DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2022-04

Nanocellulose and its derivative materials for energy and environmental applications

Sherin Peter, Nathalie Lyczko, Deepu Gopakumar, Hanna J. Maria, Ange Nzihou, Sabu Thomas

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 13
Publisher page
Source abstract

Abstract

The application of biomass-derived renewable materials has generated great interest in recent research works. Among many such biopolymers, nanocellulose has become the leading topic in the sphere of sustainable material owing to the outstanding mechanical, chemical and thermal properties along with non-toxicity, surface functionality, ease of modification and sustainability. Nanocellulose is often considered to be a second-generation renewable resource and a better replacement for conventional petroleum-based products with or without any modifications. Even though some reviews have reported on some of the applications of nanocellulose, so far there is no comprehensive report gathering the extraction, properties, functionalization towards energy and environmental applications. This review aims to present the use of nanocellulose based materials for energy and environmental challenges. Important characteristics such as crystallinity, hydrophilicity, thermal decomposition and surface charge are described as a function of the targeted applications. In the latter part of this review, we have looked into the recent studies in the area of applications such as air pollution, heavy metal sorption, dye adsorption, biosensors, EMI shielding, fuel cell, solar cell, lithium-ion batteries and biofuels etc. However, a green, sustainable and scalable nanocellulose extraction is yet to be fulfilled. In our view, the bacterial nanocellulose based approach can address all these issues with the added advantage of producing a very high purity of nanocellulose. Hence this review is intended to provide new insights into the field of eco-friendly functional materials with included in-depth perspectives about nanocellulose and its future based on the current research trends.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

Energy storageNanomaterials

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Soares LA, Silva EL, Varesche MBA (2021) Dissecting the role of heterogeneity and hydrothermal pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse in metabolic pathways for biofuels production. Ind Crops Prod 160:113120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.11312010.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113120 ↗
2. Gopakumar DA, Pasquini D, Henrique MA et al (2017) Meldrum’s acid modified cellulose nanofiber-based polyvinylidene fluoride microfiltration membrane for dye water treatment and nanoparticle removal. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0295210.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02952 ↗
3. Gopakumar DA, Pai AR, Pottathara YB et al (2018) Cellulose nanofiber-based polyaniline flexible papers as sustainable microwave absorbers in the X-band. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b0454910.1021/acsami.8b04549 ↗
4. Li Z, Gou M, Yue X et al (2021) Facile fabrication of bifunctional ZIF-L/cellulose composite membrane for efficient removal of tellurium and antibacterial effects. J Hazard Mater 416:125888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12588810.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125888 ↗
5. Ghanadpour M, Carosio F, Larsson PT, Wågberg L (2015) Phosphorylated cellulose nanofibrils: a renewable nanomaterial for the preparation of intrinsically flame-retardant materials. Biomacromol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0111710.1021/acs.biomac.5b01117 ↗
6. Ai J, Yang S, Sun Y et al (2021) Corncob cellulose-derived hierarchical porous carbon for high performance supercapacitors. J Power Sources 484:229221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22922110.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229221 ↗
7. Thomas MG, Abraham E, Jyotishkumar P et al (2015) Nanocelluloses from jute fibers and their nanocomposites with natural rubber: Preparation and characterization. Int J Biol Macromol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.05310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.053 ↗
8. Abdelhamid HN, Mathew AP (2022) Cellulose–metal organic frameworks (CelloMOFs) hybrid materials and their multifaceted applications: a review. Coord Chem Rev 451:214263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CCR.2021.21426310.1016/J.CCR.2021.214263 ↗
