Recent developments on epoxy-based syntactic foams for deep sea exploration
Source abstract
Abstract
Epoxy syntactic foam (ESF) materials are widely used in marine detection systems, deep sea diving equipment, offshore oil exploration and other deep sea development and exploration equipment due to their superior properties such as low density, high compressive strength and low water absorption. The composition and preparation process of the ESF material determine the structure of the ESF material, the structure determines the performance, and the performance determines the application of the ESF material. The review describes the epoxy-based syntactic foams from the following aspects: definition and classification, preparation methods, properties and influencing factors, application, problems and development trend. The forming methods of hollow glass microspheres (solid-state powder processing method and liquid atomization method), hollow polymer microspheres (spray drying method) and centimeter-sized hollow spheres (rolling ball method and electrostatic fiber flocking method) are introduced in detail, as well as the casting molding method, vacuum molding method and pressure molding method of the syntactic foams. The main objective of this paper is focusing on the influence of various factors including filler content, graded structure, clay material, carbon material, fiber-reinforced material, molding process, material structure (sandwich structure) on the compressive strength and the density of the syntactic foam in detail. The paper may also provide some guidance to the preparation of ESF used in deep sea development and exploration equipment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Railway Systems and Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Ashrith HS, Doddamani M, Gaitonde V (2019) Effect of wall thickness and cutting parameters on drilling of glass microballoon/epoxy syntactic foam composites. Compos Struct 211:318–33610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.022 ↗
2. Dando KR, Cross WM, Robinson MJ, Salem DR (2019) Characterization of mixture epoxy syntactic foams highly loaded with thermoplastic and glass microballoons. J Compos Mater 53:1737–174910.1177/0021998318810782 ↗
3. Ding JJ, Ye F, Liu Q, Yang CP, Gao Y, Zhang B (2019) Co-continuous hollow glass microspheres/epoxy resin syntactic foam prepared by vacuum resin transfer molding. J Reinf Plast Comp 38:896–90910.1177/0731684419857173 ↗
4. Kaur M, Jayakumari LS (2019) Consequence of cenosphere loading on hygrothermal, thermal, and mechanical properties of epoxy syntactic foams. J Cell Plast 55:297–31810.1177/0021955X19837503 ↗
5. Shahapurkar K, Doddamani M, Kumar GCM, Gupta N (2019) Effect of cenosphere filler surface treatment on the erosion behavior of epoxy matrix syntactic foams. Polym Compos. 40:2109–211810.1002/pc.24994 ↗
6. Rohatgi PK, Matsunaga T, Gupta N (2009) Compressive and ultrasonic properties of polyester/fly ash composites. J Mater Sci 44:1485–1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3165-110.1007/s10853-008-3165-1 ↗
7. Shunmugasamy VC, Pinisetty D, Gupta N (2013) Viscoelastic properties of hollow glass particle filled vinyl ester matrix syntactic foams: effect of temperature and loading frequency. J Mater Sci 48:1685–1701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6927-810.1007/s10853-012-6927-8 ↗
8. Croom BP, Jin H, Mills B, Carroll J, Long K, Brown J et al (2019) Damage mechanisms in elastomeric foam composites: multiscale X-ray computed tomography and finite element analyses. Compos Sci Technol 169:195–20210.1016/j.compscitech.2018.11.025 ↗
9. Patterson BM, Henderson K, Smith Z (2013) Measure of morphological and performance properties in polymeric silicone foams by X-ray tomography. J Mater Sci 48:1986–1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6965-210.1007/s10853-012-6965-2 ↗
