journal article·2025-08Open access

Review: machine learning approaches for diverse alloy systems

Arafat Rahman, Md Sojib Hossain, Abdullah-Bin Siddique

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 60· Issue 29

Abstract

Abstract The integration of machine learning (ML) into alloy design has revolutionized the discovery and optimization of advanced materials by enabling high-throughput, data-driven methodologies. This review systematically examines recent advancements in ML applications across diverse alloy systems, including steels, aluminum alloys, magnesium alloys, nickel-based superalloys, high-entropy alloys (HEAs), shape memory alloys, and metallic glasses. We categorize ML approaches into supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning paradigms, detailing their specific implementations for property prediction, phase stability analysis, and composition optimization. Advanced techniques, such as inverse design frameworks and physics-informed ML models, have demonstrated substantial improvements in predictive accuracy and interpretability by integrating domain knowledge with data-driven approaches. The review further explores the synergy between ML and traditional computational methods, including CALPHAD-based thermodynamic modeling and density functional theory (DFT), enhancing the reliability of property predictions. We highlight case studies where ML-driven strategies have successfully accelerated alloy discovery, optimized mechanical properties, and identified novel compositions with tailored performance metrics. Additionally, we address key challenges in ML-driven alloy design, including data scarcity, feature selection, model interpretability, and the necessity for standardized benchmarking datasets. By providing a comprehensive evaluation of current methodologies and emerging trends, this review underscores the transformative role of ML in advancing next-generation alloy design and manufacturing, ultimately enabling the rapid development of high-performance materials for aerospace, energy, biomedical, and structural applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Pan G, Wang F, Shang C, Wu H, Wu G, Gao J, Wang S, Gao Z, Zhou X, Mao X (2023) Advances in machine learning- and artificial intelligence-assisted material design of steels. Int J Miner Metall Mater 30(6):1003–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-022-2595-010.1007/s12613-022-2595-0 ↗
2. Mangos J, Birbilis N (2021) Aluminium Alloy Design and Discovery using Machine Learning. arXiv preprint, pp 22. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.14806
3. Cheng Y, Wang L, Yang C, Bai Y, Wang H, Cheng W, Tiyyagura HR, Komissarov A, Shin KS (2024) A brief review of machine learning-assisted mg alloy design, processing, and property predictions. J Mark Res 30:8108–8127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.13910.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.139 ↗
4. Xu B, Yin H, Jiang X, Zhang C, Zhang R, Wang Y, Qu X (2022) Computational materials design: Composition optimization to develop novel Ni-based single crystal superalloys. Comput Mater Sci 202:11102110.1016/j.commatsci.2021.111021 ↗
5. Li Y, Pang J, Li Z, Wang Q, Wang Z, Li J, Zhang H, Jiao Z, Dong C, Liaw PK (2025) Developing novel low-density high-entropy superalloys with high strength and superior creep resistance guided by automated machine learning. Acta Mater 285:12065610.1016/j.actamat.2024.120656 ↗
6. He S, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Xiao F, Zuo S, Zhou Y, Cai X, Jin X (2023) Interpretable machine learning workflow for evaluation of the transformation temperatures of TiZrHfNiCoCu high entropy shape memory alloys. Mater Des 225:111513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11151310.1016/j.matdes.2022.111513 ↗
7. Zhou Z, Shang Y, Liu X, Yang Y (2023) A generative deep learning framework for inverse design of compositionally complex bulk metallic glasses. npj Comput Mater 9:15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-00968-y10.1038/s41524-023-00968-y ↗
8. Liu Y, Wu J, Wang Z, Lu X-G, Avdeev M, Shi S, Wang C, Yu T (2020) Predicting creep rupture life of Ni-based single crystal superalloys using divide-and-conquer approach based machine learning. Acta Mater 195:454–46710.1016/j.actamat.2020.05.001 ↗
