Effects of physical and chemical ageing on 3D printed poly (ether ether ketone)/poly (ether imide) [PEEK/PEI] blend for aerospace applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. De Leon AC, Chen Q, Palaganas NB et al (2016) High performance polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing applications. React Funct Polym 103:141–15510.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.04.010 ↗
2. Vanaei S, Parizi MS, Vanaei S et al (2021) An overview on materials and techniques in 3D bioprinting toward biomedical application. Eng Regen 2:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2020.12.00110.1016/j.engreg.2020.12.001 ↗
3. Holycross DR, Chai M (2013) Comprehensive NMR studies of the structures and properties of PEI polymers. Macromolecules 46:6891–6897. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma401179610.1021/ma4011796 ↗
4. Abate L, Blanco I, Orestano A et al (2005) Kinetics of the isothermal degradation of model polymers containing ether, ketone and sulfone groups. Polym Degrad Stab 87:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.06.01110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.06.011 ↗
5. Mittal V (2011) High Performance Polymers and Engineering Plastics10.1002/9781118171950 ↗
6. El Magri A, Vanaei S, Vaudreuil S (2021) An overview on the influence of process parameters through the characteristic of 3D-printed PEEK and PEI parts. High Perform Polym. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954008321100996110.1177/09540083211009961 ↗
7. Rinaldi M, Ghidini T, Cecchini F et al (2018) Additive layer manufacturing of poly (ether ether ketone) via FDM. Compos Part B Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.029 ↗
8. El Magri A, El Mabrouk K, Vaudreuil S et al (2020) Optimization of printing parameters for improvement of mechanical and thermal performances of 3D printed poly(ether ether ketone) parts. J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4908710.1002/app.49087 ↗
9. Zalaznik M, Kalin M, Novak S (2016) Influence of the processing temperature on the tribological and mechanical properties of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) polymer. Tribol Int 94:92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.08.01610.1016/j.triboint.2015.08.016 ↗
10. Shen LQ, Xu ZK, Liu ZM, Xu YY (2003) Ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes from poly(ether imide): preparation, morphologies and properties. J Membr Sci 223(1–2):105–118
11. Shibata.M, Fang.Z Y. (2001) Miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(ether imide) blends. Appl Polym Sci 80:769–77510.1002/1097-4628(20010502)80:5<769::AID-APP1153>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
12. Crevecoeur G, Groeninckx G (1991) Binary blends of poly(ether ether ketone) and poly(ether imide). Miscibility, crystallization behavior, and semicrystalline morphology. Macromolecules 24:1190–1195. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00005a03410.1021/ma00005a034 ↗
13. Forés-Garriga A, Pérez MA, Gómez-Gras G, Reyes-Pozo G (2020) Role of infill parameters on the mechanical performance and weight reduction of PEI Ultem processed by FFF. Mater Des 193:108810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10881010.1016/j.matdes.2020.108810 ↗
14. Kong X, Teng F, Tang H et al (1996) Miscibility and crystallization behaviour of poly(ether ether ketone)/polyimide blends. Polymer (Guildf) 37:1751–1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(96)83729-310.1016/0032-3861(96)83729-3 ↗
15. Hudson SD, Davis DD, Lovinger AJ (1992) Semicrystalline morphology of poly(aryl ether ether ketone)/poly(ether imide) blends. Macromolecules 25:1759–176510.1021/ma00032a021 ↗
16. Arzak A, Eguiazábal JI, Nazábal J (2006) Mechanical performance of directly injection-molded PEEK/PEI blends at room and high temperature. 36:233–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022234970822042810.1080/00222349708220428 ↗
17. Chen J, Guo Q, Zhao Z, et al (2012) Structures and mechanical properties of PEEK/PEI/PES plastics alloys blent by extrusion molding used for cable insulating jacketing. In: Procedia Engineering. Elsevier Ltd, pp 96–10410.1016/j.proeng.2012.03.016 ↗
18. Askanian H, Muranaka de Lima D, Commereuc S, Verney V (2018) Toward a better understanding of the fused deposition modeling process: comparison with injection molding. 3D Print Addit Manuf 3dp.2017.0060. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2017.006010.1089/3dp.2017.0060 ↗
19. Cicala G, Ognibene G, Portuesi S et al (2018) Comparison of ultem 9085 used in fused deposition modelling (FDM) with polytherimide blends. Materials (Basel) 11:285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1102028510.3390/ma11020285 ↗
20. Vanaei HR, Raissi K, Deligant M et al (2020) Toward the understanding of temperature effect on bonding strength, dimensions and geometry of 3D-printed parts. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05057-910.1007/s10853-020-05057-9 ↗
21. Vanaei H, Shirinbayan M, Deligant M et al (2020) Influence of process parameters on thermal and mechanical properties of polylactic acid fabricated by fused filament fabrication. Polym Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2541910.1002/pen.25419 ↗
