Polymer-based electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries: from fundamental research to performance improvement
Source abstract
Abstract
With the increasing demand for a higher energy density and a lower cost energy storage system, lithium–sulfur batteries have become one of the promising candidates to replace current Li-ion batteries. However, in liquid electrolyte systems, the lithium dendrite growth and the shuttle effect cause severe safety hazard as well as capacity decay, which hinders the commercialization of practical lithium–sulfur batteries. Polymer-based electrolytes provide a promising solution to these challenges. This type of electrolyte, including polymer and composite polymer electrolytes, demonstrates the capabilities to prevent polysulfide dissolution and suppress lithium dendrite growths, while ensuring good surface contact and high flame resistance. This review summarizes the most recent progress of polymer-based all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries (ASSLSB), which revealed mechanisms and challenges of electrolyte ionic conductivity, reaction mechanism, anode/electrolyte interface, and cathode/electrolyte interface. Based on these revealed principles, possible solutions to these challenges such as the addition of inorganic fillers, interface modification, utilization of different types of lithium salt and polymers are introduced. In addition, the state-of-the-art approaches with great performance improvement are highlighted in this review. Finally, we provide perspectives on research directions that can further the understanding and development of polymer-based ASSLSB.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Ji X, Nazar LF (2010) Advances in Li–S batteries. J Mater Chem 20:9821–9826. https://doi.org/10.1039/B925751A10.1039/B925751A ↗
2. Busche MR, Adelhelm P, Sommer H et al (2014) Systematical electrochemical study on the parasitic shuttle-effect in lithium–sulfur-cells at different temperatures and different rates. J Power Sources 259:289–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.07510.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.075 ↗
3. Fang R, Zhao S, Sun Z et al (2017) More reliable lithium-sulfur batteries: status, solutions and prospects. Adv Mater 29:1606823. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20160682310.1002/adma.201606823 ↗
4. Kolosnitsyn VS, Kuzmina EV, Karaseva EV, Mochalov SE (2011) A study of the electrochemical processes in lithium–sulphur cells by impedance spectroscopy. J Power Sources 196:1478–1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.10510.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.105 ↗
5. Lin D, Liu Y, Cui Y (2017) Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries. Nat Nanotechnol 12:194–206. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.1610.1038/nnano.2017.16 ↗
6. Peled E (1997) Advanced model for solid electrolyte interphase electrodes in liquid and polymer electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 144:L208. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.183785810.1149/1.1837858 ↗
7. Hagen M, Hanselmann D, Ahlbrecht K et al (2015) Lithium–sulfur cells: the gap between the state-of-the-art and the requirements for high energy battery cells. Adv Energy Mater 5:1401986. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20140198610.1002/aenm.201401986 ↗
8. Yang X, Luo J, Sun X (2020) Towards high-performance solid-state Li–S batteries: from fundamental understanding to engineering design. Chem Soc Rev 49:2140–2195. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CS00635D10.1039/C9CS00635D ↗
9. Wu Z, Xie Z, Yoshida A et al (2019) Utmost limits of various solid electrolytes in all-solid-state lithium batteries: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 109:367–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.03510.1016/j.rser.2019.04.035 ↗
10. Bag S, Zhou C, Kim PJ et al (2020) LiF modified stable flexible PVDF-garnet hybrid electrolyte for high performance all-solid-state Li–S batteries. Energy Storage Mater 24:198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.08.01910.1016/j.ensm.2019.08.019 ↗
11. Zhao Y, Wu C, Peng G et al (2016) A new solid polymer electrolyte incorporating Li10GeP2S12 into a polyethylene oxide matrix for all-solid-state lithium batteries. J Power Sources 301:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.11110.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.111 ↗
12. Eshetu GG, Judez X, Li C et al (2017) Lithium azide as an electrolyte additive for all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 56:15368–15372. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20170930510.1002/anie.201709305 ↗