9. Shen C, Wang C, Wei X, Li Y, Zwaag S, Xu W (2019) Physical metallurgy-guided machine learning and artificial intelligent design of ultra high-strength stainless steel. Acta Mater 179:201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.03310.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.033 ↗
10. Cemernek D, Cemernek S, Gursch H, Pandeshwar A, Leitner T, Berger M, Klösch G, Kern R (2022) Machine learning in continuous casting of steel: a state-of-the-art survey. J Intell Manuf 33:1561–1579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01754-710.1007/s10845-021-01754-7 ↗
11. Li S-G, Chen Q-R, Huang L, Chen M, Wei C-D, Yue Z-J, Liu R-X, Tong C, Liu Q (2024) Data-driven approach to predict the fatigue properties of ferrous metal materials using the cgan and machine-learning algorithms. Adv Manuf 12:447–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-024-00491-310.1007/s40436-024-00491-3 ↗
12. Huang X, Wang H, Xue W, Ullah A, Xiang S, Huang H, Meng L, Ma G, Zhang G (2020) A combined machine learning model for the prediction of time-temperature-transformation diagrams of high-alloy steels. J Alloy Compd 823:153694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15369410.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153694 ↗
13. Xiong J, Zhang T, Shi S (2020) Machine learning of mechanical properties of steels. Sci China Technol Sci 63(7):1247–1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1599-510.1007/s11431-020-1599-5 ↗
14. Laha D, Ren Y, Suganthan PN (2015) Modeling of steelmaking process with effective machine learning techniques. Expert Syst Appl 42:4687–4696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.03010.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.030 ↗
15. Deng L, Wang C, Luo J (2022) Preparation and property optimization of FeCrAl-based ODS alloy by machine learning combined with wedge-shaped hot-rolling. Mater Charact 188:111894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11189410.1016/j.matchar.2022.111894 ↗
16. Wang R, Zeng S, Wang X (2019) Machine learning for hierarchical prediction of elastic properties in Fe-Cr-Al system. Comput Mater Sci 166:119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.04.05110.1016/j.commatsci.2019.04.051 ↗
17. Shin D, Yamamoto Y, Brady M (2019) Modern data analytics approach to predict creep of high-temperature alloys. Acta Mater 168:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.01710.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.017 ↗
18. Geng X, Cheng Z, Wang S (2022) A data-driven machine learning approach to predict the hardenability curve of boron steels and assist alloy design. J Mater Sci 57:10755–10768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07132-910.1007/s10853-022-07132-9 ↗
19. Guo Z, Sha W (2004) Modelling the correlation between processing parameters and properties of maraging steels using artificial neural network. Comput Mater Sci 29(1):12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0256(03)00092-210.1016/S0927-0256(03)00092-2 ↗
20. Rao KP, Prasad Y (1995) Neural network approach to flow stress evaluation in hot deformation. J Mater Process Technol 53(3):552–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(94)01744-L10.1016/0924-0136(94)01744-L ↗
21. Gocheva-Ilieva S, Dobrev G (2022) Study of the tensile strength of alloy steels using polynomial regression. AIP Conf Proc 2522(1):050005. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.010120610.1063/5.0101206 ↗
22. Paulson NH, Priddy MW, McDowell D (2018) Data-driven reduced-order models for rank-ordering the high cycle fatigue performance of polycrystalline microstructures. Mater Des 154:170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.00910.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.009 ↗
23. Fu Y, Frazier WE, Choi KS, Li L, Xu Z, Joshi VV, Soulami A (2022) Prediction of grain structure after thermomechanical processing of U-10Mo alloy using sensitivity analysis and machine learning surrogate model. Sci Rep 12(1):1091710.1038/s41598-022-14731-8 ↗
24. Rahnama A, Clark S, Sridhar S (2018) Machine learning for predicting occurrence of interphase precipitation in hsla steels. Comput Mater Sci 154:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.07.05510.1016/j.commatsci.2018.07.055 ↗
