journal article·2023-01

A review to elucidate the multi-faceted science of the electrical-resistance-based strain/temperature/damage self-sensing in continuous carbon fiber polymer-matrix structural composites

D. D. L. Chung

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 58· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

This critical review provides the first coherent elucidation of the science behind electrical-resistance-based strain/damage/temperature self-sensing in continuous carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites, which are important for lightweight structures (e.g., aircraft). Self-sensing pertains to smart structures. It is based on structure–property relationships. There is no device incorporation. The type of loading and the type of resistance measurement affect the resistance change. The resistance changes are consistently elucidated in terms of the structure–property relationships. Upon elastic flexure, the tension-surface resistance increases, due to the fiber waviness decrease and consequent current penetration decrease, while the compression-surface resistance decreases. Upon elastic through-thickness compression, the through-thickness resistivity decreases, due to the enhanced through-thickness fiber proximity, thus promoting the longitudinal current path detour necessitated by fiber imperfection and decreasing the longitudinal resistivity. For a single fiber in epoxy, the resistivity decreases upon tension, due to the decrease of the composite-fabrication-induced residual compressive stress in the fiber. For multi-lamina laminates, the residual compressive stress decrease upon elastic longitudinal tension causes the longitudinal resistivity to decrease, while the through-thickness resistivity increases due to the fiber waviness decrease. For 1-lamina laminates, elastic longitudinal tension decreases the relatively limited fiber waviness, thereby increasing the through-thickness/transverse resistivity and consequently hindering the longitudinal current path detour and increasing the longitudinal resistivity. Delamination decreases the interlaminar fiber touching, thereby increasing the through-thickness/interlaminar resistivity. Heating decreases the interlaminar resistivity, due to interlaminar electron jumping, thereby enabling temperature sensing. Fiber fracture and interlaminar degradation increase the resistance irreversibly. For sensing matrix cracking, conductive filler incorporation helps.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Klein L, Joseph Y, Kroeger M (2021) Product integration of established crash sensors for safety applications in lightweight vehicles. Sensors 21(21):6994. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2121699410.3390/s21216994 ↗
2. Selleri G, Gino ME, Brugo TM, D’Anniballe R, Tabucol J, Focarete ML, Carloni R, Fabiani D, Zucchelli A (2022) Self-sensing composite material based on piezoelectric nanofibers. Mater Des 219:110787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11078710.1016/j.matdes.2022.110787 ↗
3. Feng Q, Ou J (2018) Self-sensing CFRP fabric for structural strengthening and damage detection of reinforced concrete structures. Sensors 18(12):4137/1-4137/20. https://doi.org/10.3390/s1812413710.3390/s18124137 ↗
4. Yu Y, Narita F (2021) Evaluation of electromechanical properties and conversion efficiency of piezoelectric nanocomposites with carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer electrodes for stress sensing and energy harvesting. Polymers (Basel Switz) 13(18):3184. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1318318410.3390/polym13183184 ↗
5. Gorski M, Krzywon R, Borodenko M (2018) Development of self-sensing textile strengthening system based on high-strength carbon fiber. Materials 11(10):2062/1-2062/10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1110206210.3390/ma11102062 ↗
6. Miguel Ramirez DDL (2016) Chung. Electromechanical, self-sensing and viscoelastic behavior of carbon fiber tows. Carbon 110:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.09510.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.095 ↗
7. Rinaldi A, Proietti A, Tamburrano A, Ciminello M, Sarto MS (2015) Graphene-based strain sensor array on carbon fiber composite laminate. IEEE Sens J 15(12):7295–7303. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.247259510.1109/JSEN.2015.2472595 ↗
8. Trigwell S, Dervishi E, Biris AS (2017) Multifunctional carbon nanotube coatings used as strain sensors for composite tanks. Part Sci Technol 35(6):674–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2016.119434610.1080/02726351.2016.1194346 ↗
9. Pinto B, Kern S, Ku-Herrera JJ, Yasui J, La Saponara V, Loh KJ (2015) A comparative study of a self strain-monitoring carbon nanotube film and carbon fibers under flexural loading by electrical resistance changes. J Phys Conf Ser 628:012098/1-012098/7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/628/1/01209810.1088/1742-6596/628/1/012098 ↗
