Review on machine learning application in tissue engineering: What has been done so far? Application areas, challenges, and perspectives
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) approaches have recently been getting much of researchers’ attention. The growing interest in these methods results from the fast development of machine learning algorithms in the last few years, especially artificial neural networks. In this review, we pay attention to the need and benefits that ML approaches can bring to tissue engineering (TE). We critically evaluate the possibilities of using the ML approaches in the tissue engineering field. We consider various paths of its utility in the TE, such as scaffold design, predicting the biological response to the scaffold, optimizing drug delivery approaches, supporting image analysis, and modeling scaffold in vivo performance. The current status of ML implementation is presented and supported by many study examples. On the other hand, we analyze the present difficulties and challenges in implementing ML approaches to tissue engineering, including the quality of published data, databases and repositories availability, the need for experiment and results publishing standardization, and ethical issues. Additionally, we assess the available natural language processing tools that could support TE research. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Mackay BS, Marshall K, Grant-Jacob JA et al (2021) The future of bone regeneration: integrating AI into tissue engineering. Biomed Phys Eng Express 7:052002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ac154f10.1088/2057-1976/ac154f ↗
2. Amalakanti S, Mulpuri RP, Avula VCR (2024) Recent advances in biomaterial design for nerve guidance conduits: a narrative review. Adv Technol Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.4103/ATN.ATN.10.4103/ATN.ATN-D-23-0000510.4103/ATN.ATN.10.4103/ATN.ATN-D-23-00005 ↗
3. Meissner S, Rees S, Nguyen L et al (2024) Encapsulation of the growth factor neurotrophin-3 in heparinised poloxamer hydrogel stabilises bioactivity and provides sustained release. Biomater Adv 159:213837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.21383710.1016/j.bioadv.2024.213837 ↗
4. Dulnik J, Jeznach O, Sajkiewicz P (2022) A comparative study of three approaches to fibre’s surface functionalization. J Funct Biomater 13:272. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb1304027210.3390/jfb13040272 ↗
5. Meyer TA, Ramirez C, Tamasi MJ, Gormley AJ (2023) A user’s guide to machine learning for polymeric biomaterials. ACS Polym Au 3:141–157. https://doi.org/10.1021/acspolymersau.2c0003710.1021/acspolymersau.2c00037 ↗
6. Vinoth A, Datta S (2022) Computational intelligence based design of biomaterials. Comput Methods Mater Sci 22(4):229–262. https://doi.org/10.7494/cmms.2022.4.079910.7494/cmms.2022.4.0799 ↗
7. Zhu F, Ma S, Cheng Z, et al (2024) Open-world machine learning: a review and new outlooks, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.0175910.48550/arXiv.2403.01759 ↗
8. Naeem S, Ali A, Anam S, Ahmed MM (2023) An unsupervised machine learning algorithms: comprehensive review. Int J Comput Digit Syst 911–921. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/13017210.12785/ijcds/130172 ↗
9. Tufail S, Riggs H, Tariq M, Sarwat AI (2023) Advancements and challenges in machine learning: a comprehensive review of models, libraries, applications, and algorithms. Electronics 12:1789. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics1208178910.3390/electronics12081789 ↗
10. Scopus - Document search | Signed in. https://www.scopus.com/search/form.uri?display=basic&zone=header&origin=searchbasic#basic. Accessed 6 Jun 2024
11. Alemu Reta B, K MB, Tesfaye T Smart and intelligent biomaterials for novel applications: a review. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2024.231619110.1080/00914037.2024.2316191 ↗
12. Zaszczyńska A, Gradys A, Ziemiecka A et al (2024) Enhanced electroactive phases of poly(vinylidene fluoride) fibers for tissue engineering applications. Int J Mol Sci 25:4980. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2509498010.3390/ijms25094980 ↗
13. Kołbuk D, Tymkiewicz R, Urbanek O, et al (2020) Influence of process-material conditions on the structure and biological properties of electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride fibers. Bull Pol Acad Sci Tech Sci 2020 68 No 3 627–633 627–63310.24425/bpasts.2020.133368 ↗
