Progress and challenges in self-healing cementitious materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Concrete is a very common material consisting of a mixture of aggregates (sand, gravel, crashed rock) and paste (cement, water and additives). The paste component, made up mainly of cement and water, degrades with time. Despite this shortcoming, research toward the next-generation cement and concrete materials has intensified in the past 10–15 years. Self-healing cementitious materials, in particular, are a research area that has attracted a great deal of attention. A number of novel formulations have demonstrated an increase in mechanical and chemical stability with respect to conventional Portland cement, through the addition of inorganic, organic, and even biological additives. This review reports on the latest developments in cement research related to the synthesis of cement and concrete materials with autogenous healing and/or self-healing capability. These include geopolymers, engineered cementitious materials, bacterial cement composites, microencapsulated self-healing materials, self-healing assisted by shape-memory alloys, and polymer–cement composites. This work describes the performance of each cementitious material and the mechanism responsible for healing, including a section on atomistic simulations and modeling of cementitious materials. A detailed understanding of various cement technologies with autogenous healing and self-healing properties, including their strengths and weaknesses, is critical to determine the areas where new development is needed to enable novel, energy-efficient, and environmentally responsible cement and concrete solutions. To this end, molecular simulations can play a significant role and have already demonstrated promise in achieving an atomic level view of interactions between cementitious materials and other add-on compounds, such as carbon nanotubes or polymers for enhanced reinforcement or autonomous healing properties. Next-generation construction materials are led by self-healing cement and concrete. With a wide range of autonomous healing strategies based on smart polymers and alloys, biotechnology, and molecular modeling, advanced cementitious materials are becoming part of our daily lives. This work represents a comprehensive review on progress, challenges, and opportunities in the development of these materials for infrastructure and beyond.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microbial Applications in Construction Materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Van Breugel K (2007) Is there a market for self-healing cement-based materials. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on self-healing materials, Noordwijk. Holland, pp 1–9
2. Worrell E et al (2001) Carbon dioxide emissions from the global cement industry. Annu Rev Energy Environ 26(1):303–32910.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.303 ↗
3. Limited IR (2020) Concrete and cement market by product, end-user, and geography—forecast and analysis 2020–2024, p 12010.36100/dorogimosti2020.21.120 ↗
4. Cailleux E, Pollet V (2009) Investigations on the development of self-healing properties in protective coatings for concrete and repair mortars. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on self-healing materials, Chicago, IL, USA
5. Frank T (2017) Civil engineers say fixing infrastructure will take $4.6 trillion. CNN Money
6. Yunovich M, Thompson NG (2003) Corrosion of highway bridges: economic impact and control methodologies. Concr Int 25(1):52–57
7. Hilloulin B et al (2015) Design of polymeric capsules for self-healing concrete. Cem Concr Compos 55:298–30710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.09.022 ↗
8. Lepech MD, Li VC (2009) Water permeability of engineered cementitious composites. Cem Concr Compos 31(10):744–75310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.07.002 ↗
9. Claisse PA (2014) 1—The transport properties of concrete and the equations that describe them. In: Claisse PA (ed) Transport properties of concrete. Woodhead Publishing, Oxford, pp 1–16
10. Hoseini M, Bindiganavile V, Banthia N (2009) The effect of mechanical stress on permeability of concrete: a review. Cem Concr Compos 31(4):213–22010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.02.003 ↗
