Design and fabrication of drug-loaded alginate/hydroxyapatite/collagen composite scaffolds for repairing infected bone defects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Deng ZW et al (2020) A novel 3D printed bioactive scaffolds with enhanced osteogenic inspired by ancient Chinese medicine HYSA for bone repair. Exp Cell Res 394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112139.10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112139 ↗
2. Wang H et al (2020) A novel vehicle-like drug delivery 3D printing scaffold and its applications for a rat femoral bone repairing in vitro and in vivo. Int J Biol Sci 16:1821–1832. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.3755210.7150/ijbs.37552 ↗
3. Sun H et al (2020) 3D printing of calcium phosphate scaffolds with controlled release o antibacterial functions for jaw bone repair. Mater Design 189:108540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10854010.1016/j.matdes.2020.108540 ↗
4. Li JL et al (2021) Immobilization of bioactive vascular endothelial growth factor onto Ca-deficient hydroxyapatite-coated Mg by covalent bonding using polydopamine. J Orthop Transl 30:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2021.06.00210.1016/j.jot.2021.06.002 ↗
5. Cao YX et al (2019) 3D printed beta-TCP scaffold with sphingosine 1-phosphate coating promotes osteogenesis and inhibits inflammation. Biochem Bioph Res Co 512:889–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.03.13210.1016/j.bbrc.2019.03.132 ↗
6. Li K et al (2021) A novel biocomposite scaffold with antibacterial potential and the ability to promote bone repair. J Biomater Appl 36:474–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/088532822199444810.1177/0885328221994448 ↗
7. Wang Q et al (2015) 3D-printed atsttrin-incorporated alginate/hydroxyapatite scaffold promotes bone defect regeneration with TNF/TNFR signaling involvement. Adv Healthc Mater 4:1701–1708. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20150021110.1002/adhm.201500211 ↗
8. Gharati G et al (2021) Comparison capacity of collagen hydrogel and collagen/strontium bioglass nanocomposite scaffolds with and without mesenchymal stem cells in regeneration of critical sized bone defect in a rabbit animal model. Biol Trace Elem Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02909-610.1007/s12011-021-02909-6 ↗
9. Zhou XJ et al (2018) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles/gelatin porous composite scaffolds with localized and sustained release of vancomycin for treatment of infected bone defects. J Mater Chem B 6:740–752. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tb01246b10.1039/c7tb01246b ↗
10. Shim JH et al (2015) Comparative efficacies of a 3D-Printed PCL/PLGA/beta-TCP membrane and a titanium membrane for guided bone regeneration in beagle dogs. Polymers-Basel 7:2061–2077. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym710150010.3390/polym7101500 ↗
11. Park SA, Lee SH, Kim WD (2011) Fabrication of porous polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite (PCL/HA) blend scaffolds using a 3D plotting system for bone tissue engineering. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 34:505–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-010-0499-210.1007/s00449-010-0499-2 ↗
12. Zhou XQ et al (2021) Fabrication of polylactic acid (PLA)-based porous scaffold through the combination of traditional bio-fabrication and 3D printing technology for bone regeneration. Colloid Surface B 197:11420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.11142010.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111420 ↗
13. Hu XY et al (2019) 3D Bio-printing of CS/Gel/HA/Gr hybrid osteochondral scaffolds. Polymers-Basel 11:1601. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1110160110.3390/polym11101601 ↗
14. Fu, S. Y. et al. 3D printing of layered mesoporous bioactive glass/sodium alginate-sodium alginate scaffolds with controllable dual-drug release behaviors. Biomed Mater 14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ab4166 (2019).10.1088/1748-605X/ab4166 ↗
15. Zhai XY et al (2017) 3D-Printed high strength bioactive supramolecular polymer/clay nanocomposite hydrogel scaffold for bone regeneration. Acs Biomater Sci Eng 3:1109–1118. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b0022410.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00224 ↗
16. Raafat AI, Kamal H, Sharada HM, Abd Elhalim SA, Mohamed RD (2020) Radiation synthesis of magnesium doped nano hydroxyapatite/(acacia-gelatin) scaffold for bone tissue regeneration: In Vitro Drug Release Study. J Inorg Organomet P 30:2890–2906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-019-01418-3.10.1007/s10904-019-01418-3 ↗
