journal article·2012-09

A study on environmental stress cracking in nano-SiO2-filled polycarbonate

Leyu Lin, Alois K. Schlarb

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 47· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the environmental stress cracking (ESC) resistance of nano-SiO2 particle-filled polycarbonate (PC) was investigated at room temperature by using a fracture mechanical test method. Two PC-based nanocomposites with nano-SiO2 content of 1 and 4 vol% were compounded using a twin-screw extruder. The incorporation of nanoparticles into PC leads to an improvement in ESC resistance, which increases with increased filler loading up to 4 vol%. Fractography analyses suggest that the formation of cavities/debonding and localized microdeformation of matrix induced by nanoparticles as a result of energy dissipation are responsible for the improvement of ESC resistance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Schlarb AK (2002) Med Device Technol 13:30
2. Moskala EJ, Jones M (1998) Med Plast Biomater, May, p 34
3. Borisova B, Kressler J (2003) Macro Mater Eng 288:50910.1002/mame.200390048 ↗
4. Choi BH, Weinhold J, Reuschle D, Kapur M (2009) Polym Eng Sci 49:2085. doi: 10.1002/pen.2145810.1002/pen.21458 ↗
5. Maxwell AS, Pilkington G (2008) Polym Eng Sci 48:360. doi: 10.1002/pen.2095210.1002/pen.20952 ↗
6. Sharif A, Mohammadi N, Ghaffarian SR (2009) J Appl Polym Sci 112:3249. doi: 10.1002/app.2989310.1002/app.29893 ↗
7. Moskala EJ (1998) Polymer 39:67510.1016/S0032-3861(97)00312-1 ↗
8. Jansen JA, Technimet S (2005) ANTEC-Conference Proceedings, vol 9, p 173
9. Sanches NB, Dias ML, Pacheco EBAV (2008) Polym Eng Sci 48:1953. doi: 10.1002/pen.2117310.1002/pen.21173 ↗
10. Jansen JA (2004) Adv Mater Process 162:50
11. Andrews EH, Bevan L (1972) Polymer 13:33710.1016/0032-3861(72)90101-2 ↗
12. Lewis PR (2009) Eng Fail Anal 16:1816. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.08.02610.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.08.026 ↗
13. Luo W, Wang C, Zhao R, Tang X, Tomita Y (2008) Mater Sci Eng A Struct, 580. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.17610.1016/j.msea.2006.07.176 ↗
14. Wang HT, Pan BR, Du QG, Li YQ (2003) Polym Test 22:12510.1016/S0142-9418(02)00042-9 ↗
15. Paris PC (1964) In: Proceeding of the 10th Sagamor Conference, Syracuse University
16. Altstädt V, Keiter S, Renner M, Schlarb AK (2004) Macromol Symp 214:3. doi: 10.1002/masy.2004510041
17. Saxena A, Hudak SJ (1978) Int J Fract 14:45310.1007/BF01390468 ↗
18. Ramsteiner F, Armbrust T (2001) Polym Test 20:32110.1016/S0142-9418(00)00039-8 ↗
19. Moet A, Chudnovsky A (1982) Polym Eng Sci 22:92210.1002/pen.760221503 ↗
20. Sehanobish K, Baer E, Chudnovsky A, Moet A (1985) J Mater Sci 20:1934. doi: 10.1007/BF0111227510.1007/BF01112275 ↗
21. Wenzel B, Rosso P, Haupert F, Friedrich K (2006) Eng Fract Mech 73:237510.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.018 ↗
22. Zhang H, Zhang Z, Yang JL, Friedrich K (2006) Polymer 47:679. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.08410.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.084 ↗
23. Hull D (1996) J Mater Sci 31:4483. doi: 10.1007/BF0036634410.1007/BF00366344 ↗
24. Yu J, Wang G, Chen J, Zeng X, Wang W (2007) Polym Eng Sci 47:20. doi: 10.1002/pen.204801