11. Jacobsen S, Marchand J, Gerard B (1998) Concrete cracks I: durability and self-healing—a review. Proc Consecutive 98:217–231
12. Muhammad NZ et al (2016) Tests and methods of evaluating the self-healing efficiency of concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 112:1123–113210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.017 ↗
13. Vijay K, Murmu M, Deo SV (2017) Bacteria based self-healing concrete—a review. Constr Build Mater 152:1008–101410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.040 ↗
14. Snoeck D, De Belie N (2015) From straw in bricks to modern use of microfibers in cementitious composites for improved autogenous healing—a review. Constr Build Mater 95:774–78710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.018 ↗
15. Dong B et al (2018) Chemical self-healing system with novel microcapsules for corrosion inhibition of rebar in concrete. Cem Concr Compos 85:83–9110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.09.012 ↗
16. Wang C-K, Salmon CG (1979) Reinforced concrete design
17. Cabrera J (1996) Deterioration of concrete due to reinforcement steel corrosion. Cem Concr Compos 18(1):47–5910.1016/0958-9465(95)00043-7 ↗
18. Guzmán S, Gálvez JC, Sancho JM (2011) Cover cracking of reinforced concrete due to rebar corrosion induced by chloride penetration. Cem Concr Res 41(8):893–90210.1016/j.cemconres.2011.04.008 ↗
19. Shi X et al (2012) Durability of steel reinforced concrete in chloride environments: an overview. Constr Build Mater 30:125–13810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.038 ↗
20. Snoeck D, De Belie N (2019) Autogenous healing in strain-hardening cementitious materials with and without superabsorbent polymers: an 8-year study. Front Mater 6(48):1–12
21. Van Tittelboom K, De Belie N (2013) Self-healing in cementitious materials—a review. Materials 6(6):2182–221710.3390/ma6062182 ↗
22. Li W et al (2018) Recent advances in intrinsic self-healing cementitious materials. Adv Mater 30(17):1705679–170568710.1002/adma.201705679 ↗
23. Noushini A et al (2016) Compressive stress-strain model for low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer and heat-cured Portland cement concrete. Cem Concr Compos 73:136–14610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.07.004 ↗
24. Wilinska I, Pacewska B (2014) Calorimetric and thermal analysis studies on the influence of waste aluminosilicate catalyst on the hydration of fly ash-cement paste. J Therm Anal Calorim 116(2):689–69710.1007/s10973-014-3749-8 ↗
25. Darsanasiri AGND et al (2018) Ternary alkali aluminosilicate cement based on rice husk ash, slag and coal fly ash. J Build Eng 19:36–4110.1016/j.jobe.2018.04.020 ↗
26. Singh LP et al (2019) Durability studies of nano-engineered fly ash concrete. Constr Build Mater 194:205–21510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.022 ↗
27. Pereira EL, de Oliveira AL, Fineza AG (2017) Optimization of mechanical properties in concrete reinforced with fibers from solid urban wastes (PET bottles) for the production of ecological concrete. Constr Build Mater 149:837–84810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.148 ↗
28. Marthong C, Sarma DK (2016) Influence of PET fiber geometry on the mechanical properties of concrete: an experimental investigation. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 20(7):771–78410.1080/19648189.2015.1072112 ↗
29. Bui NK, Satomi T, Takahashi H (2018) Recycling woven plastic sack waste and PET bottle waste as fiber in recycled aggregate concrete: an experimental study. Waste Manag 78:79–9310.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.035 ↗
30. Al-Hadithi AI, Noaman AT, Mosleh WK (2019) Mechanical properties and impact behavior of PET fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete (SCC). Compos Struct 224:111021
31. Soydan AM et al (2018) Air-cured fiber-cement composite mixtures with different types of cellulose fibers. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:3841514
32. Raabe J et al (2018) Effect of nano-silica deposition on cellulose fibers on the initial hydration of the Portland cement. BioResources 13(2):3525–354410.15376/biores.13.2.3525-3544 ↗
33. Palomar I, Barluenga G (2018) A multiscale model for pervious lime-cement mortar with perlite and cellulose fibers. Constr Build Mater 160:136–14410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.032 ↗
