journal article·2007-07

The crystallographic orientation relationship between Al2O3 and MgAl2O4 in the composite material Al2O3/Al–Mg–Si alloy

Susumu Ikeno, Kenji Matsuda, Toshimasa Matsuki, Toshiaki Suzuki, Noriaki Endo, Tokimasa Kawabata, Yasuhiro Uetani

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

The formation mechanism of spinels on Al2O3 particles in the Al2O3/Al–1.0 mass% Mg2Si alloy composite material has been investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in order to determine the crystallographic orientation relationship. A thin sample of the Al2O3/Al–Mg–Si alloy composite material was obtained by the FIB method, and the orientation relationship between Al2O3 and MgAl2O4, which was formed on the surface of Al2O3 particles, was discovered by the TEM technique as follows: $$ \left\{ {111} \right\}_{{\text{MgAl}}_{\text{2}} {\text{O}}_{\text{4}} } //\left\{ {0001} \right\}_{{\text{Al}}_{\text{2}} {\text{O}}_{\text{3}} } $$ $$ \left[ {2\bar 1\bar 1} \right]_{{\text{MgAl}}_{\text{2}} {\text{O}}_{\text{4}} } //\left[ {2\bar 1\bar 10} \right]_{{\text{Al}}_{\text{2}} {\text{O}}_{\text{3}} } ,\left[ {1\bar 10} \right]_{{\text{MgAl}}_{\text{2}} {\text{O}}_{\text{4}} } //\left[ {1\bar 100} \right]_{{\text{Al}}_{\text{2}} {\text{O}}_{\text{3}} } $$ At the interface between the Al2O3 and the matrix the MgAl2O4 (spinel) crystals had facets of {111} planes. Spinels were not grown as thin films, but as particles consisting of {111} planes. They grow towards both the matrix and the Al2O3 particles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. Ikeno S, Araki M, Matsuda K, Shinagawa F, Uetani Y (1999) J Japan Inst Light Metal 49:24410.2464/jilm.49.244 ↗
2. Ikeno S, Matusda K, Teraki T, Terayama K, Rengakuji S, Shinagawa F, Uetani Y (1997) J Japan Inst Light Metal 47:42110.2464/jilm.47.421 ↗
3. Ikeno S, Matsuda K, Rengakuji S, Uetani Y (2001) J Mater Sci 36:192110.1023/A:1017589723605 ↗
4. Ikeno S, Matsui H, Matsuda K, Uetani Y (2000) Mater Sci Forum 331–337:119310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.331-337.1193 ↗
5. Ikeno S, Furuta K, Teraki T, Matsuda K, Anada H, Uetani Y (1996) J Japan Inst Light Metals 46:910.2464/jilm.46.9 ↗
6. Lee KB, Kim YS, Kwon H (1998) Met Mater Trans A 29A:308710.1007/s11661-998-0216-9 ↗
7. Lu P, Loehman RE, Ewsuk KG, Fahrenholtz WG (1999) Acta Mater 47:309910.1016/S1359-6454(99)00176-7 ↗
8. Rao BS, Jayaram V (2001) Acta Mater 49:237310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00158-6 ↗
9. Daoud A, Reif W (2002) J Mater Process Tech 123:31310.1016/S0924-0136(02)00103-6 ↗
10. Thirsk HR, Whitmore EJ (1940) Trans Faraday Soc 36:56510.1039/tf9403500565 ↗
11. Li DX, Pirouz P, Heuer AH (1992) Phil Mag A 65:40310.1080/01418619208201530 ↗
12. Carter CB, Schmalzried H (1985) Phil Mag A 52:20710.1080/01418618508237619 ↗