journal article·2023-04

Review: a developmental perspective on protective helmets

Omender Singh, Bijoya Kumar Behera

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 58· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

This review presents an overview of the design and functionality of protective headgear, including its components and their ability to protect against low- and high-velocity impacts. It discusses the transmission of load from the helmet to the head, as well as the biomechanics involved. This insight provides a comprehensive understanding of the effect that head trauma can have on the tolerance limits and thresholds of protective headgear. Furthermore, the fundamental elements of the helmet and its primary function are discussed. The review focuses on the use of various textile preforms in the design of helmet shells and liners to enhance protection. It explores the use of innovative materials such as shear thickening fluid, ZnO nanorods, polymeric coatings, and graphene to improve impact performance. Additionally, various energy-absorbing materials, including lattice structures, bioinspired structures, shape-changing materials, and honeycomb-based structures, are discussed to improve energy absorption. The purpose of this review is to offer a comprehensive overview of the topic and suggest new ideas for designing protective helmets to enhance their protection performance.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Environmental Engineering and Cultural Studies · Dental Trauma and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Cheng ZQ, Pilkey WD, Crandall JR et al (1999) Limiting performance of helmets for the prevention of head injury. Shock Vib 6:299–320. https://doi.org/10.1155/1999/14645810.1155/1999/146458 ↗
2. Ivers R, Brown K, Norton R, Stevenson M (2016) Road traffic injuries. Int Encycl Public Heal 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803678-5.00391-X10.1016/B978-0-12-803678-5.00391-X ↗
3. Panzer MB, Myers BS, Capehart BP, Bass CR (2012) Development of a finite element model for blast brain injury and the effects of CSF cavitation. Ann Biomed Eng 40:1530–1544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0519-210.1007/s10439-012-0519-2 ↗
4. Kulkarni SG, Gao XL, Horner SE et al (2013) Ballistic helmets - Their design, materials, and performance against traumatic brain injury. Compos Struct 101:313–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.014 ↗
5. Jamroziak K, Bajkowski M, Bocian M et al (2019) Ballistic head protection in the light of injury criteria in the case of the Wz.93 combat helmet. Appl Sci 9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app913270210.3390/app9132702 ↗
6. Dow RS, Ulett G, Raaf J (2009) Electroencephalographic Studies in Head Injuries. J Neurosurg 2:154–169. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1945.2.2.015410.3171/jns.1945.2.2.0154 ↗
7. Toth C, Mcneil S, Feasby T (2005) Central nervous system injuries in a systematic review. Sport Med - Open 35:685–71510.2165/00007256-200535080-00003 ↗
8. RodrguIez-Millan M, Tan LB, Tse KM et al (2017) Effect of full helmet systems on human head responses under blast loading. Mater Des 117:58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.08110.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.081 ↗
9. Chen W, Hao H, Hughes D et al (2015) Static and dynamic mechanical properties of expanded polystyrene. Mater Des 69:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.02410.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.024 ↗
10. Gohel G, Bhudolia SK, Elisetty SBS, et al (2021) Development and impact characterization of acrylic thermoplastic composite bicycle helmet shell with improved safety and performance. Compos Part B Eng 221:109008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10900810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109008 ↗
11. Delye H, Verschueren P, Depreitere B et al (2007) Biomechanics of frontal skull fracture. J Neurotrauma 24:1576–1586. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2007.028310.1089/neu.2007.0283 ↗
12. Gurdjian ES, Webster JE, Lissner HR (1950) The mechanism of skull fracture. J Neurosurg 7:106–114. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1950.7.2.010610.3171/jns.1950.7.2.0106 ↗
13. Monea AG, Van der Perre G, Baeck K et al (2014) The relation between mechanical impact parameters and most frequent bicycle related head injuries. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 33:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.06.01110.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.06.011 ↗
14. Miyazaki Y, Ujihashi S, Jin T et al (2006) Effects of the mechanical properties of the shell and liner on the shock absorption of helmets. Eng Sport 6(3):145–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45951-6_2710.1007/978-0-387-45951-6_27 ↗
