journal article·2022-01

CNTs reinforced Al-based composites produced via modified flake powder metallurgy

B. Sadeghi, P. Cavaliere

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The bimodal Al–Mg alloy structure reinforced with carbon nanotubes was evaluated after the composites production through a modified flake metallurgy technique followed by hot extrusion. The obtained bimodal microstructure of the matrix allowed to identify the microstructural mechanisms, leading to high strength, uniform elongation and strain hardening ability of the produced composites. The effect of the reinforcing phases percentages on the dislocations mechanisms evolution was evaluated through stress relaxation tests, leading to the underlying of the effect of reinforcing phases on the modification of the interphase influence zone. The results revealed that the deformation mechanism for unreinforced Al–Mg materials was forest dislocation cutting, whereas for CNT reinforcing Al–Mg composite was grain boundary and interface mediated straining. In fact, for Al–Mg/CNT composite, a task allocation occurred during the deformation process, namely at the early deformation stage by forest dislocation cutting and afterward at later deformation stage by dislocation/grain boundary/interface interaction.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (79)

Show source-provided references
1. Yang M, Weng L, Zhu HX, Fan TX, Zhang D (2017) Simultaneously enhancing the strength, ductility and conductivity of copper matrix composites with graphene nanoribbons. Carbon 118:250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.05510.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.055 ↗
2. Ramakrishnan N (1996) An analytical study on strengthening of particulate reinforced metal matrix composites. Acta Mater 44:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-6454(95)00150-910.1016/1359-6454(95)00150-9 ↗
3. Shao JC, Xiao BL, Wang QZ, Ma ZY, Yang K (2011) An enhanced FEM model for particle size dependent flow strengthening and interface damage in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 71:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.014 ↗
4. Bagherpour E, Reihanian M, Miyamoto H (2017) Tailoring particle distribution nonuniformity and grain refinement in nanostructured metal matrix composites fabricated by severe plastic deformation (SPD): a correlation with flow stress. J Mater Sci 52:3436–3446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0632-y10.1007/s10853-016-0632-y ↗
5. Cavaliere P, Sadeghi B, Shabani A (2017) Carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum matrix composites produced by spark plasma sintering. J Mater Sci 52:8618–8629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1086-610.1007/s10853-017-1086-6 ↗
6. Chen B, Shen J, Ye X, Jia L, Li S, Umeda J, Takahashi M, Kondoh K (2017) Length effect of carbon nanotubes on the strengthening mechanisms in metal matrix composites. Acta Mater 140:317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.04810.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.048 ↗
7. Gan YX, Dong J, Gan JB (2017) Carbon network/aluminum composite made by powder metallurgy and its corrosion behavior in seawaterMater. Chem Phys 202:190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.09.03310.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.09.033 ↗
8. Yoo S, Han S, Kim W (2013) Strength and strain hardening of aluminum matrix composites with randomly dispersed nanometer-length fragmented carbon nanotubes. Scripta Mater 68:711–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.01.01310.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.01.013 ↗
9. Wu C, Ma WX, Chen YP, Li Y, Chen Y, Li J (2014) Progress of the current interface research on carbon nanotubes reinforced aluminum-matrix composites. Mater Mech Manuf Eng 842:196–200.