10. Koopman M, Chawla KK, Carlisle KB, Gladysz GM (2006) Microstructural failure modes in three-phase glass syntactic foams. J Mater Sci 41:4009–4014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7601-910.1007/s10853-006-7601-9 ↗
11. Gladysz GM, Perry B, McEachen G, Lula J (2006) Three-phase syntactic foams: structure-property relationships. J Mater Sci 41:4085–4092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7646-910.1007/s10853-006-7646-9 ↗
12. Dando KR, Cross WM, Robinson MJ, Salem DR (2018) Production and characterization of epoxy syntactic foams highly loaded with thermoplastic microballoons. J Cell Plast 54:499–51410.1177/0021955X17700093 ↗
13. Zegeye E, Wicker S, Woldesenbet E (2018) AC and DC electrical properties of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced epoxy syntactic foam. Mater Res Express 5:04560510.1088/2053-1591/aabbfd ↗
14. Zeltmann SE, Chen B, Gupta N (2018) Thermal expansion and dynamic mechanical analysis of epoxy matrix-borosilicate glass hollow particle syntactic foams. J Cell Plast 54:463–48110.1177/0021955X17691566 ↗
15. Yu W, Xue HL (2017) Effect of soaking corrosion on flexural properties of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy syntactic foams. Fiber Polym 18:971–97810.1007/s12221-017-7057-3 ↗
16. Yu W, Xue HL, Qian M (2017) Tensile and compressive properties of epoxy syntactic foams reinforced by short glass fiber. Indian J Eng Mater S 24:283–289
17. Zhang XG, Ya B, Huang BK, Zhou BW, Pei LZ, Jia F (2017) Study on preparation and properties of carbon nanotubes/hollow glass microspheres/epoxy syntactic foam. J Polym Eng 37:93–9810.1515/polyeng-2016-0001 ↗
18. Karthikeyan CS, Sankaran S, Kumar MNJ, Kishore, (2001) Processing and compressive strengths of syntactic foams with and without fibrous reinforcements. J Appl Polym Sci 81:405–41110.1002/app.1452 ↗
19. Kishore SR, Sankaran S (2006) Effects of microballoons' size and content in epoxy on compressive strength and modulus. J Mater Sci 41:7459–7465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0801-510.1007/s10853-006-0801-5 ↗
20. Panteghini A, Bardella L (2015) On the compressive strength of glass microballoons-based syntactic foams. Mech Mater 82:63–7710.1016/j.mechmat.2014.12.005 ↗
21. Gupta N, Pinisetty D, Shunmugasamy VC (2013) Reinforced polymer matrix syntactic foams. Springerbriefs in Materials, New York10.1007/978-3-319-01243-8 ↗
22. Sankaran S, Ravishankar BN, Sekhar KR, Dasgupta S, Kumar MNJ (2017) Syntactic foams for multifunctional applications. In: Kar KK (ed) Composite materials. Springer, Berlin
23. Cavasin M, Giannis S, Salvo M, Casalegno V, Sangermano M (2018) Mechanical and thermal characterization of an epoxy foam as thermal layer insulation for a glass fiber reinforced polymer. J Appl Polym Sci 135:4686410.1002/app.46864 ↗
24. Kishore SR, Sankaran S (2005) Short beam three point bend tests in syntactic foams. Part 1: microscopic characterization of the failure zones. J Appl Polym Sci 98:673–67910.1002/app.22096 ↗
25. Kishore SR, Sankaran S (2005) Short-beam three-point bend tests in syntactic foams. Part II: effect of microballoons content on shear strength. J Appl Polym Sci 98:680–68610.1002/app.22097 ↗
26. Kishore SR, Sankaran S (2005) Short-beam three-point bend test study in syntactic foam. Part III: effects of interface modification on strength and fractographic features. J Appl Polym Sci 98:687–69310.1002/app.22098 ↗
27. Saha MC, Nilufar S (2010) Nanoclay-reinforced syntactic foams: flexure and thermal behavior. Polym Compos 31:1332–134210.1002/pc.20918 ↗
28. Gupta N, Nagorny R (2006) Tensile properties of glass microballoon-epoxy resin syntactic foams. J Appl Polym Sci 102:1254–126110.1002/app.23548 ↗
29. Kumar BRB, Zeltmann SE, Doddamani M, Gupta N, Uzma GS et al (2016) Effect of cenosphere surface treatment and blending method on the tensile properties of thermoplastic matrix syntactic foams. J Appl Polym Sci 133:4388110.1002/app.43881 ↗
