journal article·2022-06Open access

Fabrication, characterization, and gamma ray shielding properties of PVA-based polymer nanocomposite

Nilly A. Kawady, Mohamed Elkattan, M. Salah, Ahmed A. Galhoum

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 24

Abstract

Abstract An innovative cost-effective and lead-free polymer nanocomposite of polyvinyl alcohol/ polyvinyl pyrrolidone was developed. PVA/PVP nanocomposite film contained spherical AgCl and SnO2 nanoparticles was facilely prepared via a one-pot synthesis method. The synthesis route affords uniform dispersion of the both nanoparticles and unique features of polymer nanocomposite of insoluble, dense, and nonporous properties. The new nanocomposite achieved an efficient gamma radiation attenuation capability. The attenuation capacity for gamma photons was investigated in terms of linear and mass attenuation coefficients (µ) and (µm), respectively, at low and high energies (using 60Co and 137Cs sources). Other parameters such as half value layer (HVL), tenth value layer (TVL), and mean free path (MFP) were used to evaluate the shielding capacity. Theoretical calculation (XCOM program) results were consistent with the obtained experimental results. The results revealed that the essential thickness of the polymer nanocomposite to reduce the γ-ray intensity to 50% is 6.6, 8.9, and 9.8 cm for 662, 1173, and 1332 keV γ-ray energies, respectively. The physio-chemical properties of the polymer nanocomposite were evaluated using spectroscopic, microscopic, and thermal analysis tools. Additionally, the formation of spherical nanoparticles was elucidated using TEM. FTIR and leachability were used to confirm the stability, good durability, and chemical resistivity of the synthesized polymer nanocomposite. The nano-filler AgCl and SnO2 formation mechanism was discussed in detail. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Ramdani N (2020) Micro and nanostrued composite materials for neutron shielding applications: Introduction to neutron shielding, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
2. Bora PJ, Anil AG, Ramamurthy PC, Tan DQ (2020) MXene interlayered crosslinked conducting polymer film for highly specific absorption and electromagnetic interference shielding. Mater Adv 1:177–183. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MA00005A10.1039/D0MA00005A ↗
3. Nambiar S, Yeow JTW (2012) Polymer-composite materials for radiation protection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:5717–5726. https://doi.org/10.1021/am300783d10.1021/am300783d ↗
4. Akman F, Ozkan I, Kaçal MR, Polat H, Issa SAM, Tekin HO, Agar O (2021) Shielding features, to non-ionizing and ionizing photons, of FeCr-based composites. Appl Radiat Isot 167:109470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.10947010.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109470 ↗
5. Paul S (2019) Biomedical engineering and its applications in healthcare: Nanostructured Materials and Their Biomedical Application. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore, pp 205–22710.1007/978-981-13-3705-5 ↗
6. Biswas R, Sahadath H, Mollah AS, Huq MF (2016) Calculation of gamma-ray attenuation parameters for locally developed shielding material: polyboron. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 9:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2015.08.00510.1016/j.jrras.2015.08.005 ↗
7. Singh VP, Shirmardi SP, Medhat ME, Badiger NM (2015) Determination of mass attenuation coefficient for some polymers using Monte Carlo simulation. Vacuum 119:284–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.06.00610.1016/j.vacuum.2015.06.006 ↗
8. Ud-Din Khan S, Ud-Din Khan S, Almutairi Z, Haider S, Ali SM (2020) Development of theoretical-computational model for radiation shielding. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 13:606–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/16878507.2020.181279810.1080/16878507.2020.1812798 ↗
9. Bayoumi EE, Abd El-Magied MO, Elshehy EA, Atia BM, Mahmoud KA, Khalil LH, Mohamed AA (2022) Lead–bismuth tungstate composite as a protective barrier against gamma rays. Mater Chem Phys 275:125262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.12526210.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125262 ↗
10. Mann HS, Brar GS, Mudahar GS (2016) Gamma-ray shielding effectiveness of novel light-weight clay-flyash bricks. Radiat Phys Chem 127:97–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.06.01310.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.06.013 ↗
11. Mirji R, Lobo B (2017) Computation of the mass attenuation coefficient of polymeric materials at specific gamma photon energies. Radiat Phys Chem 135:32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.03.00110.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.03.001 ↗