10. Sadeghi B, Cavaliere P, Nosko M, TremboŠovÁ V, Nagy Š (2021) Hot deformation behaviour of bimodal sized Al2O3/Al nanocomposites fabricated by spark plasma sintering. J Micros 281:28–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.1294710.1111/jmi.12947 ↗
11. Cavaliere P (2021) Fatigue and fracture of nanostructured materials, Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58088-910.1007/978-3-030-58088-9 ↗
12. Mikhaylovskaya A, Yakovtseva O, Sitkina M, Kotov AD (2020) Grain-boundary and intragranular deformation in ultrafine-grained aluminum-based alloy at high strain rate. Mater Lett 276:128242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12824210.1016/j.matlet.2020.128242 ↗
13. Liu F, Cocks AF, Tarleton E (2021) Dislocation dynamics modelling of the creep behaviour of particle-strengthened materials. Proc Royal Soc A 477:20210083. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2021.008310.1098/rspa.2021.0083 ↗
14. Moldovan D, Wolf D, Phillpot SR, Mukherjee AK, Gleiter H (2003) Grain-boundary diffusion-controlled stress concentration in polycrystals. Phil Mag Lett 83:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/095008302100004574210.1080/0950083021000045742 ↗
15. Yamakov V, Wolf D, Phillpot SR, Mukherjee AK, Gleiter H (2004) Deformation-mechanism map for nanocrystalline metals by molecular-dynamics simulation. Nature Mater 3:43–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat103510.1038/nmat1035 ↗
16. Zhao L, Guo Q, Li Z et al (2018) Strain-rate dependent deformation mechanism of graphene-Al nanolaminated composites studied using micro-pillar compression. Int J Plast 105:128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.02.00610.1016/j.ijplas.2018.02.006 ↗
17. Zhao L, Guo Q, Shi Y et al (2019) Interfacial effect on the deformation mechanism of bulk nanolaminated graphene-Al composites. Metall Mater Trans A 50:1113–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-018-05108-610.1007/s11661-018-05108-6 ↗
18. Xu R, Fan GL, Tan ZQ et al (2018) Back stress in strain hardening of carbon nanotube/aluminum composites. Mater Res Lett 6:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2017.140537110.1080/21663831.2017.1405371 ↗
19. Cavaliere P, Sadeghi B, Shamanian M, Ashrafizadeh F (2019) Al-based nanocomposites produced via spark plasma sintering: effect of processing route and reinforcing phases. In: Cavaliere P. (eds) spark plasma sintering of materials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05327-7_610.1007/978-3-030-05327-7_6 ↗
20. Sadeghi B, Tan Z, Qi J et al (2021) Enhanced mechanical properties of CNT/Al composite through tailoring grain interior/grain boundary affected zones. Composites B 223:109133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10913310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109133 ↗
21. Wang Y, Yang M, Ma X et al (2018) Improved back stress and synergetic strain hardening in coarse-grain/nanostructure laminates. Mater Sci Eng A 727:11310.1016/j.msea.2018.04.107 ↗
22. Ma K, Liu ZY, Liu K, Chen XG, Xiao BL, Ma ZY (2021) Structure optimization for improving the strength and ductility of heterogeneous carbon nanotube/Al–Cu–Mg composites. Carbon 178:190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.03.00610.1016/j.carbon.2021.03.006 ↗
23. Sadeghi B, Qi J, Min X, Cavaliere P (2021) Modelling of strain rate dependent dislocation behavior of CNT/Al composites based on grain interior/grain boundary affected zone (GI/GBAZ). Mater Sci Eng 820:141547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14154710.1016/j.msea.2021.141547 ↗
24. Wu X, Zhu Y (2017) Heterogeneous materials: a new class of materials with unprecedented mechanical properties. Mater Res Lett 5:527–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2017.134320810.1080/21663831.2017.1343208 ↗
25. Wang Y, Chen M, Zhou F, Ma E (2002) High tensile ductility in a nanostructured metal. Nature 419:912–915. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0113310.1038/nature01133 ↗
26. Jiang L, Ma K, Yang H, Li M, Lavernia EJ, Schoenung JM (2017) The microstructural design of trimodal aluminum composites. JOM 66:898–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-014-0906-210.1007/s11837-014-0906-2 ↗
27. Fu X, Tan Z, Min X et al (2021) Trimodal grain structure enables high-strength CNT/Al-Cu-Mg composites higher ductility by powder assembly & alloying. Mater Res Lett 9:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2020.181832410.1080/21663831.2020.1818324 ↗
28. Ye J, Han BQ, Schoenung JM (2006) Mechanical behaviour of an Al–matrix composite reinforced with nanocrystalline Al-coated B4C particulates. Phil Mag Lett 86:721–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950083060098610910.1080/09500830600986109 ↗