9. Chen X, Wang K, Wang Z et al (2021) Highly stretchable composites based on cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 170:71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2020.12.11610.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2020.12.116 ↗
10. Chen C, Hu L (2018) Nanocellulose toward advanced energy storage devices: structure and electrochemistry. Acc Chem Res. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0039110.1021/acs.accounts.8b00391 ↗
11. Chami Khazraji A, Robert S (2013) Self-assembly and intermolecular forces when cellulose and water interact using molecular modeling. J Nanomater. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/74597910.1155/2013/745979 ↗
12. Chirayil CJ, Joy J, Mathew L et al (2014) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from Helicteres isora plant. Ind Crops Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.04.02010.1016/j.indcrop.2014.04.020 ↗
13. Zhang L, Ruan D, Gao S (2002) Dissolution and regeneration of cellulose in NaOH/thiourea aqueous solution. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 40:1521–1529. https://doi.org/10.1002/POLB.1021510.1002/POLB.10215 ↗
14. Yamane C, Aoyagi T, Ago M et al (2006) Two different surface properties of regenerated cellulose due to structural anisotropy. Polym J 38:819–826. https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.pj200518710.1295/polymj.pj2005187 ↗
15. Medronho B, Romano A, Miguel MG et al (2012) Rationalizing cellulose (in)solubility: reviewing basic physicochemical aspects and role of hydrophobic interactions. Cellulose 19:581–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10570-011-9644-6/FIGURES/110.1007/S10570-011-9644-6/FIGURES/1 ↗
16. Cai J, Zhang L (2005) Rapid dissolution of cellulose in LiOH/Urea and NaOH/urea aqueous solutions. Macromol Biosci 5:539–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/MABI.20040022210.1002/MABI.200400222 ↗
17. Yan L, Gao Z (2008) Dissolving of cellulose in PEG/NaOH aqueous solution. Cellulose 15:789–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10570-008-9233-5/FIGURES/910.1007/S10570-008-9233-5/FIGURES/9 ↗
18. Leão A, Sartor S, Caraschi J (2006) Natural fibers based composites—technical and social issues. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst. https://doi.org/10.1080/1542140050038808810.1080/15421400500388088 ↗
19. Abraham E, Deepa B, Pothan LA et al (2011) Extraction of nanocellulose fibrils from lignocellulosic fibres: A novel approach. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.03410.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.034 ↗
20. Satyanarayana KG, Arizaga GGC, Wypych F (2009) Biodegradable composites based on lignocellulosic fibers—an overview. Progress in Polymer Science (Oxford)10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.12.002 ↗
21. Reddy N, Yang Y (2005) Biofibers from agricultural byproducts for industrial applications. Trends Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.00210.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.002 ↗
22. Bismarck A, Aranberri-Askargorta I, Springer J et al (2002) Surface characterization of flax, hemp and cellulose fibers: surface properties and the water uptake behavior. Polym Compos 6:66. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.1048510.1002/pc.10485 ↗
23. Abdul Khalil HPS, Hanida S, Kang CW, Nik Fuaad NA (2007) Agro-hybrid composite: the effects on mechanical and physical properties of oil palm fiber (EFB)/glass hybrid reinforced polyester composites. J Reinf Plast Compos. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168440707002710.1177/0731684407070027 ↗
24. Reddy N, Yang Y (2006) Properties of high-quality long natural cellulose fibers from rice straw. J Agric Food Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf061772310.1021/jf0617723 ↗
25. Fávaro SL, Ganzerli TA, de Carvalho Neto AGV et al (2010) Chemical, morphological and mechanical analysis of sisal fiber-reinforced recycled high-density polyethylene composites. Express Polym Lett. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.5910.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.59 ↗
26. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Iβ from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124:9074–9082. https://doi.org/10.1021/JA0257319/SUPPL_FILE/JA0257319_S1.CIF10.1021/JA0257319/SUPPL_FILE/JA0257319_S1.CIF ↗
27. Salama A, Neumann M, Günter C, Taubert A (2014) Ionic liquid-assisted formation of cellulose/calcium phosphate hybrid materials. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.5.16710.3762/bjnano.5.167 ↗
