journal article·2008-09

Shape-memory effects of polyurethane copolymer cross-linked by dextrin

Yong-Chan Chung, Jung Hoon Choi, Byoung Chul Chun

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

The effects of the dextrin cross-linking and hard-segment content on the shape-memory property of a polyurethane (PU) block copolymer were investigated. Although dextrin was selected due to its large number of free hydroxyl groups and ubiquitous availability, it is unfortunately insoluble in most organic solvents. The insolubility of dextrin was resolved by attaching a phenyl group onto the dextrin to reduce its hydrophilicity. The phase separations of hard and soft segments were not dependent on the dextrin cross-linking and hard-segment content, as per the results obtained from FTIR, DSC, and XRD analysis. An increased content of chemically cross-linked dextrin increased the maximum stress, but did not decrease the strain for most cases. The cross-linking density increased with increasing dextrin content, as expected. After dextrin cross-linking, the shape recovery rate was generally over 90%, and remained the same after four cyclical tests, while a low shape retention rate was observed for most cases. The best shape-memory effect, considering both the shape recovery and retention rate, was found for a PU consisting of 35 wt.% hard segment and 2 wt.% dextrin. Finally, dextrin was compared to other cross-linking compounds, such as glycerol and pentaerythritol, in this investigation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Marine Sponges and Natural Products · Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. Kim BK, Lee SY, Xu M (1996) Polymer 37:5781. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00442-910.1016/S0032-3861(96)00442-9 ↗
2. Takahashi T, Hayashi N, Hayashi S (1996) J Appl Polym Sci 60:1061. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960516)60:7<1061::AID-APP18>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960516)60:7<1061::AID-APP18>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
3. Lee BS, Chun BC, Chung YC, Sul KI, Cho JW (2001) Macromolecules 34:6431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ma001842l10.1021/ma001842l ↗
4. Chun BC, Chong MH, Chung YC (2007) J Mater Sci 42:6524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1568-z10.1007/s10853-007-1568-z ↗
5. Cho TK, Chong MH, Chun BC, Kim HR, Chung YC (2007) Fibers Polym 8:710.1007/BF02908153 ↗
6. Yang JH, Chun BC, Chung YC, Cho JH (2003) Polymer 44:3251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00260-X10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00260-X ↗
7. Lin JR, Chen LW (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 69:1575. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980822)69:8<1575::AID-APP12>3.0.CO;2-U10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980822)69:8<1575::AID-APP12>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
8. Chun BC, Cha SH, Park C, Chung YC, Park MJ, Cho JW (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 90:3141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1306010.1002/app.13060 ↗
9. Shim YS, Chun BC, Chung YC (2006) Fibers Polym 7:32810.1007/BF02875762 ↗
10. Chun BC, Cho TK, Chong MH, Chung YC (2007) J Mater Sci 42:9045. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1824-210.1007/s10853-007-1824-2 ↗
11. Blackwell J, Lee CD (1983) J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 21:2169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1983.18021102410.1002/pol.1983.180211024 ↗
12. Tobushi H, Hara H, Yamada E, Hayashi S (1996) Smart Mater Struct 5:483. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/5/4/01210.1088/0964-1726/5/4/012 ↗