17. Viray CM, van Magill B, Zreiqat H, Ramaswamy Y (2022) Stereolithographic visible-light printing of poly(L-glutamic acid) hydrogel scaffolds. Acs Biomater Sci Eng 8:1115–1131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c0151910.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01519 ↗
18. Xu DL et al (2022) A composite deferoxamine/black phosphorus nanosheet/gelatin hydrogel scaffold for ischemic tibial bone repair. Int J Nanomed 17:1015–1030. https://doi.org/10.2147/Ijn.S35181410.2147/Ijn.S351814 ↗
19. Rath SN et al (2012) Development of a pre-vascularized 3D scaffold-hydrogel composite graft using an arterio-venous loop for tissue engineering applications. J Biomater Appl 27:277–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/088532821140224310.1177/0885328211402243 ↗
20. Bendtsen ST, Quinnell SP, Wei M (2017) Development of a novel alginate-polyvinyl alcohol-hydroxyapatite hydrogel for 3D bioprinting bone tissue engineered scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 105:1457–1468. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3603610.1002/jbm.a.36036 ↗
21. Bian, T. & Xing, H. A collagen(Col)/nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) biological composite bone scaffold with double multi-level interface reinforcement. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.103733 (2022).10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.103733 ↗
22. Liu SH et al (2020) Designing vascular supportive albumen-rich composite bioink for organ 3D printing. J Mech Behav Biomed 104:103642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10364210.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103642 ↗
23. Liu SH et al (2022) Evaluation of different crosslinking methods in altering the properties of extrusion-printed chitosan-based multi-material hydrogel composites. Bio-Des Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-022-00194-310.1007/s42242-022-00194-3 ↗
24. Liu SH et al (2022) 3D printing of self-standing and vascular supportive multimaterial hydrogel structures for organ engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng 119:118–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.2795410.1002/bit.27954 ↗
25. Hu Q et al (2021) Rapid fabrication of gelatin-based scaffolds with prevascularized channels for organ regeneration. Biomed Mater 16:045010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/abef7b10.1088/1748-605X/abef7b ↗
26. Liu SH et al (2021) High-resolution combinatorial 3D printing of gelatin-based biomimetic triple-layered conduits for nerve tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 166:1280–1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.01010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.010 ↗
27. Chuysinuan P et al (2021) Injectable eggshell-derived hydroxyapatite-incorporated fibroin-alginate composite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 193:799–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.13210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.132 ↗
28. Wu JW et al (2019) 3D printing mesoporous bioactive glass/sodium alginate/gelatin sustained release scaffolds for bone repair. J Biomater Appl 33:755–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/088532821881026910.1177/0885328218810269 ↗
29. Liang TT et al (2021) Drug-loading three-dimensional scaffolds based on hydroxyapatite-sodium alginate for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 109:219–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3701810.1002/jbm.a.37018 ↗
30. Li Q et al (2019) Hydroxyapatite/collagen three-dimensional printed scaffolds and their osteogenic effects on human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Pt A 25:1261–1271. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2018.020110.1089/ten.tea.2018.0201 ↗
31. Liu DK et al (2021) Synthesis and characterization of a hydroxyapatite-sodium alginate-chitosan scaffold for bone regeneration. Front Mater 8:648980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.64898010.3389/fmats.2021.648980 ↗
32. Bhat S, Uthappa UT, Altalhi T, Jung HY, Kurkuri MD (2022) Functionalized porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: a focused review. Acs Biomater Sci Eng 8:4039–4076. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c0043810.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00438 ↗
33. Cicuendez M et al (2018) Multifunctional pH sensitive 3D scaffolds for treatment and prevention of bone infection. Acta Biomater 65:450–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.00910.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.009 ↗
