DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2022-06

Toward emerging applications using core–shell nanostructured materials: a review

Huanwei Zou, Zirui Luo, Xiao Yang, Qingqing Xie, Yaoyu Zhou

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 57· Issue 24
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Nanomaterials

OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Covalent Organic Framework Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Ghosh Chaudhuri R, Paria S (2012) Core/shell nanoparticles: classes, properties, synthesis mechanisms, characterization, and applications. Chem Rev 112:2373−2433. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100449n10.1021/cr100449n ↗
2. Moriarty P (2001) Nanostructured materials. Rep Prog Phys 64:297–381. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/64/3/20110.1088/0034-4885/64/3/201 ↗
3. Aric BP, Scrosati B, Tarascon J-M, Schalkwijk W (2005) Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. Nat Mater 4:366–377. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat136810.1038/nmat1368 ↗
4. Liu Y, Tang Z (2013) Multifunctional nanoparticle@MOF core-shell nanostructures. Adv Mater 25:5819–5825. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20130278110.1002/adma.201302781 ↗
5. Li G, Tang Z (2014) Noble metal nanoparticle@metal oxide core/yolk-shell nanostructures as catalysts: recent progress and perspective. Nanoscale 6:3995–4011. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr06787d10.1039/c3nr06787d ↗
6. Arnal PM, Comotti M, Schüth F (2006) High-temperature-stable catalysts by hollow sphere encapsulation. Angew Chem Int Ed 45:8224–8227. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20060350710.1002/anie.200603507 ↗
7. Rajabi SK, Sohrabnezhad S (2017) Synthesis and characterization of magnetic core with two shells: mordenite zeolite and CuO to form Fe3O4@MOR@CuO core-shell—as a visible light driven photocatalyst. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 242:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.01.02410.1016/j.micromeso.2017.01.024 ↗
8. Ghosh Chaudhuri R, Paria S (2011) Core/shell nanoparticles: classes, properties, synthesis mechanisms, characterization, and applications. Chem Rev 112:2373–2433. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100449n10.1021/cr100449n ↗
9. Zhang J, Zhao F, Zuo Y-j et al (2020) Improving actuation strain and breakdown strength of dielectric elastomers using core-shell structured CNT-Al2O3. Compos Sci Technol 200:108393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10839310.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108393 ↗
10. Zhang J, Zhao F-w, Liu Z-h et al (2021) Influence of core–shell structured conductive fillers on the electromechanical properties of ferroelectric nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 56:9157–9170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-05857-710.1007/s10853-021-05857-7 ↗
11. Zhao F, Chen X, Zhang J et al (2021) A wearable, nozzle-diffuser microfluidic pump based on high-performance ferroelectric nanocomposites. Sens Actuators B Chem 347:130611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.13061110.1016/j.snb.2021.130611 ↗
12. Bele M, Jovanovic P, Pavlisic A et al (2014) A highly active PtCu3 intermetallic core-shell, multilayered Pt-skin, carbon embedded electrocatalyst produced by a scale-up sol–gel synthesis. Chem Commun 50:13124–13126. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc05637j10.1039/c4cc05637j ↗
13. Chen L, Huang B, Qiu X, Wang X, Luque R, Li Y (2016) Seed-mediated growth of MOF-encapsulated Pd@Ag core-shell nanoparticles: toward advanced room temperature nanocatalysts. Chem Sci 7:228–233. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sc02925b10.1039/c5sc02925b ↗
14. Mishra S, Chatterjee A, Singh R (2011) Novel synthesis of nano-calcium carbonate (CaCO3)/polystyrene (PS) core–shell nanoparticles by atomized microemulsion technique and its effect on properties of polypropylene (PP) composites. Polym Adv Technol 22:2571–2582. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.180210.1002/pat.1802 ↗
15. Xu C, Liu Y, Wang J, Geng H, Qiu H (2011) Fabrication of nanoporous Cu–Pt(Pd) core/shell structure by galvanic replacement and its application in electrocatalysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:4626–4632. https://doi.org/10.1021/am201057t10.1021/am201057t ↗
16. Urayama T, Mitsudome T, Maeno Z, Mizugaki T, Jitsukawa K, Kaneda K (2016) Green, multi-gram one-step synthesis of core–shell nanocomposites in water and their catalytic application to chemoselective hydrogenations. Chem A Eur J 22:17962–17966. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20160476310.1002/chem.201604763 ↗
