journal article·2022-07

Superhydrophobic hybrid silica-cellulose aerogel for enhanced thermal, acoustic, and oil absorption characteristics

Debabrata Panda, Krunal M. Gangawane

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 28
Publisher page

Abstract

A facile and cost-effective modified sol–gel synthesis is employed to synthesize flexible silica-cellulose hybrid aerogels (SCHA) using recycled cellulose fibers (RCF). The effect of cellulose fiber concentrations and ambient temperature conditions on the thermal, acoustic, and oil absorption characteristics was quantified comprehensively. The experiments were conducted by considering the range of weight fractions from 1–4 wt.% from waste tissue paper with a cross-linker and tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) as silica precursors. The SCHA aerogels were modified by a silylating agent with surface hydroxyl groups to achieve superhydrophobic behavior with a water contact angle (WCA) as high as 168°. The synthesized aerogels were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and Brunauer-Emmett-Test (BET) to identify the physical morphology. An excellent oil absorption capacity of 24.8 g.g−1 was also noticed with 4 wt.% of cellulose concentration in hybrid aerogel retained up to 5 cycles with an absorption capacity of 6.4 g.g−1. The average thermal conductivity of hybrid aerogels was estimated in the range of 0.038–0.032 W/m K. Slight enhancement in the thermal conductivity is noted with the increase in wt.% of cellulose to the silica aerogel. However, about 40–50 °C improvement in thermal degradability (as concluded from Thermogravimetric Analysis) with a minimum weight loss was observed in hybrid aerogel over cellulose aerogel. A comparatively high sound absorption coefficient of 0.453–0.628 at low frequency (1500 Hz) and 0.86–0.94 at high frequency (3600 Hz) was achieved with an average thickness of 8 mm compared to cellulose aerogel. The compressive Young’s modulus of hybrid aerogels was also enhanced by 94.12%.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerogels and thermal insulation · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Neubauer SC, Megonigal JP (2015) Moving beyond global warming potentials to quantify the climatic role of ecosystems. Ecosystems 18:1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9879-410.1007/s10021-015-9879-4 ↗
2. Tebaldi C, Ranasinghe R, Vousdoukas M et al (2021) Extreme sea levels at different global warming levels. Nat Clim Chang 11:746–751. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01127-110.1038/s41558-021-01127-1 ↗
3. Baetens R, Jelle BP, Gustavsen A (2011) Aerogel insulation for building applications: a state-of-the-art review. Energy Build 43:761–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.12.01210.1016/j.enbuild.2010.12.012 ↗
4. Byrne A, Byrne GG, O’Donnell, Robinson A (2016) Case studies of cavity and external wall insulation retrofitted under the irish home energy saving scheme: technical analysis and occupant perspectives. Energy Build 130:420–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.02710.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.027 ↗
5. Koh HW, Le DK, Ng GN et al (2018) Advanced recycled polyethylene terephthalate aerogels from plastic waste for acoustic and thermal insulation applications. Gels. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels402004310.3390/gels4020043 ↗
6. Rivera ML, MacLean HL, McCabe B (2021) Implications of passive energy efficiency measures on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of high-rise residential building envelopes. Energy Build 249:111202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.11120210.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111202 ↗
7. Chen DR, Chang XH, Jiao XL (2014) Aerogels in the environment protection. Elsevier BV10.1016/B978-0-444-63283-8.00022-3 ↗
8. Morillas JMB, Gozalo GR, González DM et al (2018) Noise pollution and urban planning. Curr Pollut Rep 4:208–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-018-0095-710.1007/s40726-018-0095-7 ↗
9. Tzivian L, Winkler A, Dlugaj M et al (2015) Effect of long-term outdoor air pollution and noise on cognitive and psychological functions in adults. Int J Hyg Environ Health 218:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2014.08.00210.1016/j.ijheh.2014.08.002 ↗
10. Tzivian L, Jokisch M, Winkler A et al (2017) Associations of long-term exposure to air pollution and road traffic noise with cognitive function—an analysis of effect measure modification. Environ Int 103:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.03.01810.1016/j.envint.2017.03.018 ↗