34. Liu KQ et al (2018) Design of low-density cement optimized by cellulose-based fibre for oil and natural gas wells. Powder Technol 338:506–51810.1016/j.powtec.2018.07.016 ↗
35. Lee HJ et al (2019) Fire resistance evaluation of fiber-reinforced cement composites using cellulose nanocrystals. Adv Concr Constr 8(4):311–320
36. Hoyos CG et al (2019) Cellulose nanofibrils extracted from fique fibers as bio-based cement additive. J Clean Prod 235:1540–154810.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.292 ↗
37. Garoushi S et al (2020) Incorporation of cellulose fiber in glass ionomer cement. Eur J Oral Sci 128:81–8810.1111/eos.12668 ↗
38. Zhang Y et al (2019) Autogenous shrinkage of high-performance cement-based carbon nanofiber composites. Mater Express 9(3):213–22510.1166/mex.2019.1491 ↗
39. Yang N, Sun QS (2019) Study on the self-monitoring of bending fatigue cumulative damage for carbon nanofiber polyurethane cement. Appl Sci Basel 9(10):2128–214710.3390/app9102128 ↗
40. Nishimura T et al (2019) Effects of powdery cellulose nanofiber addition on the properties of glass ionomer cement. Materials 12(19):3077–308410.3390/ma12193077 ↗
41. Kosson M, Brown L, Sanchez F (2020) Early-age performance of 3D printed carbon nanofiber and carbon microfiber cement composites. Transp Res Rec 2674:10–2010.1177/0361198120902704 ↗
42. Aloulou F, Sabrine A, Sammouda H (2019) Influence and dispersion of nanofiber of wood modified on properties of cement based mortars. J Renew Mater 7(7):631–64110.32604/jrm.2019.04070 ↗
43. Tang W, Kardani O, Cui H (2015) Robust evaluation of self-healing efficiency in cementitious materials—a review. Constr Build Mater 81:233–24710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.054 ↗
44. Gupta S, Dai Pang S, Kua HW (2017) Autonomous healing in concrete by bio-based healing agents—a review. Constr Build Mater 146:419–42810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.111 ↗
45. Snoeck D et al (2018) Validation of self-healing properties of construction materials through nondestructive and minimal invasive testing. Adv Mater Interfaces 5(17):180017910.1002/admi.201800179 ↗
46. Cohades A et al (2018) Progress in self-healing fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Adv Mater Interfaces 5(17): 1800177
47. De Belie N et al (2018) A review of self-healing concrete for damage management of structures. Adv Mater Interfaces 5(17):180007410.1002/admi.201800074 ↗
48. Ferrara L et al (2018) Experimental characterization of the self-healing capacity of cement based materials and its effects on the material performance: a state of the art report by COST action SARCOS WG2. Constr Build Mater 167:115–14210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.143 ↗
49. Jefferson T et al (2018) Research progress on numerical models for self-healing cementitious materials. Adv Mater Interfaces 5(17):170137810.1002/admi.201701378 ↗
50. Luhar S, Gourav S (2015) A review paper on self-healing concrete. J Civ Eng Res 5(3):53–58
51. Wu M, Johannesson B, Geiker M (2012) A review: self-healing in cementitious materials and engineered cementitious composite as a self-healing material. Constr Build Mater 28(1):571–58310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.086 ↗
52. Jakhrani SH et al (2019) Review on the self-healing concrete-approach and evaluation techniques. J Ceram Proc Res 20:1–18
53. Ravitheja A, Reddy TCS, Sashidhar C (2019) Self-healing concrete with crystalline admixture—a review. J Wuhan Univ Technol Mater Sci Edition 34(5):1143–115410.1007/s11595-019-2171-2 ↗
54. Wang XF et al (2019) Evaluation of the mechanical performance recovery of self-healing cementitious materials—its methods and future development: a review. Constr Build Mater 212:400–42110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.117 ↗
55. Xue CH et al (2019) A review study on encapsulation-based self-healing for cementitious materials. Struct Concr 20(1):198–21210.1002/suco.201800177 ↗
56. Xu S et al (2019) Investigation of the potential use of calcium alginate capsules for self-healing in porous asphalt concrete. Materials 12(1):168–18010.3390/ma12010168 ↗
57. Wu MY et al (2019) Two-component polyurethane healing system: effect of different accelerators and capsules on the healing efficiency of dynamic concrete cracks. Constr Build Mater 227:116700