13. Cheng X, Pan J, Zhao Y et al (2018) Gel polymer electrolytes for electrochemical energy storage. Adv Energy Mater 8:1702184. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20170218410.1002/aenm.201702184 ↗
14. Xia Y, Wang X, Xia X et al (2017) A newly designed composite gel polymer electrolyte based on poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) for enhanced solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem A Eur J 23:15203–15209. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20170346410.1002/chem.201703464 ↗
15. Zhou D, Shanmukaraj D, Tkacheva A et al (2019) Polymer electrolytes for lithium-based batteries: advances and prospects. Chem 5:2326–2352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.00910.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.009 ↗
16. Osada I, de Vries H, Scrosati B, Passerini S (2016) Ionic-liquid-based polymer electrolytes for battery applications. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:500–513. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20150497110.1002/anie.201504971 ↗
17. Guo P, Su A, Wei Y et al (2019) Healable, highly conductive, flexible, and nonflammable supramolecular ionogel electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:19413–19420. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b0218210.1021/acsami.9b02182 ↗
18. Guyomard-Lack A, Abusleme J, Soudan P et al (2014) Hybrid silica-polymer ionogel solid electrolyte with tunable properties. Adv Energy Mater 4:1301570. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20130157010.1002/aenm.201301570 ↗
19. Yang G, Song Y, Wang Q et al (2020) Review of ionic liquids containing, polymer/inorganic hybrid electrolytes for lithium metal batteries. Mater Des 190:108563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10856310.1016/j.matdes.2020.108563 ↗
20. Ashby DS, DeBlock RH, Lai C-H et al (2017) Patternable, solution-processed ionogels for thin-film lithium-ion electrolytes. Joule 1:344–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.01210.1016/j.joule.2017.08.012 ↗
21. Golodnitsky D, Strauss E, Peled E, Greenbaum S (2015) Review—on order and disorder in polymer electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 162:A2551–A2566. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0161514jes10.1149/2.0161514jes ↗
22. Fenton DE, Parker JM, Wright PV (1973) Complexes of alkali metal ions with poly(ethylene oxide). Polymer (Guildf) 14:589. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(73)90146-810.1016/0032-3861(73)90146-8 ↗
23. Zhang X, Liu T, Zhang S et al (2017) Synergistic coupling between Li6.75La3Zr1.75Ta0.25O12 and Poly(vinylidene fluoride) induces high ionic conductivity, mechanical strength, and thermal stability of solid composite electrolytes. J Am Chem Soc 139:13779–13785. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b0636410.1021/jacs.7b06364 ↗
24. Yu J, Kwok SCT, Lu Z et al (2018) A ceramic-PVDF composite membrane with modified interfaces as an ion-conducting electrolyte for solid-state lithium-ion batteries operating at room temperature. ChemElectroChem 5:2873–2881. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.20180064310.1002/celc.201800643 ↗
25. Cheng S, Smith DM, Li CY (2014) How does nanoscale crystalline structure affect ion transport in solid polymer electrolytes? Macromolecules 47:3978–3986. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma500734q10.1021/ma500734q ↗
26. Deepa M, Sharma N, Agnihotry SA et al (2002) Conductivity and viscosity of liquid and gel electrolytes based on LiClO4, LiN(CF3SO2)2 and PMMA. Solid State Ion 152–153:253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00307-710.1016/S0167-2738(02)00307-7 ↗
27. Borodin O, Smith GD (2006) Mechanism of ion transport in amorphous poly(ethylene oxide)/LiTFSI from molecular dynamics simulations. Macromolecules 39:1620–1629. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma052277v10.1021/ma052277v ↗
28. Xue Z, He D, Xie X (2015) Poly(ethylene oxide)-based electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:19218–19253. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA03471J10.1039/C5TA03471J ↗
29. Webb MA, Jung Y, Pesko DM et al (2015) Systematic computational and experimental investigation of lithium-ion transport mechanisms in polyester-based polymer electrolytes. ACS Cent Sci 1:198–205. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.5b0019510.1021/acscentsci.5b00195 ↗
30. Berthier C, Gorecki W, Minier M et al (1983) Microscopic investigation of ionic conductivity in alkali metal salts-poly(ethylene oxide) adducts. Solid State Ion 11:91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(83)90068-110.1016/0167-2738(83)90068-1 ↗
31. Stolwijk NA, Heddier C, Reschke M et al (2013) Salt-concentration dependence of the glass transition temperature in PEO–NaI and PEO–LiTFSI polymer electrolytes. Macromolecules 46:8580–8588. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma401686r10.1021/ma401686r ↗