12. Saim A, Tebboune A, Berkok H, Belameiri N, Belbachir AH (2014) Linear and mass attenuation coefficient for CdTe compound of X-rays from 10 to 100keV energy range in different phases. J Alloy Compd 602:261–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.01210.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.012 ↗
13. Buyuk B, Tugrul AB (2014) Comparison of lead and WC-Co materials against gamma irradiation. Acta Phys Pol A 125:423–425. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.125.42310.12693/APhysPolA.125.423 ↗
14. Luković J, Babić B, Bučevac D, Prekajski M, Pantić J, Baščarević Z, Matović B (2015) Synthesis and characterization of tungsten carbide fine powders. Ceram Int 41:1271–1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.05710.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.057 ↗
15. Galhoum AA, Atia AA, Mahfouz MG, Abdel-Rehem ST, Gomaa NA, Vincent T, Guibal E (2015) Dy(III) recovery from dilute solutions using magnetic-chitosan nano-based particles grafted with amino acids. J Mater Sci 50:2832–2848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8845-z10.1007/s10853-015-8845-z ↗
16. More CV, Alsayed Z, Badawi MS, Thabet AA, Pawar PP (2021) Polymeric composite materials for radiation shielding: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19:2057–2090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01189-910.1007/s10311-021-01189-9 ↗
17. Kiani MA, Ahmadi SJ, Outokesh M, Adeli R, Kiani H (2019) Study on physico-mechanical and gamma-ray shielding characteristics of new ternary nanocomposites. Appl Radiat Isot 143:141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.10.00610.1016/j.apradiso.2018.10.006 ↗
18. Kaçal MR, Akman F, Sayyed MI, Akman F (2019) Evaluation of gamma-ray and neutron attenuation properties of some polymers. Nucl Eng Technol 51:818–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.11.01110.1016/j.net.2018.11.011 ↗
19. Saini P, Choudhary V, Singh BP, Mathur RB, Dhawan SK (2011) Enhanced microwave absorption behavior of polyaniline-CNT/polystyrene blend in 12.4–18.0GHz range. Synth Metals 161:1522–1526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2011.04.03310.1016/j.synthmet.2011.04.033 ↗
20. Bryning MB, Islam MF, Kikkawa JM, Yodh AG (2005) Very low conductivity threshold in bulk isotropic single-walled carbon nanotube-epoxy composites. Adv Mater 17:1186–1191. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20040164910.1002/adma.200401649 ↗
21. Kazemi F, Malekie S, Hosseini MA (2019) Study on the shielding properties of a novel polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/WO(3) composite, against gamma rays, using the MCNPX code. J Biomed Phys Eng 9:465–472. https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.111410.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1114 ↗
22. Eid M, El-Arnaouty MB, Salah M, Soliman E-S, Hegazy E-SA (2012) Radiation synthesis and characterization of poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) based hydrogels containing silver nanoparticles. J Polym Res 19:9835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-012-9835-310.1007/s10965-012-9835-3 ↗
23. Qiao J, Fu J, Lin R, Ma J, Liu J (2010) Alkaline solid polymer electrolyte membranes based on structurally modified PVA/PVP with improved alkali stability. Polymer 51:4850–4859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.01810.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.018 ↗
24. Bai J, Ma X, Yan H, Zhu J, Wang K, Wang J (2020) A novel functional porous organic polymer for the removal of uranium from wastewater. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 306:110441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.11044110.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110441 ↗
25. Karan R, Manna P, Maiti PK, Das K (2020) Influence of selenium dioxide (SeO2) on properties of bioglass in SiO2-Na2O-CaO-P2O5 system. J Aust Ceram Soc 56:1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-020-00459-z10.1007/s41779-020-00459-z ↗
26. Lebrun L, Follain N, Metayer M (2004) Elaboration of a new anion-exchange membrane with semi-interpenetrating polymer networks and characterisation. Electrochim Acta 50:985–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2004.07.04010.1016/j.electacta.2004.07.040 ↗
27. Aslam M, Kalyar MA, Raza ZA (2018) Polyvinyl alcohol: a review of research status and use of polyvinyl alcohol based nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci 58:2119–2132. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2485510.1002/pen.24855 ↗
28. Zhang Q, Liu F, Li L, Pan G, Shang S (2011) Magnetic ionic liquid-assisted synthesis of polyaniline/AgCl nanocomposites by interface polymerization. J Nanopart Res 13:415–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0070-810.1007/s11051-010-0070-8 ↗
29. Pearson RG (1966) Acids and bases. Science 151:172–177. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.151.3707.17210.1126/science.151.3707.172 ↗
