Model improvement for super-Nernstian pH sensors: the effect of surface hydration
Source abstract
Abstract
The maximum sensitivity of pH sensors is given by the Nernst equation, and its theoretical value is 59.2 mV pH−1. However, countless sensors developed and reported in the literature have their sensitivity higher than the Nernstian limit. These are called super-Nernstian sensors. To understand the causes of this behavior, the sensitivity of polyaniline thin films was studied by evaluation of an important parameter: the hydration of the film’s surface. Sensitivities were measured before and after varied heat treatments, and the sensor's parameters were associated with the amount of water lost in the process. Polyaniline thin films were fabricated by galvanostatic electrodeposition in aqueous solution, and their sensitivity was measured before and after heating of the samples. An endothermic process, typical of evaporation, was revealed by the analysis of mass loss during the heating process. A decrease in the sensitivity of the films was observed after heating process. For comparison, polyaniline thin films were also fabricated by spin coating, in the absence of water, and their sensitivity proved to be smaller than for the galvanostatically fabricated ones and it did not change significantly after the heating processes. The results indicated that the Nernst model can be adjusted using a parameter ( $$1/r$$ ) related to the hydration of the surface of the sample, which directly affects the sensitivity of the thin films. The lowest reachable $$1/r$$ value for samples containing no water is approximately 0.9. The parameter also describes the upper limits for the sensitivity of super-Nernstian sensors.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Conducting polymers and applications · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Lange U, Roznyatovskaya NV, Mirsky VM (2008) Conducting polymers in chemical sensors and arrays. Anal Chim Acta 614:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2008.02.06810.1016/j.aca.2008.02.068 ↗
2. Bergveld P (1970) Development of an ion-sensitive solid-state device for neurophysiological measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 17:70–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1970.450268810.1109/TBME.1970.4502688 ↗
3. van der Spiegel J, Lauks I, Chan P, Babic D (1983) The extended gate chemically sensitive field effect transistor as multi-species microprobe. Sens Actuators 4:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0250-6874(83)85035-510.1016/0250-6874(83)85035-5 ↗
4. Mello HJNPD, Heimfarth T, Mulato M (2015) Influence of the physical–chemical properties of polyaniline thin films on the final sensitivity of varied field effect sensors. Mater Chem Phys 160:257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.04.03410.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.04.034 ↗
5. Mello HJNPD, Mulato M (2016) Well-established materials in microelectronic devices systems for differential-mode extended-gate field effect transistor chemical sensors. Microelectron Eng 160:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2016.03.03610.1016/j.mee.2016.03.036 ↗
6. Zhao R, Xu M, Wang J, Chen G (2010) A pH sensor based on the TiO2 nanotube array modified Ti electrode. Electrochim Acta 55:5647–5651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.04.10210.1016/j.electacta.2010.04.102 ↗
7. Guerra EM, Silva GR, Mulato M (2009) Extended gate field effect transistor using V2O5 xerogel sensing membrane by sol–gel method. Solid State Sci 11:456–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2008.07.01410.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2008.07.014 ↗
8. Guidelli EJ, Guerra EM, Mulato M (2012) V2O5/WO3 mixed oxide films as pH-EGFET sensor: sequential re-usage and fabrication volume analysis. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol 1:N39–N44. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.007203jss10.1149/2.007203jss ↗
9. Chou J-C, Kwan P-K, Chen Z-J (2003) SnO2 separative structure extended gate H+$-ion sensitive field effect transistor by the sol–gel technology and the readout circuit developed by source follower. Jpn J Appl Phys 42:6790–6794. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.42.679010.1143/JJAP.42.6790 ↗
10. Chi L-L, Chou J-C, Chung W-Y, Sun T-P, Hsiung S-K (2000) Study on extended gate field effect transistor with tin oxide sensing membrane. Mater Chem Phys 63:19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(99)00184-410.1016/S0254-0584(99)00184-4 ↗
11. Batista PD, Mulato M (2010) Polycrystalline fluorine-doped tin oxide as sensoring thin film in EGFET pH sensor. J Mater Sci 45:5478–5481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4603-410.1007/s10853-010-4603-4 ↗
12. Batista PD, Mulato M (2005) ZnO extended-gate field-effect transistors as pH sensors. Appl Phys Lett 87:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.208431910.1063/1.2084319 ↗
13. Al-Hilli SM, Willander M, Öst A, Strålfors P (2007) ZnO nanorods as an intracellular sensor for pH measurements. J Appl Phys 102:084304–084304-5. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.279858210.1063/1.2798582 ↗