17. Wu T, Liu Y, Zeng X et al (2016) Facile hydrothermal synthesis of Fe3O4/C core-shell nanorings for efficient low-frequency microwave absorption. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:7370–7380. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b0026410.1021/acsami.6b00264 ↗
18. Pan C, Xu J, Wang Y, Li D, Zhu Y (2012) Dramatic activity of C3N4/BiPO4 photocatalyst with core/shell structure formed by self-assembly. Adv Func Mater 22:1518–1524. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20110230610.1002/adfm.201102306 ↗
19. Guo S, Zhang S, Su D, Sun S (2013) Seed-mediated synthesis of core/shell FePtM/FePt (M = Pd, Au) nanowires and their electrocatalysis for oxygen reduction reaction. J Am Chem Soc 135:13879–13884. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja406091p10.1021/ja406091p ↗
20. Wu B, Liu D, Mubeen S, Chuong TT, Moskovits M, Stucky GD (2016) Anisotropic growth of TiO2 onto gold nanorods for plasmon-enhanced hydrogen production from water reduction. J Am Chem Soc 138:1114–1117. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b1134110.1021/jacs.5b11341 ↗
21. Jing Y-Q, Gui C-X, Qu J, Hao S-M, Wang Q-Q, Yu Z-Z (2017) Silver silicate@carbon nanotube nanocomposites for enhanced visible light photodegradation performance. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:3641–3649. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0265010.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02650 ↗
22. Yin M, Wang F, Fan H, Xu L, Liu S (2016) Heterojunction CuO@ZnO microcubes for superior p-type gas sensor application. J Alloy Compd 672:374–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.19710.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.197 ↗
23. Liu X, Shi S, Xiong Q et al (2013) Hierarchical NiCo2O4@NiCo2O4 core/shell nanoflake arrays as high-performance supercapacitor materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:8790–8795. https://doi.org/10.1021/am402681m10.1021/am402681m ↗
24. Qu F, Jiang H, Yang M (2016) Designed formation through a metal organic framework route of ZnO/ZnCo2O4 hollow core–shell nanocages with enhanced gas sensing properties. Nanoscale 8:16349–16356. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR05187A10.1039/C6NR05187A ↗
25. Kou T, Wang Y, Zhang C, Sun J, Zhang Z (2013) Adsorption behavior of methyl orange onto nanoporous core–shell Cu@Cu2O nanocomposite. Chem Eng J 223:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.01310.1016/j.cej.2013.03.013 ↗
26. Zhang N, Liu S, Xu YJ (2012) Recent progress on metal core@semiconductor shell nanocomposites as a promising type of photocatalyst. Nanoscale 4:2227–2238. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr00009a10.1039/c2nr00009a ↗
27. Du X, Guan G, Li X et al (2016) A novel electroactive λ-MnO2/PPy/PSS core-shell nanorod coated electrode for selective recovery of lithium ions at low concentration. J Mater Chem A 4:13989–13996. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta05985f10.1039/c6ta05985f ↗
28. Wang T, Zhang L, Li C et al (2015) Synthesis of core-shell magnetic Fe3O4@poly(m-phenylenediamine) particles for chromium reduction and adsorption. Environ Sci Technol 49:5654–5662. https://doi.org/10.1021/es506127510.1021/es5061275 ↗
29. El-Toni AM, Habila MA, Labis JP et al (2016) Design, synthesis and applications of core-shell, hollow core, and nanorattle multifunctional nanostructures. Nanoscale 8:2510–2531. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr07004j10.1039/c5nr07004j ↗
30. Kalele S, Gosavi SW, Urban J, Kulkarni SK (2006) Nanoshell particles: synthesis, properties and applications. Neuropsychopharmacol Official Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 40:475–1052
31. Xie Y, Yan B, Xu H et al (2014) Highly regenerable mussel-inspired Fe3O4@polydopamine-Ag core-shell microspheres as catalyst and adsorbent for methylene blue removal. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:8845–8852. https://doi.org/10.1021/am501632f10.1021/am501632f ↗
32. Yue Q, Li J, Zhang Y et al (2017) Plasmolysis-inspired nanoengineering of functional yolk-shell microspheres with magnetic core and mesoporous silica shell. J Am Chem Soc 139:15486–15493. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b0905510.1021/jacs.7b09055 ↗
33. Liu J, Qiao SZ, Chen JS, Lou XW, Xing X, Lu GQ (2011) Yolk/shell nanoparticles: new platforms for nanoreactors, drug delivery and lithium-ion batteries. Chem Commun 47:12578–12591. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CC13658E10.1039/C1CC13658E ↗
34. Shang M, Wang W, Zou H, Ren G (2016) Coating Fe3O4 spheres with polypyrrole-Pd composites and their application as recyclable catalysts. Synth Met 221:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.08.01510.1016/j.synthmet.2016.08.015 ↗