11. Asdrubali F, Schiavoni S, Horoshenkov KV (2012) A review of sustainable materials for acoustic applications. Build Acoust 19:283–312. https://doi.org/10.1260/1351-010X.19.4.28310.1260/1351-010X.19.4.283 ↗
12. Moretti E, Merli F, Cuce E, Buratti C (2017) Thermal and acoustic properties of aerogels: preliminary investigation of the influence of granule size. Energy Procedia 111:472–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.20910.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.209 ↗
13. Pedroso M, de Brito J, Dinis Silvestre J (2019) Characterization of walls with eco-efficient acoustic insulation materials (traditional and innovative). Constr Build Mater 222:892–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.25910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.259 ↗
14. Li D, Chang D, Liu B (2020) Diffuse sound absorptive properties of parallel-arranged perforated plates with extended tubes and porous materials. Materials (Basel) 13:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1305109110.3390/ma13051091 ↗
15. Li P, Cai Q, Lin W et al (2016) Offshore oil spill response practices and emerging challenges. Mar Pollut Bull 110:6–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.02010.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.020 ↗
16. Nyankson E, Rodene D, Gupta RB (2016) Advancements in crude oil spill remediation research after the deepwater horizon oil spill. Water Air Soil Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2727-510.1007/s11270-015-2727-5 ↗
17. Zhu T, Hao X, Wu Q, Wang W (2021) Exploring anchoring performance of defective MgO nanotubes for lithium–sulphur batteries: a density functional theory (DFT) study. Can J Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.2424410.1002/cjce.24244 ↗
18. Du A, Zhou B, Zhang Z, Shen J (2013) A special material or a new state of matter: a review and reconsideration of the aerogel. Materials (Basel) 6:941–968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma603094110.3390/ma6030941 ↗
19. Li X, Yang Z, Li K et al (2019) A flexible silica aerogel with good thermal and acoustic insulation prepared via water solvent system. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 92:652–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-05107-y10.1007/s10971-019-05107-y ↗
20. Randall JP, Meador MAB, Jana SC (2011) Tailoring mechanical properties of aerogels for aerospace applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:613–626. https://doi.org/10.1021/am200007n10.1021/am200007n ↗
21. Thapliyal PC, Singh K (2014) Aerogels as promising thermal insulating materials: an overview. J Mater 2014:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/12704910.1155/2014/127049 ↗
22. Simfukwe J, Mapasha RE, Braun A, Diale M (2017) Biopatterning of keratinocytes in aqueous two-phase systems as a potential tool for skin tissue engineering. MRS Adv 357:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.20110.1557/adv.201 ↗
23. Nardecchia S, Carriazo D, Ferrer ML et al (2013) Three dimensional macroporous architectures and aerogels built of carbon nanotubes and/or graphene: synthesis and applications. Chem Soc Rev 42:794–830. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35353a10.1039/c2cs35353a ↗
24. Wang J, Ellsworth MW (2009) Graphene aerogel. ECS Trans 19:241–247. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.311954810.1149/1.3119548 ↗
25. Thakkar SV, Pinna A, Carbonaro CM et al (2020) Performance of oil sorbents based on reduced graphene oxide-silica composite aerogels. J Environ Chem Eng 8:103632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.10363210.1016/j.jece.2019.103632 ↗
26. Huang J, Liu H, Chen S, Ding C (2016) Hierarchical porous MWCNTs-silica aerogel synthesis for high-efficiency oily water treatment. J Environ Chem Eng 4:3274–3282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.06.03910.1016/j.jece.2016.06.039 ↗
27. Tafreshi OA, Mosanenzadeh SG, Karamikamkar S et al (2022) A review on multifunctional aerogel fibers: processing, fabrication, functionalization, and applications. Mater Today Chem 23:100736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.10073610.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100736 ↗
28. Fu Y, Guo Z (2022) Natural polysaccharide-based aerogels and their applications in oil–water separations: a review. J Mater Chem A 10:8129–8158. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA00708H10.1039/D2TA00708H ↗
