Review: impact resistance and damage tolerance of 3D woven composites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmed A, Wei L (2015) The low-velocity impact damage resistance of the composite structures–a review. Rev Adv Mater Sci 40:127–145
2. Pan M, He Y, Tian G, Chen D, Luo F (2012) Defect characterisation using pulsed eddy current thermography under transmission mode and NDT applications. NDT E Int 52:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.08.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2012.08.007 ↗
3. Huang YD, Froyen L, Wevers M (2001) Quality control and nondestructive tests in metal matrix composites. J Nondestruct Eval 20:113–132. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101350300574310.1023/A:1013503005743 ↗
4. Godin N, Huguet S, Gaertner R, Salmon L (2004) Clustering of acoustic emission signals collected during tensile tests on unidirectional glass/polyester composite using supervised and unsupervised classifiers. NDT E Int 37:253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2003.09.01010.1016/j.ndteint.2003.09.010 ↗
5. Mangalgiri P (1999) Composite materials for aerospace applications. Bull. Mater. Sci 22:657–66410.1007/BF02749982 ↗
6. Mangalgiri P (2005) Polymer-matrix composites for high-temperature applications. Def Sci J 55:175–193. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.55.198010.14429/dsj.55.1980 ↗
7. Kumar A, Bijoya D, Behera K, Dash AK, Behera BK (2018) Role of weave design on the mechanical properties of 3D woven fabrics as reinforcements for structural composites. J Text Inst 109:952–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2017.139378710.1080/00405000.2017.1393787 ↗
8. Neje G, Behera BK (2018) Lateral compressive properties of spacer fabric composites with different cell shapes. Appl Compos Mater 25:725–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-018-9729-610.1007/s10443-018-9729-6 ↗
9. Tripathi L, Chowdhury S, Behera BK (2020) Modelling and simulation of compression behaviour of 3D woven hollow composite structures using FEM analysis. Text Leather Rev 3:6–1810.31881/TLR.2020.03 ↗
10. Tripathi L, Neje G, Behera BK (2020) Geometrical modeling of 3D woven honeycomb fabric for manufacturing of lightweight sandwich composite material. J Ind Text 51:152808372093147. https://doi.org/10.1177/152808372093147210.1177/1528083720931472 ↗
11. Das S, Warren J, West D, Schexnayder S (2016) Global carbon fiber composites supply chain competitiveness analysis. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge TN
12. Winkel J (1985) Instrumented drop weight impact testing of cross-ply and fabric composites. Composites 16:268–27810.1016/0010-4361(85)90279-4 ↗
13. Adams DF, Miller AK (1975) An analysis of the impact behavior of hybrid composite materials. Mater Sci Eng 19:245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(75)90112-310.1016/0025-5416(75)90112-3 ↗
14. Zachariah SA, Dayananda Pai K, Satish SB (2021) Multi-level hybridization in mitigating impact damages in advanced composites–a review on recent trends. Mater Today Proc 46:9059–9066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.38810.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.388 ↗
15. Rouchon J (1990) Certification of large airplane composite structures. In: ICAS congress proceedings, ICAS Org
16. Abrate S (2001) Modeling of impacts on composite structures. Compos Struct 51:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00138-010.1016/S0263-8223(00)00138-0 ↗
17. Davies GAO, Olsson R (2004) Impact on composite structures. Aeronaut J 108:541–563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000192400000038510.1017/S0001924000000385 ↗
18. Tomblin J, Lacy T, Smith B, Hooper S, Vizzini A, Lee S (1999) Review of damage tolerance for composite sandwich airframe structures. Bericht, vol 71
19. Reid SR, Zhou G (2000) Impact behaviour of fibre-reinforced composite materials and structures, vol 44. SAGE Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks10.1533/9781855738904 ↗
20. Tan KT, Watanabe N, Iwahori Y (2012) Impact damage resistance, response, and mechanisms of laminated composites reinforced by through-thickness stitching. Int J Damage Mech 21:51–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678951039707010.1177/1056789510397070 ↗
21. Bibo GA, Hogg PJ (1996) The role of reinforcement architecture on impact damage mechanisms and post-impact compression behaviour. J Mater Sci 31:1115–1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0035309110.1007/BF00353091 ↗
22. Robinson P, Hodgkinson J (2000) Mechanical testing of advanced fibre composites. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Sawston
23. Hodgkinson J (2000) Mechanical testing of advanced fibre composites. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Sawston10.1533/9781855738911 ↗
24. Jacob GC, Fellers JF, Simunovic S, Starbuck JM (2002) Energy absorption in polymer composites for automotive crashworthiness. J Compos Mater 36:813–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830203600716410.1177/0021998302036007164 ↗
25. Wang S, Wu L (2010) Low-velocity impact and residual tensile strength analysis to carbon fiber composite laminates. Mater Des 31(1):118–12510.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.003 ↗
