journal article·2020-10

Tailored crystalline structure and enhanced impact strength of isotactic polypropylene/high-density polyethylene blend by controlling the printing speed of fused filament fabrication

Jie Leng, Xuanbo Gu, Rui Hong, Jie Zhang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 55· Issue 28
Publisher page

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is the most commonly used 3D printing technology. In this work, the isotactic polypropylene/high-density polyethylene blend was used for FFF for the first time. A printing platform with arrays of conical holes was designed to overcome the warpage deformation of product. In order to investigate the influences of shearing force during the nozzle-extrusion process and stretching force during deposition process on the part property, various printing speeds were selected for series of samples. WAXD, SAXS and SEM measurements were used to study the phase morphology and crystalline structure of components. Results reveal that with the increase in printing speed, the PP crystal would deform into shish-kebab structure and PE crystal would deform into epitaxy crystalline structure owing to the strong shearing and stretching forces. These structures improved the impact strength by about 5 times. The printing speed showed slight influence on the thermal behavior. This work confirms the applicability of semicrystalline polymer in FFF technology and gives a deep understanding toward the printing conditions and part property. The obtained results also provide a new method to fabricate high-performance product which will broaden the research field of FFF.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Valino AD, Dizon JRC, Espera AH, Chen QY, Messman J, Advincula RC (2019) Advances in 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer composites and nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 98:101162–101219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.10116210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101162 ↗
2. Pham DT, Gault RS (1998) A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38(10–11):1257–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0890-6955(97)00137-510.1016/s0890-6955(97)00137-5 ↗
3. Nannan G, Leu MC (2013) Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Front Mech Eng 8(3):215–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-013-0248-810.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 ↗
4. Wu J, Xu X, Zhao Z, Wang M, Zhang J (2018) Study in performance and morphology of polyamide 12 produced by selective laser sintering technology. Rapid Prototyp J 24(5):813–820. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-01-2017-001010.1108/rpj-01-2017-0010 ↗
5. Hong R, Zhao Z, Leng J, Wu J, Zhang J (2019) Two-step approach based on selective laser sintering for high performance carbon black/polyamide 12 composite with 3D segregated conductive network. Compos Part B Eng 176:107214 (11 pages). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10721410.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107214 ↗
6. Turner BN, Strong R, Gold SA (2014) A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):192–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-01-2013-001210.1108/rpj-01-2013-0012 ↗
7. Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, Gou J, Hui D (2017) 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos Part B Eng 110:442–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
8. Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5–8):1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4558-510.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 ↗
9. Wu J, Chen N, Bai F, Wang Q (2018) Preparation of poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite bioactive nanocomposites for fused deposition modeling. Polym Compos 39:E508–E518. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2464210.1002/pc.24642 ↗
10. Rahim T, Abdullah AM, Akil HM (2019) Recent developments in fused deposition modeling-based 3D printing of polymers and their composites. Polym Rev 59(4):589–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2019.159788310.1080/15583724.2019.1597883 ↗
11. Aa A, Qattawi A (2018) Investigating the effect of fused deposition modeling processing parameters using Taguchi design of experiment method. J Manuf Process 36:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.02510.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.025 ↗
12. Mohan N, Senthil P, Vinodh S, Jayanth N (2017) A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process. Virtual Phys Prototyp 12(1):47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.127449010.1080/17452759.2016.1274490 ↗
13. Schmidt L, Schricker K, Bergmann JP, Hussenoeder F, Eiber M (2019) Characterization of a granulate-based strand deposition process in the FLM-method for definition of material-dependent process strategies. Rapid Prototyp J 25(1):104–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-09-2017-018610.1108/rpj-09-2017-0186 ↗
14. Leng J, Wu J, Chen N, Xu X, Zhang J (2019) The development of a conical screw-based extrusion deposition system and its application in fused deposition modeling with thermoplastic polyurethane. Rapid Prototyp J 26(2):409–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-05-2019-013910.1108/rpj-05-2019-0139 ↗
15. Boschetto A, Bottini L (2014) Accuracy prediction in fused deposition modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(5–8):913–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5886-410.1007/s00170-014-5886-4 ↗
16. Boschetto A, Giordano V, Veniali F (2013) Surface roughness prediction in fused deposition modelling by neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(9–12):2727–2742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4687-x10.1007/s00170-012-4687-x ↗
