Microstructure and strength development of quaternary blend high-volume fly ash concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates low cement quaternary blend HVFA concrete mixes utilizing up to 80% cement replacement using fly ash, hydrated lime and nano-silica. The optimized concrete mixes achieved a compressive strength of 55 MPa and 48 MPa, for HVFA-65 and HVFA-80 concretes, respectively. Additional fly ash and hydrated lime dosage in HVFA concrete increased the rate of hydration of the C3A and C4AF phases but decreased the hydration of the C3S phase. This resulted in lower early age strength development in the HVFA concrete than occurs in PC concrete but significantly higher than for fly ash and hydrated lime alone. The addition of the nano-silica resulted in an increase in C–S–H gel incorporation of tetrahedrally coordinated aluminium (AlIV) into the HVFA concrete and the substitution of Si by Al in the C–S–H gel, leading to an increase in compressive strength in the HVFA concrete. Early age carbonation was increased with a higher of fly ash percentage. However, the reaction products dissolved in the pore water to form calcium bicarbonate with time.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Nuclear materials and radiation effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. CEMBUREAU (2010) World statistical review 1996–2008 cement production, in trade, consumption data. The European Cement Association, Brussels
2. CEMBUREAU (2016) Activity report 2015, Brussels. http://www.cembureau.be/sites/default/files/AR2015.pdf
3. FAO (2013) Food wastage footprint impacts on natural resources: summary report. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome
4. MacKenzie KJ, Smith ME (2002) Multinuclear solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance of inorganic materials, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam
5. WBCSD (2016) Cement sustainability initiative, getting the numbers right, project emissions report 2014. http://www.gnr-project.org/
6. Boden T, Marland G (2016) Global CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel burning, cement manufacture, and gas flaring: 1751–2013. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp030/global.1751_2013.ems
7. IEA W (2009) Cement technology road-map 2009 carbon emissions reductions up to 2050. OECD/IEA: WBCSD, Paris. Conches-Geneva, Switzerland. http://wbcsdcement.org/pdf/technology/WBCSD-IEA_Cement%20Roadmap.pdf
8. Park JH et al (2014) The application of coal combustion by-products in mine site rehabilitation. J Clean Prod 84:761–77210.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.049 ↗
9. Khodr M et al (2019) Compressive strength and microstructure evolution of low calcium brown coal fly ash-based geopolymer. J Sustain Cem Based Mater 9(1):17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2019.166606110.1080/21650373.2019.1666061 ↗
10. Gunasekara CM (2016) Influence of properties of fly ash from different sources on the mix design and performance of geopolymer concrete. RMIT University Melbourne, Melbourne
11. Khale D, Chaudhary R (2007) Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review. J Mater Sci 42(3):729–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0401-410.1007/s10853-006-0401-4 ↗
12. Rakhimova N, Rakhimov R (2014) A review on alkali-activated slag cements incorporated with supplementary materials. J Sustain Cem Based Mater 3(1):61–7410.1080/21650373.2013.876944 ↗
13. Sagoe-Crentsil K, Brown T, Taylor A (2013) Drying shrinkage and creep performance of geopolymer concrete. J Sustain Cem Based Mater 2(1):35–4210.1080/21650373.2013.764963 ↗
14. Sandanayake M et al (2018) Greenhouse gas emissions of different fly ash based geopolymer concretes in building construction. J Clean Prod 204:399–40810.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.311 ↗
15. Gunasekera C, Setunge S, Law DW (2017) Correlations between mechanical properties of low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concretes. J Mater Civ Eng 29(9):0401711110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001916 ↗
16. Malhotra VM, Mehta PK (2002) Development, high-performance, high-volume fly ash concrete: materials, mixture proportioning, properties, construction practice, and case histories. Supplementary Cementing Materials for Sustainable Development
17. Shaikh F, Supit S, Sarker P (2014) A study on the effect of nano silica on compressive strength of high volume fly ash mortars and concretes. Mater Des 60:433–44210.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.025 ↗
18. Li H et al (2004) Microstructure of cement mortar with nano-particles. Compos B Eng 35(2):185–18910.1016/S1359-8368(03)00052-0 ↗
19. Rudolph W, Brooker MH, Tremaine PR (1997) Raman spectroscopic investigation of aqueous FeSO4 in neutral and acidic solutions from 25‡ C to 303‡ C: inner-and outer-sphere complexes. J Solut Chem 26(8):757–77710.1007/BF02767782 ↗
20. Supit SWM, Shaikh FUA (2015) Durability properties of high volume fly ash concrete containing nano-silica. Mater Struct 48(8):2431–244510.1617/s11527-014-0329-0 ↗