35. Jiang L-b, Yuan X-z, Liang J, Zhang J, Wang H, Zeng G-m (2016) Nanostructured core-shell electrode materials for electrochemical capacitors. J Power Sources 331:408–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.05410.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.054 ↗
36. Zhong CJ, Maye MM (2001) Core-shell assembled nanoparticles as catalysts. Adv Mater 13:1507–1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4095(200110)13:1910.1002/1521-4095(200110)13:19 ↗
37. Mahata A, Pathak B (2017) Bimetallic core-based cuboctahedral core–shell nanoclusters for the formation of hydrogen peroxide (2e− reduction) over water (4e− reduction): role of core metals. Nanoscale 9:9537–9547. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR03002A10.1039/C7NR03002A ↗
38. Navlani García M, Salinas Torres D, Cazorla Amorós D (2021). In Yamashita H, Li H (Eds) Core-Shell and Yolk-Shell NanocatalystsSpringer Singapore, Singapore
39. Ma C, Zhang W, Chang Q et al (2021) θ-Fe3C dominated Fe@C core–shell catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: roles of θ-Fe3C and carbon shell. J Catal 393:238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2020.11.03310.1016/j.jcat.2020.11.033 ↗
40. Qin N, Pan A, Yuan J et al (2021) One-step construction of a hollow Au@bimetal–organic framework core-shell catalytic nanoreactor for selective alcohol oxidation reaction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13:12463–12471. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c2044510.1021/acsami.0c20445 ↗
41. Xu G, Zhu X (2021) A core-shell structured Zn/SiO2@ZSM-5 catalyst: preparation and enhanced catalytic properties in methane co-aromatization with propane. Appl Catal B 293:120241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12024110.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120241 ↗
42. Ma Y, Wu X, Zhang G (2017) Core-shell Ag@Pt nanoparticles supported on sepiolite nanofibers for the catalytic reduction of nitrophenols in water: enhanced catalytic performance and DFT study. Appl Catal B 205:262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.02510.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.025 ↗
43. Wang H, Wang C, Yan H, Yi H, Lu J (2015) Precisely-controlled synthesis of Au@Pd core-shell bimetallic catalyst via atomic layer deposition for selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol. J Catal 324:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2015.01.01910.1016/j.jcat.2015.01.019 ↗
44. Li M, Zhang L, Fan X et al (2017) Core-shell LaPO4/g-C3N4 nanowires for highly active and selective CO2 reduction. Appl Catal B 201:629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.00410.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.004 ↗
45. Cantane DA, Oliveira FER, Santos SF, Lima FHB (2013) Synthesis of Pt-based hollow nanoparticles using carbon-supported Co@Pt and Ni@Pt core-shell structures as templates: Electrocatalytic activity for the oxygen reduction reaction. Appl Catal B 136–137:351–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.01.06010.1016/j.apcatb.2013.01.060 ↗
46. Zheng JN, Lv JJ, Li SS, Xue MW, Wang AJ, Feng JJ (2014) One-pot synthesis of reduced graphene oxide supported hollow Ag@Pt core-shell nanospheres with enhanced electrocatalytic activity for ethylene glycol oxidation. J Mater Chem A 2:3445–3451. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta13935b10.1039/c3ta13935b ↗
47. Fu G, Liu Z, Chen Y, Lin J, Tang Y, Lu T (2014) Synthesis and electrocatalytic activity of Au@Pd core-shell nanothorns for the oxygen reduction reaction. Nano Res 7:1205–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-014-0483-210.1007/s12274-014-0483-2 ↗
48. Wang D, Xin HL, Hovden R et al (2013) Structurally ordered intermetallic platinum-cobalt core-shell nanoparticles with enhanced activity and stability as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat Mater 12:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat345810.1038/nmat3458 ↗
49. Xue Y, Guo Y, Yi Y et al (2016) Self-catalyzed growth of Cu@graphdiyne core-shell nanowires array for high efficient hydrogen evolution cathode. Nano Energy 30:858–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.00510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.005 ↗
50. Hou Y, Huang T, Wen Z, Mao S, Cui S, Chen J (2014) Metal-Organic framework-derived nitrogen-doped core-shell-structured porous Fe/Fe3C@C nanoboxes supported on graphene sheets for efficient oxygen reduction reactions. Adv Energy Mater 4:1400337. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20140033710.1002/aenm.201400337 ↗