28. Okano T, Sarko A (1985) Mercerization of cellulose. II. Alkali–cellulose intermediates and a possible mercerization mechanism. J Appl Polym Sci 30:325–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.1985.07030012810.1002/APP.1985.070300128 ↗
29. Meader D, Atkins EDT, Happey F (1978) Cellulose trinitrate: molecular conformation and packing considerations. Polymer 19:1371–1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(78)90086-110.1016/0032-3861(78)90086-1 ↗
30. Gopi S, Balakrishnan P, Divya C et al (2017) Facile synthesis of chitin nanocrystals decorated on 3D cellulose aerogels as a new multi-functional material for waste water treatment with enhanced anti-bacterial and anti-oxidant properties. New J Chem. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nj02392h10.1039/c7nj02392h ↗
31. Suhas GVK, Carrott PJM et al (2016) Cellulose: A review as natural, modified and activated carbon adsorbent. Biores Technol 216:1066–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2016.05.10610.1016/J.BIORTECH.2016.05.106 ↗
32. Rosa SML, Rehman N, De Miranda MIG et al (2012) Chlorine-free extraction of cellulose from rice husk and whisker isolation. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.08410.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.084 ↗
33. Oksman K, Etang JA, Mathew AP, Jonoobi M (2011) Cellulose nanowhiskers separated from a bio-residue from wood bioethanol production. Biomass Bioenerg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.02110.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.021 ↗
34. dos Santos RM, Flauzino Neto WP, Silvério HA et al (2013) Cellulose nanocrystals from pineapple leaf, a new approach for the reuse of this agro-waste. Ind Crops Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.08.04910.1016/j.indcrop.2013.08.049 ↗
35. Sukyai P, Anongjanya P, Bunyahwuthakul N et al (2018) Effect of cellulose nanocrystals from sugarcane bagasse on whey protein isolate-based films. Food Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.02.05210.1016/j.foodres.2018.02.052 ↗
36. Fernandes SCM, Freire CSR, Silvestre AJD et al (2010) Transparent chitosan films reinforced with a high content of nanofibrillated cellulose. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.02.03710.1016/j.carbpol.2010.02.037 ↗
37. Liu Y, Guo B, Xia Q et al (2017) Efficient cleavage of strong hydrogen bonds in cotton by deep eutectic solvents and facile fabrication of cellulose nanocrystals in high yields. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0095410.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00954 ↗
38. Ross P, Weinhouse H, Aloni Y et al (1987) Regulation of cellulose synthesis in Acetobacter xylinum by cyclic diguanylic acid. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/325279a010.1038/325279a0 ↗
39. Zinniel DK, Lambrecht P, Harris NB et al (2002) Isolation and characterization of endophytic colonizing bacteria from agronomic crops and prairie plants. Appl Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.5.2198-2208.200210.1128/AEM.68.5.2198-2208.2002 ↗
40. Fu XY, Sotani T, Matsuyama H (2008) Effect of membrane preparation method on the outer surface roughness of cellulose acetate butyrate hollow fiber membrane. Desalination 233:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DESAL.2007.09.02210.1016/J.DESAL.2007.09.022 ↗
41. Omura T, Suzuki T, Minami H (2020) Preparation of cellulose particles with a hollow structure. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0264610.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02646 ↗
42. van de Ven TGM, Sheikhi A (2016) Hairy cellulose nanocrystalloids: a novel class of nanocellulose. Nanoscale 8:15101–15114. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR01570K10.1039/C6NR01570K ↗
43. Reddy N, Yang Y (2015) Introduction to regenerated cellulose fibers. Innov Biofibers Renew Resour. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45136-6_1510.1007/978-3-662-45136-6_15 ↗
44. Fink HP, Weigel P, Purz HJ, Ganster J (2001) Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials from NMMO-solutions. Prog Polym Sci 26:1473–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00025-910.1016/S0079-6700(01)00025-9 ↗
45. Liu C, Li B, Du H et al (2016) Properties of nanocellulose isolated from corncob residue using sulfuric acid, formic acid, oxidative and mechanical methods. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.02510.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.025 ↗