34. Mulazzi M et al (2021) Medicated hydroxyapatite/collagen hybrid scaffolds for bone regeneration and local antimicrobial therapy to prevent bone infections. Pharmaceutics 13:1090. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics1307109010.3390/pharmaceutics13071090 ↗
35. Loca D, Sokolova M, Locs J, Smirnova A, Irbe Z (2015) Calcium phosphate bone cements for local vancomycin delivery. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater 49:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.07510.1016/j.msec.2014.12.075 ↗
36. Rajabi A, Esmaeili A (2020) Preparation of three-phase nanocomposite antimicrobial scaffold BCP/Gelatin/45S5 glass with drug vancomycin and BMP-2 loading for bone regeneration. Colloid Surface A 606:125508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12550810.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125508 ↗
37. Jiang XD et al (2021) A combined experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study on doxorubicin adsorption on strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite hollow microspheres. Appl Surf Sci 542:148667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14866710.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148667 ↗
38. Qiao SC et al (2020) The combination of multi-functional ingredients-loaded hydrogels and three-dimensional printed porous titanium alloys for infective bone defect treatment. J Tissue Eng 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731420965797.10.1177/2041731420965797 ↗
39. Prasanna APS, Venkatasubbu GD (2018) Sustained release of amoxicillin from hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for bone infections. Prog Biomater 7:289–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0103-410.1007/s40204-018-0103-4 ↗
40. Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Hamzah E, Abbasizadeh N, Najafinezhad A, Kashefian M (2018) Synthesis of novel nanostructured bredigite-amoxicillin scaffolds for bone defect treatment: cytocompatibility and antibacterial activity. J Sol-Gel Sci Techn 86:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-018-4606-110.1007/s10971-018-4606-1 ↗
41. Krishnan AG, Biswas R, Menon D, Nair MB (2020) Biodegradable nanocomposite fibrous scaffold mediated local delivery of vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA infected experimental osteomyelitis. Biomater Sci-Uk 8:2653–2665. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00140f10.1039/d0bm00140f ↗
42. Uthappa UT, Bhat MP, Jung H-Y, Kurkuri MD (2021) In: Devarajan Thangadurai, Jeyabalan Sangeetha, Ram Prasad (eds) Bioprospecting algae for nanosized materials. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 275–289.10.1007/978-3-030-81557-8_12 ↗
43. Kolanthai E, Ganesan K, Epple M, Kalkura SN (2016) Synthesis of nanosized hydroxyapatite/agarose powders for bone filler and drug delivery application. Mater Today Commun 8:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2016.03.00810.1016/j.mtcomm.2016.03.008 ↗
44. Ferraz, M. P., Mateus, A. Y., Sousa, J. C. & Monteiro, F. J. Nanohydroxyapatite microspheres as delivery system for antibiotics: Release kinetics, antimicrobial activity, and interaction with osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res A 81a, 994–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31151 (2007).10.1002/jbm.a.31151 ↗
45. Zhao Q et al (2019) Adsorption behavior of drugs on hydroxyapatite with different morphologies: a combined experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study. Ceram Int 45:19522–19527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.06810.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.068 ↗
46. Liu SF et al (2020) Sodium alginate/collagen composite multiscale porous scaffolds containing poly(epsilon-caprolactone) microspheres fabricated based on additive manufacturing technology. Rsc Adv 10:39241–39250. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra04581k10.1039/d0ra04581k ↗
47. Sun X, Tong S, Yang SD, Guo S (2021) The effects of graphene on the biocompatibility of a 3D-printed porous titanium alloy. Coatings 11:1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1112150910.3390/coatings11121509 ↗
48. Iglesias-Mejuto A, Garcia-Gonzalez CA (2022) 3D-Printed, dual crosslinked and sterile aerogel scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Polymers-Basel 14:1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1406121110.3390/polym14061211 ↗
49. Kolanthai E et al (2015) Effect of solvent; enhancing the wettability and engineering the porous structure of a calcium phosphate/agarose composite for drug delivery. Rsc Adv 5:18301–18311. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra14584d10.1039/c4ra14584d ↗