51. Liu Q, Xu Y-R, Wang A-J, Feng J-J (2016) A single-step route for large-scale synthesis of core-shell palladium@platinum dendritic nanocrystals/reduced graphene oxide with enhanced electrocatalytic properties. J Power Sources 302:394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.07910.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.079 ↗
52. Kuttiyiel KA, Choi Y, Hwang S-M et al (2015) Enhancement of the oxygen reduction on nitride stabilized pt-M (M=Fe Co, and Ni) core-shell nanoparticle electrocatalysts. Nano Energy 13:442–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.03.00710.1016/j.nanoen.2015.03.007 ↗
53. Shao M, Chang Q, Dodelet J-P, Chenitz R (2016) Recent advances in electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem Rev 116:3594–3657. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0046210.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462 ↗
54. Habibul N, Hu Y, Sheng G-P (2016) Microbial fuel cell driving electrokinetic remediation of toxic metal contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 318:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.04110.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.041 ↗
55. Zhuang TT, Liang ZQ, Seifitokaldani A et al (2018) Steering post-C-C coupling selectivity enables high efficiency electroreduction of carbon dioxide to multi-carbon alcohols. Nat Catal 1:421–428. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0084-710.1038/s41929-018-0084-7 ↗
56. Fashedemi OO, Ozoemena KI (2014) Comparative electrocatalytic oxidation of ethanol, ethylene glycol and glycerol in alkaline medium at Pd-decorated FeCo@Fe/C core-shell nanocatalysts. Electrochim Acta 128:279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.19410.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.194 ↗
57. Zhu H, Zhang J, Yanzhang R et al (2015) When cubic cobalt sulfide meets layered molybdenum disulfide: a core-shell system toward synergetic electrocatalytic water splitting. Adv Mater 27:4752–4759. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150196910.1002/adma.201501969 ↗
58. Wang W, Li Y, Kang Z, Wang F, Yu JC (2016) A NIR-driven photocatalyst based on α-NaYF4:Yb, Tm@TiO2 core–shell structure supported on reduced graphene oxide. Appl Catal B 182:184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.02210.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.022 ↗
59. Kumar S, Baruah A, Tonda S, Kumar B, Shanker V, Sreedhar B (2014) Cost-effective and eco-friendly synthesis of novel and stable N-doped ZnO/g-C3N4 core-shell nanoplates with excellent visible-light responsive photocatalysis. Nanoscale 6:4830–4842. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr05271k10.1039/c3nr05271k ↗
60. Xie YP, Yu ZB, Liu G, Ma XL, Cheng H-M (2014) CdS-mesoporous ZnS core-shell particles for efficient and stable photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light. Energy Environ Sci 7:1895–1901. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee43750g10.1039/c3ee43750g ↗
61. Wang M, Pang X, Zheng D et al (2016) Nonepitaxial growth of uniform and precisely size-tunable core/shell nanoparticles and their enhanced plasmon-driven photocatalysis. J Mater Chem A 4:7190–7199. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA01838F10.1039/C6TA01838F ↗
62. Liu L, Ding L, Liu Y et al (2017) A stable Ag3PO4@PANI core@shell hybrid: enrichment photocatalytic degradation with π-π conjugation. Appl Catal B 201:92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.00510.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.005 ↗
63. Liu L, Qi Y, Lu J et al (2016) A stable Ag3PO4@g-C3N4 hybrid core@shell composite with enhanced visible light photocatalytic degradation. Appl Catal B 183:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.10.03510.1016/j.apcatb.2015.10.035 ↗
64. Lu B, Liu A, Wu H, Shen Q, Zhao T, Wang J (2016) Hollow Au-Cu2O core-shell nanoparticles with geometry-dependent optical properties as efficient plasmonic photocatalysts under visible light. Langmuir 32:3085–3094. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0033110.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00331 ↗
65. Darabdhara G, Das MR (2019) Dual responsive magnetic Au@Ni nanostructures loaded reduced graphene oxide sheets for colorimetric detection and photocatalytic degradation of toxic phenolic compounds. J Hazard Mater 368:365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.01010.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.010 ↗
66. Wang C, Wang L, Jin J et al (2016) Probing effective photocorrosion inhibition and highly improved photocatalytic hydrogen production on monodisperse PANI@CdS core-shell nanospheres. Appl Catal B 188:351–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.01710.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.017 ↗