32. Pesko DM, Timachova K, Bhattacharya R et al (2017) Negative transference numbers in poly (ethylene oxide)-based electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 164:E3569–E3575. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0581711jes10.1149/2.0581711jes ↗
33. Pożyczka K, Marzantowicz M, Dygas JR, Krok F (2017) Ionic conductivity and lithium transference number of poly(ethylene oxide):LiTFSI system. Electrochim Acta 227:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.17210.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.172 ↗
34. Evans J, Vincent CA, Bruce PG (1987) Electrochemical measurement of transference numbers in polymer electrolytes. Polymer (Guildf) 28:2324–2328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(87)90394-610.1016/0032-3861(87)90394-6 ↗
35. Thomas J (1996) Solid state electrochemistry. Edited by Peter G. Bruce, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995, XVI, 344 pp., hardcover, £60.00, ISBN 0-521-40007-4. Adv Mater 8:360. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.1996008041710.1002/adma.19960080417 ↗
36. Hiller MM, Joost M, Gores HJ et al (2013) The influence of interface polarization on the determination of lithium transference numbers of salt in polyethylene oxide electrolytes. Electrochim Acta 114:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.13810.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.138 ↗
37. Lemaı̂tre-Auger F, Prud’homme J (2001) Ion–ion, short-range interactions in PEO-LiX rubbery electrolytes containing LiSCN, LiN(CF3SO2)2 or Li[CF3SO2N(CH2)3OCH3] as deduced from studies performed on PEO-LiX-KX ternary systems. Electrochim Acta 46:1359–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00720-910.1016/S0013-4686(00)00720-9 ↗
38. Zhao Y, Tao R, Fujinami T (2006) Enhancement of ionic conductivity of PEO-LiTFSI electrolyte upon incorporation of plasticizing lithium borate. Electrochim Acta 51:6451–6455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2006.04.03010.1016/j.electacta.2006.04.030 ↗
39. Rey I (1998) Raman spectroelectrochemistry of a lithium/polymer electrolyte symmetric cell. J Electrochem Soc 145:3034. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.183875910.1149/1.1838759 ↗
40. Edman L, Doeff MM, Ferry A et al (2000) Transport properties of the solid polymer electrolyte system P(EO)nLiTFSI. J Phys Chem B 104:3476–3480. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp993897z10.1021/jp993897z ↗
41. Pesko DM, Timachova K, Bhattacharya R et al (2017) Negative transference numbers in poly(ethylene oxide)-based electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 164:E3569–E3575. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0581711jes10.1149/2.0581711jes ↗
42. Bruce PG (2006) Ion–polyether coordination complexes: crystalline ionic conductors for clean energy storage. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 60:13651365–13691369. https://doi.org/10.1039/b517247k10.1039/b517247k ↗
43. Brandell D, Liivat A, Aabloo A, Thomas JO (2005) Conduction mechanisms in crystalline LiPF6·PEO6 doped with SiF62- and SF6. Chem Mater 17:3673–3680. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm050540110.1021/cm0505401 ↗
44. Johansson P, Tegenfeldt J, Lindgren J (2001) Modelling lithium ion transport in helical PEO by ab initio calculations. Polymer (Guildf) 42:6573–6577. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00101-X10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00101-X ↗
45. Andreev YG, Lightfoot P, Bruce PG (1996) Structure of the polymer electrolyte poly(ethylene oxide)3: LiN(SO2CF3)2 determined by powder diffraction using a powerful Monte Carlo approach. Chem Commun. https://doi.org/10.1039/CC996000216910.1039/CC9960002169 ↗
46. Chen L, Fan L (2018) Dendrite-free Li metal deposition in all-solid-state lithium sulfur batteries with polymer-in-salt polysiloxane electrolyte. Energy Storage Mater 15:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.03.01510.1016/j.ensm.2018.03.015 ↗
47. Zou Z, Li Y, Lu Z et al (2020) Mobile ions in composite solids. Chem Rev 120:4169–4221. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0076010.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00760 ↗
48. Marceau H, Kim C-S, Paolella A et al (2016) In operando scanning electron microscopy and ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy studies of lithium/sulfur cells using all solid-state polymer electrolyte. J Power Sources 319:247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.09310.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.093 ↗
49. Judez X, Eshetu GG, Gracia I et al (2019) Understanding the role of nano-aluminum oxide in all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries. ChemElectroChem 6:326–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.20180139010.1002/celc.201801390 ↗
