journal article·2021-08

Microstructure evolution and mechanical responses of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys during hot deformation process

Yue Guo, Jianhai Zhang, Hongwei Zhao

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys can be fabricated by a series of thermo-mechanical processing methods (e.g., hot rolling, forging and extrusion), which is able to serve in aeronautic, automobile, and marine industries because of its excellent physical properties. However, reaching the balance between high strength and favorable ductility to present its high performance is still in progress, during which temperature and strain rate are two very important external variables. More importantly, the core lies in sophisticated microstructure evolution paths involved in hot deformation, which consists of different microstructure mechanisms and behaviors and can be expressed as various mechanical responses. Therefore, a fundamental review of microstructure mechanisms and behaviors, microstructure evolution and relevant mechanical responses of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys during high-temperature deformation is of great significance. In present paper, first, various experimental methods have been introduced. Second, general trends of mechanical properties changing with temperature and strain rate have been summarized. Third, major microstructure mechanisms and behaviors have been discussed. Then, a schematic illustration originating from dislocations’ movement has been depicted, which succeeding microstructure evolution and mechanical responses (including superplasticity) have been reviewed accordingly. Finally, further suggestions of hot deformation of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys have been given.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Azarniya A, Hosseini HRM, Jafari M, Bagheri N (2015) Thermal decomposition of nanostructured aluminum titanate in an active Al matrix: A novel approach to fabrication of in situ Al/Al2O3–Al3Ti composites. Mater Des 88:932–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.05010.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.050 ↗
2. Azarniya A, Madaah Hosseini HR (2015) A new method for fabrication of in situ Al/Al3Ti–Al2O3 nanocomposites based on thermal decomposition of nanostructured tialite. J Alloys Compd 643:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.14510.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.145 ↗
3. Salvado FC, Teixeira-Dias F, Walley SM, Lea LJ, Cardoso JB (2017) A review on the strain rate dependency of the dynamic viscoplastic response of FCC metals. Progress Mater Sci 88:186–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.004 ↗
4. Lee W-S, Lin C-R (2016) Deformation behavior and microstructural evolution of 7075–T6 aluminum alloy at cryogenic temperatures. Cryogenics 79:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2016.07.00710.1016/j.cryogenics.2016.07.007 ↗
5. Williams JC, Starke EA (2003) Progress in structural materials for aerospace systems. Acta Mater 51(19):5775–5799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.02310.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.023 ↗
6. Contrepois Q, Maurice C, Driver J (2010) Hot rolling textures of Al–Cu–Li and Al–Zn–Mg–Cu aeronautical alloys: experiments and simulations to high strains. Mater Sci Eng A 527(27–28):7305–7312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.09510.1016/j.msea.2010.07.095 ↗
7. Wang X, Pan Q, Liu L, Xiong S, Wang W, Lai J, Sun Y, Huang Z (2018) Characterization of hot extrusion and heat treatment on mechanical properties in a spray formed ultra-high strength Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Mater Charact 144:131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.07.01210.1016/j.matchar.2018.07.012 ↗
8. Zhang H, Chen G, Chen Q, Han F, Zhao Z (2018) A physically-based constitutive modelling of a high strength aluminum alloy at hot working conditions. J Alloys Compd 743:283–29310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.039 ↗
9. Liu Y, Wang X, Zhu D, Chen D, Wang Q, Li X, Sun T (2020) Hot workability characteristics and optimization of processing parameters of 7475 aluminum alloy using 3D processing map. J Mater Eng Perform 29(2):787–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-04629-910.1007/s11665-020-04629-9 ↗
10. Lin YC, Chen X-M (2011) A critical review of experimental results and constitutive descriptions for metals and alloys in hot working. Mater Des 32(4):1733–1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.04810.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.048 ↗
11. Azarniya A, Taheri AK, Taheri KK (2019) Recent advances in ageing of 7xxx series aluminum alloys: a physical metallurgy perspective. J Alloys Compd 781:945–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.28610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.286 ↗