67. Ji W, Qu J, Li C-A et al (2017) In situ surface assembly of core-shell TiO2-copper(I) cluster nanocomposites for visible-light photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI). Appl Catal B 205:368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.04110.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.041 ↗
68. Zhao W, Liu Y, Wei Z, Yang S, He H, Sun C (2016) Fabrication of a novel p-n heterojunction photocatalyst n-BiVO4@p-MoS2 with core-shell structure and its excellent visible-light photocatalytic reduction and oxidation activities. Appl Catal B 185:242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.02310.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.023 ↗
69. Álvarez-Torrellas S, Rodríguez A, Ovejero G, García J (2016) Comparative adsorption performance of ibuprofen and tetracycline from aqueous solution by carbonaceous materials. Chem Eng J 283:936–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.02310.1016/j.cej.2015.08.023 ↗
70. Zhu G, Liu J, Yin J et al (2016) Functionalized polyacrylamide by xanthate for Cr (VI) removal from aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 288:390–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.04310.1016/j.cej.2015.12.043 ↗
71. Zhang Y, Lin X, Zhou Q, Luo X (2016) Fluoride adsorption from aqueous solution by magnetic core-shell Fe3O4@alginate-La particles fabricated via electro-coextrusion. Appl Surf Sci 389:34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.08710.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.087 ↗
72. Celis R, Hermosin M, Cornejo J (2000) Heavy metal adsorption by functionalized clays. Environ Sci Technol 34: 4593–4599. https://doi.org/10.1021/es000013c10.1021/es000013c ↗
73. Foo KY, Hameed B (2009) An overview of landfill leachate treatment via activated carbon adsorption process. J Hazard Mater 171:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.03810.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.038 ↗
74. Smit B, Maesen T (2008) Molecular simulations of zeolites: adsorption, diffusion, and shape selectivity. Chem Rev 108:4125–4184. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr800264210.1021/cr8002642 ↗
75. Lai L, Xie Q, Chi L, Gu W, Wu D (2016) Adsorption of phosphate from water by easily separable Fe3O4@SiO2 core/shell magnetic nanoparticles functionalized with hydrous lanthanum oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 465:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.11.04310.1016/j.jcis.2015.11.043 ↗
76. Lv H, Liang X, Cheng Y et al (2015) Coin-like alpha-Fe2O3@CoFe2O4 core-shell composites with excellent electromagnetic absorption performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:4744–4750. https://doi.org/10.1021/am508438s10.1021/am508438s ↗
77. Zhu B, Zhao J, Yu H, Yan L, Wei Q, Du B (2013) Naphthalimide-functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2 core/shell nanoparticles for selective and sensitive adsorption and detection of Hg2+. Chem Eng J 219:411–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.06810.1016/j.cej.2012.12.068 ↗
78. Yin L, Song S, Wang XX et al (2018) Rationally designed core-shell and yolk-shell magnetic titanate nanosheets for efficient U(VI) adsorption performance. Environ Pollut 238:725–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.09210.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.092 ↗
79. He H, Xiao D, He J et al (2014) Preparation of a core-shell magnetic ion-imprinted polymer via a sol-gel process for selective extraction of Cu(II) from herbal medicines. Analyst 139:2459–2466. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3an02096g10.1039/c3an02096g ↗
80. Yan Y, An Q, Xiao Z, Zheng W, Zhai S (2017) Flexible core-shell/bead-like alginate@PEI with exceptional adsorption capacity, recycling performance toward batch and column sorption of Cr(VI). Chem Eng J 313:475–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.09910.1016/j.cej.2016.12.099 ↗
81. Gui C-X, Li Q-J, Lv L-L et al (2015) Core–shell structured MgO@mesoporous silica spheres for enhanced adsorption of methylene blue and lead ions. RSC Adv 5:20440–20445. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA02596F10.1039/C5RA02596F ↗
82. Tang L, Feng H, Tang J et al (2017) Treatment of arsenic in acid wastewater and river sediment by Fe@Fe2O3 nanobunches: The effect of environmental conditions and reaction mechanism. Water Res 117:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.03.05910.1016/j.watres.2017.03.059 ↗
83. Zhou Q, Wang Y, Xiao J, Fan H (2016) Adsorption and removal of bisphenol A, α-naphthol and β-naphthol from aqueous solution by Fe3O4@polyaniline core–shell nanomaterials. Synth Met 212:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.12.00810.1016/j.synthmet.2015.12.008 ↗