15. Sarron JC, Dannawi M, Faure A et al (2004) Dynamic effects of a 9 mm missile on cadaveric skull protected by aramid, polyethylene or aluminum plate: an experimental study. J Trauma - Inj Infect Crit Care 57:236–242. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000133575.48065.3F10.1097/01.TA.0000133575.48065.3F ↗
16. Sarron JC, Caillou JP, Da Cunha J et al (2000) Consequences of nonpenetrating projectile impact on a protected head: Study of rear effects of protections. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 49:923–929. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200011000-0002110.1097/00005373-200011000-00021 ↗
17. Deck C, Willinger R (2008) Improved head injury criteria based on head FE model. Int J Crashworthiness 13:667–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358826080241152310.1080/13588260802411523 ↗
18. Kleiven S (2003) Influence of impact direction on the human head in prediction of subdural hematoma. J Neurotrauma 20:365–37910.1089/089771503765172327 ↗
19. Rubertone MV, Brundage JF (2002) The defense medical surveillance system and the department of defense serum repository: glimpses of the future of public health surveillance. Am J Public Health 92:1900–1904. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.92.12.190010.2105/AJPH.92.12.1900 ↗
20. Monson KL (2018). Cerebral blood vessel damage in traumatic brain injury. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.02.01110.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.02.011 ↗
21. Moss WC, King MJ, Blackman EG (2009) Skull flexure from blast waves: A mechanism for brain injury with implications for helmet design. Phys Rev Lett 103:4–7. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.10870210.1103/PhysRevLett.103.108702 ↗
22. Aare M, Kleiven S (2007) Evaluation of head response to ballistic helmet impacts using the finite element method. Int J Impact Eng 34:596–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.08.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.08.001 ↗
23. Watson C, Webb A, Horsfall I (2008) Assessment and measurement of potential blunt trauma under ballistic helmets. Proc 24th Int Symp Ballist Ballist 2008 1:448–455
24. Gadd CW (1966) Use of a weighted-impulse criterion for estimating injury hazard. SAE Tech Pap.10.4271/660793 ↗
25. ASTM F2397-09 (2015) Standard Specification for Protective Headgear Used in Martial Arts. ASTM Int 06:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1520/F2397-09.210.1520/F2397-09.2 ↗
26. Versace J (1971) A review of the severity index. SAE Tech Pap 22:251–262. https://doi.org/10.4271/71088110.4271/710881 ↗
27. Caçoilo A, Mourão R, Teixeira-Dias F et al (2021) modelling ballistic impact on military helmets: the relevance of projectile plasticity. Def Technol 17:1699–1711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2020.09.01110.1016/j.dt.2020.09.011 ↗
28. Eppinger R, Sun E, Bandak F et al (1999) Development of improved injury criteria for the assessment of advanced automotive restraint systems - II By. Environ Sci 21:235–257
29. Willinger R, Baumgartner D (2003) Human head tolerance limits to specific injury mechanisms R Willinger and D Baumgartner. 8:605–61710.1533/ijcr.2003.0264 ↗
30. Ruan JS, Khalil T, King AI (1994) Dynamic response of the human head to impact by three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Biomech Eng 116:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.289570310.1115/1.2895703 ↗
31. Melvin JW, Li L, Lighthall JW (1995) Development of tissue level brain injury criteria by finite element analysis. J Neurotrauma 12:695–70610.1089/neu.1995.12.695 ↗
32. Tarlochan F (2013) Finite element ( FE ) human head models / literature review. Int J Sci Technol Res 2:17–31
33. Ghajari M, Hellyer PJ, Sharp DJ (2017) Computational modelling of traumatic brain injury predicts the location of chronic traumatic encephalopathy pathology, pp 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww31710.1093/brain/aww317 ↗
34. Kleiven S (2007) Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions. Svein Kleiven Stapp Car Crash J 51:1–35
35. Newman J, Barr C, Beusenberg M, et al (1995) a new biomechanical assessment of mild traumatic brain injury. Proc 2000 Int Conf Biomech Impact 108:223–233
36. Zhang L, Yang KH, King AI (2004) A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. J Biomech Eng 126:226–236. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.169144610.1115/1.1691446 ↗
37. Young L, Rule GT, Bocchieri RT et al (2015) When physics meets biology: Low and high-velocity penetration, blunt impact, and blast injuries to the brain. Front Neurol 6:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.0008910.3389/fneur.2015.00089 ↗
38. Horstemeyer MF, Panzer MB, Prabhu RK (2019) State-of-the-art modeling and simulation of the brain’s response to mechanical loads. Ann Biomed Eng 47:1829–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02351-910.1007/s10439-019-02351-9 ↗