12. Luo L, Liu Z, Bai S, Zhao J, Zeng D, Wang J, Cao J, Hu Y (2020) Hot deformation behavior considering strain effects and recrystallization mechanism of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1307174310.3390/ma13071743 ↗
13. Khan MA, Wang Y, Yasin G, Nazeer F, Malik A, Khan WQ, Ahmad T, Zhang H, Afifi MA (2020) The effect of strain rates on the microstructure and the mechanical properties of an over-aged Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Mater Charact 167:110472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11047210.1016/j.matchar.2020.110472 ↗
14. Li G, Ding H, Wang J, Zhang N, Hou H (2019) Superplastic tensile deformation behavior and microstructural evolution of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Metals 9(9):941. https://doi.org/10.3390/met909094110.3390/met9090941 ↗
15. Tang J, Jiang F, Luo C, Bo G, Chen K, Teng J, Fu D, Zhang H (2020) Integrated physically based modeling for the multiple static softening mechanisms following multi-stage hot deformation in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Int J Plast 134:102809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10280910.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102809 ↗
16. Wang W, Pan Q, Sun Y, Wang X, Li A, Song W (2018) Study on hot compressive deformation behaviors and corresponding industrial extrusion of as-homogenized Al–7.82Zn–1.96Mg–2.35Cu–0.11Zr alloy. J Mater Sci 53(16):11728–11748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2388-z10.1007/s10853-018-2388-z ↗
17. Khan AS, Huang S (1992) Experimental and theoretical study of mechanical behavior of 1100 aluminum in the strain rate range 10–5−104s−1. Int J Plast 8(4):397–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(92)90057-J10.1016/0749-6419(92)90057-J ↗
18. Nes E (1997) Modelling of work hardening and stress saturation in FCC metals. Prog Mater Sci 41(3):129–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(97)00032-710.1016/S0079-6425(97)00032-7 ↗
19. Zurob H, Hutchinson C, Brechet Y, Purdy G (2002) Modeling recrystallization of microalloyed austenite: effect of coupling recovery, precipitation and recrystallization. Acta Mater 50(12):3077–3094. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00097-610.1016/S1359-6454(02)00097-6 ↗
20. Zeng R, Huang L, Li J, Li H, Zhu H, Zhang X (2019) Quantification of multiple softening processes occurring during multi-stage thermoforming of high-strength steel. Int J Plast 120:64–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.04.01010.1016/j.ijplas.2019.04.010 ↗
21. Adam KF, Long Z, Field DP (2017) Analysis of particle-stimulated nucleation (PSN)-dominated recrystallization for hot-rolled 7050 aluminum alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 48(4):2062–2076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-017-3967-310.1007/s11661-017-3967-3 ↗
22. Preston DL, Tonks DL, Wallace DC (2003) Model of plastic deformation for extreme loading conditions. J Appl Phys 93(1):211–220. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.152470610.1063/1.1524706 ↗
23. Lin YC, Dong W-Y, Zhou M, Wen D-X, Chen D-D (2018) A unified constitutive model based on dislocation density for an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy at time-variant hot deformation conditions. Mater Sci Eng A 718:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.10910.1016/j.msea.2018.01.109 ↗
24. Zhang J, Li Z, Wen K, Huang S, Li X, Yan H, Yan L, Liu H, Zhang Y, Xiong B (2019) Simulation of dynamic recrystallization for an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy using cellular automaton. Progress Nat Sci Mater Int 29(4):477–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2019.04.00210.1016/j.pnsc.2019.04.002 ↗
25. Zhou M, Lin YC, Deng J, Jiang Y-Q (2014) Hot tensile deformation behaviors and constitutive model of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Mater Des 59:141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.05210.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.052 ↗
26. Gang C, Wei C, Li M, Anzhen G, Juan L, Zhimin Z, Shunqi Z (2015) Strain-compensated arrhenius-type constitutive model for flow behavior of Al–12Zn–24Mg–12Cu alloy. Rare Met Mater Eng 44(9):2120–2125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1875-5372(16)30009-110.1016/S1875-5372(16)30009-1 ↗
27. Chen G, Ren C, Ke Z, Li J, Yang X (2016) Modeling of flow behavior for 7050–T7451 aluminum alloy considering microstructural evolution over a wide range of strain rates. Mech Mater 95:146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.01.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2016.01.006 ↗
28. Xu L, Dai G, Huang X, Zhao J, Han J, Gao J (2013) Foundation and application of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy flow stress constitutive equation in friction screw press die forging. Mater Des 47:465–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.01110.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.011 ↗