84. Yu H, Lv Y, Ma K et al (2014) Synthesis of core-shell structured zeolite-A@mesoporous silica composites for butyraldehyde adsorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 428:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.04.06010.1016/j.jcis.2014.04.060 ↗
85. Wang M, Liu P, Wang Y et al (2015) Core-shell superparamagnetic Fe3O4@beta-CD composites for host-guest adsorption of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). J Colloid Interface Sci 447:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.01.06110.1016/j.jcis.2015.01.061 ↗
86. Chen B, Liu Y, Chen S, Zhao X, Yue W, Pan X (2016) Nitrogen-rich core/shell magnetic nanostructures for selective adsorption and separation of anionic dyes from aqueous solution. Environ Sci Nano 3:670–681. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EN00022C10.1039/C6EN00022C ↗
87. Wang W, Jiao T, Zhang Q et al (2015) Hydrothermal synthesis of hierarchical core–shell manganese oxide nanocomposites as efficient dye adsorbents for wastewater treatment. RSC Adv 5:56279–56285. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA08678G10.1039/C5RA08678G ↗
88. Farmany A, Mortazavi SS, Mahdavi H (2016) Ultrasond-assisted synthesis of Fe3O4/SiO2 core/shell with enhanced adsorption capacity for diazinon removal. J Magn Magn Mater 416:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.04.00710.1016/j.jmmm.2016.04.007 ↗
89. Zhou L, Pan S, Chen X, Zhao Y, Zou B, Jin M (2014) Kinetics and thermodynamics studies of pentachlorophenol adsorption on covalently functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2–MWCNTs core–shell magnetic microspheres. Chem Eng J 257:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.06010.1016/j.cej.2014.07.060 ↗
90. Gao M, Zeng L, Nie J, Ma G (2016) Polymer–metal–organic framework core–shell framework nanofibers via electrospinning and their gas adsorption activities. RSC Adv 6:7078–7085. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA23147G10.1039/C5RA23147G ↗
91. Sorribas S, Zornoza B, Serra-Crespo P et al (2016) Synthesis and gas adsorption properties of mesoporous silica-NH2-MIL-53(Al) core–shell spheres. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 225:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.12.00410.1016/j.micromeso.2015.12.004 ↗
92. Zhang J, Sun W, Ding L, Wu Z, Gao F (2021) Au Nanocrystals@defective amorphous MnO2 nanosheets Core/Shell nanostructure with effective CO2 adsorption and activation toward CO2 electroreduction to CO. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:5230–5239. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0099510.1021/acssuschemeng.1c00995 ↗
93. Cao J, Wang Z, Wang R et al (2015) Synthesis of core-shell α-Fe2O3@NiO nanofibers with hollow structures and their enhanced HCHO sensing properties. J Mater Chem A 3:5635–5641. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta06892k10.1039/c4ta06892k ↗
94. Kim J-H, Kim SS (2015) Realization of ppb-Scale Toluene-Sensing Abilities with Pt-Functionalized SnO2–ZnO Core-Shell Nanowires. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:17199–17208. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0406610.1021/acsami.5b04066 ↗
95. Trujillo-Reyes J, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2014) Supported and unsupported nanomaterials for water and soil remediation: are they a useful solution for worldwide pollution? J Hazard Mater 280:487–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.08.02910.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.08.029 ↗
96. Barsan N, Weimar U (2001) Conduction model of metal oxide gas sensors. J Electroceram 7:143–167. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101440581137110.1023/A:1014405811371 ↗
97. Göpel W, Schierbaum KD (1995) SnO2 sensors: current status and future prospects. Sens Actuators B Chem 26:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4005(94)01546-T10.1016/0925-4005(94)01546-T ↗
98. Zhang ZY, Xu MZ, Liu L et al (2018) Novel SnO2@ZnO hierarchical nanostructures for highly sensitive and selective NO2 gas sensing. Sens Actuator B Chem 257:714–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.10.19010.1016/j.snb.2017.10.190 ↗
99. He L, Liu Y, Liu J et al (2013) Core-shell noble-metal@metal-organic-framework nanoparticles with highly selective sensing property. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:3741. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20120990310.1002/anie.201209903 ↗
100. Nasir ME, Dickson W, Wurtz GA, Wardley WP, Zayats AV (2014) Hydrogen detected by the naked eye: optical hydrogen gas sensors based on core/shell plasmonic nanorod metamaterials. Adv Mater 26:3532–3833. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20130595810.1002/adma.201305958 ↗