10. Aviles F, Oliva-Aviles AI, Cen-Puc M (2018) Piezoresistivity, strain, and damage self-sensing of polymer composites filled with carbon nanostructures. Adv Eng Mater 20(7):1701159. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20170115910.1002/adem.201701159 ↗
11. Xiang D, Wang L, Tang Y, Harkin-Jones E, Zhao C, Wang P, Li Y (2018) Damage self-sensing behavior of carbon nanofiller reinforced polymer composites with different conductive network structures. Polymer 158:308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.00710.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.007 ↗
12. Jeong S, Kang Y, Lim T, Ju S (2018) Hydrophobic microfiber strain sensor operating stably in sweat and water environment. Adv Mater Interfaces 5(24):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20180137610.1002/admi.201801376 ↗
13. Gupta TK, Kumar S, Khan AZ, Varadarajan KM, Cantwell WJ (2018) Self-sensing performance of MWCNT-low density polyethylene nanocomposites. Mater Res Express 5(1):015703/1-015703/16. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa9f9e10.1088/2053-1591/aa9f9e ↗
14. Han S, Meng Q, Xing K, Araby S, Yu Y, Mouritz A, Ma J (2020) Epoxy/graphene film for lifecycle self-sensing and multifunctional applications. Compos Sci Technol 198:10831210.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108312 ↗
15. Al-Bahrani M, Cree A (2021) Micro-scale damage sensing in self-sensing nanocomposite material based CNTs. Compos Part B 205:108479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10831210.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108312 ↗
16. Koo GM, Tallman TN (2020) Higher-order resistivity-strain relations for self-sensing nanocomposites subject to general deformations. Compos Part B 190:107907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10790710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107907 ↗
17. Huo QS, Jin JQ, Lu SW, Zhang L, Ma KM, Wang XQ (2019) Self-sensing properties of bending deformation of buckypaper composites. Mater Res Express 6(10):105004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab356a10.1088/2053-1591/ab356a ↗
18. Crall MD, Laney SG, Keller MW (2019) Multimodal damage detection in self-sensing fiber reinforced composites. Adv Funct Mater 29(12):1806634. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20180663410.1002/adfm.201806634 ↗
19. Crall MD, Laney SG, Keller MW (2019) Giant magnetoresistance scanning of magnetic self-sensing composites. Smart Mater Struct 28(10):105002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab351e10.1088/1361-665X/ab351e ↗
20. Katabira K, Kurita H, Yoshida Y, Narita F (2019) Fabrication and characterization of carbon fiber reinforced plastics containing magnetostrictive Fe–Co fibers with damage self-detection capability. Sensors 19(22):4984. https://doi.org/10.3390/s1922498410.3390/s19224984 ↗
21. Semperlotti F, Conlon SC, Barnard AR (2011) Airframe structural damage detection: a non-linear structural surface intensity based technique. J Acoust Soc Am 129(4):EL121-7. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.355508510.1121/1.3555085 ↗
22. Askaripour K, Zak A (2019) A survey of scrutinizing delaminated composites via various categories of sensing apparatus. J Compos Sci 3(4):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs304009510.3390/jcs3040095 ↗
23. Li Z, Haigh A, Soutis C, Gibson A (2018) Principles and applications of microwave testing for woven and non-woven carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composites: a topical review. Appl Compos Mater 25(4):965–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-018-9733-x10.1007/s10443-018-9733-x ↗
24. Rifaie-Graham O, Apebende EA, Bast LK, Bruns N (2018) Self-reporting fiber-reinforced composites that mimic the ability of biological materials to sense and report damage. Adv Mater (Weinheim Ger) 30(19):1705483. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20170548310.1002/adma.201705483 ↗
25. Neisiany RE, Lee JKY, Khorasani SN, Ramakrishna S (2017) Self-healing and interfacially toughened carbon fibre-epoxy composites based on electrospun core-shell nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci 134(31):44956. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4495610.1002/app.44956 ↗
26. Luo S, Wang G, Wang Y, Xu Y, Luo Y (2019) Carbon nanomaterials enabled fiber sensors: a structure-oriented strategy for highly sensitive and versatile in situ monitoring of composite curing process. Compos B 166:645–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.06710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.067 ↗