58. Tsangouri E et al (2019) Feasibility study on real-scale, self-healing concrete slab by developing a smart capsules network and assessed by a plethora of advanced monitoring techniques. Constr Build Mater 228:11678010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116780 ↗
59. Tsangouri E et al (2019) Concrete fracture toughness increase by embedding self-healing capsules using an integrated experimental approach. Constr Build Mater 218:424–43310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.138 ↗
60. Savija B et al (2017) Simulation-aided design of tubular polymeric capsules for self-healing concrete. Materials 10(1):10–2210.3390/ma10010010 ↗
61. Qureshi TS, Kanellopoulos A, Al-Tabbaa A (2016) Encapsulation of expansive powder minerals within a concentric glass capsule system for self-healing concrete. Constr Build Mater 121:629–64310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.030 ↗
62. Lv LY et al (2020) Light induced self-healing in concrete using novel cementitious capsules containing UV curable adhesive. Cem Concr Compos 105:103445
63. Gruyaert E et al (2016) Capsules with evolving brittleness to resist the preparation of self-healing concrete. Mater Constr 66(323):92-102
64. Araujo M et al (2018) Poly(methyl methacrylate) capsules as an alternative to the “proof-of-concept” glass capsules used in self-healing concrete. Cem Concr Compos 89:260–27110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.02.015 ↗
65. Oh SR, Choi YW, Kim YJ (2019) Effect of cement powder based self-healing solid capsule on the quality of mortar. Constr Build Mater 214:574–58010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.123 ↗
66. Choi YW, Oh SR, Choi BK (2017) A study on the manufacturing properties of crack self-healing capsules using cement powder for addition to cement composites. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2017:518754310.1155/2017/5187543 ↗
67. Yang Z et al (2011) A self-healing cementitious composite using oil core/silica gel shell microcapsules. Cem Concr Compos 33(4):506–51210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.01.010 ↗
68. Erşan YÇ et al (2016) Enhanced crack closure performance of microbial mortar through nitrate reduction. Cem Concr Compos 70:159–17010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.04.001 ↗
69. Wang JY et al (2014) Self-healing concrete by use of microencapsulated bacterial spores. Cem Concr Res 56:139–15210.1016/j.cemconres.2013.11.009 ↗
70. Lu S et al (2019) Bacterial self-healing cement based materials: mechanism at nanoscale. AIP Adv 9(10):105312
71. Rong H et al (2020) Influence of bacterial concentration on crack self-healing of cement-based materials. Constr Build Mater 244:11837210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118372 ↗
72. Su YL et al (2019) Influence of bacterial self-healing agent on early age performance of cement-based materials. Constr Build Mater 218:224–23410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.077 ↗
73. Bhaskar S et al (2017) Effect of self-healing on strength and durability of zeolite-immobilized bacterial cementitious mortar composites. Cem Concr Compos 82:23–3310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.05.013 ↗
74. Tziviloglou E et al (2016) Bacteria-based self-healing concrete to increase liquid tightness of cracks. Constr Build Mater 122:118–12510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.080 ↗
75. Ramakrishnan V et al (2005) Improvement of concrete durability by bacterial mineral precipitation. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference on fracture, pp 1–6
76. Pei R et al (2013) Use of bacterial cell walls to improve the mechanical performance of concrete. Cem Concr Compos 39:122–13010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.03.024 ↗
77. Palin D, Wiktor V, Jonkers H (2016) A bacteria-based bead for possible self-healing marine concrete applications. Smart Mater Struct 25(8):08400810.1088/0964-1726/25/8/084008 ↗
78. Jonkers HM et al (2010) Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecol Eng 36(2):230–23510.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.036 ↗
79. Huang HL, Ye G (2016) Numerical studies of the effects of water capsules on self-healing efficiency and mechanical properties in cementitious materials. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2016:827121410.1155/2016/8271214 ↗