25. Chaudry UM, Hamad K, Abuhmed T (2021) Machine learning-aided design of aluminum alloys with high performance. Mater Today Commun 26:10189710.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101897 ↗
26. Yong-fei J, Guo-shuai N, Yang Y, Yong-bing D, Jiao Z, Yan-feng H, Bao-de S (2023) Knowledge-aware design of high-strength aviation aluminum alloys via machine learning. J Mark Res 24:346–361
27. Bhat N, Barnard AS, Birbilis N (2023) Unsupervised machine learning discovers classes in aluminium alloys. R Soc Open Sci 10(2):22036010.1098/rsos.220360 ↗
28. Hu M, Tan Q, Knibbe R, Wang S, Li X, Wu T, Jarin S, Zhang M-X (2021) Prediction of mechanical properties of wrought aluminium alloys using feature engineering assisted machine learning approach. Metall Mater Trans A 52(7):2873–288410.1007/s11661-021-06279-5 ↗
29. Marchand D, Jain A, Glensk A, Curtin W (2020) Machine learning for metallurgy I. A neural-network potential for Al-Cu. Phys Rev Mater 4(10):10360110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.103601 ↗
30. Jakse N, Sandberg J, Granz LF, Saliou A, Jarry P, Devijver E, Voigtmann T, Horbach J, Meyer A (2022) Machine learning interatomic potentials for aluminium: application to solidification phenomena. J Phys: Condens Matter 35(3):035402
31. Varol Özkavak H, Ince M, Bıçaklı EE (2023) Prediction of mechanical properties of the 2024 aluminum alloy by using machine learning methods. Arab J Sci Eng 48(3):2841–285010.1007/s13369-022-07009-8 ↗
32. Kumar AK, Surya MS, Venkataramaiah P (2023) Performance evaluation of machine learning based-classifiers in friction stir welding of Aa6061-T6 alloy. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM) 17(1):469–47210.1007/s12008-022-00904-2 ↗
33. Yao D, Pu S, Li M, Guan Y, Duan Y (2022) Parameter identification method of the semi-coupled fracture model for 6061 aluminium alloy sheet based on machine learning assistance. Int J Solids Struct 254:11182310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111823 ↗
34. Liu Q, Wu H, Paul MJ, He P, Peng Z, Gludovatz B, Kruzic JJ, Wang CH, Li X (2020) Machine-learning assisted laser powder bed fusion process optimization for AlSi10Mg: new microstructure description indices and fracture mechanisms. Acta Mater 201:316–32810.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.010 ↗
35. Yanase Y, Miyauchi H, Matsumoto H, Yokota K (2022) Densification behavior and microstructures of the Al–10% Si–0.35 Mg alloy fabricated by selective laser melting: from experimental observation to machine learning. Mater Trans 63(2):176–18410.2320/matertrans.MT-M2021215 ↗
36. Chun M, Biglou J, Lenard J, Kim J (1999) Using neural networks to predict parameters in the hot working of aluminum alloys. J Mater Process Technol 86(1–3):245–25110.1016/S0924-0136(98)00318-5 ↗
37. Li B, Du Y, Zheng Z, Ye X, Fang D, Si X, Wang Y (2022) Manipulation of mechanical properties of 7xxx aluminum alloy via a hybrid approach of machine learning and key experiments. J Market Res 19:2483–2496
38. Aydin F (2021) The investigation of the effect of particle size on wear performance of AA7075/Al2O3 composites using statistical analysis and different machine learning methods. Adv Powder Technol 32(2):445–46310.1016/j.apt.2020.12.024 ↗
39. Decke J, Engelhardt A, Rauch L, Degener S, Sajadifar SV, Scharifi E, Steinhoff K, Niendorf T, Sick B (2022) Predicting flow stress behavior of an AA7075 alloy using machine learning methods. Crystals 12(9):128110.3390/cryst12091281 ↗
40. Shang H, Wu P, Lou Y, Wang J, Chen Q (2022) Machine learning-based modeling of the coupling effect of strain rate and temperature on strain hardening for 5182-O aluminum alloy. J Mater Process Technol 302:11750110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117501 ↗
41. Soofi YJ, Rahman MA, Gu Y, Liu J (2022) A feasibility study of machine learning-assisted alloy design using wrought aluminum alloys as an example. Comput Mater Sci 215:11178310.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111783 ↗
42. Takara Y, Ozawa T, Yamaguchi M (2022) Analysis of the elemental effects on the surface potential of aluminum alloy using machine learning. Jpn J Appl Phys 61(SL):100810.35848/1347-4065/ac5a2a ↗
43. Lian Z, Li M, Lu W (2022) Fatigue life prediction of aluminum alloy via knowledge-based machine learning. Int J Fatigue 157:10671610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106716 ↗