27. Chung DDL (2022) Pitfalls in piezoresistivity testing. J Electron Mater 51:5473–5481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-022-09857-410.1007/s11664-022-09857-4 ↗
28. Montazerian H, Rashidi A, Milani AS, Hoorfar M (2020) Integrated sensors in advanced composites: a critical review. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 45(3):187–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2019.158870510.1080/10408436.2019.1588705 ↗
29. Jerold John Britto J, Vasanthanathan A (2022) Smart piezo-bonded carbon fibre/epoxy composite structure: experiments and finite element simulation. Mater. Res. Express 9:045702. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac616910.1088/2053-1591/ac6169 ↗
30. Deraemaeker, Nasser H, Benjeddou A, Preumont A (2022) Mixing rules for the piezoelectric properties of macro fiber composites. Mater Res Express 9:045702S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X0933561510.1177/1045389X09335615 ↗
31. Greminger M, Haghiashtiani G (2017) Multiscale modeling of PVDF matrix carbon fiber composites. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 25(4):045007/1-045007/15. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/aa6a8a10.1088/1361-651X/aa6a8a ↗
32. Chung DDL (2020) A critical review of piezoresistivity and its application in electrical-resistance-based strain sensing. J Mater Sci 55(32):15367–15396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05099-z10.1007/s10853-020-05099-z ↗
33. Wang S, Chung DDL (2007) Negative piezoresistivity in continuous carbon fiber epoxy-matrix composite. J Mater Sci 42(13):4987–4995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0580-z10.1007/s10853-006-0580-z ↗
34. Chung DDL (2018) Carbon materials. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore
35. Baron C, Schulte K (1988) Determination of electric resistance for in-situ determination of fiber failure in carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites. Materialpruefung 30(11–12):361–366
36. Schulte Z, Baron C (1989) Load and failure analyses of CFRP laminates by means of electrical resistivity measurements. Compos Sci Tech 36(1):63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(89)90016-X10.1016/0266-3538(89)90016-X ↗
37. Swait TJ, Rauf A, Grainger R, Bailey PBS, Lafferty AD, Fleet EJ, Hand RJ, Hayes SA (2012) Smart composite materials for self-sensing and self-healing. Plast Rubber Compos 41(4/5):215–224. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743289811Y.000000003910.1179/1743289811Y.0000000039 ↗
38. Wen J, Xia Z, Choy F (2011) Damage detection of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites via electrical resistance measurement. Compos B 42B(1):77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.08.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2010.08.005 ↗
39. Rana S, Subramani P, Fangueiro R, Correia AG (2016) A review on smart self-sensing composite materials for civil engineering applications. AIMS Mater Sci 3(2):357–379. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2016.2.35710.3934/matersci.2016.2.357 ↗
40. Park S, Kim B (2015) Carbon fibers and their composites. Springer Ser Mater Sci 210:275–31710.1007/978-94-017-9478-7_8 ↗
41. Chung DDL (2001) Structural health monitoring by electrical resistance measurement. Smart Mater Struct 10(4):624–636. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/4/30510.1088/0964-1726/10/4/305 ↗
42. Chung DDL (2012) Carbon materials for structural self-sensing, electromagnetic shielding and thermal interfacing. Carbon 50(9):3342–3353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.03110.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.031 ↗
43. Chung DDL (2019) A review of multifunctional polymer-matrix structural composites. Compos B 160:644–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.11710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.117 ↗
44. Chung DDL (2017) Processing-structure-property relationships of continuous carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng R 113:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2017.01.00210.1016/j.mser.2017.01.002 ↗
45. Chung DDL (2001) Continuous carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites and their joints, studied by electrical measurements. Polym Compos 22(2):250–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.1053610.1002/pc.10536 ↗
46. Chung DDL (2002) Composites get smart. Mater Today 5(1):30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(02)05140-410.1016/S1369-7021(02)05140-4 ↗
47. Scholle P, Sinapius MA (2021) Review on the usage of continuous carbon fibers for piezoresistive self strain sensing fiber reinforced plastics. J Compos Sci 5(4):96. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs504009610.3390/jcs5040096 ↗