80. Formia A et al (2015) Setup of extruded cementitious hollow tubes as containing/releasing devices in self-healing systems. Materials 8(4):1897–192310.3390/ma8041897 ↗
81. Chen X, Yuan J, Alazhari M (2019) Effect of microbiological growth components for bacteria-based self-healing on the properties of cement mortar. Materials 12(8):1303
82. Childers MI et al (2017) Polymer-cement composites with self-healing ability for geothermal and fossil energy applications. Chem Mater 29(11):4708–471810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00344 ↗
83. Nguyen M-T et al (2018) Atomic origins of the self-healing function in cement-polymer composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(3):3011–301910.1021/acsami.7b13309 ↗
84. Rod KA et al (2019) Insights into the physical and chemical properties of a cement-polymer composite developed for geothermal wellbore applications. Cem Concr Compos 97:279–28710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.022 ↗
85. Rod KA et al (2020) Self-repairing polymer-modified cements for high temperature geothermal and fossil energy applications. Geothermics 85:101790
86. Fernandez CA et al (2019) Into the adhesion and re-adhesion (healing) to formation of novel polymer-cement composites for geothermal applications. In: 15th international congress on the chemistry of cement, Prague, Czech Republic, September 16–20, 2019, p 15
87. Fernandez CA et al (2018) Advanced polymer-modified cements for subsurface applications. In: Proceedings, 43rd workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, February 12–14, 2018, p 9
88. Rod KA et al (2020) Polymer-cement composites with adhesion and re-adhesion (healing) to casing capability for geothermal wellbore applications. Cem Concr Compos 107(10):103490
89. Giergiczny Z (2019) Fly ash and slag. Cem Concr Res 124:10582610.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105826 ↗
90. Drochytka R et al (2019) Use of secondary crystallization and fly ash in waterproofing materials to increase concrete resistance to aggressive gases and liquids. Adv Civ Eng 2019:753032510.1155/2019/7530325 ↗
91. Sugama T, Pyatina T (2019) Self-healing, re-adhering, and carbon-steel corrosion mitigating properties of fly ash-containing calcium aluminum phosphate cement composite at 300 degrees C hydrothermal temperature. Cem Concr Compos 99:1–1610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.02.011 ↗
92. Snoeck D et al (2016) X-ray computed microtomography to study autogenous healing of cementitious materials promoted by superabsorbent polymers. Cem Concr Compos 65:83–9310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.10.016 ↗
93. Snoeck D, De Belie N (2015) Repeated autogenous healing in strain-hardening cementitious composites by using superabsorbent polymers. J Mater Civ Eng 28(1):0401508610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001360 ↗
94. Lee H, Wong H, Buenfeld N (2016) Self-sealing of cracks in concrete using superabsorbent polymers. Cem Concr Res 79:194–20810.1016/j.cemconres.2015.09.008 ↗
95. Kua HW et al (2019) Biochar-immobilized bacteria and superabsorbent polymers enable self-healing of fiber-reinforced concrete after multiple damage cycles. Cem Concr Compos 100:35–5210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.03.017 ↗
96. Hu MM et al (2019) Development of Ca2+ -based, ion-responsive superabsorbent hydrogel for cement applications: self-healing and compressive strength. J Colloid Interface Sci 538:397–40310.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.004 ↗
97. Gwon S, Ahn E, Shin M (2019) Self-healing of modified sulfur composites with calcium sulfoaluminate cement and superabsorbent polymer. Compos Part B Eng 162:469–48310.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.003 ↗
98. Wang CY et al (2019) Self-healing cement composite: amine- and ammonium-based pH-sensitive superabsorbent polymers. Cem Concr Compos 96:154–16210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.11.023 ↗
99. Mignon A et al (2015) pH-sensitive superabsorbent polymers: a potential candidate material for self-healing concrete. J Mater Sci 50(2):970–97910.1007/s10853-014-8657-6 ↗
100. Sarkar M et al (2014) Autonomous bioremediation of a microbial protein (bioremediase) in Pozzolana cementitious composite. J Mater Sci 49(13):4461–446810.1007/s10853-014-8143-1 ↗