26. Kara M, Uyaner M, Avci A (2014) Effect of non-penetrating impact damages of pre-stressed GRP tubes at low velocities on the burst strength. Compos Part B Eng 60:507–51410.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.003 ↗
27. Tripathi L, Behera BK (2021) Review: 3D woven honeycomb composites. J Mater Sci 56:15609–15652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06302-510.1007/s10853-021-06302-5 ↗
28. Tripathi L, Chowdhury S, Behera BK (2020) Modeling and simulation of impact behavior of 3D woven solid structure for ballistic application. J Ind Text 51:6065S-6086S. https://doi.org/10.1177/152808372098046710.1177/1528083720980467 ↗
29. Jayan VR, Tripathi L, Behera PK, Petru M, Behera BK (2022) Prediction of internal geometry and tensile behavior of 3D woven solid structures by mathematical coding. J Ind Text 51:7034S-7055S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083721100134810.1177/15280837211001348 ↗
30. Tripathi L, Chowdhury S, Behera BK (2023) Low-velocity impact behavior of 3D woven structural honeycomb composite. Mech Adv Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2023.219941510.1080/15376494.2023.2199415 ↗
31. Tripathi L, Behera BK (2023) Comparative analysis of aluminium core honeycomb with 3D woven Kevlar honeycomb composite. Mater Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2023.218060110.1080/02670836.2023.2180601 ↗
32. Behera BK, Jain M, Tripathi L, Choudhury S (2022) Low-velocity impact behaviour of textile-reinforced composite sandwich panels. Sandw Compos Fabr Charact. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003143031-1210.1201/9781003143031-12 ↗
33. Tripathi L, Behera BK (2023) Comparative analysis of the mechanical performance of 3D woven honeycomb composites produced in warp and weft directions. J Text Inst. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2023.219129710.1080/00405000.2023.2191297 ↗
34. Gliszczynski A, Kubiak T, Rozylo P, Jakubczak P, Bieniaś J (2019) The response of laminated composite plates and profiles under low-velocity impact load. Compos Struct 207:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.005 ↗
35. Potluri P, Hogg P, Arshad M, Jetavat D, Jamshidi P (2012) Influence of fibre architecture on impact damage tolerance in 3D woven composites. Appl Compos Mater 19:799–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10443-012-9256-910.1007/S10443-012-9256-9 ↗
36. Brandt J, Drechsler K, Arendts FJ (1996) Mechanical performance of composites based on various three-dimensional woven-fibre preforms. Compos Sci Technol 56:381–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(95)00135-210.1016/0266-3538(95)00135-2 ↗
37. Ko DHFK (1986) Impact behaviorof 2-D and 3-D glass/epoxy composites. SAMPE J 22:26–30
38. Gerlach R, Siviour CR, Wiegand J, Petrinic N (2012) In-plane and through-thickness properties, failure modes, damage and delamination in 3D woven carbon fibre composites subjected to impact loading. Compos Sci Technol 72:397–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.03210.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.032 ↗
39. Padaki NV, Alagirusamy R, Deopura BL, Fangueiro R (2010) Influence of preform interlacement on the low velocity impact behavior of multilayer textile composites. J Ind Text 40:171–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/152808371036672310.1177/1528083710366723 ↗
40. Jefferson Andrew J, Arumugam V, Santulli C (2016) Effect of post-cure temperature and different reinforcements in adhesive bonded repair for damaged glass/epoxy composites under multiple quasi-static indentation loading. Compos Struct 143:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.03710.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.037 ↗
41. Andrew JJ, Srinivasan SM, Arockiarajan A, Dhakal HN (2019) Parameters influencing the impact response of fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite materials: a critical review. Compos Struct 224:1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11100710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111007 ↗
42. Robinson P, Davies GAO (1992) Impactor mass and specimen geometry effects in low velocity impact of laminated composites. Int J Impact Eng 12:189–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(92)90408-L10.1016/0734-743X(92)90408-L ↗
43. Robinson P (1992) Impactor mass and specimen geometry effects in low velocity impact of laminated composites. Int J Impact Eng 12(2):189–20710.1016/0734-743X(92)90408-L ↗
44. Naik N, Shrirao P (2006) Ballistic impact behaviour of woven fabric composites: formulation. Int J Impact Eng 32(9):1521–155210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.01.004 ↗
45. Hancox NL (2000) An overview of the impact behaviour of fibre-reinforced composites. Impact behaviour of fibre-reinforced composite materials and structures. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–32
46. Cantwell WJ, Morton J (1990) Impact perforation of carbon fibre reinforced plastic. Compos Sci Technol 38:119–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(90)90002-M10.1016/0266-3538(90)90002-M ↗
47. Zheng D (2007) Low velocity impact analysis of composite laminated plates. Compos Struct 12:2–95
48. Banach M, Konieczny L, Roterman I (2019) From globular proteins to amyloids. Composite structures. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 117–33