48. Zhao Q, Zhang K, Zhu S, Xu H, Cao D, Zhao L, Zhang R, Yin W (2019) Review on the electrical resistance/conductivity of carbon fiber reinforced polymer. Appl Sci 9(11):2390. https://doi.org/10.3390/app911239010.3390/app9112390 ↗
49. Tomas M, Jalali S, Silva de Vargas A (2022) Creep evaluation and temperature dependence in self-sensing micro carbon polymer-based composites for further development as an Internet of Things Sensor device. J Compos Mater 56(6):961–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998321105880510.1177/00219983211058805 ↗
50. Jang S, Li L (2020) Self-sensing carbon nanotube composites exposed to glass transition temperature. Materials 13(2):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1302025910.3390/ma13020259 ↗
51. Andrew JJ, Alhashmi H, Schiffer A, Kumar S, Deshpande VS (2021) Energy absorption and self-sensing performance of 3D printed CF/PEEK cellular composites. Mater Des 208:109863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10986310.1016/j.matdes.2021.109863 ↗
52. Verma P, Ubaid J, Varadarajan KM, Wardle BL, Kumar S (2022) Synthesis and characterization of carbon nanotube-doped thermoplastic nanocomposites for the additive manufacturing of self-sensing piezoresistive materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14(6):8361–8372. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c2049110.1021/acsami.1c20491 ↗
53. Owston CN (1970) Electrical properties of single carbon fibers. J Phys D 3(11):1615–1626. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/3/11/30910.1088/0022-3727/3/11/309 ↗
54. Gordon DA, Wang S, Chung DDL (2004) Piezoresistivity in unidirectional continuous carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites: single-lamina composite versus two-lamina composite. Compos Interfaces 11(1):95–103. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685540432268107310.1163/156855404322681073 ↗
55. Louis M, Joshi SP, Brockmann W (2001) An experimental investigation of through-thickness electrical resistivity of CFRP laminates. Compos Sci Technol 61(6):911–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-3538(00)00177-910.1016/s0266-3538(00)00177-9 ↗
56. Park J, Hwang TK, Kim HG, Doh YD (2007) Experimental and numerical study of the electrical anisotropy in unidirectional carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Smart Mater Struct 16(1):57–66. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/16/1/00610.1088/0964-1726/16/1/006 ↗
57. Wang S, Kowalik DP, Chung DDL (2004) Self-sensing attained in carbon-fiber-polymer-matrix structural composites by using the interlaminar interface as a sensor. Smart Mater Struct 13(3):570–592. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/13/3/01710.1088/0964-1726/13/3/017 ↗
58. Wang S, Chung DDL (2000) Electrical behavior of carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites in the through-thickness direction. J Mater Sci 35(1):91–100. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100474460028410.1023/A:1004744600284 ↗
59. Wang S, Chung DDL (1999) Temperature/light sensing using carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite. Compos B 30(6):591–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00020-710.1016/S1359-8368(99)00020-7 ↗
60. Wang X, Chung DDL (1997) Electromechanical behavior of carbon fiber. Carbon 35(5):706–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-6223(97)86644-410.1016/s0008-6223(97)86644-4 ↗
61. Rankin SM, Moody MK, Naskar AK, Bowland CC (2021) Enhancing functionalities in carbon fiber composites by titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Compos Sci Technol 201:108491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10849110.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108491 ↗
62. Huo YY, Yang Q, Meng SH, Gao B (2022) A damage sensing method of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites via multi-frequency electrical impedance fusion. Exp Mech 62(1):35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00763-010.1007/s11340-021-00763-0 ↗
63. Wang S, Chung DDL (2006) Self-sensing of flexural strain and damage in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite by electrical resistance measurement. Carbon 44(13):2739–2751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.03.03410.1016/j.carbon.2006.03.034 ↗
64. Zhu S, Chung DDL (2007) Analytical model of piezoresistivity for strain sensing in carbon fiber polymer-matrix structural composite under flexure. Carbon 45(8):1606–1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.04.01210.1016/j.carbon.2007.04.012 ↗
65. Wang D, Chung DDL (2013) Through-thickness piezoresistivity in a carbon fiber polymer-matrix structural composite for electrical-resistance-based through-thickness strain sensing. Carbon 60(1):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.00510.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.005 ↗