17. McCullough EJ, Yadavalli VK (2013) Surface modification of fused deposition modeling ABS to enable rapid prototyping of biomedical microdevices. J Mater Process Technol 213(6):947–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.12.01510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.12.015 ↗
18. Martens T, Mears L, Dotson M, Graham M, Sanger P (2011) Use of fused deposition modeling of polyphenylsulfone for centrifugal casting of polyurethane: material, surface, and process considerations. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 133(5):051003 (10 pages). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.400484810.1115/1.4004848 ↗
19. Zhou Y-G, Su B, Turng L-s (2017) Deposition-induced effects of isotactic polypropylene and polycarbonate composites during fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 23(5):869–880. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-12-2015-018910.1108/rpj-12-2015-0189 ↗
20. Zhou Y-G, Zou J-R, Wu H-H, Xu B-P (2020) Balance between bonding and deposition during fused deposition modeling of polycarbonate and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene composites. Polym Compos 41(1):60–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2534510.1002/pc.25345 ↗
21. Leng J, Wu J, Zhang J (2019) Preparation of thermoplastic polyurethane parts reinforced with in situ polylactic acid microfibers during fused deposition modeling: the influences of deposition-induced effects. Ind Eng Chem Res 58(47):21476–21484. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0428510.1021/acs.iecr.9b04285 ↗
22. Chatham CA, Zawaski CE, Bobbitt DC, Moore RB, Long TE, Williams CB (2019) Semi-crystalline polymer blends for material extrusion additive manufacturing printability: a case study with poly(ethylene terephthalate) and polypropylene. Macromol Mater Eng 304(5):1800764 (11 pages). https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20180076410.1002/mame.201800764 ↗
23. Sodeifian G, Ghaseminejad S, Yousefi AA (2019) Preparation of polypropylene/short glass fiber composite as fused deposition modeling (FDM) filament. Results Phys 12:205–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.06510.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.065 ↗
24. Carneiro OS, Silva AF, Gomes R (2015) Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene. Mater Des 83:768–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.05310.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.053 ↗
25. Banerjee SS, Burbine S, Shivaprakash NK, Mead J (2019) 3D-printable PP/SEBS thermoplastic elastomeric blends: preparation and properties. Polymers 11(2):11020347 (13 pages). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1102034710.3390/polym11020347 ↗
26. Spoerk M, Arbeiter F, Raguz I, Weingrill G, Fischinger T, Traxler G, Schuschnigg S, Cardon L, Holzer C (2018) polypropylene filled with glass spheres in extrusion-based additive manufacturing: effect of filler size and printing chamber temperature. Macromol Mater Eng 303(7):1800179 (15 pages). https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20180017910.1002/mame.201800179 ↗
27. Spoerk M, Sapkota J, Weingrill G, Fischinger T, Arbeiter F, Holzer C (2017) Shrinkage and warpage optimization of expanded-perlite-filled polypropylene composites in extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Macromol Mater Eng 302(10):1700143 (13 pages). https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20170014310.1002/mame.201700143 ↗
28. Jin M, Neuber C, Schmidt H-W (2020) Tailoring polypropylene for extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 33:101101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10110110.1016/j.addma.2020.101101 ↗
29. Das A, Marnot AEC, Fallon JJ, Martin SM, Joseph EG, Bortner MJ (2020) Material extrusion-based additive manufacturing with blends of polypropylene and hydrocarbon resins. ACS Appl Polym Mater 2(2):911–921. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b0112710.1021/acsapm.9b01127 ↗
30. Gudadhe A, Bachhar N, Kumar A, Andrade P, Kumaraswamy G (2019) Three-Dimensional Printing with Waste High-Density Polyethylene. ACS Appl Polym Mater 1(11):3157–3164. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b0081310.1021/acsapm.9b00813 ↗
31. Peng F, Jiang HW, Woods A, Joo P, Amis EJ, Zacharia NS, Vogt BD (2019) 3D printing with core–shell filaments containing high or low density polyethylene shells. ACS Appl Polym Mater 1(2):275–285. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.8b0018610.1021/acsapm.8b00186 ↗
32. Schirmeister CG, Hees T, Licht EH, Mulhaupt R (2019) 3D printing of high density polyethylene by fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf 28:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.00310.1016/j.addma.2019.05.003 ↗
33. Lin JH, Pan YJ, Liu CF, Huang CL, Hsieh CT, Chen CK, Lin ZI, Lou CW (2015) Preparation and compatibility evaluation of polypropylene/high density polyethylene polyblends. Materials 8(12):8850–8859. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma812549610.3390/ma8125496 ↗
34. Lotz B, Wittmann JC (1987) Polyethylene isotactic polypropylene epitaxy—analysis of the diffraction patterns of oriented biphasic blends. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 25(5):1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.1987.09025050910.1002/polb.1987.090250509 ↗
35. Gross B, Peterman J (1984) Synergisms of mechanical-properties in blends of semi-crystalline polymers. J Mater Sci 19(1):105–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0055299810.1007/BF00552998 ↗
36. Gu X, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Liu M, Fu Q, Zhang J (2019) High impact performance induced by a synergistic effect of heteroepitaxy and oriented layer-unoriented layer alternated structure in iPP/HDPE injection molded part. Polymer 175:206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2019.05.01810.1016/j.polymer.2019.05.018 ↗
