journal article·2021-07

Effect of aging temperature on the heterogeneous microstructure and mechanical properties of a 12Cr–10Ni–Mo–Ti maraging steel for cryogenic applications

Honglin Zhang, Mingyue Sun, Dongping Ma, Bin Xu, Taijiang Wang, Dianzhong Li, Yiyi Li

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

The evolution of heterogeneous microstructure and mechanical properties of a 12Cr–10Ni–Mo–Ti maraging steel was investigated at different aging temperatures. As the aging temperature increases, more reversed austenite forms with the recovery of martensite matrix. When aging temperature is up to 560 °C, more lath-like reversed austenite coalesces together and leads to the formation of martensite and austenite dual-phase microstructure. Fine η-Ni3(Ti, Al) particles initially precipitate at 440 °C and grow up with increased aging temperature. Notably, it was found that η-precipitates can be encompassed in reversed austenite at 500 °C. Thermodynamic calculations further verify the austenite reversion, and nanoprecipitation can occur independently of each other though there is competition of Ni element. However, it leads to the coarsening and dissolution of η-precipitates as the aging temperature further increases. The desirable heterogeneous microstructure of the aged martensite matrix, soft reversed austenite and stable η-precipitates at 500 °C contributes to a high yield strength (~ 1 GPa, 25 °C; ~ 1.4 GPa, -196 °C) and a reasonable cryogenic impact toughness (~ 60 J, − 196 °C), which is mainly ascribed to the precipitation strengthening of η-precipitates, transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) toughening effect from the lath-like reversed austenite and the increased misorientation toward high-angle grain boundary.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Green J, Quest J (2011) A short history of the European Transonic Wind Tunnel ETW. Prog Aerosp Sci 47:319–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2011.06.00210.1016/j.paerosci.2011.06.002 ↗
2. Cao H, Luo X, Zhan G, Liu S (2017) Effect of intercritical quenching on the microstructure and cryogenic mechanical properties of a 7 Pct Ni steel. Metall Mater Trans A 48:4403–4410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-017-4200-010.1007/s11661-017-4200-0 ↗
3. Nakada N, Syarif J, Tsuchiyama T, Takaki S (2004) Improvement of strength–ductility balance by copper addition in 9%Ni steels. Mater Sci Eng A 374:137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.01.04810.1016/j.msea.2004.01.048 ↗
4. Chen J, Ren J, Liu Z, Wang G (2018) Interpretation of significant decrease in cryogenic-temperature Charpy impact toughness in a high manganese steel. Mater Sci Eng A 737:158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.09.04310.1016/j.msea.2018.09.043 ↗
5. Lee J, Sohn SS, Hong S et al (2014) Effects of Mn addition on tensile and Charpy impact properties in austenitic Fe–Mn–C–Al-based steels for cryogenic applications. Metall Mater Trans A 45:5419–5430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2513-910.1007/s11661-014-2513-9 ↗
6. Morris JW Jr (2017) Making steel strong and cheap. Nat Mater 16:787–789. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat494910.1038/nmat4949 ↗
7. Novikov VI, Semenov VN, Dmitriev VV (2001) High-strength stainless steels with microduplex structure for cryogenic applications. Met Sci Heat Treat 43:481–483. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:101484890569110.1023/a:1014848905691 ↗
8. Wagner JA (1991) Correlation of mechanical properties with metallurgical structure for 18Ni 200 grade maraging steel at room and cryogenic temperatures. Cryogenics (Guildf) 31:780–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2275(91)90134-I10.1016/0011-2275(91)90134-I ↗
9. Morris JW (2001) Cryogenic Steels. In: Buschow KHJ, Cahn RW, Flemings MC et al (eds) Encyclopedia of materials: science and technology. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1849–185110.1016/B0-08-043152-6/00337-5 ↗
10. Wang B, Duan QQ, Zhang P et al (2020) Investigation on the cracking resistances of different ageing treated 18Ni maraging steels. Mater Sci Eng A 771:138553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.13855310.1016/j.msea.2019.138553 ↗
11. Kapoor M, Isheim D, Vaynman S et al (2016) Effects of increased alloying element content on NiAl-type precipitate formation, loading rate sensitivity, and ductility of Cu- and NiAl-precipitation-strengthened ferritic steels. Acta Mater 104:166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.11.04110.1016/j.actamat.2015.11.041 ↗