66. Leong C, Wang S, Chung DDL (2006) Effect of through-thickness compression on the microstructure of carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites, as studied by electrical resistance measurement. J Mater Sci 41(10):2877–2884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-5121-710.1007/s10853-005-5121-7 ↗
67. Wang D, Chung DDL (2007) Through-thickness stress sensing of carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite by electrical resistance measurement. Smart Mater Struct 16:1320–1330. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/16/4/04610.1088/0964-1726/16/4/046 ↗
68. Kalashnyk N, Faulques E, Schjoedt-Thomsen J, Jensen LR, Rauhe JCM, Pyrz R (2017) Monitoring self-sensing damage of multiple carbon fiber composites using piezoresistivity. Synth Met 224:56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.12.02110.1016/j.synthmet.2016.12.021 ↗
69. Wang X, Chung DDL (1998) An electromechanical study of the transverse behavior of carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite. Compos Interfaces 5(3):191–199. https://doi.org/10.1163/156855498X0014410.1163/156855498X00144 ↗
70. Wang X, Fu X, Chung DDL (1998) Electromechanical study of carbon fiber composites. J Mater Res 13(11):3081–3092. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1998.042010.1557/JMR.1998.0420 ↗
71. Park J, Kim D, Kong J, Kim S, Jang J, Kim M, Kim W, DeVries KL (2007) Interfacial evaluation and self-sensing on residual stress and microfailure of toughened carbon fiber/epoxy-amine terminated (AT)-polyetherimide (PEI) composites. Compos B 38B(7–8):833–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.12.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2006.12.003 ↗
72. Kalashnyk N, Faulques E, Schjoedt-Thomsen J, Jensen LR, Rauhe JCM, Pyrz R (2016) Strain sensing in single carbon fiber epoxy composites by simultaneous in-situ Raman and piezoresistance measurements. Carbon 109:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.07.06410.1016/j.carbon.2016.07.064 ↗
73. Wang S, Chung DDL (2000) Piezoresistivity in continuous carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite. Polym Compos 21(1):13–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.1016010.1002/pc.10160 ↗
74. Kwon D, Wang Z, Choi J, Shin P, De Vries KL, Park J (2015) Interfacial evaluation of carbon fiber/epoxy composites using electrical resistance measurements at room and a cryogenic temperature. Compos Part A 72:160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.007 ↗
75. Todoroki A, Samejima Y, Hirano Y, Matsuzaki R (2009) Piezoresistivity of unidirectional carbon/epoxy composites for multiaxial loading. Compos Sci Technol 69:1841–1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.023 ↗
76. Todoroki A, Yoshida J (2004) Electrical resistance change of unidirectional CFRP due to applied load. JSME Int J Ser A 47(3):357–364. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmea.47.35710.1299/jsmea.47.357 ↗
77. Yang CQ, Wang XL, Jiao YJ, Ding YL, Zhang YF, Wu ZS (2016) Linear strain sensing performance of continuous high strength carbon fibre reinforced polymer composites. Compos B 102:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.07.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.07.013 ↗
78. Saifeldeen MA, Fouad N, Huang H, Wu ZS (2017) Stabilization of electrical sensing properties of carbon fiber sensors using pre-tensioning approach. Smart Mater Struct 26(1):015012/1-015012/11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/26/1/01501210.1088/1361-665X/26/1/015012 ↗
79. Roh HD, Cho B, Lee I, Park Y (2021) Multi-scale hybrid in situ tow scale carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic strain sensor. Compos Sci Technol 214:108946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10894610.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108946 ↗
80. Roh HD, Park Y (2022) Carbon fiber grid sensor for structural deformation using piezoresistive behavior of carbon fiber. Sensors Actuators A 341:113348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2021.11334810.1016/j.sna.2021.113348 ↗
81. Wang X, Chung DDL (1998) Self-monitoring of fatigue damage and dynamic strain in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite. Compos B 29B(1):63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(97)00014-010.1016/S1359-8368(97)00014-0 ↗
82. Angelidis N, Wei CY, Irving PE (2004) The electrical resistance response of continuous carbon fibre composite laminates to mechanical strain. Compos A 35:1135–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.020 ↗
83. Wang S, Pang DS, Chung DDL (2007) Hygrothermal stability of electrical contacts made from silver and graphite electrically conductive pastes. J Electron Mater 36(1):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-006-0018-z10.1007/s11664-006-0018-z ↗