22. Vaezi M, Yang S (2015) Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications. Virtual Phys Prototyp 10:123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.109705310.1080/17452759.2015.1097053 ↗
23. Yang C, Tian X, Li D et al (2017) Influence of thermal processing conditions in 3D printing on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of PEEK material. J Mater Process Technol 248:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.02710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 ↗
24. Ding S, Zou B, Wang P, Ding H (2019) Effects of nozzle temperature and building orientation on mechanical properties and microstructure of PEEK and PEI printed by 3D-FDM. Polym Test. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10594810.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105948 ↗
25. El Magri A, El Mabrouk K (2021) Vaudreuil S (2021) Preparation and characterization of poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(ether imide) [PEEK/PEI] blends for fused filament fabrication. J Mater Sci 5625(56):14348–14367. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-021-06172-X10.1007/S10853-021-06172-X ↗
26. Perng L-H (2000) Thermal decomposition characteristics of poly(ether imide) by TG/MS. Polym Res 7(3):185–19310.1007/s10965-006-0119-7 ↗
27. Ramani R, Alam S (2010) Composition optimization of PEEK/PEI blend using model-free kinetics analysis. Thermochim Acta 511:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2010.08.01210.1016/j.tca.2010.08.012 ↗
28. Perng LH, Tsai CJLY (1999) Mechanism and kinetic modelling of PEEK pyrolysis by TG/MS. Polymer Polymer (Guildf) 40:7321–7329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00006-310.1016/S0032-3861(99)00006-3 ↗
29. Perng LH (1999) Thermal cracking characteristics of PEEK under different environments by the TG/FTIR technique. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 37:4582–4590. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19991215)37:24%3c4582::AID-POLA15%3e3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/(SICI)1099-0518(19991215)37:24<4582::AID-POLA15>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
30. Diez-Pascual AM, Martínez G, Gómez MA (2009) Synthesis and characterization of poly(ether ether ketone) derivatives obtained by carbonyl reduction. Macromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma901208e10.1021/ma901208e ↗
31. Nguyen HX, Ishida H (1986) Molecular analysis of the melting behaviour of poly(aryl ether ether ketone. Polymer (Guildf) 27:1400–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(86)90041-810.1016/0032-3861(86)90041-8 ↗
32. Yasin S, Shakeel A, Ahmad M et al (2019) Physico-chemical analysis of semi-crystalline PEEK in aliphatic and aromatic solvents. Soft Mater. https://doi.org/10.1080/1539445X.2019.157262210.1080/1539445X.2019.1572622 ↗
33. Chen BK, Su CT, Tseng MC, Tsay SY (2006) Preparation of polyetherimide nanocomposites with improved thermal, mechanical and dielectric properties. Polym Bull 57:671–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-006-0630-310.1007/s00289-006-0630-3 ↗
34. Farong H, Xueqiu W, Shijin L (1987) The thermal stability of polyetherimide. Polym Degrad Stab 18:247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-3910(87)90005-X10.1016/0141-3910(87)90005-X ↗
35. Díez-Pascual AM, Díez-Vicente AL (2015) Nano-TiO2 reinforced PEEK/PEI blends as biomaterials for load-bearing implant applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:5561–5573. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0021010.1021/acsami.5b00210 ↗
36. Rajeesh KR, Gnanamoorthy R, Velmurugan R (2010) The effect of moisture content on the tensile behaviour of polyamide 6. Nanocomposites 224:173–176. https://doi.org/10.1243/14644207JMDA31610.1243/14644207JMDA316 ↗
37. Srivastava VK (1999) Influence of water immersion on mechanical properties of quasi-isotropic glass fibre reinforced epoxy vinylester resin composites. Mater Sci Eng A 263:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01037-510.1016/S0921-5093(98)01037-5 ↗
38. Song Y, Deng J, Xu Z, et al (2021) Effect of Thermal Aging on Mechanical Properties and Color Difference of Glass Fiber/Polyetherimide (GF/PEI) Composites. Polym 2022, 14:67. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM1401006710.3390/POLYM14010067 ↗
39. Zhong Y, Cheng M, Zhang X et al (2019) Hygrothermal durability of glass and carbon fiber reinforced composites—a comparative study. Compos Struct 211:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2018.12.03410.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2018.12.034 ↗
40. Karsli NG, Demirkol S, Yilmaz T (2016) Thermal aging and reinforcement type effects on the tribological, thermal, thermomechanical, physical and morphological properties of poly(ether ether ketone) composites. Compos Part B Eng 88:253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.013 ↗
41. Gardea F, Lagoudas DC, Naraghi M (2016) An experimental study into active damping mechanisms in CNT nanocomposite10.2514/6.2016-1418 ↗