12. Sha W, Ye A, Malinov S, Wilson EA (2012) Microstructure and mechanical properties of low nickel maraging steel. Mater Sci Eng A 536:129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.08610.1016/j.msea.2011.12.086 ↗
13. Qian F, Sharp J, Rainforth WM (2016) Microstructural evolution of Mn-based maraging steels and their influences on mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A 674:286–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.00610.1016/j.msea.2016.08.006 ↗
14. Behravan A, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Fatemi SM et al (2019) The effect of aging temperature on microstructure and tensile properties of a novel designed Fe–12Mn–3Ni Maraging-TRIP steel. Steel Res Int 90:1800282. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.20180028210.1002/srin.201800282 ↗
15. Li K, Wei L, Yu B, Misra RDK (2019) Reverted austenite with distinct characteristics in a new cobalt-free low lattice misfit precipitate-bearing 19Ni3Mo1.5Ti maraging steel. Mater Lett 257:126692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12669210.1016/j.matlet.2019.126692 ↗
16. Qian F, Rainforth WM (2019) The formation mechanism of reverted austenite in Mn-based maraging steels. J Mater Sci 54:6624–6631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03319-910.1007/s10853-019-03319-9 ↗
17. Sha W, Guo Z (2009) Maraging steels. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge10.1533/9781845696931 ↗
18. Galindo-Nava EI, Rainforth WM, Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo PEJ (2016) Predicting microstructure and strength of maraging steels: elemental optimisation. Acta Mater 117:270–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.02010.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.020 ↗
19. He Y, Yang K, Sha W (2005) Microstructure and mechanical properties of a 2000 MPa grade co-free maraging steel. Metall Mater Trans A 36:2273–2287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0100-910.1007/s11661-005-0100-9 ↗
20. Ifergane S, Pinkas M, Barkay Z et al (2017) The relation between aging temperature, microstructure evolution and hardening of Custom 465® stainless steel. Mater Charact 127:129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2017.02.02310.1016/j.matchar.2017.02.023 ↗
21. Knowles AJ, Gong P, Rahman KM et al (2019) Development of Ni-free Mn-stabilised maraging steels using Fe2SiTi precipitates. Acta Mater 174:260–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.03410.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.034 ↗
22. Hao S, Liu WK, Moran B et al (2004) Multi-scale constitutive model and computational framework for the design of ultra-high strength, high toughness steels. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.02610.1016/j.cma.2003.12.026 ↗
23. Olson GB (1997) Computational design of hierarchically structured materials. Science (80-). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5330.123710.1126/science.277.5330.1237 ↗
24. Ayer R, Machmeier PM (1996) Microstructural basis for the effect of chromium on the strength and toughness of AF1410-based high performance steels. Metall Mater Trans A 27:2510–2517. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0265234510.1007/BF02652345 ↗
25. Anoop CR, Prakash A, Narayana Murty SVS, Samajdar I (2018) Origin of low temperature toughness in a 12Cr–10Ni martensitic precipitation hardenable stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 709:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.03210.1016/j.msea.2017.10.032 ↗
26. Schnitzer R, Radis R, Nöhrer M et al (2010) Reverted austenite in PH 13–8 Mo maraging steels. Mater Chem Phys 122:138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.05810.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.058 ↗
27. Schnitzer R, Zickler GA, Lach E et al (2010) Influence of reverted austenite on static and dynamic mechanical properties of a PH 13–8 Mo maraging steel. Mater Sci Eng A 527:2065–2070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.04610.1016/j.msea.2009.11.046 ↗
28. Hou W, Liu Q, Gu J (2020) Nano-sized austenite and Cu precipitates formed by using intercritical tempering plus tempering and their effect on the mechanical property in a low carbon Cu bearing 7 Ni steel. Mater Sci Eng A 780:139186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.13918610.1016/j.msea.2020.139186 ↗
29. Zhao X, Pan T, Wang Q et al (2011) Effect of tempering temperature on microstrueture and mechanical properties of steel containing Ni of 9%. J Iron Steel Res Int 18:47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(11)60064-210.1016/S1006-706X(11)60064-2 ↗