49. Agrawal S, Singh KK, Sarkar PK (2014) Impact damage on fibre-reinforced polymer matrix composite–a review. J Compos Mater 48:317–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831247221710.1177/0021998312472217 ↗
50. Richardson MOW, Wisheart MJ (1996) Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 27:1123–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-835X(96)00074-710.1016/1359-835X(96)00074-7 ↗
51. Safri SNA, Sultan MTH, Jawaid M, Jayakrishna K (2018) Impact behaviour of hybrid composites for structural applications: a review. Compos Part B Eng 133:112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.008 ↗
52. Naik NK, Borade SV, Arya H, Sailendra M, Prabhu SV (2002) Experimental studies on impact behaviour of woven fabric composites: effect of impact parameters. J Reinf Plast Compos 21:1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168440202101529410.1177/0731684402021015294 ↗
53. Sutherland LS (2018) A review of impact testing on marine composite materials: part IV–scaling, strain rate and marine-type laminates. Compos Struct 200:929–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.052 ↗
54. Chai GB, Zhu S (2011) A review of low-velocity impact on sandwich structures. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 225:207–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146442071140998510.1177/1464420711409985 ↗
55. Richardson M (1996) Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 27(12):1123–113110.1016/1359-835X(96)00074-7 ↗
56. Safri S, Sultan M, Yidris N (2014) Low velocity and high velocity impact test on composite materials–a review. Int J Eng Sci 3(9):50–60
57. Shyr TW, Pan YH (2003) Impact resistance and damage characteristics of composite laminates. Compos Struct 62:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-410.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-4 ↗
58. Davies G (1995) Impact damage prediction in carbon composite structures. Int J Impact Eng 16:149–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(94)00039-Y10.1016/0734-743X(94)00039-Y ↗
59. Davies GAO, Hitchings D, Zhou G (1996) Impact damage and residual strengths of woven fabric glass/polyester laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 27:1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-835X(96)00083-810.1016/1359-835X(96)00083-8 ↗
60. Syed Abdullah SIB (2021) Low velocity impact testing on laminated composites. Impact studies of composite materials. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–17
61. Ahmed M, Dhakal H, Zhang Z (2021) Enhancement of impact toughness and damage behaviour of natural fibre reinforced composites and their hybrids through novel improvement techniques. Composite structures. Elsevier, Amsterdam
62. Hassan MZ, Cantwell WJ (2012) The influence of core properties on the perforation resistance of sandwich structures–an experimental study. Compos Part B Eng 43:3231–3238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.012 ↗
63. Hassan MZ, Guan ZW, Cantwell WJ, Langdon GS, Nurick GN (2012) The influence of core density on the blast resistance of foam-based sandwich structures. Int J Impact Eng 50:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.06.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.06.009 ↗
64. Abrate S (1997) Localized impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings. Appl Mech Rev 50:69–8210.1115/1.3101689 ↗
65. Abrate S (2011) Impact dynamics. Impact engineering of composite structures, vol 526. Springer, Cham, pp 71–9610.1007/978-3-7091-0523-8_3 ↗
66. Hassan M (2012) The low velocity impact response of sandwich structures. University of Liverpool, Liverpool
67. Hassan MZ, Umer R, Balawi S, Cantwell WJ (2014) The impact response of environmental-friendly sandwich structures. J Compos Mater 48:3083–3090. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831350672710.1177/0021998313506727 ↗
68. Yaghoubi AS (2012) Stacking sequence and geometrical effects on low-velocity impact behaviors of GLARE 5 (3/2) fiber–metal laminates. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 25:223–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/089270571140816510.1177/0892705711408165 ↗
69. Ghelli D, Minak G (2011) Low velocity impact and compression after impact tests on thin carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos Part B Eng 42:2067–2079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.017 ↗
70. Chen X (2016) Advanced fibrous composite materials for ballistic protection. Elsevier, Amsterdam
71. Chen X, Taylor LW, Tsai L-J (2011) An overview on fabrication of three-dimensional woven textile preforms for composites. Text Res J 81:932–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051751039247110.1177/0040517510392471 ↗
72. Chen P, Huang F, Dai K, Ding Y (2005) Detection and characterization of long-pulse low-velocity impact damage in plastic bonded explosives. Int J Impact Eng 31:497–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.01.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.01.008 ↗
73. Asay J (1987) The response of materials to dynamic loading. Int J Impact Eng 5(1–4):69–9910.1016/0734-743X(87)90031-5 ↗
74. Scheffler D (2000) Practical aspects of numerical simulation of dynamic events: material interfaces. Int J Impact Eng 24:821–84210.1016/S0734-743X(00)00003-8 ↗
75. Cantwell WJ, Morton J (1991) The impact resistance of composite materials–a review. Composites 22:347–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V ↗
