Design, processing, 3D/4D printing, and characterization of the novel PETG–PBAT blends

Saeed J. A. Ali; Davood Rahmatabadi; Mostafa Baghani; Majid Baniassadi

doi:10.1007/s10853-024-09761-8

journal article·2024-05

Design, processing, 3D/4D printing, and characterization of the novel PETG–PBAT blends

Saeed J. A. Ali, Davood Rahmatabadi, Mostafa Baghani, Majid Baniassadi

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 20

Publisher page

Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references

1. Kanwal A, Zhang M, Sharaf F, Li C (2022) Polymer pollution and its solutions with special emphasis on Poly (butylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT)). Polym Bull 7911(79):9303–9330. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00289-021-04065-210.1007/S00289-021-04065-2 ↗

2. Jian J, Xiangbin Z, Xianbo H (2020) An overview on synthesis, properties and applications of poly(butylene-adipate-co-terephthalate)–PBAT. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res 3:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AIEPR.2020.01.00110.1016/J.AIEPR.2020.01.001 ↗

3. Kanwal A, Zhang M, Sharaf F, Li C (2022) Enzymatic degradation of poly (butylene adipate co-terephthalate) (PBAT) copolymer using lipase B from Candida antarctica (CALB) and effect of PBAT on plant growth. Polym Bull 79:9059–9073. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00289-021-03946-W/METRICS10.1007/S00289-021-03946-W/METRICS ↗

4. Weng YX, Jin YJ, Meng QY et al (2013) Biodegradation behavior of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT), poly(lactic acid) (PLA), and their blend under soil conditions. Polym Test 32:918–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2013.05.00110.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2013.05.001 ↗

5. Witt U, Einig T, Yamamoto M et al (2001) Biodegradation of aliphatic–aromatic copolyesters: evaluation of the final biodegradability and ecotoxicological impact of degradation intermediates. Chemosphere 44:289–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00162-410.1016/S0045-6535(00)00162-4 ↗

6. Zhang Y, Huang Z, Wang H, Li J (2023) Regulation of the interface compatibility of the 3D-printing interpenetration networks toward reduced structure anisotropy and enhanced performances. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:32984–32992. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSAMI.3C06514/SUPPL_FILE/AM3C06514_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACSAMI.3C06514/SUPPL_FILE/AM3C06514_SI_001.PDF ↗

7. Yang S, Zhang Y, Sha Z et al (2022) Deterministic manipulation of heat flow via three-dimensional-printed thermal meta-materials for multiple protection of critical components. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14(34):39354–39363. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSAMI.2C09602/SUPPL_FILE/AM2C09602_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACSAMI.2C09602/SUPPL_FILE/AM2C09602_SI_001.PDF ↗

8. Xiao C, Zheng K, Chen S et al (2023) Additive manufacturing of high solid content lunar regolith simulant paste based on vat photopolymerization and the effect of water addition on paste retention properties. Addit Manuf 71:103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2023.10360710.1016/J.ADDMA.2023.103607 ↗

9. Xu Y, Zhang F, Zhai W et al (2022) Unraveling of advances in 3D-printed polymer-based bone scaffolds. Polymers 14:566. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM1403056610.3390/POLYM14030566 ↗

10. Yao X, Lyu X, Sun J et al (2023) AI-based performance prediction for 3D-printed concrete considering anisotropy and steam curing condition. Constr Build Mater 375:130898. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.13089810.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.130898 ↗

11. Jiang XJ, Bao SJ, Zhang LW et al (2023) Effect of Zr on microstructure and properties of TC4 alloy fabricated by laser additive manufacturing. J Mater Res Technol 24:8782–8792. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2023.05.13710.1016/J.JMRT.2023.05.137 ↗

12. Song D, Chen X, Wang M et al (2023) 3D-printed flexible sensors for food monitoring. Chem Eng J 474:146011. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2023.14601110.1016/J.CEJ.2023.146011 ↗