39. Curnow WJ (2008) Bicycle helmets: a scientific evaluation. Transp Accid Anal Prev 22:139–176
40. Gilchrist A, Mills NJ (1987) Fast fracture of rubber-toughened thermoplastics used for the shells of motorcycle helmets. J Mater Sci 22:2397–2406. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0108212210.1007/BF01082122 ↗
41. Gohel G, Bhudolia SK, Bala S, et al (2021) Development and impact characterization of acrylic thermoplastic composite bicycle helmet shell with improved safety and performance. Compos Part B 221:109008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10900810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109008 ↗
42. Shuaeib FM, Hamouda AMS, Wong SV et al (2007) A new motorcycle helmet liner material: the finite element simulation and design of experiment optimization. Mater Des 28:182–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2005.04.01510.1016/j.matdes.2005.04.015 ↗
43. Hutchinson TP (2014) Peak acceleration during impact with helmet materials: effects of impactor mass and speed. Eur J Sport Sci 14:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2012.70533410.1080/17461391.2012.705334 ↗
44. Teng TL, Liang CC, Shih CJ, Nguyen VH (2013) Design and analysis of bicycle helmet with impaxx foam liner. Adv Mater Res 706–708:1778–1781. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.706-708.177810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.706-708.1778 ↗
45. Drane P, De Jesus-Vega M, Inalpolat M et al (2020) Inductive quantification of energy absorption of high-density polyethylene foam for repeated blunt impact. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 234:531–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/146442071989911210.1177/1464420719899112 ↗
46. Briganti E, Losi P, Raffi A et al (2006) Silicone based polyurethane materials: A promising biocompatible elastomeric formulation for cardiovascular applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 17:259–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-7312-410.1007/s10856-006-7312-4 ↗
47. Ibrahim NA, Amr A, Eid BM et al (2012) Poly(acrylic acid)/poly(ethylene glycol) adduct for attaining multifunctional cellulosic fabrics. Carbohydr Polym 89:648–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.06810.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.068 ↗
48. Tabary M, Ahmadi S, Amirzade-Iranaq MH, et al (2021) The effectiveness of different types of motorcycle helmets—a scoping review. Accid Anal Prev 154:106065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.10606510.1016/j.aap.2021.106065 ↗
49. Wu D, Dufournet M, Martin JL (2019) Does a full-face helmet effectively protect against facial injuries? Inj Epidemiol 6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-019-0197-810.1186/s40621-019-0197-8 ↗
50. Kim JK, Kim S, Ulfarsson GF, Porrello LA (2007) Bicyclist injury severities in bicycle-motor vehicle accidents. Accid Anal Prev 39:238–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.00210.1016/j.aap.2006.07.002 ↗
51. Rivara FP, Thompson DC, Thompson RS (2015) Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury. Inj Prev 21:47–51. https://doi.org/10.1136/injprev-00002-0038rep10.1136/injprev-00002-0038rep ↗
52. Fernandes FAO, Alves De Sousa RJ (2013) Motorcycle helmets—a state of the art review. Accid Anal Prev 56:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.03.01110.1016/j.aap.2013.03.011 ↗
53. Kim SC, Ro YS, Shin S Do, Kim JY (2016) Preventive effects of safety helmets on traumatic brain injury after work-related falls. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1311106310.3390/ijerph13111063 ↗
54. ANS Z89.11969 (1969) Safety requirement for inductrial head protetion. Am Natl Stand 552:
55. Palta E, Hongbing F, Weggel DC (2018) Int J Impact Eng Finite Element Anal Adv Combat Helmet Under Various Ballistic Impacts 112:125–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.010 ↗
56. Liang Y, Chen X, Soutis C (2022) Review on manufacture of military composite helmet. Appl Compos Mater 29:305–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-021-09944-510.1007/s10443-021-09944-5 ↗
57. McIntosh AS, Janda D (2003) Evaluation of cricket helmet performance and comparison with baseball and ice hockey helmets. Br J Sports Med 37:325–330. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.4.32510.1136/bjsm.37.4.325 ↗
58. BS 7928:2013 (2013) Specification for head protectors for cricketers. Br Stand
59. Standard Australia; AS/NZS 4499.1:1997 (1997) Protective headgear for cricket. Aust Zeal Stand
60. Hoshizaki TB, Ph D, Brien SE (2004) The science and design of head protection in sports. Congr Neurol Surg 55:956–967. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000137275.50246.0B10.1227/01.NEU.0000137275.50246.0B ↗