30. Robert TM, Nair S, Mathew D, Nair CPR (2018) Room temperature processable heat-resistant epoxy-oxazolidone-based syntactic foams. Polym Advan Technol 29:121–12910.1002/pat.4094 ↗
31. Waddar S, Pitchaimani J, Doddamani M (2018) Snap-through buckling of fly ash cenosphere/epoxy syntactic foams under thermal environment. Thin Wall Struct 131:417–42710.1016/j.tws.2018.07.013 ↗
32. Wang Z, Zhang T, Park BK, Lee WI, Hwang DJ (2017) Minimal contact formation between hollow glass microparticles toward low-density and thermally insulating composite materials. J Mater Sci 52:6726–6740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0908-x10.1007/s10853-017-0908-x ↗
33. Shabde VS, Hoo KA, Gladysz GM (2006) Experimental determination of the thermal conductivity of three-phase syntactic foams. J Mater Sci 41:4061–4073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7637-x10.1007/s10853-006-7637-x ↗
34. Gupta N, Pinisetty D (2013) A review of thermal conductivity of polymer matrix syntactic foams-effect of hollow particle wall thickness and volume fraction. JOM 65:234–24510.1007/s11837-012-0512-0 ↗
35. Chen P, Li JC, Zhang L (2018) Analysis of mechanical characteristics of fly ash cenospheres reinforced epoxy composites. J Wuhan Univ Technol 33:139–14510.1007/s11595-018-1798-8 ↗
36. Singh AK, Shishkin A, Koppel T, Gupta N (2018) A review of porous lightweight composite materials for electromagnetic interference shielding. Compos Part B-Eng 149:188–19710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.05.027 ↗
37. Shunmugasamy VC, Pinisetty D, Gupta N (2014) Electrical properties of hollow glass particle filled vinyl ester matrix syntactic foams. J Mater Sci 49:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7691-010.1007/s10853-013-7691-0 ↗
38. Xiang YS, Wang LJ, Yang Z, Gao P, Qin SH, Yu J (2019) Effect of aluminum phosphinate on the flame-retardant properties of epoxy syntactic foams. J Therm Anal Calorim 137:1645–165610.1007/s10973-019-08051-9 ↗
39. Manakari V, Parande G, Doddamani M, Gaitonde VN, Siddhalingeshwar IG, Kishore SR et al (2015) Dry sliding wear of epoxy/cenosphere syntactic foams. Tribol Int 92:425–43810.1016/j.triboint.2015.07.026 ↗
40. Shahapurkar K, Chavan VB, Doddamani M, Kumar GCM (2018) Influence of surface modification on wear behavior of fly ash cenosphere/epoxy syntactic foam. Wear 414:327–34010.1016/j.wear.2018.09.001 ↗
41. Zhang LY, Wang LB, See KY, Ma J (2013) Effect of carbon nanofiber reinforcement on electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of syntactic foam. J Mater Sci 48:7757–7763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7597-x10.1007/s10853-013-7597-x ↗
42. Park J, Yang SH, Minn KS, Yu CB, Pak SY, Song YS et al (2018) Design and numerical analysis of syntactic hybrid foam for superior sound absorption. Mater Design 142:212–22010.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.040 ↗
43. Tagliavia G, Porfiri M, Gupta N (2009) Vinyl ester—glass hollow particle composites: dynamic mechanical properties at high inclusion volume fraction. J Compos Mater 43:561–58210.1177/0021998308097683 ↗
44. Gupta N, Ye R, Porfiri M (2010) Comparison of tensile and compressive characteristics of vinyl ester/glass microballoon syntactic foams. Compos Part B-Eng 41:236–24510.1016/j.compositesb.2009.07.004 ↗
45. Zhang L, Ma J (2010) Effect of coupling agent on mechanical properties of hollow carbon microsphere/phenolic resin syntactic foam. Compos Sci Technol 70:1265–127110.1016/j.compscitech.2010.03.016 ↗
46. Islam MM, Kim HS (2012) Sandwich composites made of syntactic foam core and paper skin: manufacturing and mechanical behavior. J Sandw Struct Mater 14:111–12710.1177/1099636211413564 ↗
47. Narkis M, Kenig S, Puterman M (1984) Three-phase syntactic foams Polym Composite 5:159–165
48. Yu M, Zhu P, Ma Y (2013) Effects of particle clustering on the tensile properties and failure mechanisms of hollow spheres filled syntactic foams: a numerical investigation by microstructure based modeling. Mater Design 47:80–8910.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.004 ↗