44. Chun P-J, Yamane T, Izumi S, Kuramoto N (2020) Development of a machine learning-based damage identification method using multi-point simultaneous acceleration measurement results. Sensors 20(10):278010.3390/s20102780 ↗
45. Jiang X, Zhang R, Zhang C, Yin H, Qu X (2019) Fast prediction of the quasi phase equilibrium in phase field model for multicomponent alloys based on machine learning method. Calphad 66:10164410.1016/j.calphad.2019.101644 ↗
46. Dai Y, Zhao S, Song C, Gao X (2021) Identification of aluminum alloy by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with machine algorithm. Microw Opt Technol Lett 63(6):1629–163410.1002/mop.32810 ↗
47. Wang J, Yousefzadi Nobakht A, Blanks JD, Shin D, Lee S, Shyam A, Rezayat H, Shin S (2019) Machine learning for thermal transport analysis of aluminum alloys with precipitate morphology. Adv Theory Simul 2(4):180019610.1002/adts.201800196 ↗
48. Dong S, Wang Y, Li J, Li Y, Wang L, Zhang J (2024) Machine learning aided prediction and design for the mechanical properties of magnesium alloys. Met Mater Int 30(3):593–60610.1007/s12540-023-01531-6 ↗
49. Chen Y, Tian Y, Zhou Y, Fang D, Ding X, Sun J, Xue D (2020) Machine learning assisted multi-objective optimization for materials processing parameters: a case study in Mg alloy. J Alloy Compd 844:15615910.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156159 ↗
50. Ghorbani M, Boley M, Nakashima P, Birbilis N (2023) A machine learning approach for accelerated design of magnesium alloys. Part A: alloy data and property space. J Magnes Alloys 11(10):3620–363310.1016/j.jma.2023.09.035 ↗
51. Ghorbani M, Boley M, Nakashima P, Birbilis N (2023) A machine learning approach for accelerated design of magnesium alloys. Part B: regression and property prediction. J Magnes Alloys 11(11):4197–420510.1016/j.jma.2023.09.010 ↗
52. Tawfik SA, Nguyen P, Tran T, Walsh TR, Venkatesh S (2022) Machine learning-aided exploration of ultrahard materials. J Phys Chem C 126(37):15952–1596110.1021/acs.jpcc.2c03926 ↗
53. Suh JS, Suh B-C, Bae JH, Kim YM (2023) Machine learning-based design of biodegradable Mg alloys for load-bearing implants. Mater Des 225:11144210.1016/j.matdes.2022.111442 ↗
54. Kolesnikov V, Pashkov D, Belyak O, Guda A, Danilchenko S, Manturov D, Novikov E, Kudryakov O, Guda S, Soldatov A et al (2023) Design of double layer protective coatings: Finite element modeling and machine learning approximations. Acta Astronaut 204:869–87710.1016/j.actaastro.2022.11.007 ↗
55. Gurgenc T, Altay O, Ulas M, Ozel C (2020) Extreme learning machine and support vector regression wear loss predictions for magnesium alloys coated using various spray coating methods. J Appl Phys 127(18):185103. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.000456210.1063/5.0004562 ↗
56. Bai X, Jiang Q, Lu S, Song P, Jia Z, Shan P, Chen Y, Cui H, Feng R, Liang Z et al (2023) Multielement magnesium-based alloys via machine learning screening for fuel cell bipolar plates. J Phys Chem C 127(32):16162–1617410.1021/acs.jpcc.3c03569 ↗
57. Zhu N, Sun C, Li YL, Qian L, Hu SY, Cai Y, Feng Y (2021) Modeling discontinuous dynamic recrystallization containing second phase particles in magnesium alloys utilizing phase field method. Comput Mater Sci 200:11085810.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110858 ↗
58. Wei X, Wang J, Wang C, Zhu S, Wang L, Guan S (2022) Prediction of electronic work function of the second phase in binary magnesium alloy based on machine learning method. J Mater Res 37(21):3792–380210.1557/s43578-022-00752-6 ↗
59. Suh JS, Suh B-C, Lee SE, Bae JH, Moon BG (2022) Quantitative analysis of mechanical properties associated with aging treatment and microstructure in Mg-Al-Zn alloys through machine learning. J Mater Sci Technol 107:52–6310.1016/j.jmst.2021.07.045 ↗
60. Jaafreh R, Kim J-G, Hamad K (2022) Interpretable machine learning analysis of stress concentration in magnesium: an insight beyond the black box of predictive modeling. Crystals 12(9):124710.3390/cryst12091247 ↗
61. Tong Z, Wang L, Zhu G, Zeng X (2019) Predicting twin nucleation in a polycrystalline Mg alloy using machine learning methods. Metall Mater Trans A 50:5543–556010.1007/s11661-019-05468-7 ↗
62. Sani SA, Ebrahimi G, Vafaeenezhad H, Kiani-Rashid AR (2018) Modeling of hot deformation behavior and prediction of flow stress in a magnesium alloy using constitutive equation and artificial neural network (ANN) model. J Magnes Alloys 6(2):134–14410.1016/j.jma.2018.05.002 ↗