29. Zhao J, Deng Y, Tang J, Zhang J (2019) Influence of strain rate on hot deformation behavior and recrystallization behavior under isothermal compression of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J Alloys Compd 809:151788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15178810.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151788 ↗
30. Zhao J, Deng Y, Tan J, Zhang J (2018) Effect of strain rate on the recrystallization mechanism during isothermal compression in 7050 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 734:120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.07.06810.1016/j.msea.2018.07.068 ↗
31. Lin YC, Zhu X-H, Dong W-Y, Yang H, Xiao Y-W, Kotkunde N (2020) Effects of deformation parameters and stress triaxiality on the fracture behaviors and microstructural evolution of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J Alloys Compd 832:154988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15498810.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154988 ↗
32. Sun L, Muszka K, Wynne BP, Palmiere EJ (2013) On the interactions between strain path reversal and dynamic recrystallisation in 316L stainless steel studied by hot torsion. Mater Sci Eng A 568:160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.01.04510.1016/j.msea.2013.01.045 ↗
33. Cerri E, Evangelista E, Forcellese A, McQueen H (1995) Comparative hot workability of 7012 and 7075 alloys after different pretreatments. Mater Sci Eng A 197(2):181–19810.1016/0921-5093(94)09714-3 ↗
34. Li D-f, Zhang D-z, Liu S-d, Shan Z-j, Zhang X-m, Wang Q, Han S-q (2016) Dynamic recrystallization behavior of 7085 aluminum alloy during hot deformation. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 26(6):1491–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64254-110.1016/S1003-6326(16)64254-1 ↗
35. Jiang H, Dong J, Zhang M, Yao Z (2016) A study on the effect of strain rate on the dynamic recrystallization mechanism of alloy 617B. Metall Mater Trans A. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3664-710.1007/s11661-016-3664-7 ↗
36. Zhu R, Liu Q, Li J, Xiang S, Chen Y, Zhang X (2015) Dynamic restoration mechanism and physically based constitutive model of 2050 Al–Li alloy during hot compression. J Alloys Compd 650:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.18210.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.182 ↗
37. Zhu F-J, Wu H-Y, Lee S, Lin M-C, Chen D (2015) Dynamic behavior of a 6069 Al alloy under hot compression. Mater Sci Eng A 640:385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.02610.1016/j.msea.2015.06.026 ↗
38. Gourdet S, Montheillet F (2003) A model of continuous dynamic recrystallization. Acta Mater 51(9):2685–2699. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00078-810.1016/S1359-6454(03)00078-8 ↗
39. Jin N, Zhang H, Han Y, Wu W, Chen J (2009) Hot deformation behavior of 7150 aluminum alloy during compression at elevated temperature. Mater Charact 60(6):530–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2008.12.01210.1016/j.matchar.2008.12.012 ↗
40. Zhao J, Deng Y, Tang J (2020) Grain refining with DDRX by isothermal MDF of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J Mater Res Technol 9(4):8001–8012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.03310.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.033 ↗
41. Huang K, Marthinsen K, Zhao Q, Logé RE (2018) The double-edge effect of second-phase particles on the recrystallization behaviour and associated mechanical properties of metallic materials. Progress Mater Sci 92:284–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.004 ↗
42. Zhao J, Deng Y, Xu F, Zhang J (2019) Effects of initial grain size of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy on the recrystallization behavior and recrystallization mechanism in isothermal compression. Metals 9(2):110. https://doi.org/10.3390/met902011010.3390/met9020110 ↗
43. Deng Y-L, Wan L, Zhang Y, Zhang X-M (2010) Evolution of microstructures and textures of 7050 Al alloy hot-rolled plate during staged solution heat-treatments. J Alloys Compd 498(1):88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.11710.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.117 ↗
44. Mikhaylovskaya AV, Kotov AD, Pozdniakov AV, Portnoy VK (2014) A high-strength aluminium-based alloy with advanced superplasticity. J Alloys Compd 599:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.06110.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.061 ↗
45. Castro-Fernandez F, Sellars C, Whiteman J (1990) Changes of flow stress and microstructure during hot deformation of Al–1Mg–1Mn. Mater Sci Technol 6(5):453–460. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1990.6.5.45310.1179/mst.1990.6.5.453 ↗