29. Nguyen ST, Feng J, Ng SK et al (2014) Advanced thermal insulation and absorption properties of recycled cellulose aerogels. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 445:128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.01.01510.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.01.015 ↗
30. Iskandar MA, Yahya EB, Abdul Khalil HPS et al (2022) Recent progress in modification strategies of nanocellulose-based aerogels for oil absorption application. Polymers (Basel) 14:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1405084910.3390/polym14050849 ↗
31. Lou CW, Zhou X, Liao X et al (2021) Sustainable cellulose-based aerogels fabricated by directional freeze-drying as excellent sound-absorption materials. J Mater Sci 56:18762–18774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06498-610.1007/s10853-021-06498-6 ↗
32. Lu Y, Li X, Yin X et al (2018) Silica aerogel as super thermal and acoustic insulation materials. J Environ Prot (Irvine, Calif) 09:295–308. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2018.9402010.4236/jep.2018.94020 ↗
33. Fu J, He C, Wang S, Chen Y (2018) A thermally stable and hydrophobic composite aerogel made from cellulose nanofibril aerogel impregnated with silica particles. J Mater Sci 53:7072–7082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2034-910.1007/s10853-018-2034-9 ↗
34. Markevicius G, Ladj R, Niemeyer P et al (2017) Ambient-dried thermal superinsulating monolithic silica-based aerogels with short cellulosic fibers. J Mater Sci 52:2210–2221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0514-310.1007/s10853-016-0514-3 ↗
35. Szabó L, Soria A, Forsström J et al (2009) A world model of the pulp and paper industry: demand, energy consumption and emission scenarios to 2030. Environ Sci Policy 12:257–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.01110.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.011 ↗
36. Ikeda Y, Park EY, Okuda N (2006) Bioconversion of waste office paper to gluconic acid in a turbine blade reactor by the filamentous fungus Aspergillus niger. Bioresour Technol 97:1030–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.04010.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.040 ↗
37. Cai J, Liu S, Feng J et al (2012) Cellulose-silica nanocomposite aerogels by in situ formation of silica in cellulose gel. Angew Chemie 124:2118–2121. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.20110573010.1002/ange.201105730 ↗
38. Feng J, Nguyen ST, Fan Z, Duong HM (2015) Advanced fabrication and oil absorption properties of superhydrophobic recycled cellulose aerogels. Chem Eng J 270:168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.03410.1016/j.cej.2015.02.034 ↗
39. Nguyen ST, Feng J, Le NT et al (2013) Cellulose aerogel from paper waste for crude oil spill cleaning. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:18386–18391. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie403256710.1021/ie4032567 ↗
40. Ba Thai Q, Ee Siang T, Le Khac D et al (2019) Advanced fabrication and multi-properties of rubber aerogels from car tire waste. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 577:702–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.06.02910.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.06.029 ↗
41. Jiang F, Lo HY (2014) Amphiphilic superabsorbent cellulose nanofibril aerogels. J Mater Chem A 2:6337–6342. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta00743c10.1039/c4ta00743c ↗
42. Kumar G, Dora DTK, Jadav D et al (2021) Utilization and regeneration of waste sugarcane bagasse as a novel robust aerogel as an effective thermal, acoustic insulator, and oil adsorbent. J Clean Prod 298:126744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12674410.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126744 ↗
43. Shi J, Lu L, Guo W et al (2013) Heat insulation performance, mechanics and hydrophobic modification of cellulose-SiO2 composite aerogels. Carbohydr Polym 98:282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.08210.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.082 ↗
44. Sai H, Xing L, Xiang J et al (2013) Flexible aerogels based on an interpenetrating network of bacterial cellulose and silica by a non-supercritical drying process. J Mater Chem A 1:7963–7970. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta11198a10.1039/c3ta11198a ↗
45. Cheng H, Gu B, Pennefather MP et al (2017) Cotton aerogels and cotton-cellulose aerogels from environmental waste for oil spillage cleanup. Mater Des 130:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.08210.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.082 ↗