14. Bertsch P, Diba M, Mooney DJ, Leeuwenburgh SCG (2023) Self-healing injectable hydrogels for tissue regeneration. Chem Rev 123:834–873. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0017910.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00179 ↗
15. Liu S, Chen Y, Wang Z et al (2024) The cutting-edge progress in bioprinting for biomedicine: principles, applications, and future perspectives. MedComm 5:e753. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.75310.1002/mco2.753 ↗
16. Mirkhalaf M, Men Y, Wang R et al (2023) Personalized 3D printed bone scaffolds: A review. Acta Biomater 156:110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.01410.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.014 ↗
17. Hu X, Wang T, Li F, Mao X (2023) Surface modifications of biomaterials in different applied fields. RSC Adv 13:20495–20511. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA02248J10.1039/D3RA02248J ↗
18. Jeznach O, Kołbuk D, Reich T, Sajkiewicz P (2022) Immobilization of gelatin on fibers for tissue engineering applications: a comparative study of three aliphatic polyesters. Polymers 14:4154. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1419415410.3390/polym14194154 ↗
19. Basu B, Gowtham NH, Xiao Y et al (2022) Biomaterialomics: data science-driven pathways to develop fourth-generation biomaterials. Acta Biomater 143:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.02.02710.1016/j.actbio.2022.02.027 ↗
20. Abodunrin OD, Bricha M, El Mabrouk K (2024) Beyond bone: a systematic review on bioactive glass innovations and breakthroughs in skeletal muscle regeneration. Biomed Mater Devices. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-024-00220-110.1007/s44174-024-00220-1 ↗
21. Sawyer SW, Takeda K, Alayoubi A et al (2022) 3D bioprinting optimization of human mesenchymal stromal cell laden gelatin-alginate-collagen bioink. Biomed Mater 18:015016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aca3e710.1088/1748-605X/aca3e7 ↗
22. Lewicki J, Bergman J, Kerins C, Hermanson O (2019) Optimization of 3D bioprinting of human neuroblastoma cells using sodium alginate hydrogel. Bioprinting 16:e00053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e0005310.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00053 ↗
23. Webb B, Doyle BJ (2017) Parameter optimization for 3D bioprinting of hydrogels. Bioprinting 8:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2017.09.00110.1016/j.bprint.2017.09.001 ↗
24. Lacroix D, Planell JA, Prendergast PJ (2009) Computer-aided design and finite-element modelling of biomaterial scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 367:1993–2009. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.002410.1098/rsta.2009.0024 ↗
25. Almeida HA, Bartolo PJ (2009) Computer simulation and optimisation of tissue engineering scaffolds: mechanical and vascular behaviour. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, pp 173–18010.1115/ESDA2008-59460 ↗
26. Scheiner S, Komlev VS, Gurin AN, Hellmich C (2016) Multiscale mathematical modeling in dental tissue engineering: toward computer-aided design of a regenerative system based on hydroxyapatite granules, focussing on early and mid-term stiffness recovery. Front Physiol 7:383. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.0038310.3389/fphys.2016.00383 ↗
27. Adir O, Poley M, Chen G et al (2020) Integrating artificial intelligence and nanotechnology for precision cancer medicine. Adv Mater 32:1901989. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20190198910.1002/adma.201901989 ↗
28. Liu D, Caliskan S, Rashidfarokhi B et al (2021) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy coupled with machine learning classification for identification of oxidative damage in freeze-dried heart valves. Sci Rep 11:12299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91802-210.1038/s41598-021-91802-2 ↗
29. Kolomenskaya E, Butova V, Poltavskiy A et al (2024) Application of artificial intelligence at all stages of bone tissue engineering. Biomedicines 12:76. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines1201007610.3390/biomedicines12010076 ↗
30. Lundberg SM, Erion G, Chen H et al (2020) From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat Mach Intell 2:56–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0138-910.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 ↗
31. Lee H, Yune S, Mansouri M et al (2019) An explainable deep-learning algorithm for the detection of acute intracranial haemorrhage from small datasets. Nat Biomed Eng 3:173–182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0324-910.1038/s41551-018-0324-9 ↗