37. Zhou M, Mi D, Hou F, Zhang J (2017) Insight into understanding the evolution of the epitaxy crystallization in isotactic polypropylene and polyethylene blends. Polym Adv Technol 28(12):1750–1758. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.405210.1002/pat.4052 ↗
38. Zhou M, Mi D, Hou F, Zhang J (2017) Tailored crystalline structure and mechanical properties of isotactic polypropylene/high molecular weight polyethylene blend. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(29):8385–8392. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0173310.1021/acs.iecr.7b01733 ↗
39. Su R, Wang K, Zhang Q, Chen F, Fu Q, Hu N, Chen E (2011) Epitaxial crystallization and oriented structure of linear low-density polyethylene/isotactic polypropylene blends obtained via dynamic packing injection molding. Polym Adv Technol 22(2):225–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.152210.1002/pat.1522 ↗
40. Na B, Zhang Q, Wang K, Li LB, Fu Q (2005) Origin of various lamellar orientations in high-density polyethylene/isotactic polypropylene blends achieved via dynamic packing injection molding: bulk crystallization versus epitaxy. Polymer 46(3):819–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.11010.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.110 ↗
41. Na B, Wang K, Zhao P, Zhang Q, Du RN, Fu Q, Yu ZQ, Chen EQ (2005) Epitaxy growth and directed crystallization of high-density polyethylene in the oriented blends with isotactic polypropylene. Polymer 46(14):5258–5267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.05210.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.052 ↗
42. Deng P, Whiteside B, Wang F, Norris K, Zhang J (2014) Epitaxial growth and morphological characteristics of isotactic polypropylene/polyethylene blends: Scale effect and mold temperature. Polym Test 34:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.01.00610.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.01.006 ↗
43. Turnerjones A, Cobbold AJ (1968) Beta crystalline form of isotactic polypropylene. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Lett 6(8PB):539. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1968.11006080210.1002/pol.1968.110060802 ↗
44. Picken SJ, Aerts J, Visser R, Northolt MG (1990) Structure and rheology of aramid solutions—X-ray-scattering measurements. Macromolecules 23(16):3849–3854. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00218a02110.1021/ma00218a021 ↗
45. Liu H, Chen F, Liu B, Estep G, Zhang J (2010) Super toughened poly(lactic acid) ternary blends by simultaneous dynamic vulcanization and interfacial compatibilization. Macromolecules 43(14):6058–6066. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma101108g10.1021/ma101108g ↗
46. Liu M, Hong R, Gu X, Fu Q, Zhang J (2019) Remarkably improved impact fracture toughness of isotactic polypropylene via combining the effects of shear layer–spherulites layer alternated structure and thermal annealing. Ind Eng Chem Res 58(32):15069–15078. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0285810.1021/acs.iecr.9b02858 ↗
47. Liu KJ, Zhang J, Liu H, Qian XY, Zhang Y, Wang T, Shen KZ (2013) A multi-layer bioinspired design with evolution of shish-kebab structures induced by controlled periodical shear field. Express Polym Lett 7(4):355–364. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.3210.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.32 ↗
48. van Erp TB, Balzano L, Spoelstra AB, Govaert LE, Peters GWM (2012) Quantification of non-isothermal, multi-phase crystallization of isotactic polypropylene: the influence of shear and pressure. Polymer 53(25):5896–5908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.10.02710.1016/j.polymer.2012.10.027 ↗
49. Shmueli Y, Lin Y-C, Lee S, Zhernenkov M, Tannenbaum R, Marom G, Rafailovich MH (2019) In situ time-resolved X-ray scattering study of isotactic polypropylene in additive manufacturing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(40):37112–37120. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1290810.1021/acsami.9b12908 ↗
50. Gu X, Zhou M, Wang Y, Zhang J (2019) Influence of annealing on the morphology and mechanical properties of iPP/HDPE blend with tailored oriented crystalline structures. J Polym Res 26(8):194 (11 pages). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-019-1864-810.1007/s10965-019-1864-8 ↗
51. Lovinger AJ, Williams ML (1980) Tensile properties and morphology of blends of polyethylene and polypropylene. J Appl Polym Sci 25(8):1703–1713. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1980.07025081710.1002/app.1980.070250817 ↗
52. Jiang Y, Wu J, Leng J, Cardon L, Zhang J (2019) Reinforced and toughened PP/PS composites prepared by fused filament fabrication (FFF) with in-situ microfibril and shish-kebab structure. Polymer 186:121971 (8 pages). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2019.12197110.1016/j.polymer.2019.121971 ↗
53. Shmueli Y, Jiang J, Zhou Y, Xue Y, Chang C-C, Yuan G, Satija SK, Lee S, Nam C-Y, Kim T, Marom G, Gersappe D, Rafailovich MH (2019) Simultaneous in situ X-ray scattering and infrared imaging of polymer extrusion in additive manufacturing. ACS Appl Polym Mater 1(6):1559–1567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b0032810.1021/acsapm.9b00328 ↗
54. McIlroy C, Graham RS (2018) Modelling flow-enhanced crystallisation during fused filament fabrication of semi-crystalline polymer melts. Addit Manuf 24:323–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.01810.1016/j.addma.2018.10.018 ↗
55. Nogales A, Gutierrez-Fernandez E, Garcia-Gutierrez M-C, Ezquerra TA, Rebollar E, Sics I, Malfois M, Gaidukovs S, Gecis E, Celms K, Bakradze G (2019) Structure development in polymers during fused filament fabrication (FFF): an in situ small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering study using synchrotron radiation. Macromolecules 52(24):9715–9723. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0162010.1021/acs.macromol.9b01620 ↗