46. Gourdet S, Montheillet F (2000) An experimental study of the recrystallization mechanism during hot deformation of aluminium. Mater Sci Eng A 283(1):274–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00733-410.1016/S0921-5093(00)00733-4 ↗
47. Kaibyshev R, Shipilova K, Musin F, Motohashi Y (2005) Continuous dynamic recrystallization in an Al–Li–Mg–Sc alloy during equal-channel angular extrusion. Mater Sci Eng A 396(1):341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.01.05310.1016/j.msea.2005.01.053 ↗
48. Sakai T, Miura H, Goloborodko A, Sitdikov O (2009) Continuous dynamic recrystallization during the transient severe deformation of aluminum alloy 7475. Acta Mater 57(1):153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.00110.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.001 ↗
49. Liu X, Han S, Chen L, Yang S, Jin M, Guo B, Mao T (2017) Flow behavior and microstructural evolution of 7A85 high-strength aluminum alloy during hot deformation. Metall Mater Trans A 48(5):2336–2348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-017-4022-010.1007/s11661-017-4022-0 ↗
50. McQueen HJ, Knustad O, Ryum N, Solberg JK (1985) Microstructural evolution in Al deformed to strains of 60 at 400 °C. Scr Metall 19(1):73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0036-9748(85)90268-610.1016/0036-9748(85)90268-6 ↗
51. Blum W, Zhu Q, Merkel R, McQueen HJ (1996) Geometric dynamic recrystallization in hot torsion of Al-5Mg-0.6Mn (AA5083). Mater Sci Eng A 205(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(95)09990-510.1016/0921-5093(95)09990-5 ↗
52. Henshall GA, Kassner ME, McQueen HJ (1992) Dynamic restoration mechanisms in Al-5.8 At. Pct Mg deformed to large strains in the solute drag regime. Metall Trans A 23(3):881–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0267556510.1007/BF02675565 ↗
53. Huang K, Logé RE (2016) A review of dynamic recrystallization phenomena in metallic materials. Mater Des 111:548–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.01210.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.012 ↗
54. Li JP, Shen J, Yan XD, Mao BP, Yan LM (2008) Effect of temperature on microstructure evolution of 7075 alloy during hot deformation. Zhongguo Youse Jinshu Xuebao/Chin J Nonferrous Met 18(11):1951–1957
55. Rokni MR, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Abedi HR (2012) Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of back extruded 7075 aluminum alloy at elevated temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 532:593–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.11.02010.1016/j.msea.2011.11.020 ↗
56. Yang Y, Zhang Z, Li X, Wang Q, Zhang Y (2013) The effects of grain size on the hot deformation and processing map for 7075 aluminum alloy. Mater Des 51:592–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.03410.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.034 ↗
57. Yang Q, Deng Z, Zhang Z, Liu Q, Jia Z, Huang G (2016) Effects of strain rate on flow stress behavior and dynamic recrystallization mechanism of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu aluminum alloy during hot deformation. Mater Sci Eng A 662:204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.03.02710.1016/j.msea.2016.03.027 ↗
58. Sun ZC, Wu HL, Cao J, Yin ZK (2018) Modeling of continuous dynamic recrystallization of Al–Zn–Cu–Mg alloy during hot deformation based on the internal-state-variable (ISV) method. Int J Plast 106:73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.03.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2018.03.002 ↗
59. Drury M, Humphreys F (1986) The development of microstructure in Al–5%Mg during high temperature deformation. Acta Metall 34(11):2259–2271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(86)90171-910.1016/0001-6160(86)90171-9 ↗
60. Azarbarmas M, Aghaie-Khafri M, Cabrera J, Calvo J (2016) Microstructural evolution and constitutive equations of Inconel 718 alloy under quasi-static and quasi-dynamic conditions. Mater Des 94:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.15710.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.157 ↗
61. Chen SF, Li DY, Zhang SH, Han HN, Lee HW, Lee MG (2020) Modelling continuous dynamic recrystallization of aluminum alloys based on the polycrystal plasticity approach. Int J Plast 131:102710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10271010.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102710 ↗
62. Taheri-Mandarjani M, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Abedi HR (2015) Hot ductility behavior of an extruded 7075 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 637:107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.03810.1016/j.msea.2015.03.038 ↗
63. Liu W, Zhao H, Li D, Zhang Z, Huang G, Liu Q (2014) Hot deformation behavior of AA7085 aluminum alloy during isothermal compression at elevated temperature. Mater Sci Eng A 596:176–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.01210.1016/j.msea.2013.12.012 ↗