32. Rafieyan S, Vasheghani-Farahani E, Baheiraei N, Keshavarz H (2023) MLATE: Machine learning for predicting cell behavior on cardiac tissue engineering scaffolds. Comput Biol Med 158:106804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.10680410.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106804 ↗
33. Kalkunte N, Cisneros J, Castillo E, Zoldan J (2024) A review on machine learning approaches in cardiac tissue engineering. Front Biomater Sci 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbiom.2024.135850810.3389/fbiom.2024.1358508 ↗
34. Rajitha A, Kansal L, Raj G, et al (2024) Biomaterials and artificial intelligence: predictive modeling and design. E3S Web Conf 505:01003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20245050100310.1051/e3sconf/202450501003 ↗
35. Javaid S, Gorji HT, Soulami KB, Kaabouch N (2023) Identification and ranking biomaterials for bone scaffolds using machine learning and PROMETHEE. Res Biomed Eng 39:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-022-00257-510.1007/s42600-022-00257-5 ↗
36. Shaikhina T, Khovanova NA, Mallick KK (2014) Artificial neural networks in hard tissue engineering: Another look at age-dependence of trabecular bone properties in osteoarthritis. In: IEEE-EMBS international conference on biomedical and health informatics (BHI). pp 622–62510.1109/BHI.2014.6864441 ↗
37. Park S-Y, Kim S-J, Park C-H et al (2023) Data-driven prediction models for forecasting multistep ahead profiles of mammalian cell culture toward bioprocess digital twins. Biotechnol Bioeng 120:2494–2508. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.2840510.1002/bit.28405 ↗
38. Qavi I, Halder S, Tan G (2023) Modeling and optimizing rheology and printability of alginate-gelatin laponite bioink with multi-response optimization (Mro) and artificial neural networks (Ann). Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.458498210.2139/ssrn.4584982 ↗
39. Yu C, Jiang J (2020) A perspective on using machine learning in 3D bioprinting. Int J Bioprinting 6:253. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i1.25310.18063/ijb.v6i1.253 ↗
40. Al-Kharusi G, Dunne NJ, Little S, Levingstone TJ (2022) The role of machine learning and design of experiments in the advancement of biomaterial and tissue engineering research. Bioengineering 9:561. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering910056110.3390/bioengineering9100561 ↗
41. Bermejillo Barrera MD, Franco-Martínez F, Díaz Lantada A (2021) Artificial intelligence aided design of tissue engineering scaffolds employing virtual tomography and 3D convolutional neural networks. Materials 14:5278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1418527810.3390/ma14185278 ↗
42. Liu X, Ye K, van Vlijmen HWT et al (2023) DrugEx v3: scaffold-constrained drug design with graph transformer-based reinforcement learning. J Cheminformatics 15:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-023-00694-z10.1186/s13321-023-00694-z ↗
43. Guillemot F, Mironov V, Nakamura M (2010) Bioprinting is coming of age: report from the International Conference on Bioprinting and Biofabrication in Bordeaux (3B’09). Biofabrication 2:010201. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/01020110.1088/1758-5082/2/1/010201 ↗
44. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M (2016) Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials 76:321–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.07610.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076 ↗
45. Ng WL, Shkolnikov V (2024) Jetting-based bioprinting: process, dispense physics, and applications. Bio-Des Manuf 7:771–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-024-00285-310.1007/s42242-024-00285-3 ↗
46. Levato R, Dudaryeva O, Garciamendez-Mijares CE et al (2023) Light-based vat-polymerization bioprinting. Nat Rev Methods Primer 3:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00231-010.1038/s43586-023-00231-0 ↗
47. Ramesh S, Harrysson OLA, Rao PK et al (2021) Extrusion bioprinting: Recent progress, challenges, and future opportunities. Bioprinting 21:e00116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e0011610.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00116 ↗
48. Zhou D, Chen J, Liu B, et al (2019) Bioinks for jet-based bioprinting. Bioprinting 16:e00060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e0006010.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00060 ↗
49. Zaszczyńska A, Niemczyk-Soczynska B, Sajkiewicz P (2022) A comprehensive review of electrospun fibers, 3D-printed scaffolds, and hydrogels for cancer therapies. Polymers 14:5278. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1423527810.3390/polym14235278 ↗