29. Yang H, Topping TD, Wehage K, Jiang L, Lavernia EJ, Schoenung JM (2014) Tensile behavior and strengthening mechanisms in a submicron B4C-reinforced Al trimodal composite. Mater Sci Eng A 616:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.07.07910.1016/j.msea.2014.07.079 ↗
30. Zhang ZH, Topping T, Li Y et al (2011) Mechanical behavior of ultrafine-grained Al composites reinforced with B4C nanoparticles. Scripta Mater 65:652–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.03710.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.037 ↗
31. Liu ZY, Ma K, Fan GH et al (2020) Enhancement of the strength-ductility relationship for carbon nanotube/Al–Cu–Mg nanocomposites by material parameter optimisation. Carbon 157:602–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.08010.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.080 ↗
32. Fu X, Yu Z, Tan Z et al (2021) Enhanced strain hardening by bimodal grain structure in carbon nanotube reinforced Al–Mg composites. Mater Sci Eng A 803:140726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.14072610.1016/j.msea.2020.140726 ↗
33. Ye C, Shi J, Cheng GJ (2012) An extended finite element method (XFEM) study on the effect of reinforcing particles on the crack propagation behavior in a metal–matrix composite. Int J Fatigue 44:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.05.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.05.004 ↗
34. Chen L, Hou Z, Liu Y, Luan C, Zhu L, Li W (2020) High strength and high ductility copper matrix composite reinforced by graded distribution of carbon nanotubes. Composites A 138:106063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10606310.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106063 ↗
35. Xu R, Tan Z, Xiong D et al (2017) Balanced strength and ductility in CNT/Al composites achieved by flake powder metallurgy via shift-speed ball milling. Composites A 96:57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.02.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2017.02.017 ↗
36. Bakshi SR, Agarwal A (2011) An analysis of the factors affecting strengthening in carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum composites. Carbon 49:533–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.09.05410.1016/j.carbon.2010.09.054 ↗
37. Jiang L, Li Z, Fan G, Cao L, Zhang D (2012) The use of flake powder metallurgy to produce carbon nanotube (CNT)/aluminum composites with a homogenous CNT distribution. Carbon 50:1993–1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.05710.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.057 ↗
38. Ahn B, Lavernia EJ, Nutt SR (2008) Dynamic observations of deformation in an ultrafine-grained Al–Mg alloy with bimodal grain structure. J Mater Sci 43:7403–7408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2950-110.1007/s10853-008-2950-1 ↗
39. Joshi SP, Ramesh KT, Han BQ, Lavernia EJ (2006) Modeling the constitutive response of bimodal metals. Metall Mater Trans A 37:2397. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0258621410.1007/BF02586214 ↗
40. Han B, Huang J, Zhu Y, Lavernia E (2006) Strain rate dependence of properties of cryomilled bimodal 5083 Al alloys. Acta Mater 54:3015–3024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.04510.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.045 ↗
41. Witkin D, Lee Z, Rodriguez R, Nutt S, Lavernia E (2003) Al–Mg alloy engineered with bimodal grain size for high strength and increased ductility. Scripta Mater 49:297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00283-510.1016/S1359-6462(03)00283-5 ↗
42. Cavaliere P, Sadeghi B, Shabani A (2019) Spark plasma sintering: process fundamentals. In: Cavaliere P. (eds) Spark plasma sintering of materials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05327-7_110.1007/978-3-030-05327-7_1 ↗
43. Sadeghi B, Shamanian M, Ashrafizadeh F, Cavaliere P (2018) Effect of processing parameters on microstructural and mechanical properties of aluminum–SiO2 nanocomposites produced by spark plasma sintering. Int J Mater Res. https://doi.org/10.3139/146.11162510.3139/146.111625 ↗
44. Sadeghi B, Cavaliere P (2021) Progress of flake powder metallurgy research. Metals 11:931. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1106093110.3390/met11060931 ↗
45. Sadeghi B, Cavaliere P, Roeen GA, Nosko M, Shamanian M, Trembošová V, Nagy Š, Ebrahimzadeh N (2019) Hot rolling of MWCNTs reinforced Al matrix composites produced via spark plasma sintering. Adv Comp Hybrid Mater 2:549–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-019-00095-710.1007/s42114-019-00095-7 ↗