46. Reddy JP, Rhim JW (2014) Characterization of bionanocomposite films prepared with agar and paper-mulberry pulp nanocellulose. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.05610.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.056 ↗
47. Abraham E, Deepa B, Pothen LA et al (2013) Environmental friendly method for the extraction of coir fibre and isolation of nanofibre. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.05610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.056 ↗
48. Camarero Espinosa S, Kuhnt T, Foster EJ, Weder C (2013) Isolation of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals by phosphoric acid hydrolysis. Biomacromol. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400219u10.1021/bm400219u ↗
49. Sheltami RM, Abdullah I, Ahmad I et al (2012) Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from mengkuang leaves (Pandanus tectorius). Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.06210.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.062 ↗
50. Watkins D, Nuruddin M, Hosur M et al (2015) Extraction and characterization of lignin from different biomass resources. J Market Res 4:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2014.10.00910.1016/J.JMRT.2014.10.009 ↗
51. Erbas Kiziltas E, Kiziltas A, Gardner DJ (2015) Synthesis of bacterial cellulose using hot water extracted wood sugars. Carbohyd Polym 124:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2015.01.03610.1016/J.CARBPOL.2015.01.036 ↗
52. Hamawand I, Seneweera S, Kumarasinghe P, Bundschuh J (2020) Nanoparticle technology for separation of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin nanoparticles from lignocellulose biomass: a short review. Nano-Struct Nano-Obj 24:100601. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NANOSO.2020.10060110.1016/J.NANOSO.2020.100601 ↗
53. Bhat AH, Khan I, Usmani MA et al (2019) Cellulose an ageless renewable green nanomaterial for medical applications: an overview of ionic liquids in extraction, separation and dissolution of cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 129:750–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2018.12.19010.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2018.12.190 ↗
54. Ma Y, Xia Q, Liu Y et al (2019) Production of nanocellulose using hydrated deep eutectic solvent combined with ultrasonic treatment. ACS Omega 4:8539–8547. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSOMEGA.9B00519/SUPPL_FILE/AO9B00519_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACSOMEGA.9B00519/SUPPL_FILE/AO9B00519_SI_001.PDF ↗
55. Novo LP, Bras J, García A et al (2015) Subcritical water: a method for green production of cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:2839–2846. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.5B00762/SUPPL_FILE/SC5B00762_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.5B00762/SUPPL_FILE/SC5B00762_SI_001.PDF ↗
56. Borzì A, Dolabella S, Szmyt W et al (2020) Microstructure analysis of epitaxial BaTiO3 thin films on SrTiO3-buffered Si: strain and dislocation density quantification using HRXRD methods. Materialia 14:100953. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTLA.2020.10095310.1016/J.MTLA.2020.100953 ↗
57. French AD (2020) Increment in evolution of cellulose crystallinity analysis. Cellulose 27:5445–5448. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10570-020-03172-Z/FIGURES/110.1007/S10570-020-03172-Z/FIGURES/1 ↗
58. Trache D, Hussin MH, Hui Chuin CT et al (2016) Microcrystalline cellulose: Isolation, characterization and bio-composites application—a review. Int J Biol Macromol 5:66
59. Mohamad Haafiz MK, Eichhorn SJ, Hassan A, Jawaid M (2013) Isolation and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from oil palm biomass residue. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.03510.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.035 ↗
60. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp 6:66
61. Attia AAM, Abas KM, Ahmed Nada AA et al (2021) Fabrication, modification, and characterization of lignin-based electrospun fibers derived from distinctive biomass sources. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM1314227710.3390/POLYM13142277 ↗
62. Zugenmaier P (2008) Cellulose crystalline cellulose and derivatives characterization and structures. Cellulose. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73934-010.1007/978-3-540-73934-0 ↗
63. Trilokesh C, Kiran &, Uppuluri B isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from jackfruit peel. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53412-x10.1038/s41598-019-53412-x ↗