50. Sheng O, Jin C, Luo J et al (2017) Ionic conductivity promotion of polymer electrolyte with ionic liquid grafted oxides for all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 5:12934–12942. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA03699J10.1039/C7TA03699J ↗
51. Shin JH, Kim KW, Ahn HJ, Ahn JH (2002) Electrochemical properties and interfacial stability of (PEO)10LiCF3SO3–TinO2n−1 composite polymer electrolytes for lithium/sulfur battery. Mater Sci Eng B 95:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5107(02)00226-X10.1016/S0921-5107(02)00226-X ↗
52. Jung Y-C, Lee S-M, Choi J-H et al (2015) All solid-state lithium batteries assembled with hybrid solid electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 162:A704–A710. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0731504jes10.1149/2.0731504jes ↗
53. Temeche E, Zhang X, Laine RM (2020) Solid electrolytes for Li–S batteries: solid solutions of poly(ethylene oxide) with LixPON- and LixSiPON-based polymers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:30353–30364. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c0619610.1021/acsami.0c06196 ↗
54. Zhang Y, Chen R, Wang S et al (2020) Free-standing sulfide/polymer composite solid electrolyte membranes with high conductance for all-solid-state lithium batteries. Energy Storage Mater 25:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.10.02010.1016/j.ensm.2019.10.020 ↗
55. Choi J-H, Lee C-H, Yu J-H et al (2015) Enhancement of ionic conductivity of composite membranes for all-solid-state lithium rechargeable batteries incorporating tetragonal Li7La3Zr2O12 into a polyethylene oxide matrix. J Power Sources 274:458–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.07810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.078 ↗
56. Wieczorek W, Stevens JR, Florjańczyk Z (1996) Composite polyether based solid electrolytes. The Lewis acid-base approach. Solid State Ion 85:67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(96)00042-210.1016/0167-2738(96)00042-2 ↗
57. Xiong H-M, Zhao K-K, Zhao X et al (2003) Elucidating the conductivity enhancement effect of nano-sized SnO2 fillers in the hybrid polymer electrolyte PEO–SnO2–LiClO4. Solid State Ion 159:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00917-710.1016/S0167-2738(02)00917-7 ↗
58. Croce F, Persi L, Scrosati B et al (2001) Role of the ceramic fillers in enhancing the transport properties of composite polymer electrolytes. Electrochim Acta 46:2457–2461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00458-310.1016/S0013-4686(01)00458-3 ↗
59. Maier J (1985) Space charge regions in solid two-phase systems and their conduction contribution—I. Conductance enhancement in the system ionic conductor-‘inert’ phase and application on AgC1:Al2O3 and AgC1:SiO2. J Phys Chem Solids 46:309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(85)90172-610.1016/0022-3697(85)90172-6 ↗
60. Roman HE, Bunde A, Dieterich W (1986) Conductivity of dispersed ionic conductors: a percolation model with two critical points. Phys Rev B 34:3439–3445. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.343910.1103/PhysRevB.34.3439 ↗
61. Zheng J, Tang M, Hu Y-Y (2016) Lithium ion pathway within Li7La3Zr2O12-polyethylene oxide composite electrolytes. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:12538–12542. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20160753910.1002/anie.201607539 ↗
62. Yang T, Zheng J, Cheng Q et al (2017) Composite polymer electrolytes with Li7La3Zr2O12 garnet-type nanowires as ceramic fillers: mechanism of conductivity enhancement and role of doping and morphology. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:21773–21780. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0380610.1021/acsami.7b03806 ↗
63. Zheng J, Wang P, Liu H, Hu Y-Y (2019) Interface-enabled ion conduction in Li10GeP2S12–poly(ethylene oxide) hybrid electrolytes. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2:1452–1459. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b0200810.1021/acsaem.8b02008 ↗
64. Zhang J, Zhao N, Zhang M et al (2016) Flexible and ion-conducting membrane electrolytes for solid-state lithium batteries: dispersion of garnet nanoparticles in insulating polyethylene oxide. Nano Energy 28:447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.00210.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.002 ↗
65. Li Z, Huang H-M, Zhu J-K et al (2019) Ionic conduction in composite polymer electrolytes: case of PEO:Ga-LLZO composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:784–791. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1727910.1021/acsami.8b17279 ↗