76. Olsson R (2012) Modelling of impact damage zones in composite laminates for strength after impact. Aeronaut J 116(1186):1349–136510.1017/S0001924000007673 ↗
77. Olsson R (2001) Analytical prediction of large mass impact damage in composite laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 32:1207–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00073-210.1016/S1359-835X(01)00073-2 ↗
78. Shah SZH, Karuppanan S, Megat-Yusoff PSM, Sajid Z (2019) Impact resistance and damage tolerance of fiber reinforced composites: a review. Compos Struct 217:100–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.021 ↗
79. Chowdhury S, Behera BK (2024) Low-velocity impact response of 3D woven solid structures for multi-scale applications: role of yarn maneuverability and weave architecture. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 46:138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-04734-z10.1007/s40430-024-04734-z ↗
80. Pingulkar H, Mache A, Munde Y, Siva I (2021) A comprehensive review on drop weight impact characteristics of bast natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Mater Today Proc 44:3872–3880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.92510.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.925 ↗
81. Hearle JWS, Chen X (2009) 3D woven preforms and properties for textile composites. In: ICCM international conference on composites materials
82. Horrocks AR, Anand SC (2000) Handbook of technical textiles. Elsevier, Amsterdam10.1533/9781855738966 ↗
83. Gurkan P (2012) 3D woven fabrics. Woven fabrics. InTech, London10.5772/37492 ↗
84. Harvey C, Holtzman E, Ko J, Hagan B, Wu R, Marschner S et al (2019) Weaving objects: spatial design and functionality of 3D-woven textiles. Leonardo 52:381–388. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_0178010.1162/LEON_a_01780 ↗
85. Khokar N (2001) 3D-weaving: theory and practice. J Text Inst 92:193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0040500010865957010.1080/00405000108659570 ↗
86. Huang L (2004) Determining micro-and macro-geometry of fabric and fabric reinforced composites. Kansas State University, Manhattan
87. Tong L, Mouritz AP, Bannister MK (2002) 3D fibre reinforced polymer composites. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 107–3610.1016/B978-008043938-9/50017-X ↗
88. Maschinenwesen F (2008) Development of the weaving machine and 3D woven spacer fabric structures for lightweight composites materials. Princeton, Citeseer
89. Fukuta K, Aoki E, Nagatsuka Y (1986) 3D fabrics for structural composites. In: Proceedings of 15th textile research symposium
90. Chen X, Taylor LW, Tsai LJ (2015) Three-dimensional fabric structures. Part 1–an overview on fabrication of three-dimensional woven textile preforms for composites. Handbook of technical textiles. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 285–304
91. Bilisik K (2012) Multiaxis three-dimensional weaving for composites: A review. Text Res J 82:725–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051751143501310.1177/0040517511435013 ↗
92. Stig F, Hallström S (2009) Assessment of the mechanical properties of a new 3D woven fibre composite material. Compos Sci Technol 69:1686–1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2008.04.04710.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2008.04.047 ↗
93. Wang W, Chouw N, Jayaraman K (2016) Effect of thickness on the impact resistance of flax fibre-reinforced polymer. J Reinf Plast Compos 35:1277–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441664878010.1177/0731684416648780 ↗
94. Ahmed KS, Vijayarangan S, Kumar A (2007) Low velocity impact damage characterization of woven jute-glass fabric reinforced isothalic polyester hybrid composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 26:959–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168440707941410.1177/0731684407079414 ↗
95. Rubio-López A, Artero-Guerrero J, Pernas-Sánchez J, Santiuste C (2017) Compression after impact of flax/PLA biodegradable composites. Polym Test 59:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2017.01.02510.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2017.01.025 ↗
96. Sy BL, Fawaz Z, Bougherara H (2018) Damage evolution in unidirectional and cross-ply flax/epoxy laminates subjected to low velocity impact loading. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 112:452–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.032 ↗
97. Al-Hajaj Z, Sy BL, Bougherara H, Zdero R (2019) Impact properties of a new hybrid composite material made from woven carbon fibres plus flax fibres in an epoxy matrix. Compos Struct 208:346–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.03310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.033 ↗
98. Ravandi M, Teo WS, Tran LQN, Yong MS, Tay TE (2017) Low velocity impact performance of stitched flax/epoxy composite laminates. Compos Part B Eng 117:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.003 ↗
99. Mache A, Deb A, Venkatesh GS (2014) A study on impact perforation resistance of jute-polyester composite laminates, vol 1. SAE International, Nre York
100. Mache A, Deb A (2013) A comparative study on the axial impact performance of jute and glass fiber-based composite tubes, vol 2. SAE Technical Paper, New York