64. Fortunati E, Puglia D, Monti M et al (2013) Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from phormium tenax fibres. J Polym Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0543-110.1007/s10924-012-0543-1 ↗
65. Rosa MF, Medeiros ES, Malmonge JA et al (2010) Cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk fibers: effect of preparation conditions on their thermal and morphological behavior. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.05910.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.059 ↗
66. Khelifa H, Bezazi A, Boumediri H et al (2021) Mechanical characterization of mortar reinforced by date palm mesh fibers: experimental and statistical analysis. Constr Build Mater 300:124067. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.12406710.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.124067 ↗
67. Bras J, Viet D, Bruzzese C, Dufresne A (2011) Correlation between stiffness of sheets prepared from cellulose whiskers and nanoparticles dimensions. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.02210.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.022 ↗
68. Slavutsky AM, Bertuzzi MA (2014) Water barrier properties of starch films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals obtained from sugarcane bagasse. Carbohyd Polym 110:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2014.03.04910.1016/J.CARBPOL.2014.03.049 ↗
69. Balakrishnan P, Gopi S, Geethamma VG, Thomas S (2019) Mechanical and permeability properties of thermoplastic starch composites reinforced with cellulose nanofiber for packaging applications. J Siberian Federal Univ Biol 66:287–30110.17516/1997-1389-0303 ↗
70. Mazeau K, Heux L (2003) Molecular dynamics simulations of bulk native crystalline and amorphous structures of cellulose. J Phys Chem B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp021939510.1021/jp0219395 ↗
71. Samyn P (2013) Wetting and hydrophobic modification of cellulose surfaces for paper applications. J Mater Sci 48:6455–6498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7519-y10.1007/s10853-013-7519-y ↗
72. Dankovich TA, Gray DG (2011) Contact angle measurements on smooth nanocrystalline cellulose(I) thin films. J Adhes Sci Technol 25:699–708. https://doi.org/10.1163/016942410X52588510.1163/016942410X525885 ↗
73. Yu HY, Zhang DZ, Lu FF, Yao J (2016) New approach for single-step extraction of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals for their use as adsorbents and flocculants. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0012610.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00126 ↗
74. Bezerra RDS, Teixeira PRS, Teixeira ASNM et al (2015) Chemical functionalization of cellulosic materials—main reactions and applications in the contaminants removal of aqueous medium. In: Cellulose—fundamental aspects and current trends10.5772/61431 ↗
75. Han J, Zhou C, Wu Y et al (2013) Self-assembling behavior of cellulose nanoparticles during freeze-drying: Effect of suspension concentration, particle size, crystal structure, and surface charge. Biomacromol. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400173410.1021/bm4001734 ↗
76. Tibolla H, Pelissari FM, Menegalli FC (2014) Cellulose nanofibers produced from banana peel by chemical and enzymatic treatment. LWT—Food Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.04.01110.1016/j.lwt.2014.04.011 ↗
77. Tian C, Yi J, Wu Y et al (2016) Preparation of highly charged cellulose nanofibrils using high-pressure homogenization coupled with strong acid hydrolysis pretreatments. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.05510.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.055 ↗
78. Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S (2001) Steric stabilization of a cellulose microcrystal suspension by poly(ethylene glycol) grafting. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la001070m10.1021/la001070m ↗
79. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL et al (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060154s10.1021/bm060154s ↗
80. Heinze T, Helbig K, Klemm D (1993) Investigation of metal ion adsorption of carboxymethyl cellulose gel beads. Acta Polym. https://doi.org/10.1002/actp.1993.01044021010.1002/actp.1993.010440210 ↗
81. Kokol V, Božič M, Vogrinčič R, Mathew AP (2015) Characterisation and properties of homo- and heterogenously phosphorylated nanocellulose. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.02.05610.1016/j.carbpol.2015.02.056 ↗
82. Oshima T, Kondo K, Ohto K et al (2008) Preparation of phosphorylated bacterial cellulose as an adsorbent for metal ions. React Funct Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.07.04610.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.07.046 ↗