66. Tao X, Liu Y, Liu W et al (2017) Solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries operated at 37 °C with composites of nanostructured Li7La3Zr2O12/carbon foam and polymer. Nano Lett 17:2967–2972. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0022110.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00221 ↗
67. Chen L, Li Y, Li S-P et al (2018) PEO/garnet composite electrolytes for solid-state lithium batteries: from “ceramic-in-polymer” to “polymer-in-ceramic.” Nano Energy 46:176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.03710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.037 ↗
68. Huang Z, Pang W, Liang P et al (2019) A dopamine modified Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12/PEO solid-state electrolyte: enhanced thermal and electrochemical properties. J Mater Chem A 7:16425–16436. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA03395E10.1039/C9TA03395E ↗
69. Gupta A, Sakamoto J (2019) Controlling Ionic Transport Through the PEO-LiTFSI/LLZTO interface. Electrochem Soc Interface 28:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.f06192if10.1149/2.f06192if ↗
70. Diwan P, Chandra A (2012) Percolation threshold and conductivity of polymer electrolyte composites: effect of dispersoid particle size. Polym Compos 33:1750–1754. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2230910.1002/pc.22309 ↗
71. Li Y, Zhao Y, Cui Y et al (2018) Screening polyethylene oxide-based composite polymer electrolytes via combining effective medium theory and Halpin-Tsai model. Comput Mater Sci 144:338–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.12.01410.1016/j.commatsci.2017.12.014 ↗
72. Lin D, Liu W, Liu Y et al (2016) High ionic conductivity of composite solid polymer electrolyte via in situ synthesis of monodispersed SiO2 nanospheres in poly(ethylene oxide). Nano Lett 16:459–465. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0411710.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04117 ↗
73. Fan L, Nan C-W, Zhao S (2003) Effect of modified SiO2 on the properties of PEO-based polymer electrolytes. Solid State Ion 164:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2003.08.00410.1016/j.ssi.2003.08.004 ↗
74. Wild M, O’Neill L, Zhang T et al (2015) Lithium sulfur batteries, a mechanistic review. Energy Environ Sci 8:3477–3494. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE01388G10.1039/C5EE01388G ↗
75. Leghié P, Lelieur J-P, Levillain E (2002) Comments on the mechanism of the electrochemical reduction of sulphur in dimethylformamide. Electrochem commun 4:406–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2481(02)00333-810.1016/S1388-2481(02)00333-8 ↗
76. Lu Y-C, He Q, Gasteiger HA (2014) Probing the lithium–sulfur redox reactions: a rotating-ring disk electrode study. J Phys Chem C 118:5733–5741. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp500382s10.1021/jp500382s ↗
77. Cuisinier M, Hart C, Balasubramanian M et al (2015) Radical or not radical: revisiting lithium–sulfur electrochemistry in nonaqueous electrolytes. Adv Energy Mater 5:1401801. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20140180110.1002/aenm.201401801 ↗
78. Kumar M, Sekhon SS (2002) Role of plasticizer’s dielectric constant on conductivity modification of PEO–NH4F polymer electrolytes. Eur Polym J 38:1297–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(01)00310-X10.1016/S0014-3057(01)00310-X ↗
79. Song YX, Shi Y, Wan J et al (2019) Direct tracking of the polysulfide shuttling and interfacial evolution in all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries: a degradation mechanism study. Energy Environ Sci 12:2496–2506. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ee00578a10.1039/c9ee00578a ↗
80. Yu X, Xie J, Yang J, Wang K (2004) All solid-state rechargeable lithium cells based on nano-sulfur composite cathodes. J Power Sources 132:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.03410.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.034 ↗
81. Zhang C, Lin Y, Liu J (2015) Sulfur double locked by a macro-structural cathode and a solid polymer electrolyte for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:10760–10766. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta01037c10.1039/c5ta01037c ↗
82. Lin Y, Wang X, Liu J, Miller JD (2017) Natural halloysite nano-clay electrolyte for advanced all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 31:478–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.04510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.045 ↗
83. Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Gosselink D, Chen P (2015) Synthesis of poly(ethylene-oxide)/nanoclay solid polymer electrolyte for all solid-state lithium/sulfur battery. Ionics (Kiel) 21:381–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-014-1176-210.1007/s11581-014-1176-2 ↗