50. Li Y, Mao Q, Xu K et al (2023) Vat photopolymerization bioprinting with a dynamic support bath. Addit Manuf 69:103533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.10353310.1016/j.addma.2023.103533 ↗
51. Ruberu K, Senadeera M, Rana S et al (2021) Coupling machine learning with 3D bioprinting to fast track optimisation of extrusion printing. Appl Mater Today 22:100914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10091410.1016/j.apmt.2020.100914 ↗
52. Banda Sánchez C, Cubo Mateo N, Saldaña L et al (2023) Selection and optimization of a bioink based on PANC-1- plasma/alginate/methylcellulose for pancreatic tumour modelling. Polymers 15:3196. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1515319610.3390/polym15153196 ↗
53. Lee J, Oh SJ, An SH et al (2020) Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability. Biofabrication 12:035018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab870710.1088/1758-5090/ab8707 ↗
54. Wang J (2023) Novel 3D bioprinting of biomaterials : application of statistical modeling & machine learning, Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
55. Huang X, Ng WL, Yeong WY (2024) Predicting the number of printed cells during inkjet-based bioprinting process based on droplet velocity profile using machine learning approaches. J Intell Manuf 35:2349–2364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-023-02167-410.1007/s10845-023-02167-4 ↗
56. Xu H, Liu Q, Casillas J et al (2022) Prediction of cell viability in dynamic optical projection stereolithography-based bioprinting using machine learning. J Intell Manuf 33:995–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01708-510.1007/s10845-020-01708-5 ↗
57. Bao Y (2022) Recent trends in advanced photoinitiators for vat photopolymerization 3D printing. Macromol Rapid Commun 43:2200202. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.20220020210.1002/marc.202200202 ↗
58. Rafieyan S, Ansari E, Vasheghani-Farahani E (2024) A practical machine learning approach for predicting the quality of 3D (bio)printed scaffolds. Biofabrication 16:045014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ad637410.1088/1758-5090/ad6374 ↗
59. Freeman S, Calabro S, Williams R, et al (2022) Bioink formulation and machine learning-empowered bioprinting optimization. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.91357910.3389/fbioe.2022.913579 ↗
60. Ng WL, Goh GL, Goh GD et al (2024) Progress and opportunities for machine learning in materials and processes of additive manufacturing. Adv Mater 36:2310006. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20231000610.1002/adma.202310006 ↗
61. Ng WL, Chan A, Ong YS, Chua CK (2020) Deep learning for fabrication and maturation of 3D bioprinted tissues and organs. Virtual Phys Prototyp 15:340–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2020.177174110.1080/17452759.2020.1771741 ↗
62. Etefagh AH, Razfar MR (2023) Bayesian optimization of 3D bioprinted polycaprolactone/magnesium oxide nanocomposite scaffold using a machine learning technique. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 09544054231202219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405423120221910.1177/09544054231202219 ↗
63. Nair M, Bica I, Best SM, Cameron RE (2021) Feature importance in multi-dimensional tissue-engineering datasets: Random forest assisted optimization of experimental variables for collagen scaffolds. Appl Phys Rev 8:041403. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.005972410.1063/5.0059724 ↗
64. López-Flores FJ, Ornelas-Guillén JA, Pérez-Nava A et al (2024) Data-driven machine learning approach for modeling the production and predicting the characteristics of aligned electrospun nanofibers. Ind Eng Chem Res 63:9904–9913. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c0007510.1021/acs.iecr.4c00075 ↗
65. Ma M, Zhou H, Gao S et al (2023) Analysis and prediction of electrospun nanofiber diameter based on artificial neural network. Polymers 15:2813. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1513281310.3390/polym15132813 ↗
66. Reddy BS, In KH, Panigrahi BB et al (2021) Modeling tensile strength and suture retention of polycaprolactone electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds by artificial neural networks. Mater Today Commun 26:102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10211510.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102115 ↗
