Effect of hybridization of liquid rubber and nanosilica particles on the morphology, mechanical properties, and fracture toughness of epoxy composites
Source abstract
Abstract
A liquid carboxyl-terminated butadiene–acrylonitrile copolymer (CTBN) and SiO2 particles in nanosize were used to modify epoxy, and binary CTBN/epoxy composites and ternary CTBN/SiO2/epoxy composites were prepared using piperidine as curing agent. The morphologies of the composites were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM), and it is indicated that the size of CTBN particles increases with CTBN content in the binary composites, however, the CTBN particle size decreases with the content of nanosilica in the ternary composites. The effects of CTBN and nanosilica particles on the mechanical and fracture toughness of the composites were also investigated, it is shown that the tensile mechanical properties of the binary CTBN-modified epoxy composites can be further improved by addition of nanosilica particles, moreover, obvious improvement in fracture toughness of epoxy can be achieved by hybridization of liquid CTBN rubber and nanosilica particles. The morphologies of the fractured surface of the composites in compact tension tests were explored attentively by field emission SEM (FE-SEM), it is found that different zones (pre-crack, stable crack propagation, and fast crack zones) on the fractured surface can be obviously discriminated, and the toughening mechanism is mainly related to the stable crack propagation zone. The cavitation of the rubber particles and subsequent void growth by matrix shear deformation are the main toughening mechanisms in both binary and ternary composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Yee AF, Du J, Thouless MD (2000) In: Paul DR, Bucknall CB (eds) Polymer blends, vol 2. Wiley, New York
2. McGarry FJ (1970) Proc R Soc A319:59. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1970.016510.1098/rspa.1970.0165 ↗
3. Kunz-Douglass S, Beaumont PWR, Ashby MF (1980) J Mater Sci 15:1109. doi: 10.1007/BF0055179910.1007/BF00551799 ↗
4. Bascom WD, Cottington RL, Jones RL, Peyser P (1975) J Appl Polym Sci 19:2545. doi: 10.1002/app.1975.07019091710.1002/app.1975.070190917 ↗
5. Yee AF, Pearson RA (1986) J Mater Sci 21:2462. doi: 10.1007/BF0111429310.1007/BF01114293 ↗
6. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1989) J Mater Sci 24:2571. doi: 10.1007/BF0117452810.1007/BF01174528 ↗
7. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ, Tod DA, Hunston DL (1983) Polymer 24:1341. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(83)90070-810.1016/0032-3861(83)90070-8 ↗
8. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ, Hunston DL (1983) Polymer 24:1355. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(83)90071-x10.1016/0032-3861(83)90071-X ↗
9. Ratna D, Banthia AK (2004) Macromol Res 12:11. doi: 10.1007/BF0321898910.1007/BF03218989 ↗
10. Bagheri R, Marouf BT, Pearson RA (2009) Polym Rev 49:201. doi: 10.1080/1558372090304822710.1080/15583720903048227 ↗
11. Unnikrishnan KP, Thachil ET (2006) Des Monomers Polym 9:129. doi: 10.1163/15685550677638266410.1163/156855506776382664 ↗
12. Garg AC, Mai YW (1988) Compos Sci Technol 31:179. doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(88)90009-710.1016/0266-3538(88)90009-7 ↗
13. Bucknall CB, Partridge IK (1983) Polymer 24:639. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(83)90120-910.1016/0032-3861(83)90120-9 ↗
14. Cecere JA, McGrath JE (1986) Polym Prepr 27:29910.1016/0032-3861(86)90344-7 ↗
15. Kim SC, Brown HR (1987) J Mater Sci 22:2589. doi: 10.1007/bf0108214910.1007/BF01082149 ↗
16. MacKinnon AJ, Jenkins SD, McGrail PT, Pethrick RA (1992) Macromolecules 25:3492. doi: 10.1021/ma00039a02910.1021/ma00039a029 ↗
17. Kinloch AJ, Yuen ML, Jenkins SD (1994) J Mater Sci 29:3781. doi: 10.1007/bf0035734910.1007/BF00357349 ↗
18. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1993) Polymer 34:3658. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(93)90051-b10.1016/0032-3861(93)90051-B ↗
19. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1991) J Mater Sci 26:3828. doi: 10.1007/bf0118497910.1007/BF01184979 ↗
20. Bagheri R, Kinloch AJ (1996) J Mater Sci 31:3945. doi: 10.1007/bf0035265510.1007/BF00352655 ↗
21. Sue HJ (1991) Polym Eng Sci 31:275. doi: 10.1002/pen.76031041110.1002/pen.760310411 ↗
22. Gam KT, Miyamoto M, Nishimura R, Sue HJ (2003) Polym Eng Sci 43:1635. doi: 10.1002/pen.1013710.1002/pen.10137 ↗
23. Nguyen-Thuc BH, Maazouz A (2002) Polym Eng Sci 42:120. doi: 10.1002/pen.1093310.1002/pen.10933 ↗
24. Mafi ER, Ebrahimi M (2008) Polym Eng Sci 48:1376. doi: 10.1002/pen.2110410.1002/pen.21104 ↗
25. Giannakopoulos G, Masania K, Taylor AC (2011) J Mater Sci 46:327. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4816-610.1007/s10853-010-4816-6 ↗
26. Johnsen BB, Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2007) Polymer 48:530. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.03810.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.038 ↗
27. Adachi T, Osaki M, Araki W, Kwon SC (2008) Acta Mater 56:2101. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.00210.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.002 ↗
28. Qi B, Zhang QX, Bannister M, Mai YW (2006) Compos Struct 75:514. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.03210.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.032 ↗
29. Auad ML (2007) Exp Polym Lett 1:629. doi: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.8610.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.86 ↗
30. Zhou YX (2008) Exp Polym Lett 2:40. doi: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.610.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.6 ↗
31. Deng S, Zhang J, Ye L, Wu J (2008) Polymer 49:5119. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.02710.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.027 ↗
32. Kelnar I, Khunová V, Kotek J, Kaprálková L (2007) Polymer 48:5332. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.06210.1016/j.polymer.2007.06.062 ↗
33. Wang YT (2012) Exp Polym Lett 6:719. doi: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.7710.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.77 ↗
34. Kusmono Mohd, Ishak ZA, Chow WS, Takeichi T, Rochmadi (2008) Eur Polym J 44:1023. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.01.01910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.01.019 ↗
35. Bashar M (2011) Exp Polym Lett 5:882. doi: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.8710.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.87 ↗
36. Kinloch A, Mohammed R, Taylor A, Eger C, Sprenger S, Egan D (2005) J Mater Sci 40:5083. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-1716-210.1007/s10853-005-1716-2 ↗
37. ASTM D638-99 (1999) Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM
38. ASTM D5045-99 (1999) In: Standard test methods for plane strain fracture toughness and strain energy release rate of plastic materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
39. Yamanaka K, Inoue T (1990) J Mater Sci 25:241. doi: 10.1007/bf0054421410.1007/BF00544214 ↗
40. Yamanaka K, Takagi Y, Inoue T (1989) Polymer 30:1839. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(89)90355-810.1016/0032-3861(89)90355-8 ↗
41. Thomas R, Abraham J, Thomas PS, Thomas S (2004) J Polym Sci, Part B 42:2531. doi: 10.1002/polb.2011510.1002/polb.20115 ↗
42. Kim NH, Kim HS (2006) J Appl Polym Sci 100:4470. doi: 10.1002/app.2298710.1002/app.22987 ↗
43. Hsu YG, Liang CW (2007) J Appl Polym Sci 106:1576. doi: 10.1002/app.2541210.1002/app.25412 ↗
44. Lazzeri A, Bucknall CB (1993) J Mater Sci 28:6799. doi: 10.1007/bf0035643310.1007/BF00356433 ↗
45. Gao XL (2008) Math Mech Solids 138:357. doi: 10.1177/1081286507086906
46. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) Polymer 51:6284. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.04810.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.048 ↗