30. Zhou Y, Song W, Zeng X, Xie C (2012) Quantitative X-ray Rietveld analysis of metallic aluminum content in nano-aluminum powders. Mater Lett 67:177–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.05110.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.051 ↗
31. Suk JI, Hong SH, Nam SW (1993) Crystallographic orientation relationships among η-Ni 3 Ti precipitate, reverted austenite, and martensitic matrix in Fe–10Cr–10Ni–2W maraging alloy. Metall Trans A 24:2643–2652. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0266626910.1007/BF02666269 ↗
32. Vasudevan VK, Kim SJ, Wayman CM (1990) Precipitation reactions and strengthening behavior in 18 Wt Pct nickel maraging steels. Metall Trans A 21:2655–2668. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264606110.1007/BF02646061 ↗
33. Raabe D, Sandlöbes S, Millán J et al (2013) Segregation engineering enables nanoscale martensite to austenite phase transformation at grain boundaries: a pathway to ductile martensite. Acta Mater 61:6132–6152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.05510.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.055 ↗
34. Bhadeshia H, Honeycombe R (2006) Steels: microstructure and properties, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
35. Sun L, Simm TH, Martin TL et al (2018) A novel ultra-high strength maraging steel with balanced ductility and creep resistance achieved by nanoscale β-NiAl and Laves phase precipitates. Acta Mater 149:285–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.04410.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.044 ↗
36. Ardell AJ (1985) Precipitation hardening. Metall Trans A 16:2131–2165. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0267041610.1007/BF02670416 ↗
37. Li Y, Li W, Liu W et al (2018) The austenite reversion and co-precipitation behavior of an ultra-low carbon medium manganese quenching-partitioning-tempering steel. Acta Mater 146:126–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.03510.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.035 ↗
38. Wang C, Zhang C, Yang Z et al (2016) Microstructure analysis and yield strength simulation in high Co–Ni secondary hardening steel. Mater Sci Eng A 669:312–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.06910.1016/j.msea.2016.05.069 ↗
39. Wang JS, Mulholland MD, Olson GB, Seidman DN (2013) Prediction of the yield strength of a secondary-hardening steel. Acta Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.05210.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.052 ↗
40. Wang M-M, Tasan CC, Ponge D et al (2014) Smaller is less stable: Size effects on twinning vs. transformation of reverted austenite in TRIP-maraging steels. Acta Mater 79:268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.02010.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.020 ↗
41. Bleck W, Guo X, Ma Y (2017) The TRIP effect and its application in cold formable sheet steels. Steel Res Int 88:1700218. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.20170021810.1002/srin.201700218 ↗
42. Liu L, Yu Q, Wang Z et al (2020) Making ultrastrong steel tough by grain-boundary delamination. Science (80-) 368:1347–1352. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba941310.1126/science.aba9413 ↗
43. Wu S, Wang D, Zhao C et al (2018) Enhanced toughness of Fe–12Cr–5.5Ni–Mo-deposited metals through formation of fine reversed austenite. J Mater Sci 53:15679–15693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2718-110.1007/s10853-018-2718-1 ↗
44. Barrick EJ, DuPont JN (2020) Microstructural characterization and toughness evaluation of 10 wt% Ni steel weld metal gas tungsten arc and gas metal arc weld fusion zones. Mater Sci Eng A 796:140043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.14004310.1016/j.msea.2020.140043 ↗
45. Song YY, Ping DH, Yin FX et al (2010) Microstructural evolution and low temperature impact toughness of a Fe–13%Cr–4%Ni–Mo martensitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 527:614–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.08.02210.1016/j.msea.2009.08.022 ↗
46. Wang C, Zhang C, Yang Z et al (2015) Analysis of fracture toughness in high Co–Ni secondary hardening steel using FEM. Mater Sci Eng A 646:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.08.00310.1016/j.msea.2015.08.003 ↗
47. Yuan L, Ponge D, Wittig J et al (2012) Nanoscale austenite reversion through partitioning, segregation and kinetic freezing: example of a ductile 2GPa Fe–Cr–C steel. Acta Mater 60:2790–2804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.04510.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.045 ↗