84. Diao Y, Xie K, Xiong S, Hong X (2013) Shuttle phenomenon—the irreversible oxidation mechanism of sulfur active material in Li–S battery. J Power Sources 235:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.13210.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.132 ↗
85. Zhu Y, Li J, Liu J (2017) A bifunctional ion-electron conducting interlayer for high energy density all-solid-state lithium-sulfur battery. J Power Sources 351:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.07210.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.072 ↗
86. Hassoun J, Scrosati B (2010) Moving to a solid-state configuration: a valid approach to making lithium–sulfur batteries viable for practical applications. Adv Mater 22:5198–5201. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20100258410.1002/adma.201002584 ↗
87. Fan Z, Ding B, Zhang T et al (2019) Solid/solid interfacial architecturing of solid polymer electrolyte-based all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries by atomic layer deposition. Small 15:1903952. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20190395210.1002/smll.201903952 ↗
88. Wang DR, Shah DB, Maslyn JA et al (2018) Rate constants of electrochemical reactions in a lithium–sulfur cell determined by operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J Electrochem Soc 165:A3487–A3495. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0981814jes10.1149/2.0981814jes ↗
89. Meddings N, Judez X, Li C, Garcia-Araez N (2020) A highly sensitive electrochemical sensor of polysulfides in polymer lithium–sulfur batteries. J Electrochem Soc 167:80520. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab8ce910.1149/1945-7111/ab8ce9 ↗
90. Xu K, Liu X, Liang J et al (2018) Manipulating the redox kinetics of Li–S chemistry by tellurium doping for improved Li–S batteries. ACS Energy Lett 3:420–427. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0124910.1021/acsenergylett.7b01249 ↗
91. Xu H, Jiang Q, Zhang B et al (2020) Integrating conductivity, immobility, and catalytic ability into high-N carbon/graphene sheets as an effective sulfur host. Adv Mater 32:1906357. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20190635710.1002/adma.201906357 ↗
92. Deng N, Wang L, Feng Y et al (2020) Co-based and Cu-based MOFs modified separators to strengthen the kinetics of redox reaction and inhibit lithium-dendrite for long-life lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem Eng J 388:124241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12424110.1016/j.cej.2020.124241 ↗
93. Hong X-J, Song C-L, Yang Y et al (2019) Cerium based metal-organic frameworks as an efficient separator coating catalyzing the conversion of polysulfides for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 13:1923–1931. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b0815510.1021/acsnano.8b08155 ↗
94. Li M, Frerichs JE, Kolek M et al (2020) Solid-state lithium-sulfur battery enabled by Thio-LiSICON/polymer composite electrolyte and sulfurized polyacrylonitrile cathode. Adv Funct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20191012310.1002/adfm.201910123 ↗
95. Wang W, Cao Z, Elia GA et al (2018) Recognizing the mechanism of sulfurized polyacrylonitrile cathode materials for Li–S batteries and beyond in Al–S batteries. ACS Energy Lett 3:2899–2907. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0194510.1021/acsenergylett.8b01945 ↗
96. Judez X, Zhang H, Li C et al (2017) Polymer-rich composite electrolytes for all-solid-state Li–S cells. J Phys Chem Lett 8:3473–3477. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0132110.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01321 ↗
97. Ding B, Shen L, Xu G et al (2013) Encapsulating sulfur into mesoporous TiO2 host as a high performance cathode for lithium–sulfur battery. Electrochim Acta 107:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.00910.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.009 ↗
98. Bieker G, Wellmann J, Kolek M et al (2017) Influence of cations in lithium and magnesium polysulphide solutions: dependence of the solvent chemistry. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:11152–11162. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP01238A10.1039/C7CP01238A ↗
99. Zhang G, Peng H-J, Zhao C-Z et al (2018) The radical pathway based on a lithium-metal-compatible high-dielectric electrolyte for lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 57:16732–16736. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20181013210.1002/anie.201810132 ↗
100. He Q, Gorlin Y, Patel MUM et al (2018) Unraveling the correlation between solvent properties and sulfur redox behavior in lithium–sulfur batteries. J Electrochem Soc 165:A4027–A4033. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0991816jes10.1149/2.0991816jes ↗