49. Yu M, Zhu P, Ma Y (2012) Global sensitivity analysis for the elastic properties of hollow spheres filled syntactic foams using high dimensional model representation method. Comput Mater Sci 61:89–9810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.04.005 ↗
50. Peroni L, Scapin M, Avalle M, Weise J, Lehmhus D (2012) Dynamic mechanical behavior of syntactic iron foams with glass microspheres. Mater Sci Eng A-Struct 552:364–37510.1016/j.msea.2012.05.053 ↗
51. Ji S, Srivastava D, Parker NJ, Lee I (2012) Transitional behavior of polymeric hollow microsphere formation in turbulent shear flow by emulsion diffusion method. Polymer 53:205–21210.1016/j.polymer.2011.11.013 ↗
52. Liang J-Z (2014) Estimation of thermal conductivity for polypropylene/hollow glass bead composites. Compos Part B: Eng 56:431–43410.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.072 ↗
53. Gu FN, Lin WG, Yang JY, Wei F, Wang Y, Zhu JH (2012) Fabrication of centimeter-sized sphere of mesoporous silica with well-defined hollow nanosphere topology and its high performance in adsorbing phenylalanine. Micropor Mesopor Mat 151:142–14810.1016/j.micromeso.2011.11.001 ↗
54. Vereshchagina TA, Vereshchagin SN, Shishkina NN, Mikhaylova OA, Solovyov LA, Anshits AG (2013) One-step fabrication of hollow aluminosilicate microspheres with a composite zeolite/glass crystalline shell. Micropor Mesopor Mat 169:207–21110.1016/j.micromeso.2012.11.010 ↗
55. Yuan C, Zeng B, Yu S, Mao J, Chen X, Luo W et al (2014) An airflow-controlled solvent evaporation route to hollow microspheres and colloidosomes. RSC Adv 4:4796–480310.1039/c3ra45758c ↗
56. Yuan C, Li J, Hou L, Lin J, Pang G, Zhang L et al (2013) Template-engaged synthesis of uniform mesoporous hollow NiCo2O4 sub-microspheres towards high-performance electrochemical capacitors. RSC Adv 3:18573–1857810.1039/c3ra42828a ↗
57. Yu J, Li Z, Liu Q, Wang J, Wei H, Zhang M et al (2013) Uranium (VI) adsorption on alumina hollow microspheres synthesized via a facile self-templating process. RSC Adv 3:6621–662610.1039/c3ra23494k ↗
58. Yu J, Le Y, Cheng B (2012) Fabrication and CO2 adsorption performance of bimodal porous silica hollow spheres with amine-modified surfaces. RSC Adv 2:6784–679110.1039/c2ra21017g ↗
59. Wang A-X, Chu D-Q, Wang L-M, Mao B-G, Sun H-M, Ma Z-C (2014) Template-free hydrothermal synthesis of copper hollow microspheres: microstructure, formation mechanism and compression plasticity. RSC Adv 4:7545–754810.1039/c3ra47127f ↗
60. Shi Z-Q, Jiao L-X, Sun J, Chen Z-B, Chen Y-Z, Zhu X-H et al (2014) Cobalt nanoparticles in hollow mesoporous spheres as a highly efficient and rapid magnetically separable catalyst for selective epoxidation of styrene with molecular oxygen. RSC Adv 4:47–5310.1039/C3RA45383A ↗
61. Panigrahi R, Srivastava SK (2013) Ultrasound assisted synthesis of a polyaniline hollow microsphere/Ag core/shell structure for sensing and catalytic applications. RSC Adv 3:7808–781510.1039/c3ra23002c ↗
62. Cai W, Wang W, Yang Y, Ren G, Chen T (2014) Sulfonated polystyrene spheres as template for fabricating hollow compact silver spheres via silver–mirror reaction at low temperature. RSC Adv 4:2295–229910.1039/C3RA46210B ↗
63. Beesabathuni S, Stockham J, Kim J, Lee H, Chung J, Shen A (2013) Fabrication of conducting polyaniline microspheres using droplet microfluidics. RSC Adv 3:24423–2442910.1039/c3ra44808h ↗
64. Xie Q, Guo H, Zhang X, Lu A, Zeng D, Chen Y et al (2013) A facile approach to fabrication of well-dispersed NiO–ZnO composite hollow microspheres. RSC Adv 3:24430–2443910.1039/C3RA43678K ↗
65. Liu R, Du W, Chen Q, Gao F, Wei C, Sun J et al (2013) Fabrication of Zn2SnO4/SnO2 hollow spheres and their application in dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv 3:2893–289610.1039/c2ra22320a ↗