64. Nes E, Ryum N, Hunderi O (1985) On the Zener drag. Acta Metall 33(1):11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(85)90214-710.1016/0001-6160(85)90214-7 ↗
65. Su JQ, Nelson TW, Mishra R, Mahoney M (2003) Microstructural investigation of friction stir welded 7050–T651 aluminium. Acta Mater 51(3):713–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00449-410.1016/s1359-6454(02)00449-4 ↗
66. Zuo J, Hou L, Shi J, Cui H, Zhuang L, Zhang J (2017) Enhanced plasticity and corrosion resistance of high strength Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy processed by an improved thermomechanical processing. J Alloys Compd 716:220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.04710.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.047 ↗
67. Kumar A, Mukhopadhyay A, Prasad K (2009) Superplastic behavior of a high-strength Al–Zn–Mg–Cu -Zr alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 40(2):278–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-008-9736-610.1007/s11661-008-9736-6 ↗
68. Zang Q, Yu H, Lee Y-S, Kim M-S, Kim H-W (2018) Hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of annealed Al–7.9Zn–2.7Mg–2.0Cu (wt%) alloy. J Alloys Compd 763:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.30710.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.307 ↗
69. Zang Q, Yu H, Lee YS, Kim MS, Kim HW (2019) Effects of initial microstructure on hot deformation behavior of Al–7.9Zn–2.7Mg–2.0Cu (wt%) alloy. Mater Charact 151:404–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.03.01910.1016/j.matchar.2019.03.019 ↗
70. Park S, Kim W (2016) Difference in the hot compressive behavior and processing maps between the as-cast and homogenized Al–Zn–Mg–Cu (7075) alloys. J Mater Sci Technol 32(7):660–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2016.04.00610.1016/j.jmst.2016.04.006 ↗
71. Chang K, Feng W, Chen L-Q (2009) Effect of second-phase particle morphology on grain growth kinetics. Acta Mater 57(17):5229–5236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.02510.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.025 ↗
72. Robson JD, Henry DT, Davis B (2011) Particle effects on recrystallization in magnesium–manganese alloys: particle pinning. Mater Sci Eng A 528(12):4239–4247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.03010.1016/j.msea.2011.02.030 ↗
73. Yamagata H, Ohuchida Y, Saito N, Otsuka M (2001) Nucleation of new grains during discontinuous dynamic recrystallization of 99.998 mass% aluminum at 453 K. Scripta Mater 45(9):1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01139-310.1016/S1359-6462(01)01139-3 ↗
74. Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M (2012) Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena. Elsevier, Amsterdam
75. Humphreys F (1977) The nucleation of recrystallization at second phase particles in deformed aluminium. Acta Metall 25(11):1323–1344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(77)90109-210.1016/0001-6160(77)90109-2 ↗
76. Gutierrez-Urrutia I, Munoz-Morris M, Morris DG (2007) Contribution of microstructural parameters to strengthening in an ultrafine-grained Al–7% Si alloy processed by severe deformation. Acta Mater 55(4):1319–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.03710.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.037 ↗
77. Waldman J, Sulinski H, Markus H (1978) Thermomechanical processing of aluminum alloy ingots. In: Advances in deformation processing. Springer, pp 301–32010.1007/978-1-4613-4024-9_9 ↗
78. Wert JA, Paton N, Hamilton C, Mahoney M (1981) Grain refinement in 7075 aluminum by thermomechanical processing. Metall Trans A 12(7):1267–1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264234010.1007/BF02642340 ↗
79. Lu J, Song Y, Zhou P, Lin J (2020) Rheological behavior and dynamic softening mechanism of AA7075 sheet under isothermal tensile deformation. J Mater Res Technol 9(5):9784–9797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.04210.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.042 ↗
80. Bobbili R, Madhu V, Gogia AK (2016) Tensile behaviour of aluminium 7017 alloy at various temperatures and strain rates. J Mater Res Technol 5(2):190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.12.00210.1016/j.jmrt.2015.12.002 ↗
81. Wu X, Li L, Liu W, Li S, Zhang L, He H (2018) Development of adiabatic shearing bands in 7003–T4 aluminum alloy under high strain rate impacting. Mater Sci Eng A 732:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.06.08710.1016/j.msea.2018.06.087 ↗
82. Duffy J, Campbell JD, Hawley RH (1971) On the use of a torsional split hopkinson bar to study rate effects in 1100–0 aluminum. J Appl Mech 38(1):83–91. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.340877110.1115/1.3408771 ↗
