in battlefield and security of production, transport and service management, and to adapt to the harsh battlefield environment. One of potential directions of explosive research and development is to reduce its vulnerability through charging structures. RDX-based high aluminized gradient structures explosives are constructed via direct ink writing. SEM and DSC demonstrated good compatibility of the gradient explosives and no significant gaps at the interface of the filaments, which leads to good thermal stability and suppressed hot spot formation within the gradient explosive. The critical dimension of detonation indicates that the critical size of explosive with gradient structure is greatly increased. This attractive integration of structural and functional advantages achieved by 3D printing gradient structure process offers new insights into the design of robust munitions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Naebe M, Shirvanimoghaddam K (2016) Functionally graded materials: a review of fabrication and properties. Appl Mater Today 5:223–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2016.10.00110.1016/j.apmt.2016.10.001 ↗
2. Zhang C, Chen F, Huang Z, Jia M, Chen G, Ye Y, Lin Y, Liu W, Chen B, Shen Q, Zhang L, Lavernia EJ (2019) Additive manufacturing of functionally graded materials: a review. Mater Sci Eng A 764:138209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.13820910.1016/j.msea.2019.138209 ↗
3. Prikhodko SV, Ivasishin OM, Markovsky PE, Savvakin DG, Stasiuk OO (2020) Advanced technologies for security applications. Springer, New York, pp 127–14010.1007/978-94-024-2021-0_13 ↗
4. Bukovsky EV, Reeves RV, Krish A, Gash AE, Glumac NG (2018) Experimental study of structure/behavior relationship for a metallized explosive . AIP Conf Proc. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.504496210.1063/1.5044962 ↗
5. Liang B, Lin Z, Chen W, He Z, Zhong J, Zhu H, Tang Z, Gui X (2018) Ultra-stretchable and highly sensitive strain sensor based on gradient structure carbon nanotubes. Nanoscale 10:13599–13606. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nr02528b10.1039/c8nr02528b ↗
6. Kokubo N, Arake M, Yamagishi K, Morimoto Y, Takeoka S, Ohta H, Fujie T (2018) Inkjet-printed neural electrodes with mechanically gradient structure. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.8b0057410.1021/acsabm.8b00574 ↗
7. Nie T, Xue L, Ge M, Ma H, Zhang J (2016) Fabrication of poly(L-lactic acid) tissue engineering scaffolds with precisely controlled gradient structure. Mater Lett 176:25–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.07810.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.078 ↗
8. Peng M, Wen Z, Xie L, Cheng J, Jia Z, Shi D, Zeng H, Zhao B, Liang Z, Li T, Jiang L (2019) 3D printing of ultralight biomimetic hierarchical graphene materials with exceptional stiffness and resilience. Adv Mater 31:1902930. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20190293010.1002/adma.201902930 ↗
9. Hindy A, Farahmand F, Pourdanesh F, Torshabi M, Al Janabi AH, Rasoulianboroujeni M, Tayebi L, Tabatabaei FS (2020) Synthesis and characterization of 3D-printed functionally graded porous titanium alloy. J Mater Sci 55:9082–9094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04645-z10.1007/s10853-020-04645-z ↗
10. Bruck HA, Gallant FM, Gowrisankaran SR (2003) Fabrication and design of multifunctional energetic structures using gradient architectures . ASME 2003 Int Mech Eng Congress and Exposit Am Soc Mecha Eng Digit Collect. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2003-4332810.1115/IMECE2003-43328 ↗
11. Xiao-feng W (2011) Developmental Trends in Military Composite Explosive. Chinese J Explos Propellants, 34:1–9 https://doi.org/10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2011.04.01910.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2011.04.019 ↗
12. Yan Q-L, Zeman S, Elbeih A (2012) Recent advances in thermal analysis and stability evaluation of insensitive plastic bonded explosives (PBXs). Thermochim Acta 537:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2012.03.00910.1016/j.tca.2012.03.009 ↗