13. Singh A, Wang Y, Zhou Y et al (2023) Utilization of antimony tailings in fiber-reinforced 3D printed concrete: a sustainable approach for construction materials. Constr Build Mater 408:133689. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.13368910.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.133689 ↗

14. Andrzejewski J, Cheng J, Anstey A et al (2020) Development of toughened blends of poly(lactic acid) and poly(butylene adipate- co-terephthalate) for 3D printing applications: compatibilization methods and material performance evaluation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:6576–6589. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.9B04925/SUPPL_FILE/SC9B04925_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.9B04925/SUPPL_FILE/SC9B04925_SI_001.PDF ↗

15. Cardoso PHM, Coutinho RRTP, Drummond FR et al (2020) Evaluation of printing parameters on porosity and mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA/PBAT blend parts. Macromol Symp 394(1):2000157. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.20200015710.1002/masy.202000157 ↗

16. Lyu Y, Chen Y, Lin Z et al (2020) Manipulating phase structure of biodegradable PLA/PBAT system: effects on dynamic rheological responses and 3D printing. Compos Sci Technol 200:108399. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2020.10839910.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2020.108399 ↗

17. Prasong W, Muanchan P, Ishigami A, et al (2020) Properties of 3D printable poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blends and nano talc composites. J Nanomater https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/804051710.1155/2020/8040517 ↗

18. Sousa FM, Costa ARM, Reul LTA et al (2019) Rheological and thermal characterization of PCL/PBAT blends. Polym Bull 76:1573–1593. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00289-018-2428-5/METRICS10.1007/S00289-018-2428-5/METRICS ↗

19. Sarasini F, Luzi F, Dominici F et al (2018) (2018) Effect of different compatibilizers on sustainable composites based on a PHBV/PBAT matrix filled with coffee silverskin. Polymers 10:1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM1011125610.3390/POLYM10111256 ↗

20. Ibrahim NA, Rahim NM, Yunus WZW, Sharif J (2011) A study of poly vinyl chloride/poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blends. J Polym Res 18:891–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10965-010-9486-1/FIGURES/1110.1007/S10965-010-9486-1/FIGURES/11 ↗

21. Pan H, Hao Y, Zhao Y et al (2017) Improved mechanical properties, barrier properties and degradation behavior of poly(butylenes adipate-co-terephthalate)/poly(propylene carbonate) films. Korean J Chem Eng 34:1294–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11814-017-0066-5/METRICS10.1007/S11814-017-0066-5/METRICS ↗

22. Aberoumand M, Soltanmohammadi K, Soleyman E et al (2022) A comprehensive experimental investigation on 4D printing of PET-G under bending. J Mater Res Technol 18:2552–2569. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2022.03.12110.1016/J.JMRT.2022.03.121 ↗

23. Soleyman E, Aberoumand M, Soltanmohammadi K et al (2022) 4D printing of PET-G via FDM including tailormade excess third shape. Manuf Lett 33:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.05.00210.1016/j.mfglet.2022.05.002 ↗

24. Soleyman E, Rahmatabadi D, Soltanmohammadi K et al (2022) Shape memory performance of PETG 4D printed parts under compression in cold, warm, and hot programming. Smart Mater Struct 31:085002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/AC77CB10.1088/1361-665X/AC77CB ↗

25. Soleyman E, Aberoumand M, Rahmatabadi D et al (2022) Assessment of controllable shape transformation, potential applications, and tensile shape memory properties of 3D printed PETG. J Mater Res Technol 18:4201–4215. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2022.04.07610.1016/J.JMRT.2022.04.076 ↗

26. Rahmatabadi D, Aberoumand M, Soltanmohammadi K et al (2023) Toughening PVC with biocompatible PCL softeners for supreme mechanical properties, morphology, shape memory effects, and FFF printability. Macromol Mater Eng 308(10):2300114. https://doi.org/10.1002/MAME.20230011410.1002/MAME.202300114 ↗