61. Viano DC, Casson IR, Pellman EJ et al (2005) Concussion in professional football: brain responses by finite element analysis: Part 9. Neurosurgery 57:891–915. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000186950.54075.3B10.1227/01.NEU.0000186950.54075.3B ↗
62. F717 – 89 (2020) Standard specification for football helmets. Annu B ASTM Stand D3699:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1520/F0717-89R06.210.1520/F0717-89R06.2 ↗
63. Vanden Oord MHAH, Frings-Dresen MHW, Sluiter JK (2012) Optimal helmet use and adjustments with respect to neck load: The experience ofmilitary helicopter aircrew. Int J Ind Ergon 42:73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2011.09.00110.1016/j.ergon.2011.09.001 ↗
64. Ang B, Linder JH-RK (2005) Neck strength and myoelectric fatigue in fighter and helicopter pilots with a history of neck pain. Aviat Sp Env Med 76:375–380
65. Tapadar S, Ray S, Saha HN, et al (2018) Accident and alcohol detection in bluetooth enabled smart helmets for motorbikes. 2018 IEEE 8th Annu Comput Commun Work Conf CCWC 2018:584–590. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCWC.2018.830163910.1109/CCWC.2018.8301639 ↗
66. Prabha C, Sunitha R, Anitha R (2014) Automatic vehicle accident detection and messaging system using GSM and GPS modem. Int J Adv Res Electr Electron Instrum Eng 3:10723–10727. https://doi.org/10.15662/ijareeie.2014.030706210.15662/ijareeie.2014.0307062 ↗
67. Jesudoss A, Vybhavi R, Anusha B (2019) Design of smart helmet for accident avoidance. Proc 2019 IEEE Int Conf Commun Signal Process ICCSP 2019 774–778. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSP.2019.869800010.1109/ICCSP.2019.8698000 ↗
68. Cantwell WJ, Morton J (1991) The impact resistance of composite materials—a review. Composites 22:347–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V ↗
69. Gholampour A, Ozbakkaloglu T (2020) A review of natural fiber composites: properties, modification and processing techniques, characterization, applications. Springer, US
70. Olhan S, Behera SK, Khatkar V, Behera BK (2023) Investigating the impact of different machinability processes and fibre architecture on the bearing performance of pin-loaded textile structural composites for automotive applications: Experimental and finite element analysis. J Manuf Process 86:30–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.12.02310.1016/j.jmapro.2022.12.023 ↗
71. Monticeli FM, Neves RM, Ornaghi HL, Almeida JHS (2021) A systematic review on high-performance fiber-reinforced 3D printed thermoset composites. Polym Compos 42:3702–3715. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2613310.1002/pc.26133 ↗
72. Hasan KMF, Horváth PG, Alpár T (2021) Potential fabric-reinforced composites: a comprehensive review. J Mater Sci 56:14381–14415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06177-610.1007/s10853-021-06177-6 ↗
73. Khatkar V, Behera BK, Manjunath RN (2020) Textile structural composites for automotive leaf spring application. Compos Part B Eng 182:107662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10766210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107662 ↗
74. Alwekar S, Yeole P, Kumar V, et al (2021) Melt extruded versus extrusion compression molded glass-polypropylene long fiber thermoplastic composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 144:106349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10634910.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106349 ↗
75. Ogale V, Alagirusamy R (2004) Textile preforms for advanced composites. Indian J Fibre Text Res 29:366–375
76. Kardos JL (1985) Critical issues in achieving desirable mechanical properties for short fiber composites. Pure Appl Chem 57:1651–1657. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac19855711165110.1351/pac198557111651 ↗
77. Ewald GW (1981) Processing continuous filament composite materials. SAE Tech Pap 90:1804–1811. https://doi.org/10.4271/81046810.4271/810468 ↗
78. Cheeseman BA, Bogetti TA (2003) Ballistic impact into fabric and compliant composite laminates. Compos Struct 61:161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00029-110.1016/S0263-8223(03)00029-1 ↗
79. Kadir Bilisik A, Turhan Y (2009) Multidirectional stitched layered aramid woven fabric structures and their experimental characterization of ballistic performance Text Res J 79:1331–1343. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051750910427510.1177/0040517509104275 ↗
80. Chen X, Taylor LW, Tsai L-J (2011) An overview on fabrication of three-dimensional woven textile preforms for composites. Text Res J 81:932–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051751039247110.1177/0040517510392471 ↗
81. Khokar N (1996) 3D Fabric-forming processes: distinguishing between 2D-weaving, 3D-weaving and an unspecified non-interlacing process. J Text Inst 87:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0040500960865905910.1080/00405009608659059 ↗