63. Liu Y, Wang L, Zhang H, Zhu G, Wang J, Zhang Y, Zeng X (2021) Accelerated development of high-strength magnesium alloys by machine learning. Metall Mater Trans A 52:943–95410.1007/s11661-020-06132-1 ↗
64. Mi X, Tian L, Tang A, Kang J, Peng P, She J, Wang H, Chen X, Pan F (2022) A reverse design model for high-performance and low-cost magnesium alloys by machine learning. Comput Mater Sci 201:11088110.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110881 ↗
65. Shaban M, Alateyah AI, Alsharekh MF, Alawad MO, BaQais A, Kamel M, Alsunaydih FN, El-Garaihy WH, Salem HG (2023) Influence of ecap parameters on the structural, electrochemical and mechanical behavior of ZK30: a combination of experimental and machine learning approaches. J Manuf Mater Process 7(2):52
66. Li M, Mesbah M, Fallahpour A, Nasiri-Tabrizi B, Liu B (2021) Mechanical strength estimation of ultrafine-grained magnesium implant by neural-based predictive machine learning. Mater Lett 305:13062710.1016/j.matlet.2021.130627 ↗
67. Zhang Y, Bai S, Jiang B, Li K, Dong Z, Pan F (2023) Modeling the correlation between texture characteristics and tensile properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy based on the artificial neural networks. J Market Res 24:5286–5297
68. Schiessler EJ, Würger T, Lamaka SV, Meißner RH, Cyron CJ, Zheludkevich ML, Feiler C, Aydin RC (2021) Predicting the inhibition efficiencies of magnesium dissolution modulators using sparse machine learning models. npj Comput Mater 7(1):19310.1038/s41524-021-00658-7 ↗
69. Wang Y, Xie T, Tang Q, Wang M, Ying T, Zhu H, Zeng X (2024) High-throughput calculations combining machine learning to investigate the corrosion properties of binary Mg alloys. J Magnes Alloys 12(4):1406–141810.1016/j.jma.2021.12.007 ↗
70. Xu S, Xu X, Jia W, Liu W, Li J, Li D (2023) Microstructure-property mapping modeling for az31 alloy rolling deformation using improved PSO-BP neural network. J Market Res 25:2127–2139
71. Liu F, Wang Z, Wang Z, Qin Z, Li Z, Jiang L, Huang L, Tan L, Liu Y (2020) Evaluating yield strength of Ni-based superalloys via high throughput experiment and machine learning. J Micromech Mol Phys 5(04):205001510.1142/S2424913020500150 ↗
72. Gao J, Tong Y, Zhang H, Zhu L, Hu Q, Hu J, Zhang S (2023) Machine learning assisted design of Ni-based superalloys with excellent high-temperature performance. Mater Charact 198:11274010.1016/j.matchar.2023.112740 ↗
73. Taylor PL, Conduit G (2022) Machine learning predictions of superalloy microstructure. Comput Mater Sci 201:201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11091610.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110916 ↗
74. Ma Q, Li X, Xin R, Liu E, Gao Q, Sun L, Zhang X, Zhang C (2023) Thermodynamic calculation and machine learning aided composition design of new nickel-based superalloys. J Market Res 26:4168–4178
75. Qin Z, Wang Z, Wang Y, Zhang L, Li W, Liu J, Wang Z, Li Z, Pan J, Zhao L et al (2021) Phase prediction of Ni-base superalloys via high-throughput experiments and machine learning. Mater Res Lett 9(1):32–4010.1080/21663831.2020.1815093 ↗
76. Tancret F (2013) Computational thermodynamics, gaussian processes and genetic algorithms: combined tools to design new alloys. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 21(4):04501310.1088/0965-0393/21/4/045013 ↗
77. Menou E, Ramstein G, Bertrand E, Tancret F (2016) Multi-objective constrained design of nickel-base superalloys using data mining-and thermodynamics-driven genetic algorithms. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 24(5):05500110.1088/0965-0393/24/5/055001 ↗
78. Conduit BD, Jones NG, Stone HJ, Conduit GJ (2017) Design of a nickel-base superalloy using a neural network. Mater Des 131:358–36510.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.007 ↗
79. Jiang X, Yin HQ, Zhang C et al (2018) An materials informatics approach to Ni-based single crystal superalloys lattice misfit prediction. Comput Mater Sci 143:295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.06110.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.061 ↗