13. Kumar AS, Rao VB, Sinha RK, Rao AS (2009) Evaluation of Plastic bonded explosive (PBX) formulations based on RDX, aluminum, and HTPB for underwater applications. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 35:359–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.20080004810.1002/prep.200800048 ↗
14. Lu JP, Lochert IJ, Daniel MA, Franson MD (2016) Shock sensitivity studies for PBXN-109. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 41:562–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.20150033610.1002/prep.201500336 ↗
15. Siviour CR, Gifford MJ, Walley SM, Proud WG, Field JE (2004) Particle size effects on the mechanical properties of a polymer bonded explosive. J Mater Sci 39:1255–1258. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000013883.45092.4510.1023/B:JMSC.0000013883.45092.45 ↗
16. Elbeih A, Jungová M, Zeman S, Vávra P, Akštein Z (2012) Explosive strength and impact sensitivity of several PBXs based on attractive cyclic nitramines. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 37:329–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.20110002010.1002/prep.201100020 ↗
17. Liu J-y, Dong Y-x, An X-y, Ye P, Sun Q-t, Gao Q (2020) Reaction degree of composition B explosive with multi-layered compound structure protection subjected to detonation loading. Def Technol . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2020.1002.1004.10.1016/j.dt.2020.02.00410.1016/j.dt.2020.1002.1004.10.1016/j.dt.2020.02.004 ↗
18. Drodge DR, Williamson DM (2015) Understanding damage in polymer-bonded explosive composites. J Mater Sci 51:668–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7378-610.1007/s10853-013-7378-6 ↗
19. Chortos A, Hajiesmaili E, Morales J, Clarke DR, Lewis JA (2019) 3D printing of interdigitated dielectric elastomer actuators. Adv Funct Mater 29:1907375. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20190737510.1002/adfm.201907375 ↗
20. Orangi J, Hamade F, Davis VA, Beidaghi M (2020) 3D printing of additive-free 2D Ti3C2Tx (MXene) Ink for fabrication of micro-supercapacitors with ultra-high energy densities. ACS Nano 14:640–650. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b0732510.1021/acsnano.9b07325 ↗
21. Xue J, Gao L, Hu X, Cao K, Zhou W, Wang W, Lu Y (2019) Stereolithographic 3D printing-based hierarchically cellular lattices for high-performance quasi-solid supercapacitor. Nanomicro Lett 11:46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0280-210.1007/s40820-019-0280-2 ↗
22. Muravyev NV, Monogarov KA, Schaller U, Fomenkov IV, Pivkina AN (2019) Progress in additive manufacturing of energetic materials: creating the reactive microstructures with high potential of applications. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 44:941–969. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.20190006010.1002/prep.201900060 ↗
23. Chandru RA, Balasubramanian N, Oommen C, Raghunandan BN (2018) Additive manufacturing of solid rocket propellant grains. J Propul Power 34:1090–1093. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B3673410.2514/1.B36734 ↗
24. Zhang L, Zhang F, Wang Y, Han R, Chen J, Zhang R, Chu E (2019) In-situ preparation of copper azide by direct ink writing. Mater Lett 238:130–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.11.16510.1016/j.matlet.2018.11.165 ↗
25. Wang D, Zheng B, Guo C, Gao B, Wang J, Yang G, Huang H, Nie F (2016) Formulation and performance of functional sub-micro CL-20-based energetic polymer composite ink for direct-write assembly. RSC Adv 6:112325–112331. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra22205f10.1039/c6ra22205f ↗
26. Mao Y, Zhong L, Zhou X, Zheng D, Zhang X, Duan T, Nie F, Gao B, Wang D (2019) 3D printing of micro-architected Al/CuO-based nanothermite for enhanced combustion performance. Adv Eng Mater 21:1900825. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20190082510.1002/adem.201900825 ↗
27. Lewis JA (2006) Direct Ink writing of 3D functional materials. Adv Funct Mater 16:2193–2204. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20060043410.1002/adfm.200600434 ↗
28. Beheshtizadeh N, Lotfibakhshaiesh N, Pazhouhnia Z, Hoseinpour M, Nafari M (2019) A review of 3D bio-printing for bone and skin tissue engineering: a commercial approach. J Mater Sci 55:3729–3749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04259-010.1007/s10853-019-04259-0 ↗