83. Yang Y, Li XM, Chen SW, Zhang QM, Jiang F, Zheng HG (2010) Effects of pre-notches on the self-organization behaviors of shear bands in aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 527(20):5084–5091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.04.07910.1016/j.msea.2010.04.079 ↗
84. Guo P, Li L, Liu X, Ye T, Cao S, Xu C, Li S (2017) Compressive deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of AM80 magnesium alloy under quasi-static and dynamic loading. Int J Impact Eng 109:112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.004 ↗
85. Yang Y, Li XM, Tong XL, Zhang QM, Xu CY (2011) Effects of microstructure on the adiabatic shearing behaviors of titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 528(7):3130–3133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.06810.1016/j.msea.2010.12.068 ↗
86. Shi G, Zhang Y, Liu H, Li X, Wang G, Li Z, Yan L, Wen K, Xiong B (2019) Constructing processing maps for hot deformation and microstructural evolution of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloys. Mater Res Express 6(9):096566. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab2fb410.1088/2053-1591/ab2fb4 ↗
87. Wang L, Yu H, Lee Y, Kim H-W (2015) Hot tensile deformation behavior of twin roll casted 7075 aluminum alloy. Met Mater Int 21(5):832–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-015-5093-310.1007/s12540-015-5093-3 ↗
88. Lin YC, Li L-T, Xia Y-C, Jiang Y-Q (2013) Hot deformation and processing map of a typical Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J Alloys Compd 550:438–44510.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.114 ↗
89. Lin YC, Li LT, Fu YX, Jiang YQ (2012) Hot compressive deformation behavior of 7075 Al alloy under elevated temperature. J Mater Sci 47(3):1306–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5904-y10.1007/s10853-011-5904-y ↗
90. Xiao D, Peng X, Liang X, Deng Y, Xu G, Yin Z (2017) Study on hot workability of Al-5.87Zn-2.07Mg-2.28Cu alloy using processing map. JOM 69(4):725–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2144-210.1007/s11837-016-2144-2 ↗
91. Wang S, Luo JR, Hou LG, Zhang JS, Zhuang LZ (2016) Physically based constitutive analysis and microstructural evolution of AA7050 aluminum alloy during hot compression. Mater Des 107:277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.02310.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.023 ↗
92. Liu S, Wang S, Ye L, Deng Y, Zhang X (2016) Flow behavior and microstructure evolution of 7055 aluminum alloy impacted at high strain rates. Mater Sci Eng A 677:203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.09.04710.1016/j.msea.2016.09.047 ↗
93. Xiong Y, Li N, Jiang H, Li Z, Xu Z, Liu L (2014) Microstructural evolutions of AA7055 aluminum alloy under dynamic and quasi-static compressions. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters) 27(2):272–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-014-0041-710.1007/s40195-014-0041-7 ↗
94. Lee W-S, Tang Z-C (2014) Relationship between mechanical properties and microstructural response of 6061–T6 aluminum alloy impacted at elevated temperatures. Mater Des 58:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.05310.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.053 ↗
95. Khan AS, Liu H (2012) Variable strain rate sensitivity in an aluminum alloy: response and constitutive modeling. Int J Plast 36:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.02.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2012.02.001 ↗
96. He H, Wu X, Sun C, Li L (2019) Grain structure and precipitate variations in 7003–T6 aluminum alloys associated with high strain rate deformation. Mater Sci Eng A 745:429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.01.00310.1016/j.msea.2019.01.003 ↗
97. Zhang W, Chen X, Zhuo B, Li P, He L (2018) Effect of strain rate and temperature on dynamic mechanical behavior and microstructure evolution of ultra-high strength aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 730:336–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.06.01810.1016/j.msea.2018.06.018 ↗
98. Guo Y, Zhou M, Sun X, Qian L, Li L, Xie Y, Liu Z, Wu D, Yang L, Wu T (2018) Effects of temperature and strain rate on the fracture behaviors of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Materials 11(7):1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1107123310.3390/ma11071233 ↗
99. Ku AY, Khan AS, Gnäupel-Herold T (2020) Quasi-static and dynamic response, and texture evolution of two overaged Al 7056 alloy plates in T761 and T721 tempers: Experiments and modeling. Int J Plast 130:102679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10267910.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102679 ↗
100. Holmen JK, Frodal BH, Hopperstad OS, Børvik T (2017) Strength differential effect in age hardened aluminum alloys. Int J Plast 99:144–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.09.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2017.09.004 ↗