80. Chandran M, Lee SC, Shim J-H (2018) Machine learning assisted first-principles calculation of multicomponent solid solutions: estimation of interface energy in Ni-based superalloys. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 26(2):025010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/aa9f3710.1088/1361-651X/aa9f37 ↗
81. Schooling J, Brown M, Reed PA (1999) An example of the use of neural computing techniques in materials science-the modelling of fatigue thresholds in Ni-base superalloys. Mater Sci Eng, A 260(1–2):222–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00957-510.1016/S0921-5093(98)00957-5 ↗
82. Wu L, Wei G, Wang G et al (2022) Creating win-wins from strength-ductility trade-off in multi-principal element alloys by machine learning. Mater Today Commun 32:104010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10401010.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104010 ↗
83. Islam N, Huang W, Zhuang HL (2018) Machine learning for phase selection in multi-principal element alloys. Comput Mater Sci 150:230–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.00310.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.003 ↗
84. Yeh J-W, Chen S-K, Lin S-J, Gan J-Y, Chin T-S, Shun T-T, Tsau C-H, Chang S-Y (2004) Nanostructured high-entropy alloys with multiple principal elements: novel alloy design concepts and outcomes. Adv Eng Mater 6(5):299–30310.1002/adem.200300567 ↗
85. George EP, Raabe D, Ritchie RO (2019) High-entropy alloys. Nat Rev Mater 4(8):515–53410.1038/s41578-019-0121-4 ↗
86. Chen Y, Wang C, Ruan J, Yang S, Omori T, Kainuma R, Ishida K, Han J, Lu Y, Liu X (2020) Development of low-density $$\gamma$$/$$\gamma$$’ Co-Al-Ta-based superalloys with high solvus temperature. Acta Mater 188:652–66410.1016/j.actamat.2020.02.049 ↗
87. Abrikosov IA, Kissavos AE, Liot F, Alling B, Simak SI, Peil O, Ruban AV (2007) Competition between magnetic structures in the Fe rich fcc FeNi alloys. Phys Rev B 76:014434. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.01443410.1103/PhysRevB.76.014434 ↗
88. Rao Z, Tung P-Y, Xie R, Wei Y, Zhang H, Ferrari A, Klaver T, Körmann F, Sukumar PT, Silva A et al (2022) Machine learning-enabled high-entropy alloy discovery. Science 378(6615):78–8510.1126/science.abo4940 ↗
89. Zhou Q, Tang P, Liu S, Pan J, Yan Q, Zhang S-C (2018) Learning atoms for materials discovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115(28):6411–641710.1073/pnas.1801181115 ↗
90. Yin J, Pei Z, Gao MC (2021) Neural network-based order parameter for phase transitions and its applications in high-entropy alloys. Nat Comput Sci 1(10):686–69310.1038/s43588-021-00139-3 ↗
91. Behler J, Parrinello M (2007) Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 98(14):14640110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
92. Behler J (2015) Constructing high-dimensional neural network potentials: a tutorial review. Int J Quantum Chem 115(16):1032–105010.1002/qua.24890 ↗
93. Bartók AP, Payne MC, Kondor R, Csányi G (2010) Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys Rev Lett 104(13):13640310.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
94. Bartók AP, Kondor R, Csányi G (2013) On representing chemical environments. Phys Rev B 87:184115. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.18411510.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 ↗
95. Shapeev AV (2016) Moment tensor potentials: a class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials. Multiscale Model Simul 14(3):1153–117310.1137/15M1054183 ↗
96. Novikov IS, Gubaev K, Podryabinkin EV, Shapeev AV (2020) The mlip package: moment tensor potentials with mpi and active learning. Mach Learn Sci Technol 2(2):02500210.1088/2632-2153/abc9fe ↗
97. Behler J (2014) Representing potential energy surfaces by high-dimensional neural network potentials. J Phys: Condens Matter 26(18):183001
98. Zhang L, Han J, Wang H, Car R, Weinan E (2018) Deep potential molecular dynamics: a scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics. Phys Rev Lett 120(14), 14300110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.143001 ↗
99. Bartók AP, De S, Poelking C, Bernstein N, Kermode JR, Csányi G, Ceriotti M (2017) Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules. Sci Adv 3(12):170181610.1126/sciadv.1701816 ↗
100. Bartók AP, Csányi G (2015) G aussian approximation potentials: a brief tutorial introduction. Int J Quantum Chem 115(16):1051–105710.1002/qua.24927 ↗