46. Sangghaleh A, Halali M (2009) Effect of magnesium addition on the wetting of alumina by aluminium. Appl Surf Sci 255:8202–8206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.05.04410.1016/j.apsusc.2009.05.044 ↗
47. Sadeghi B, Cavaliere P (2021) Effect of bimodal grain structure on the microstructural and mechanical evolution of al-mg/cnts composite. Metals 11:1524. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1110152410.3390/met11101524 ↗
48. Fu X, Xu R, Yuan C, Tan Z, Fan G, Ji G, Xiong DB, Guo Q, Li Z, Zhang D (2019) Strain rate sensitivity and deformation mechanism of carbon nanotubes reinforced aluminum composites. Met Trans A 50:3544–3554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-019-05284-z10.1007/s11661-019-05284-z ↗
49. Guo B, Song M, Zhang X, Liu Y, Cen X, Chen B, Li W (2021) Exploiting the synergic strengthening effects of stacking faults in carbon nanotubes reinforced aluminum matrix composites for enhanced mechanical properties. Composites B 211:108646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10864610.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108646 ↗
50. Yuan C, Zhang Z, Tan Z et al (2021) Enhanced ductility by Mg addition in the CNT/Al-Cu composites via flake powder metallurgy. Mater Today Comm 26:101854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10185410.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101854 ↗
51. Yuan C, Zhang Z, Du T et al (2021) Influence of aging treatment on mechanical properties of CNT/Al–Cu–Mg rolled composites. MRS Comm 11:249–255. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-021-00044-w10.1557/s43579-021-00044-w ↗
52. Sadeghi B, Cavaliere P, Shamanian M, Sanayei M, Szpunar JA, Nosko M (2018) Electron backscattered diffraction analysis of friction stir processed nanocomposites produced via spark plasma sintering. J Microsc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.1270410.1111/jmi.12704 ↗
53. Sadeghi B, Cavaliere P, Nosko M, TremboŠovÁ V, Nagy Š (2020) Hot deformation behavior of bimodal size Al2O3/Al nanocomposites fabricated by spark plasma sintering. J Microsc 281:28–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.1294710.1111/jmi.12947 ↗
54. Rollett A, Humphreys F, Rohrer GS, Hatherly M (2004) Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena, 2nd edn. Pergamon, Elmsford, New York10.1016/B978-008044164-1/50016-5 ↗
55. Zhang J, Wang B, Wang H (2020) Geometrically necessary dislocations distribution in face-centred cubic alloy with varied grain size. Mater Charact 162:110205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11020510.1016/j.matchar.2020.110205 ↗
56. Nes E, Ryum N, Hunderi O (1985) On the zener drag. Acta Metall 33:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(85)90214-710.1016/0001-6160(85)90214-7 ↗
57. Bennett TA, Petrov RH, Kestens LAI (2010) Effect of particles on texture banding in an aluminium alloy. Scripta Mater 62:78–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.09.03210.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.09.032 ↗
58. Balog M, Krizik P, Bajana O et al (2019) Influence of grain boundaries with dispersed nanoscale Al2O3 particles on the strength of Al for a wide range of homologous temperatures. J Alloys Compd 772:472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.16410.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.164 ↗
59. Balog M, Krizik P, Bajana O, Hu T, Yang H, Schoenung JM, Lavernia EJ (2019) Influence of grain boundaries with dispersed nanoscale Al2O3 particles on the strength of Al for a wide range of homologous temperatures. J Alloys Compd 772:472–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.16410.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.164 ↗
60. Fan GL, Xu R, Tan ZQ, Zhang D, Li ZQ (2014) Development of flake powder metallurgy in fabricating metal matrix composites: a review. Acta Metall Sin-Eng Lett 27:806–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-014-0148-x10.1007/s40195-014-0148-x ↗
61. Wang M, Li Y, Chen B et al (2021) The rate-dependent mechanical behavior of CNT-reinforced aluminum matrix composites under tensile loading. Mater Sci Eng A 808:140893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14089310.1016/j.msea.2021.140893 ↗
62. Wei H, Li ZQ, Xiong DB et al (2014) Towards strong and stiff carbon nanotube-reinforced high-strength aluminum alloy composites through a microlaminated architecture design. Scripta Mater 75:30–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.11.01410.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.11.014 ↗