67. Carotenuto F, Fiaschini N, Di Nardo P, Rinaldi A (2023) Towards a material-by-design approach to electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering based on statistical design of experiments (DOE). Materials 16:1539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1604153910.3390/ma16041539 ↗
68. Li F, Han J, Cao T et al (2019) Design of self-assembly dipeptide hydrogels and machine learning via their chemical features. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116:11259–11264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.190337611610.1073/pnas.1903376116 ↗
69. Rahmati M, Silva EA, Reseland JE et al (2020) Biological responses to physicochemical properties of biomaterial surface. Chem Soc Rev 49:5178–5224. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS00103A10.1039/D0CS00103A ↗
70. Anselme K, Ploux L, Ponche A (2010) Cell/material interfaces: influence of surface chemistry and surface topography on cell adhesion. J Adhes Sci Technol 24:831–852. https://doi.org/10.1163/016942409X1259823156818610.1163/016942409X12598231568186 ↗
71. Roy K, Kar S, Das RN (2015) QSAR/QSPR Modeling: Introduction. In: Roy K, Kar S, Das RN (eds) A primer on QSAR/QSPR modeling: fundamental concepts. Springer, Cham, pp 1–3610.1007/978-3-319-17281-1 ↗
72. Szewczyk PK, Ura DP, Metwally S et al (2019) Roughness and fiber fraction dominated wetting of electrospun fiber-based porous meshes. Polymers 11:34. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1101003410.3390/polym11010034 ↗
73. Li Y, Xiao Y, Liu C (2017) The horizon of materiobiology: a perspective on material-guided cell behaviors and tissue engineering. Chem Rev 117:4376–4421. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0065410.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00654 ↗
74. Sujeeun LY, Goonoo N, Ramphul H et al (2020) Correlating in vitro performance with physico-chemical characteristics of nanofibrous scaffolds for skin tissue engineering using supervised machine learning algorithms. R Soc Open Sci 7:201293. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.20129310.1098/rsos.201293 ↗
75. Le TC, Penna M, Winkler DA, Yarovsky I (2019) Quantitative design rules for protein-resistant surface coatings using machine learning. Sci Rep 9:265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36597-510.1038/s41598-018-36597-5 ↗
76. Ostuni E, Chapman RG, Holmlin RE et al (2001) A survey of structure−property relationships of surfaces that resist the adsorption of protein. Langmuir 17:5605–5620. https://doi.org/10.1021/la010384m10.1021/la010384m ↗
77. (2024) saeedrafieyan/MLATE. https://github.com/saeedrafieyan/MLATE. Accessed 30 Sep 2024
78. Desai AS, Ashok A, Edis Z et al (2023) Meta-analysis of cytotoxicity studies using machine learning models on physical properties of plant extract-derived silver nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci 24:4220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2404422010.3390/ijms24044220 ↗
79. Ahmadi M, Ayyoubzadeh SM, Ghorbani-Bidkorpeh F (2024) Toxicity prediction of nanoparticles using machine learning approaches. Toxicology 501:153697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2023.15369710.1016/j.tox.2023.153697 ↗
80. Chen D, Dunkers JP, Losert W, Sarkar S (2021) Early time-point cell morphology classifiers successfully predict human bone marrow stromal cell differentiation modulated by fiber density in nanofiber scaffolds. Biomaterials 274:120812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.12081210.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120812 ↗
81. Mei Y, Saha K, Bogatyrev SR et al (2010) Combinatorial development of biomaterials for clonal growth of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Mater 9:768–778. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat281210.1038/nmat2812 ↗
82. Kwaria RJ, Mondarte EAQ, Tahara H et al (2020) Data-Driven prediction of protein adsorption on self-assembled monolayers toward material screening and design. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 6:4949–4956. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c0100810.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01008 ↗
83. Gil CJ, Li L, Hwang B et al (2022) Tissue engineered drug delivery vehicles: methods to monitor and regulate the release behavior. J Controlled Release 349:143–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.04.04410.1016/j.jconrel.2022.04.044 ↗
84. Zhang H, Jackson JK, Chiao M (2017) Microfabricated drug delivery devices: design, fabrication, and applications. Adv Funct Mater 27:1703606. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20170360610.1002/adfm.201703606 ↗