82. Brandt J, Drechsler K, Arendts FJ (1996) Mechanical performance of composites based on various three-dimensional woven-fibre preforms. Compos Sci Technol 56:381–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(95)00135-210.1016/0266-3538(95)00135-2 ↗
83. Tripathi L (2022) Modeling and simulation of impact behavior of 3D woven solid structure for ballistic application. https://doi.org/10.1177/152808372098046710.1177/1528083720980467 ↗
84. Dufour C, Boussu F, Wang P, Soulat D (2013) Experimental analysis of the wrap interlock deformability during the stamping process. Compos week TexComp - 11th Conf 8
85. Chen X, Yang D (2010) Use of 3D angle-interlock woven fabric for seamless female body armor: part 1: ballistic evaluation. Text Res J 80:1581–1588. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051751036318710.1177/0040517510363187 ↗
86. Busgen IA, Finsterbusch IK, Birghan D-IFA (2006) Simulation of composite properties reinforced by 3D shaped woven fabrics. 12th Int Conf Compos Mater (ECCM), Biarritz, Fr 1–9
87. Dangora LM, Mitchell CJ, Sherwood J, Parker JC (2017) Deep-drawing forming trials on a cross-ply thermoplastic lamina for helmet preform manufacture. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 139:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403479110.1115/1.4034791 ↗
88. Campbell DT, Cramer DR (2008) Hybrid thermoplastic composite ballistic helmet fabrication study. Int SAMPE Symp Exhib 52:
89. Kostopoulos V (2002) Finite element analysis of impact damage response of composite motorcycle safety helmets. Compos Part B Eng Part B 8368:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00066-X10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00066-X ↗
90. Singh Y, Singh J, Sharma S (2020) Fabrication and characterization of coir / carbon- fiber reinforced epoxy based hybrid composite for helmet shells and sports-good applications: influence of fiber surface modifications on the mechanical, thermal and morphological properties. J Mater Res Technol 9:15593–15603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.02310.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.023 ↗
91. Kim S, Lee J, Roh C, et al (2019) Mechanics of materials evaluation of carbon fiber and p-aramid composite for industrial helmet using simple cross-ply for protecting human heads. Mech Mater 139:103203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.10320310.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103203 ↗
92. Bharath B, Kumar GC, Shivanna G et al (2018) Science direct fabrication and mechanical characterization of bio-composite helmet. Mater Today Proc 5:2716–2720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.05310.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.053 ↗
93. Barnes HA (1989) Shear-thickening (“Dilatancy”) in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in newtonian liquids. J Rheol (N Y N Y) 33:329–366. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.55001710.1122/1.550017 ↗
94. Lee BW, Kim IJ, Kim CG (2009) The influence of the particle size of silica on the ballistic performance of fabrics impregnated with silica colloidal suspension. J Compos Mater 43:2679–2698. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830934529210.1177/0021998309345292 ↗
95. Lee YS, Wetzel ED, Wagner NJ (2003) The ballistic impact characteristics of Kevlar woven fabrics impregnated with a colloidal shear thickening fluid. J Mater Sci Sci 8:2825–283310.1023/A:1024424200221 ↗
96. Zhang Q, Qin Z, Yan R, et al (2021) Processing technology and ballistic-resistant mechanism of shear thickening fluid/high-performance fiber-reinforced composites: A review. Compos Struct 266:113806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11380610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113806 ↗
97. Zhao C, Wang Y, Cao S, et al (2019) Conductive shear thickening gel/Kevlar wearable fabrics: A flexible body armor with mechano-electric coupling ballistic performance. Compos Sci Technol 182:107782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10778210.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107782 ↗
98. Majumdar A, Laha A, Bhattacharjee D, Biswas I (2017) Tuning the structure of 3D woven aramid fabrics reinforced with shear thickening fluid for developing soft body armour. Compos Struct 178:415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.018 ↗
99. Zeng XS, Tan VBC, Shim VPW (2006) Modelling inter-yarn friction in woven fabric armour. Int J Numer Methods Eng 66:1309–1330. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.159610.1002/nme.1596 ↗
100. Hwang HS, Malakooti MH, Sodano HA (2015) Tailored interyarn friction in aramid fabrics through morphology control of surface grown ZnO nanowires. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 76:326–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.012 ↗