83. Vieira AP, Santana SAA, Bezerra CWB et al (2010) Copper sorption from aqueous solutions and sugar cane spirits by chemically modified babassu coconut (Orbignya speciosa) mesocarp. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.04.03610.1016/j.cej.2010.04.036 ↗
84. Gremos S, Zarafeta D, Kekos D, Kolisis F (2011) Direct enzymatic acylation of cellulose pretreated in BMIMCl ionic liquid. Biores Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.02110.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.021 ↗
85. Malik DS, Jain CK, Yadav AK (2017) Removal of heavy metals from emerging cellulosic low-cost adsorbents: a review. Appl Water Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0401-810.1007/s13201-016-0401-8 ↗
86. Silva Filho EC, Santos Júnior LS, Silva MMF et al (2012) Surface cellulose modification with 2-aminomethylpyridine for copper, cobalt, nickel and zinc removal from aqueous solution. Mater Res. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-1439201200500014710.1590/s1516-14392012005000147 ↗
87. Emengo FN, Nduka JKC, Onwu EO (2011) Nitration of cellulose and performance of cellulose nitrate based adhesives for selected substrates. In: New trends in chemical physics research
88. da Silva Filho EC, de Melo JCP, Airoldi C (2006) Preparation of ethylenediamine-anchored cellulose and determination of thermochemical data for the interaction between cations and basic centers at the solid/liquid interface. Carbohyd Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2006.09.00410.1016/j.carres.2006.09.004 ↗
89. Yu X, Tong S, Ge M et al (2013) Synthesis and characterization of multi-amino-functionalized cellulose for arsenic adsorption. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.05010.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.050 ↗
90. Zhang J, Jiang N, Dang Z et al (2008) Oxidation and sulfonation of cellulosics. Cellulose. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9193-110.1007/s10570-007-9193-1 ↗
91. Rajalaxmi D, Jiang N, Leslie G, Ragauskas AJ (2010) Synthesis of novel water-soluble sulfonated cellulose. Carbohyd Res 345:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2009.09.03710.1016/j.carres.2009.09.037 ↗
92. Silva Filho EC, Lima LCB, Silva FC et al (2013) Immobilization of ethylene sulfide in aminated cellulose for removal of the divalent cations. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.03110.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.031 ↗
93. Agrawal R, Saxena NS, Sharma KB et al (2000) Activation energy and crystallization kinetics of untreated and treated oil palm fibre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-5093(99)00556-010.1016/s0921-5093(99)00556-0 ↗
94. Abdelmouleh M, Boufi S, Belgacem MN et al (2004) Modification of cellulosic fibres with functionalised silanes: development of surface properties. Int J Adhes Adhes. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00099-X10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00099-X ↗
95. Sobkowicz MJ, Braun B, Dorgan JR (2009) Decorating in green: Surface esterification of carbon and cellulosic nanoparticles. Green Chem. https://doi.org/10.1039/b817223d10.1039/b817223d ↗
96. Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp 6:66
97. Zhu G, Giraldo Isaza L, Dufresne A (2021) Cellulose nanocrystal-mediated assembly of graphene oxide in natural rubber nanocomposites with high electrical conductivity. J Appl Polym Sci 138:51460. https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.5146010.1002/APP.51460 ↗
98. Guo W, Wang X, Zhang P et al (2018) Nano-fibrillated cellulose-hydroxyapatite based composite foams with excellent fire resistance. Carbohyd Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.06310.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.063 ↗
99. Zhang QQ, Zhu YJ, Wu J, Dong LY (2019) Nanofiltration filter paper based on ultralong hydroxyapatite nanowires and cellulose fibers/nanofibers. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:17198–17209. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.9B03793/SUPPL_FILE/SC9B03793_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.9B03793/SUPPL_FILE/SC9B03793_SI_001.PDF ↗
100. Xing Q, Zhao F, Chen S et al (2010) Porous biocompatible three-dimensional scaffolds of cellulose microfiber/gelatin composites for cell culture. Acta Biomater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.03610.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.036 ↗