85. Ramesh K, Gupta S, Ahmed S, Kakkar V (2016) A comprehensive study on design trends and future scope of implantable drug delivery systems. Int J Bio-Sci Bio-Technol 8:11–20. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijbsbt.2016.8.6.0210.14257/ijbsbt.2016.8.6.02 ↗
86. Gao J, Karp JM, Langer R, Joshi N (2023) The future of drug delivery. Chem Mater 35:359–363. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0300310.1021/acs.chemmater.2c03003 ↗
87. Srinivasan SS, Alshareef A, Hwang AV, et al (2022) RoboCap: Robotic mucus-clearing capsule for enhanced drug delivery in the gastrointestinal tract. Sci Robot 7:eabp9066. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abp906610.1126/scirobotics.abp9066 ↗
88. Blanco E, Shen H, Ferrari M (2015) Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol 33:941–951. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.333010.1038/nbt.3330 ↗
89. Hassanzadeh P, Atyabi F, Dinarvand R (2019) The significance of artificial intelligence in drug delivery system design. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 151–152:169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2019.05.00110.1016/j.addr.2019.05.001 ↗
90. Vora LK, Gholap AD, Jetha K et al (2023) Artificial intelligence in pharmaceutical technology and drug delivery design. Pharmaceutics 15:1916. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics1507191610.3390/pharmaceutics15071916 ↗
91. Visan AI, Negut I (2024) Integrating artificial intelligence for drug discovery in the context of revolutionizing drug delivery. Life 14:233. https://doi.org/10.3390/life1402023310.3390/life14020233 ↗
92. Sharma A, Virmani T, Pathak V, et al (2022) Artificial intelligence-based data-driven strategy to accelerate research, development, and clinical trials of COVID vaccine. BioMed Res Int 2022:. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/720524110.1155/2022/7205241 ↗
93. Muñiz Castro B, Elbadawi M, Ong JJ et al (2021) Machine learning predicts 3D printing performance of over 900 drug delivery systems. J Controlled Release 337:530–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.04610.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.046 ↗
94. Asadi H, Rostamizadeh K, Salari D, Hamidi M (2011) Preparation of biodegradable nanoparticles of tri-block PLA–PEG–PLA copolymer and determination of factors controlling the particle size using artificial neural network. J Microencapsul 28:406–416. https://doi.org/10.3109/02652048.2011.57678410.3109/02652048.2011.576784 ↗
95. Li Y, Abbaspour MR, Grootendorst PV et al (2015) Optimization of controlled release nanoparticle formulation of verapamil hydrochloride using artificial neural networks with genetic algorithm and response surface methodology. Eur J Pharm Biopharm Off J Arbeitsgemeinschaft Pharm Verfahrenstechnik EV 94:170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.04.02810.1016/j.ejpb.2015.04.028 ↗
96. van Laarhoven T, Marchiori E (2013) Predicting drug-target interactions for new drug compounds using a weighted nearest neighbor profile. PLoS ONE 8:e66952. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.006695210.1371/journal.pone.0066952 ↗
97. Lee Y, Khemka A, Yoo J-W, Lee CH (2008) Assessment of diffusion coefficient from mucoadhesive barrier devices using artificial neural networks. Int J Pharm 351:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.09.03210.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.09.032 ↗
98. Nemati P, Imani M, Farahmandghavi F et al (2014) Artificial neural networks for bilateral prediction of formulation parameters and drug release profiles from cochlear implant coatings fabricated as porous monolithic devices based on silicone rubber. J Pharm Pharmacol 66:624–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphp.1218710.1111/jphp.12187 ↗
99. Vu GTT, Phan NT, Nguyen HT, et al (2020) Application of the artificial neural network to optimize the formulation of self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system containing rosuvastatin. J Appl Pharm Sci 10,:001–011. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2020.1090110.7324/JAPS.2020.10901 ↗
100. Obeid S, Madžarević M, Krkobabić M, Ibrić S (2021) Predicting drug release from diazepam FDM printed tablets using deep learning approach: influence of process parameters and tablet surface/volume ratio. Int J Pharm 601:120507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.12050710.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120507 ↗