66. Lin TC, Gupta N, Talalayev A (2009) Thermoanalytical characterization of epoxy matrix-glass microballoon syntactic foams. J Mater Sci 44:1520–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3074-310.1007/s10853-008-3074-3 ↗
67. An XZ, He SS, Feng HD, Qian Q (2015) Packing densification of binary mixtures of spheres and cubes subjected to 3D mechanical vibrations. Appl Phys A-Mater 118:151–16210.1007/s00339-014-8835-z ↗
68. Yerazunis PS, Cornell SW, Wintner B (1965) Dense random packing of binary mixtures of spheres. Nature 207:835–83710.1038/207835a0 ↗
69. Yu AB, Standish N (1988) An analytical—parametric theory of the random packing of particles. Powder Technol 55:171–18610.1016/0032-5910(88)80101-3 ↗
70. Gupta N, Kishore WE, Sankaran S (2001) Studies on compressive failure features in syntactic foam material. J Mater Sci 36:4485–4491. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101798682060310.1023/A:1017986820603 ↗
71. Gupta N, Woldesenbet E, Kishore SR (2002) Compressive fracture features of syntactic foams-microscopic examination. J Mater Sci 37:3199–3209. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101616652984110.1023/A:1016166529841 ↗
72. Kim HS, Khamis MA (2001) Fracture and impact behaviours of hollow micro-sphere/epoxy resin composites. Compos Part A-Appl S 32:1311–131710.1016/S1359-835X(01)00098-7 ↗
73. Kim HS, Oh HH (2000) Manufacturing and impact behavior of syntactic foam. J Appl Polym Sci 76:1324–132810.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000523)76:8<1324::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
74. Ding JJ, Ye F, Liu Q, Yang CP, Gao Y (2019) Preparation of lightweight hollow glass microsphere ceramics by gel casting. Ceram Int 45:10126–1013210.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.060 ↗
75. Zhou JG, Zhao HY, Wang JT, Qiao WM, Long DH, Ling LC (2016) Scalable preparation of hollow polymer and carbon microspheres by spray drying and their application in low-density syntactic foam. Mater Chem Phys 181:150–15810.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.06.044 ↗
76. Wu XF, Dong LH, Zhang FH, Zhou Y, Wang LP, Wang DS et al (2016) Preparation and characterization of three phase epoxy syntactic foam filled with carbon fiber reinforced hollow epoxy macrospheres and hollow glass microspheres. Polym Compos 37:497–50210.1002/pc.23205 ↗
77. Wu XF, Tang B, Yu JH, Cao X, Zhang CY, Lv YG (2018) Preparation and investigation of epoxy syntactic foam (epoxy/graphite reinforced hollow epoxy macrosphere/hollow glass microsphere composite). Fiber Polym 19:170–18710.1007/s12221-018-7584-y ↗
78. Wu XF, Wang Y, Yang XR, Yu JH, Wang LC, Hou SJ et al (2015) A "rolling ball method" to make glass fiber reinforced hollow epoxy macrospheres used for a three phase epoxy syntactic foam. RSC Adv 5:61204–6121710.1039/C5RA07048A ↗
79. Yu QY, Zhao Y, Dong AQ, Li Y (2019) Comparison of two different methods for producing hollow macrospheres with carbon fiber reinforced composite skin used in syntactic foams. Polym Compos 40:E1075–E108310.1002/pc.24862 ↗
80. Yung K, Zhu B, Yue T, Xie C (2009) Preparation and properties of hollow glass microsphere-filled epoxy-matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 69:260–26410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.014 ↗
81. Caeti R, Gupta N, Porfiri M (2009) Processing and compressive response of functionally graded composites. Mater Lett 63:1964–196710.1016/j.matlet.2009.06.024 ↗
82. Karthikeyan C, Sankaran S (2004) Elastic behaviour of plain and fibre-reinforced syntactic foams under compression. Mater Lett 58:995–99910.1016/j.matlet.2003.08.012 ↗
83. Samsudin SS, Ariff ZM, Zakaria Z, Bakar AA (2011) Development and characterization of epoxy syntactic foam filled with epoxy hollow spheres. Express Polym Lett 5:653–66010.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.63 ↗