21. Korpa A, Kowald T, Trettin R (2008) Hydration behaviour, structure and morphology of hydration phases in advanced cement-based systems containing micro and nanoscale pozzolanic additives. Cem Concr Res 38(7):955–96210.1016/j.cemconres.2008.02.010 ↗
22. Kong D, Ye Q, Ni T (2010) Effect of silica sol on rheological behavior of the cement paste. Rare Metal Mater Eng 39(S2):12–115
23. Kirby GH, Lewis JA (2004) Comb polymer architecture effects on the rheological property evolution of concentrated cement suspensions. J Am Ceram Soc 87(9):1643–165210.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.01643.x ↗
24. ASTM (2016) Standard specification for Portland cement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
25. AS (1998) Supplementary cementitious materials for use with portland and blended cement, part 1: fly ash, in AS (Australian Standards). Standards Australia, Melbourne, pp 1–13
26. AS (2000) Methods for sampling and testing aggregates, method 5: particle density and water absorption of fine aggregate, in AS (Australian Standards). Standards Australia, Melbourne, pp 1–8
27. Gunasekara C, Setunge DWLS (2018) Design of ternary blend high-volume fly ash concrete mixes using hydrated Lime. In: Sixth international conference on the durability of concrete structures. University of Leeds, Leeds
28. Neville AM (1996) Properties of concrete. Fourth and Final Edition ed. Standards updated to 2002. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow
29. Hielscher T (2007) Ultrasonic production of nano-size dispersions and emulsions. arXiv preprint arXiv:0708.1831
30. AS (1999) Method of testing concrete, method 9: determination of the compressive strength of concrete specimens, in AS (Australian Standards). Standards Australia, Melbourne, pp 1–12
31. Jawed I, Skalny J (1978) Alkalies in cement: a review: II. Effects of alkalies on hydration and performance of Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 8(1):37–5110.1016/0008-8846(78)90056-X ↗
32. Lagier F, Kurtis KE (2007) Influence of Portland cement composition on early age reactions with metakaolin. Cem Concr Res 37(10):1411–141710.1016/j.cemconres.2007.07.002 ↗
33. Neville AM (2011) Properties of concrete, 5th edn. Pearson Education Limited, England
34. Hemalatha T, Sasmal S (2017) Early-age strength development in fly ash blended cement composites: investigation through chemical activation. Mag Concr Res 71(5):260–270. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.17.0033610.1680/jmacr.17.00336 ↗
35. Xu Q et al (2010) Isothermal calorimetry tests and modeling of cement hydration parameters. Thermochim Acta 499(1–2):91–9910.1016/j.tca.2009.11.007 ↗
36. Sofi M et al (2017) From hydration to strength properties of fly ash based mortar. J Mater Sci Chem Eng 5(12):63–78
37. Bentz DP (2010) Powder additions to mitigate retardation in high-volume fly ash mixtures. ACI Mater J 107(5):508–514
38. Bentz DP, Ferraris CF (2010) Rheology and setting of high volume fly ash mixtures. Cem Concr Res 32(4):265–27010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.01.008 ↗
39. Deboucha W et al (2017) Hydration development of mineral additives blended cement using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA): methodology of calculating the degree of hydration. Constr Build Mater 146:687–70110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.132 ↗
40. Bhatty J (1986) Hydration versus strength in a portland cement developed from domestic mineral wastes—a comparative study. Thermochim Acta 106(15):93–10310.1016/0040-6031(86)85120-6 ↗
41. Larsen G (1961) Microscopic point measuring: a quantitative petrographic method of determining the Ca(OH)2 content of the cement paste of concrete. Mag Concr Res 13(38):71–7610.1680/macr.1961.13.38.71 ↗
42. Belkowitz JS (2009) An investigation of nano silica in the cement hydration process. Thesis, University of DenverProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search-proquestcom.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/openview/a0b7bae8634bc3f3577b03c20d23ab5f/1.pdf?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
43. Park S-M et al (2016) An NMR spectroscopic investigation of aluminosilicate gel in alkali-activated fly ash in a CO2-rich environment. Materials 9(5):30810.3390/ma9050308 ↗
44. Andersen MD, Jakobsen HJ, Skibsted J (2004) Characterization of white Portland cement hydration and the C–S–H structure in the presence of sodium aluminate by 27Al and 29Si MAS NMR spectroscopy. Cem Concr Res 34(5):857–86810.1016/j.cemconres.2003.10.009 ↗
45. Love CA, Richardson IG, Brough AR (2007) Composition and structure of C–S–H in white Portland cement—20% metakaolin pastes hydrated at 25 °C. Cem Concr Res 37(2):109–11710.1016/j.cemconres.2006.11.012 ↗
46. Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A, Criado M (2005) Microstructure development of alkali-activated fly ash cement: a descriptive model. Cem Concr Res 35(6):1204–120910.1016/j.cemconres.2004.08.021 ↗
47. Steveson M, Sagoe-Crentsil K (2005) Relationships between composition, structure and strength of inorganic polymers. J Mater Sci 40(16):4247–4259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-1226-210.1007/s10853-005-1226-2 ↗