46. Zhou S, Liu P, Wang M et al (2016) Sustainable, reusable, and superhydrophobic aerogels from microfibrillated cellulose for highly effective oil/water separation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:6409–6416. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0107510.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01075 ↗
47. Feng J, Le D, Nguyen ST et al (2016) Silica–cellulose hybrid aerogels for thermal and acoustic insulation applications. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 506:298–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.06.05210.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.06.052 ↗
48. Zhang H, Wang J, Xu G et al (2021) Ultralight, hydrophobic, sustainable, cost-effective and floating kapok/microfibrillated cellulose aerogels as speedy and recyclable oil superabsorbents. J Hazard Mater 406:124758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12475810.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124758 ↗
49. Akhlamadi G, Goharshadi EK (2021) Sustainable and superhydrophobic cellulose nanocrystal-based aerogel derived from waste tissue paper as a sorbent for efficient oil/water separation. Process Saf Environ Prot 154:155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.08.00910.1016/j.psep.2021.08.009 ↗
50. Huang J, Li D, Huang L et al (2022) Bio-based aerogel based on bamboo, waste paper, and reduced graphene oxide for oil/water separation. Langmuir 38:3064–3075. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0282110.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02821 ↗
51. Mathis N (2000) Transient thermal conductivity measurements: comparison of destructive and nondestructive techniques. High Temp - High Press 32:321–327. https://doi.org/10.1068/htwu28910.1068/htwu289 ↗
52. Zhang W, Zhang Y, Lu C, Deng Y (2012) Aerogels from crosslinked cellulose nano/micro-fibrils and their fast shape recovery property in water. J Mater Chem 22:11642–11650. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm30688c10.1039/c2jm30688c ↗
53. Cai J, Zhang L (2006) Unique gelation behavior of cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. Biomacromol 7:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm050558510.1021/bm0505585 ↗
54. Shi J, Lu L, Guo W et al (2013) An environment-friendly thermal insulation material from cellulose and plasma modification. J Appl Polym Sci 130:3652–3658. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3961510.1002/app.39615 ↗
55. Holik H (2006) Handbook of Paper and board10.1002/3527608257 ↗
56. Błaszczyński T, Ślosarczyk A, Morawski M (2013) Synthesis of silica aerogel by supercritical drying method. Procedia Eng 57:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.02810.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.028 ↗
57. Litschauer M, Neouze MA, Haimer E et al (2011) Silica modified cellulosic aerogels. Cellulose 18:143–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9459-x10.1007/s10570-010-9459-x ↗
58. Bhagat SD, Hirashima H, Venkateswara Rao A (2007) Low density TEOS based silica aerogels using methanol solvent. J Mater Sci 42:3207–3214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1366-z10.1007/s10853-006-1366-z ↗
59. Demilecamps A, Beauger C, Hildenbrand C et al (2015) Cellulose-silica aerogels. Carbohydr Polym 122:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.02210.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.022 ↗
60. Rao AV, Kulkarni MM, Amalnerkar DP, Seth T (2003) Superhydrophobic silica aerogels based on methyltrimethoxysilane precursor. J Non Cryst Solids 330:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.08.04810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.08.048 ↗
61. Shafi S, Rasheed T, Naz R et al (2021) Supercritical CO2 drying of pure silica aerogels: effect of drying time on textural properties of nanoporous silica aerogels. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 98:478–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-021-05530-010.1007/s10971-021-05530-0 ↗
62. Sequeira S, Evtuguin DV, Portugal I (2009) Preparation and properties of cellulose/silica hybrid composites. Polym Compos 30:1275–1282. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2069110.1002/pc.20691 ↗
63. Tang X, Yan X (2017) Acoustic energy absorption properties of fibrous materials: a review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 101:360–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.002 ↗
64. Jia N, Li SM, Ma MG, et al (2011) Synthesis and characterization of cellulose-silica composite fiber in ethanol/water mixed solvents Bio Res 6:1186–1195 https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.6.2.1186-119510.15376/biores.6.2.1186-1195 ↗