84. Chung DDL, Bannon JT, Yang W (2021) Dielectric behavior discovered in electrically conductive thick film. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 32(14):19605–19613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-06481-610.1007/s10854-021-06481-6 ↗
85. Thomas GC, Chung DDL (2022) Dielectric behavior of an electrically conductive metal-particle thick film. J Electron Mater 51:3005–3013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-022-09540-810.1007/s11664-022-09540-8 ↗
86. Angelidis N, Wei CY, Irving PE (2006) Response to discussion of paper: the electrical resistance response of continuous carbon fibre composite laminates to mechanical strain. Compos A 37(9):1495–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.11.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.11.003 ↗
87. Cho JW, Choi JS (2000) Relationship between electrical resistance and strain of carbon fibers upon loading. J Appl Polym Sci 77(9):2082–2087. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20000829)77:9%3c2082::AID-APP26%3e3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/1097-4628(20000829)77:9<2082::AID-APP26>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
88. Ramirez M, Chung DDL (2016) Electromechanical, self-sensing and viscoelastic behavior of carbon fiber tows. Carbon 110:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.09510.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.095 ↗
89. Abry JC, Bochard S, Chateauminois A, Salvia M, Girand G (1999) In situ detection of damage in CFRP laminates by electrical resistance measurements. Compos Sci Technol 59(6):925–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00132-810.1016/S0266-3538(98)00132-8 ↗
90. Irving PE, Thiagarajan C (1998) Fatigue damage characterisation in carbon fibre composite materials using an electrical potential technique. Smart Mater Struct 7:456–466. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/7/4/00410.1088/0964-1726/7/4/004 ↗
91. Kaddour AS, Al-Salehi FAR, Al-Hassani STS (1994) Electrical resistance measurement technique for detecting failure in CFRP materials at high strain rates. Compos Sci Technol 51(3):377–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(94)90107-410.1016/0266-3538(94)90107-4 ↗
92. Prabhakaran R (1990) Damage assessment through electrical resistance measurement in graphite fibre reinforced composites. Exp Technol 14:16–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.1990.tb01059.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.1990.tb01059.x ↗
93. Moriya K, Endo T (1990) A study on flaw detection method for CFRP composite laminates (1st report) the measurement of crack extension in CFRP composites by electrical potential method. Trans Jpn Soc Aero Space Sci 32(98):184–196
94. Todoroki A, Haruyama D, Mizutani Y, Suzuki Y, Yasuoka T (2014) Electrical resistance change of carbon/epoxy composite laminates under cyclic loading under damage initiation limit. Open J Compos Mater 4(1):22–31. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojcm.2014.4100310.4236/ojcm.2014.41003 ↗
95. Angelidis N, Irving PE (2007) Detection of impact damage in CFRP laminates by means of electrical potential techniques. Compos Sci Technol 67:594–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.03310.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.033 ↗
96. Irving PE, Thiagarajan C (1998) Fatigue damage characterization in carbon fibre composite materials using an electrical potential technique. Smart Mater Struct 7:456–466. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/7/4/00410.1088/0964-1726/7/4/004 ↗
97. Ceysson O, Salvia M, Vincent L (1996) Damage mechanisms characterisation of carbon fibre/epoxy composite laminates by both electrical resistance measurements and acoustic emission analysis. Scr Mater 34(8):1273–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-6462(95)00638-910.1016/1359-6462(95)00638-9 ↗
98. Kaddour AS, Al-Salehi AR, Al-Hassani STS, Hinton MJ (1994) Electrical resistance measurement technique for detecting failure in CFRP materials at high strain rates. Compos Sci Technol 51(3):377–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(94)90107-410.1016/0266-3538(94)90107-4 ↗
99. Kwon D, Shin P, Kim J, DeVries KL, Park J (2016) Evaluation of dispersion and damage sensing of carbon fiber/polypropylene (PP)-polyamide (PA) composites using 2 dimensional electrical resistance mapping. Compos Part A 90:417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.009 ↗
100. Angelidis N, Khemiri N, Irving PE (2005) Experimental and finite element study of the electrical potential technique for damage detection in CFRP laminates. Smart Mater Struct 14:147–154. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/14/1/01410.1088/0964-1726/14/1/014 ↗