84. Poveda RL, Achar S, Gupta N (2014) Viscoelastic properties of carbon nanofiber reinforced multiscale syntactic foam. Compos Part B-Eng 58:208–21610.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.079 ↗
85. Altuna FI, Esposito L, Ruseckaite RA, Stefani PM (2010) Syntactic foams from copolymers based on epoxidized soybean oil. Compos Part A-Appl S 41:1238–124410.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.006 ↗
86. Manoj KDMA, Mondal DP (2018) High temperature deformation behavior of closed cell ZnAl27 hybrid foam made through stir casting technique. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 731:324–33010.1016/j.msea.2018.06.044 ↗
87. Mondal DP, Das S, Ramakrishnan N, Bhasker KU (2009) Cenosphere filled aluminum syntactic foam made through stir-casting technique. Compos Part A-Appl S 40:279–28810.1016/j.compositesa.2008.12.006 ↗
88. Huang RX, Li PF (2015) Elastic behaviour and failure mechanism in epoxy syntactic foams: the effect of glass microballoon volume fractions. Compos Part B-Eng 78:401–40810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.002 ↗
89. Braszczynska-Malik KN, Kamieniak J (2017) AZ91 magnesium matrix foam composites with fly ash cenospheres fabricated by negative pressure infiltration technique. Mater Charact 128:209–21610.1016/j.matchar.2017.04.005 ↗
90. Anbuchezhiyan G, Muthuramalingam T, Mohan B (2018) Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties of hollow glass microsphere reinforced magnesium alloy syntactic foams under vacuum die casting. Arch Civ Mech Eng 18:1645–165010.1016/j.acme.2018.07.008 ↗
91. Palmer RA, Gao K, Doan TM, Green L, Cavallaro G (2007) Pressure infiltrated syntactic foams—process development and mechanical properties. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 464:85–9210.1016/j.msea.2007.01.116 ↗
92. Szlancsik A, Katona B, Bobor K, Majlinger K, Orbulov IN (2015) Compressive behaviour of aluminium matrix syntactic foams reinforced by iron hollow spheres. Mater Design 83:230–23710.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.011 ↗
93. Omar MY, Xiang CC, Gupta N, Strbik OM, Cho K (2015) Syntactic foam core metal matrix sandwich composite: compressive properties and strain rate effects. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 643:156–16810.1016/j.msea.2015.07.033 ↗
94. Omar MY, Xiang CC, Gupta N, Strbik OM, Cho K (2015) Syntactic foam core metal matrix sandwich composite under bending conditions. Mater Design 86:536–54410.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.127 ↗
95. Pham TM, Kingston J, Strickland G, Chen WS, Hao H (2018) Effect of crumb rubber on mechanical properties of multi-phase syntactic foams. Polym Test 66:1–1210.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.12.033 ↗
96. Afolabi LO, Mutalib NAA, Ariff ZM (2019) Fabrication and characterization of two-phase syntactic foam using vacuum assisted mould filling technique. J Mater Res Technol 8:3843–385110.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.046 ↗
97. Yu QY, Zhao Y, Dong AQ, Li Y (2018) Mechanical properties of EPS filled syntactic foams prepared by VARTM. Compos Part B-Eng 136:126–13410.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.053 ↗
98. Fan ZQ, Miao YZ, Wang ZZ, Zhang BB, Ma HH (2019) Effect of the cenospheres size and internally lateral constraints on dynamic compressive behavior of fly ash cenospheres polyurethane syntactic foams. Compos Part B-Eng 171:329–33810.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.008 ↗
99. Zhang BB, Fan ZQ, Hu SQ, Shen ZW, Ma HH (2019) Mechanical response of the fly ash cenospheres/polyurethane syntactic foams fabricated through infiltration process. Constr Build Mater 206:552–55910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.047 ↗
100. Zhang Q, Lin YF, Chi HT, Chang J, Wu GH (2018) Quasi-static and dynamic compression behavior of glass cenospheres/5A03 syntactic foam and its sandwich structure. Compos Struct 183:499–50910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.024 ↗