63. Li CH, Qiu RS, Luan BF, He WJ, Li ZQ (2018) Hot deformation and processing maps of as-sintered CNT/Al-Cu composites fabricated by flake powder metallurgy. Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 28:1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(18)64813-710.1016/S1003-6326(18)64813-7 ↗
64. Balog M, Hu T, Krizik P, Castro Riglos MV, Saller BD, Yang H, Schoenung JM, Lavernia EJ (2015) On the thermal stability of ultrafine-grained Al stabilized by in-situ amorphous Al2O3 network. Mater Sci Eng A 648:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.09.03710.1016/j.msea.2015.09.037 ↗
65. Roters F, Diehl M, Shanthraj P, Eisenlohr P, Reuber C, Wong SL, Maiti T, Ebrahimi A, Hochrainer T, Fabritius HO (2019) DAMASK – the düsseldorf advanced material simulation kit for modeling multi-physics crystal plasticity, thermal, and damage phenomena from the single crystal up to the component scale. Comput Mater Sci 158:420–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.03010.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.030 ↗
66. Grilli N, Tarleton E, Edmondson PD, Gussev MN, Cocks ACF (2020) In situ measurement and modelling of the growth and length scale of twins in $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-uranium. Phys Rev Mater 4:043605. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.04360510.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.043605 ↗
67. Orlov D, Kulagin R, Beygelzimer Y (2020) Strain partitioning and back-stress evaluation in harmonic-structure materials. Mater Lett 275:128126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12812610.1016/j.matlet.2020.128126 ↗
68. Park HK, Ameyama K, Yoo J, Hwang H, Kim HS (2018) Additional hardening in harmonic structured materials by strain partitioning and back stress. Mater Res Lett 6:261–26710.1080/21663831.2018.1439115 ↗
69. Wu X, Yang M, Yuan F et al (2015) Heterogeneous lamella structure unites ultrafine-grain strength with coarse-grain ductility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:14501. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.151719311210.1073/pnas.1517193112 ↗
70. Xiang Y, Wang X, Hu X et al (2019) Achieving ultra-high strengthening and toughening efficiency in carbon nanotubes/magnesium composites via constructing micro-nano layered structure. Composites A 119:225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.02.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2019.02.006 ↗
71. Li Z, Zhao L, Guo Q, Li Z, Fan G, Guo C, Zhang D (2017) Enhanced dislocation obstruction in nanolaminated graphene/Cu composite as revealed by stress relaxation experiments. Scripta Mater 131:67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.01.01510.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.01.015 ↗
72. Brandstetter S, Van Swygenhoven H, Van Petegem S, Schmitt B, Maaß R, Derlet PM (2006) From micro- to macroplasticity. Adv Mater 18:1545–1548. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20060039710.1002/adma.200600397 ↗
73. Li JC (1967) Dislocation dynamics in deformation and recovery. Can J Phys 45:493–50910.1139/p67-043 ↗
74. Wang YF, Huang CX, Fang XT, Höppel HW, Göken M, Zhu YT (2020) Hetero-deformation induced (HDI) hardening does not increase linearly with strain gradient. Scripta Mater 174:19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.08.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.08.022 ↗
75. Jiang Y, Xu R, Tan Z et al (2019) Interface-induced strain hardening of graphene nanosheet/aluminum composites. Carbon 146:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.01.09410.1016/j.carbon.2019.01.094 ↗
76. Kurita H, Kwon H, Estili M, Kawasaki A (2011) Multi-walled carbon nanotube-aluminum matrix composites prepared by combination of hetero-agglomeration method. Spark Plasma Sinter Hot Extrus Mater Trand 52:1960–1965. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.M201114610.2320/matertrans.M2011146 ↗
77. Delincé M, Bréchet Y, Embury JD, Geers MGD, Jacques PJ, Pardoen T (2007) Structure–property optimization of ultrafine-grained dual-phase steels using a microstructure-based strain hardening model. Acta Mater 55:2337–2350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.02910.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.029 ↗
78. Dong S, Zhou J, Hui D, Wang Y, Zhang S (2015) Size dependent strengthening mechanisms in carbon nanotube reinforced metal matrix composites. Composites A 68:356–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.10.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2014.10.018 ↗
79. Blum W (2018) Discussion: activation volumes of plastic deformation of crystals. Scripta Mater 146:27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.10.02910.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.10.029 ↗