29. Shuai X, Zeng Y, Li P, Chen J (2020) Fabrication of fine and complex lattice structure Al2O3 ceramic by digital light processing 3D printing technology. J Mater Sci 55:6771–6782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04503-y10.1007/s10853-020-04503-y ↗
30. Dunju W, Changping G, Ruihao W, Baohui Z, Bing G, Fude N (2019) Additive manufacturing and combustion performance of CL-20 composites. J Mater Sci 55:2836–2845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04209-w10.1007/s10853-019-04209-w ↗
31. Hu Y, Yuan S, Li X, Liu M, Sun F, Yang Y, Hao G, Jiang W (2020) Preparation and characterization of nano-CL-20/TNT cocrystal explosives by mechanical ball-milling method. ACS Omega 5:17761–17766. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c0242610.1021/acsomega.0c02426 ↗
32. Ruz-Nuglo F, Groven L, Puszynski JAr (2014) Additive Manufacturing for Energetic Components and Materials. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-389410.2514/6.2014-3894 ↗
33. He K (1957) Reaction kinetics in different thermal analysis. Anal Chem 29:1702–170610.1021/ac60131a045 ↗
34. Blaine RL, Kissinger HE (2012) Homer kissinger and the kissinger equation. Thermochim Acta 540:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2012.04.00810.1016/j.tca.2012.04.008 ↗
35. 772A-97 G (1997) Method 502.1: stability and compatibility — method of differential thermal analysis and differential scanning calorimetry Beijing, China: National Defense Science, Technology and Industry Committee, 159
36. Xu C, An C, Long Y, Li Q, Guo H, Wang S, Wang J (2018) Inkjet printing of energetic composites with high density. RSC Adv 8:35863–35869. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra06610h10.1039/c8ra06610h ↗
37. Hussain G, Rees GJ (1995) Thermal decomposition of RDX and mixtures. Fule 74:273–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(95)92665-S10.1016/0016-2361(95)92665-S ↗
38. Abd-Elghany M, Elbeih A, Hassanein S (2016) Thermal behavior and decomposition kinetics of RDX and RDX/HTPB composition using various techniques and Methods. Cent Eur J Energ Mater, 13:714–735. https://doi.org/10.22211/cejem/6495410.22211/cejem/64954 ↗
39. Liu R, Yang L, Zhou Z, Zhang T (2013) Thermal stability and sensitivity of RDX-based aluminized explosives. J Therm Anal Calorim 115:1939–1948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-013-3468-610.1007/s10973-013-3468-6 ↗
40. Sweeney M, Campbell LL, Hanson J, Pantoya ML, Christopher GF (2017) Characterizing the feasibility of processing wet granular materials to improve rheology for 3D printing. J Mater Sci 52:13040–13053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1404-z10.1007/s10853-017-1404-z ↗
41. Courtial E-J, Perrinet C, Colly A, Mariot D, Frances J-M, Fulchiron R, Marquette C (2019) Silicone rheological behavior modification for 3D printing: evaluation of yield stress impact on printed object properties. Addit Manufact 28:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.04.00610.1016/j.addma.2019.04.006 ↗
42. Woods H, Boddorff A, Ewaldz E, Adams Z, Ketcham M, Jang DJ, Sinner E, Thadhani N, Brettmann B (2019) Rheological Considerations for binder development in direct ink writing of energetic materials. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 45:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.20190015910.1002/prep.201900159 ↗
43. M’Barki A, Bocquet L, Stevenson A (2017) Linking rheology and printability for dense and strong ceramics by direct ink writing. Sci Rep 7:6017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06115-010.1038/s41598-017-06115-0 ↗
44. Zeng L, Jiaq Q-j, Ren H, Zhou Q (2011) Experimental study on the secondary reaction time of aluminized explosive. Initiat Pyrotech 2:19–23
45. Chen Lang LX-p, Feng Chang-gen, Jiang Xiao-hua (2004) Explosive detonation with aluminum. Beijing: Ordnance Industry Press,
46. Prakash V, Phadke VK, Sinha RK, Singh H (2004) Influence of aluminium on performance of HTPB-based aluminised PBXs. Def Sci J 54:475–482. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.54.206110.14429/dsj.54.2061 ↗