Characterising and modelling the mechanical behaviour of polymeric foams under complex loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Polymeric foams are used extensively as the core of sandwich structures in automotive and aerospace industries. Normally, several experiments are necessary to obtain the required properties to model the response of crushable foams using finite element analysis (FEA). Hence, this research aims to develop a simple and reliable calibration process for extracting the physical parameters which are required by the material model available in the commercial FE package Abaqus. To do this, a set of experimental tests, including uniaxial compression, uniaxial tension and shear punch tests, is proposed. All the experimental tests were also simulated, and generally, good correlations between experiments and numerical models were obtained. The validity of the overall approach was finally demonstrated using an indentation test in which the foam was subjected to a more complex mixed mode loading. During these indentation tests, digital image correlation was used to observe full-field strain distribution in the foam under the indenter. Good agreement between the experimental results and the numerical predictions was found for load–displacement response, failure mode and strain distribution.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1988) Cellular solids. Pergamon Press, Oxford
2. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Schajer GS, Robertson CI (1982) The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 382:25–4210.1098/rspa.1982.0087 ↗
3. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1982) The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 382:43–5910.1098/rspa.1982.0088 ↗
4. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000) Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams. J Mech Phys Solids 48:1253–128310.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4 ↗
5. Harte AM, Fleck NA, Ashby MF (1999) Fatigue failure of an open cell and closed cell aluminium alloy foam. Acta Metall Mater 47:2511–252410.1016/S1359-6454(99)00097-X ↗
6. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2001) Multi-axial yield behaviour of polymer foams. Acta Mater 49:1859–186610.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-1 ↗
7. Mangipudi KR, Onck PR (2012) Tensile failure of two-dimensional quasi-brittle foams. Int J Solids Struct 49:2823–2829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.00210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.002 ↗
8. Systemes D (2018) Abaqus 2017 Documentation 2017. http://3www.3ds.com . Accessed 15 Jan 2018
9. Li QM, Mines RAW, Birch RS (2000) The crush behaviour of Rohacell-51WF structural foam. Int J Solids Struct 37:6321–6341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00277-210.1016/S0020-7683(99)00277-2 ↗
10. Li QM, Mines RAW (1999) Strain localization in rigid crushable foam during uniaxial compression
11. Li QM, Mines RAW (2002) Strain measures for rigid crushable foam in uniaxial compression. Strain 38:132–140. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1305.2002.00029.x10.1046/j.1475-1305.2002.00029.x ↗
12. Mines RAW (2007) Strain rate effects in crushable structural foams. Appl Mech Mater 7–8:231–236. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.7-8.23110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.7-8.231 ↗
13. Arezoo S, Tagarielli VL, Siviour CR, Petrinic N (2013) Compressive deformation of Rohacell foams: Effects of strain rate and temperature. Int J Impact Eng 51:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.07.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.07.010 ↗
14. Richeton J, Ahzi S, Vecchio KSS, Jiang FCC, Adharapurapu RRR (2006) Influence of temperature and strain rate on the mechanical behavior of three amorphous polymers: characterization and modeling of the compressive yield stress. Int J Solids Struct 43:2318–2335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.04010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.040 ↗
15. Flores-Johnson EA, Li QM, Mines RAW (2008) Degradation of elastic modulus of progressively crushable foams in uniaxial compression. J Cell Plast 44:415–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955x0809511310.1177/0021955X08095113 ↗
16. Arezoo S, Tagarielli VL, Petrinic N, Reed JM (2011) The mechanical response of Rohacell foams at different length scales. J Mater Sci 46:6863–6870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5649-710.1007/s10853-011-5649-7 ↗
17. Maji AK, Schreyer HL, Donald S, Zuo Q, Satpathi D (1995) Mechanical properties of polyurethane-foam impact limiters. J Eng Mech 121:528–540. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:4(528)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:4(528) ↗
18. Triantafillou TC, Zhang J, Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1989) Failure surfaces for cellular materials under multiaxial loads-I: Modelling. Int J Mech Sci 31:635–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7403(89)80001-310.1016/S0020-7403(89)80002-5 ↗
19. Siriruk A, Weitsman YJ, Penumadu D (2009) Polymeric foams and sandwich composites: material properties, environmental effects, and shear-lag modeling. Compos Sci Technol 69:814–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.03410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.034 ↗
20. Mostafa A, Shankar K, Morozov EV (2013) Insight into the shear behaviour of composite sandwich panels with foam core. Mater Des 50:92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.01610.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.016 ↗
21. Yoshihara H, Ataka N, Maruta M (2018) Measurement of the Young’s modulus and shear modulus of extruded polystyrene foam by the longitudinal and flexural vibration methods. J Cell Plast 54:199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955X1668144710.1177/0021955X16681447 ↗
22. Gdoutos EE, Daniel IM, Wang K (2001) Multiaxial characterization and modeling of a PVC cellular foam. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 14:365–37310.1106/XLY7-890K-TFUG-1JVU ↗
23. ASTM standard (2013) ASTM C297/C297M standard test method for flatwise tensile strength of sandwich constructions. ASTM Int 04:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1520/c029710.1520/c0297 ↗
24. ASTM Standard (2016) ASTM C273/C273M-16 standard test method for shear properties of sandwich core materials. ASTM Int i:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/c027310.1520/c0273 ↗
25. Chen CP, Lakes RS (1995) Analysis of the structure-property relations of foam materials. Cell Polym 14:186–202
26. ASTM Standard (2013) ASTM C365/C365M standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores. ASTM Int 2013:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1520/c036510.1520/c0365 ↗
27. BS ISO 1926. Rigid cellular plastics—Determination of tensile properties 2009
28. ASTM Standard (2010) ASTM D732 standard test method for shear strength of plastics by punch tool. ASTM Int, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1520/d0732-17.210.1520/d0732-17.2 ↗