14. Asif MH, Ali SMU, Nur O, Willander M, Brännmark C, Strålfors P, Englund UH, Elinder F, Danielsson B (2010) Functionalised ZnO-nanorod-based selective electrochemical sensor for intracellular glucose. Biosens Bioelectron 25:2205–2211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2010.02.02510.1016/j.bios.2010.02.025 ↗
15. Alcarás JR, Mello HJNPD, Mulato M (2015) Polyaniline protonation and deprotonation process as the main mechanism for ionic field effect sensors. Org Bioelectron Process Appl 1795:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2015.67410.1557/opl.2015.674 ↗
16. Mello HJNPD, Mulato M (2018) Effect of aniline monomer concentration on PANI electropolymerization process and its influence for applications in chemical sensors. Synth Met 239:66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2018.02.00810.1016/j.synthmet.2018.02.008 ↗
17. Mello HJNPD, Mulato M (2018) Influence of galvanostatic electrodeposition parameters on the structure-property relationships of polyaniline thin films and their use as potentiometric and optical pH sensors. Thin Solid Films 656:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2018.04.02210.1016/j.tsf.2018.04.022 ↗
18. Mello HJNPD, Mulato M (2018) PANI/PPY blend thin films electrodeposited for use in EGFET sensors. J Appl Polym Sci 135:46625–46632. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4662510.1002/app.46625 ↗
19. Bergveld P (2003) Thirty years of ISFETOLOGY: what happened in the past 30 years and what may happen in the next 30 years. Sens Actuators B Chem 88:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(02)00301-510.1016/S0925-4005(02)00301-5 ↗
20. van Hal REG, Eijkel JCT, Bergveld P (1996) A general model to describe the electrostatic potential at electrolyte oxide interfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 69:31–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8686(96)00307-710.1016/S0001-8686(96)00307-7 ↗
21. Kaisti M (2017) Detection principles of biological and chemical FET sensors. Biosens Bioelectron 98:437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.07.01010.1016/j.bios.2017.07.010 ↗
22. Das A, Ko DH, Chen C-H, Chang L-B, Lai C-S, Chu F-C, Chow L, Lin R-M (2014) Highly sensitive palladium oxide thin film extended gate FETs as pH sensor. Sens Actuators B Chem 205:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.08.05710.1016/j.snb.2014.08.057 ↗
23. Chung H-J, Sulkin MS, Kim J-S, Goudeseune C, Chao H-Y, Song JW, Yang SY, Hsu Y-Y, Ghaffari R, Efimov IR, Rogers JA (2014) Stretchable, multiplexed pH sensors with demonstrations on rabbit and human hearts undergoing ischemia. Adv Healthc Mater 3:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20130012410.1002/adhm.201300124 ↗
24. Singh K, Lou B-S, Her J-L, Pang S-T, Pan T-M (2019) Super Nernstian pH response and enzyme-free detection of glucose using sol-gel derived RuOx on PET flexible-based extended-gate field-effect transistor. Sens Actuators B Chem 298:126837–126846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.12683710.1016/j.snb.2019.126837 ↗
25. Burke LD, Whelan DP (1984) A voltammetric investigation of the charge storage reactions of hydrous iridium oxide layers. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem 162:121–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(84)80159-X10.1016/S0022-0728(84)80159-X ↗
26. Qin Y, Kwon H-J, Howlader MMR, Deen MJ (2015) Microfabricated electrochemical pH and free chlorine sensors for water quality monitoring: recent advances and research challenges. RSC Adv 5:69086–69109. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA11291E10.1039/C5RA11291E ↗
27. Ping Z, Nauer BGE, Neugebauer H, Theiner J, Neckel A (1997) Protonation and electrochemical redox doping processes of polyaniline in aqueous solutions: investigations using in-situ FTIR-ATR spectroscopy and a new doping system. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 93:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1039/A604620G10.1039/A604620G ↗
28. He L, Jia Y, Meng F, Li M, Liu J (2009) Gas sensors for ammonia detection based on polyaniline-coated multi-wall carbon nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng B 163:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2009.05.00910.1016/j.mseb.2009.05.009 ↗
29. Huang J, Kaner RB (2004) A general chemical route to polyaniline nanofibers. J Am Chem Soc 126:851–855. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja037175410.1021/ja0371754 ↗
30. Do Nascimento GM, Silva CHB, Temperini MLA (2008) Spectroscopic characterization of the structural changes of polyaniline nanofibers after heating. Polym Degrad Stab 93:291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.09.00110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.09.001 ↗
31. Zhang J, Liu C, Shi G (2005) Raman spectroscopic study on the structural changes of polyaniline during heating and cooling processes. J Appl Polym Sci 96:732–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2152010.1002/app.21520 ↗