30. Fajans K (1923) Struktur und Deformation der Elektronenhüllen in ihrer Bedeutung für die chemischen und optischen Eigenschaften anorganischer Verbindungen. Naturwissenschaften 11:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0155236510.1007/BF01552365 ↗
31. Tyrra W (2002) Silver(I) fluoride and related compounds in chemical synthesis. Heteroat Chem 13:561–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/hc.1010210.1002/hc.10102 ↗
32. Wang J, Liu S, Cao X, Wang Z, Guo Y, Li X, Liu C, Jiang W, Wang H, Wang N et al (2019) One-pot synthesis and gas sensitivity of SnO2 nanoparticles prepared using two Sn salts of SnCl4·5H2O and SnCl2·2H2O. Appl Phys A 126:44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-019-3230-410.1007/s00339-019-3230-4 ↗
33. Ikhmayies SJ (2019) Optical parameters of nanocrystalline SnO2: F thin films prepared by the spray pyrolysis method. JOM 71:1507–1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03388-w10.1007/s11837-019-03388-w ↗
34. Ikhmayies SJ (2019) Spray deposited thin films of SnO2: F/CdS: in bilayers produced using different fluorine sources: NH4F and HF. J Energy Syst 3:111–122. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.60508510.30521/jes.605085 ↗
35. Ibarguen CA, Mosquera A, Parra R, Castro MS, Rodríguez-Páez JE (2007) Synthesis of SnO2 nanoparticles through the controlled precipitation route. Mater Chem Phys 101:433–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.08.00310.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.08.003 ↗
36. Morshedy AS, Galhoum AA, Aleem A, Abdel Aleem H, Shehab El-din MT, Okaba DM, Mostafa MS, Mira HI, Yang Z, El-Sayed IET- (2021) Functionalized aminophosphonate chitosan-magnetic nanocomposites for Cd(II) removal from aqueous solutions: performance and mechanisms of sorption. Appl Surf Sci 561:150069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15006910.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150069 ↗
37. Assis M, Groppo Filho FC, Pimentel DS, Robeldo T, Gouveia AF, Castro TFD, Fukushima HCS, de Foggi CC, da Costa JPC, Borra RC et al (2020) Ag nanoparticles/AgX (X=Cl, Br and I) composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity and low toxicological effects. ChemistrySelect 5:4655–4673. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20200050210.1002/slct.202000502 ↗
38. Akyil C, Akdas G, Afsin P, Ürgen M (2019) Freestanding SnO2 films produced with anodic polarization in acidic media containing colloidal tin hydroxides. Mater Chem Phys 221:263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.09.06210.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.09.062 ↗
39. Morshedy AS, Tawfik SM, Hashem KM, Abd El-Aty DM, Galhoum AA, Mostafa MS, Guibal E (2021) The production of clean diesel fuel by facile sun light photocatalytic desulfurization process using Cd-based diacetate as a novel liquid photocatalyst. J Cleaner Prod 279:123629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12362910.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123629 ↗
40. Bhangare B, Ramgir NS, Jagtap S, Debnath AK, Muthe KP, Terashima C, Aswal DK, Gosavi SW, Fujishima A (2019) XPS and Kelvin probe studies of SnO2/RGO nanohybrids based NO2 sensors. Appl Surf Sci 487:918–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.17610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.176 ↗
41. Kwoka M, Lyson-Sypien B, Kulis A, Zappa D, Comini E (2018) Surface properties of SnO2 nanowires deposited on Si substrate covered by Au catalyst studies by XPS, TDS and SEM. Nanomaterials 8:738. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano809073810.3390/nano8090738 ↗
42. Moulder JF, Stickle WF, Sobol PE, Bomben KD (1978) Handbook of x ray photoelectron spectroscopy In: CD Wanger, WM Riggs, LE Davis, JF Moulder and GE Muilenberg Perkin Elmer Corp. (eds) Physical Electronics Division, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA, 1979. 190 pp. $195. 3
43. Coates J (2000) Interpretation of infrared spectra: a practical approach. Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry. Wiley, Chochester, pp 10815–10837
44. Chen F, Yang Q, Niu C, Li X, Zhang C, Zeng G (2015) Plasmonic photocatalyst Ag@AgCl/ZnSn(OH)6: synthesis, characterization and enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity in the decomposition of dyes and phenol. RSC Adv 5:63152–63164. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA10480G10.1039/C5RA10480G ↗
45. Mostafa MS, El Naga AOA, Galhoum AA, Guibal E, Morshedy AS (2019) A new route for the synthesis of self-acidified and granulated mesoporous alumina catalyst with superior Lewis acidity and its application in cumene conversion. J Mater Sci 54:5424–5444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03270-110.1007/s10853-018-03270-1 ↗
46. Manjunatha HC (2017) A study of gamma attenuation parameters in poly methyl methacrylate and Kapton. Radiat Phys Chem 137:254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.01.02410.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.01.024 ↗