50. Iqbal DN et al (2021) Enhanced antibacterial activity of chitosan, guar gum and polyvinyl alcohol blend matrix loaded with amoxicillin and doxycycline hyclate drugs. Arab J Chem 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103156 (2021).10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103156 ↗
51. Ajalloueian F et al (2022) Amoxicillin-loaded multilayer pullulan-based nanofibers maintain long-term antibacterial properties with tunable release profile for topical skin delivery applications. Int J Biol Macromol 215:413–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.05410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.054 ↗
52. Pupo YM et al (2021) Effect of Hydroxyapatite microspheres, amoxicillin-hydroxyapatite and collagen-hydroxyapatite composites on human dental pulp-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Materials 14:7515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1424751510.3390/ma14247515 ↗
53. Wu MH et al (2020) Biomimetic mineralization of novel hydroxyethyl cellulose/soy protein isolate scaffolds promote bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Int J Biol Macromol 162:1627–1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.02910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.029 ↗
54. Farzamfar S et al (2019) Tetracycline hydrochloride-containing poly (epsilon-caprolactone)/poly lactic acid scaffold for bone tissue engineering application: in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Polym Mater Po 68:472–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2018.146613310.1080/00914037.2018.1466133 ↗
55. Hu D, Ren Q, Li ZC, Zhang LL (2020) Chitosan-based biomimetically mineralized composite materials in human hard tissue repair. Molecules 25:4785. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2520478510.3390/molecules25204785 ↗
56. Li XZ et al (2020) Osteoblastic differentiation of stem cells induced by graphene oxide-hydroxyapatite-alginate hydrogel composites and construction of tissue-engineered bone. J Mater Sci-Mater M 31:125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06467-610.1007/s10856-020-06467-6 ↗
57. Turco G et al (2009) Alginate/hydroxyapatite biocomposite for bone ingrowth: a trabecular structure with high and isotropic connectivity. Biomacromol 10:1575–1583. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm900154b10.1021/bm900154b ↗
58. Liu SF et al (2019) Bioactive and biocompatible macroporous scaffolds with tunable performances prepared based on 3D printing of the pre-crosslinked sodium alginate/hydroxyapatite hydrogel ink. Macromol Mater Eng 304:1800698. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201800698.10.1002/mame.201800698 ↗
59. Xing F et al (2021) Chitin-hydroxyapatite-collagen composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol 184:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.01910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.019 ↗
60. Gilarska A, Lewandowska-Lancucka J, Horak W, Nowakowska M (2018) Collagen/chitosan/hyaluronic acid—based injectable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications—design, physicochemical and biological characterization. Colloid Surface B 170:152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.00410.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.06.004 ↗
61. Pandithevan P, Kumar GS (2010) Finite element analysis of a personalized femoral scaffold with designed microarchitecture. P I Mech Eng H 224:877–889. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544119jeim63310.1243/09544119jeim633 ↗
62. Cheng MQ et al (2016) A novel open-porous magnesium scaffold with controllable microstructures and properties for bone regeneration. Sci Rep 6:24134. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2413410.1038/srep24134 ↗
63. Guo R et al (2022) Mechanical stability and biological activity of Mg-Sr co-doped bioactive glass/chitosan composite scaffolds. J Non-Cryst Solids 583:121481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.12148110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121481 ↗
64. Wei Z, Wu C, Li R, Yu D, Ding Q (2021) Nanocellulose based hydrogel or aerogel scaffolds for tissue engineering. Cellulose 28:7497–7520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04021-310.1007/s10570-021-04021-3 ↗
65. Furtos G, Rivero G, Rapuntean S, Abraham GA (2017) Amoxicillin-loaded electrospun nanocomposite membranes for dental applications. J Biomed Mater Res B 105:966–976. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3362910.1002/jbm.b.33629 ↗