27. Rahmatabadi D, Ghasemi I, Baniassadi M et al (2023) 4D printing of PLA-TPU blends: effect of PLA concentration, loading mode, and programming temperature on the shape memory effect. J Mater Sci 58(16):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-023-08460-010.1007/S10853-023-08460-0 ↗

28. Mohammadi M, Kouzani AZ, Bodaghi M et al (2024) Sustainable robotic joints 4D printing with variable stiffness using reinforcement learning. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 85:102636. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RCIM.2023.10263610.1016/J.RCIM.2023.102636 ↗

29. Zolfagharian A, Kaynak A, Kouzani A (2020) Closed-loop 4D-printed soft robots. Mater Des 188:108411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10841110.1016/j.matdes.2019.108411 ↗

30. Niazy D, Ashraf M, Bodaghi M, Zolfagharian A (2024) Resilient city perspective: 4D printing in art, architecture and construction. Mater Today Sustain 26:100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTSUST.2024.10070810.1016/J.MTSUST.2024.100708 ↗

31. Qu J, Mao B, Li Z et al (2023) Recent progress in advanced Tactile sensing technologies for soft grippers. Adv Funct Mater 33:2306249. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADFM.20230624910.1002/ADFM.202306249 ↗

32. Barletta M, Gisario A, Mehrpouya M (2021) 4D printing of shape memory polylactic acid (PLA) components: investigating the role of the operational parameters in fused deposition modelling (FDM). J Manuf Process 61:473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2020.11.03610.1016/J.JMAPRO.2020.11.036 ↗

33. Zeidi M, Kim C II, Park CB (2021) The role of interface on the toughening and failure mechanisms of thermoplastic nanocomposites reinforced with nanofibrillated rubber. Nanoscale 13(47):20248–20280. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1nr07363j10.1039/d1nr07363j ↗

34. Dean G, Crocker L, Read B, Wright L (2004) Prediction of deformation and failure of rubber-toughened adhesive joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 24(4):295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.08.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.08.002 ↗

35. Jing X, Mi H-Y, Peng X-F, Turng L-S (2015) The morphology, properties, and shape memory behavior of polylactic acid/thermoplastic polyurethane blends. Polym Eng Sci 55:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2387310.1002/pen.23873 ↗

36. Liu Z, Zhu X, Wu L et al (2001) Effects of interfacial adhesion on the rubber toughening of poly(vinyl chloride) Part 1. Impact Tests Polym (Guildf) 42:737–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00375-X10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00375-X ↗

37. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ, Tod DA, Hunston DL (1983) Deformation and fracture behaviour of a rubber-toughened epoxy: 1 Microstructure and fracture studies. Polymer (Guildf) 24:1341–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(83)90070-810.1016/0032-3861(83)90070-8 ↗

38. Tao Y, Kong F, Li Z et al (2021) A review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication. J Mater Res Technol 15:4860–487910.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.108 ↗

39. Huang B, Singamneni S (2014) Raster angle mechanics in fused deposition modelling. J Compos Mater 49(3):363–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831351915310.1177/0021998313519153 ↗

40. Ghorbani J, Koirala P, Shen Y-L, Tehrani M (2022) Eliminating voids and reducing mechanical anisotropy in fused filament fabrication parts by adjusting the filament extrusion rate. J Manuf Process 80:651–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2022.06.02610.1016/J.JMAPRO.2022.06.026 ↗

41. Seppala JE, Hoon Han S, Hillgartner KE et al (2017) Weld formation during material extrusion additive manufacturing. Soft Matter 13:6761–6769. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SM00950J10.1039/C7SM00950J ↗

42. Rahmatabadi D, Ghasemi I, Baniassadi M et al (2022) 3D printing of PLA-TPU with different component ratios: fracture toughness, mechanical properties, and morphology. J Mater Res Technol 21:3970–3981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.02410.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.024 ↗

43. Xia Y, He Y, Zhang F et al (2021) A review of shape memory polymers and composites: mechanisms, materials, and applications. Adv Mater 33:2000713. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADMA.20200071310.1002/ADMA.202000713 ↗

44. Aberoumand M, Soltanmohammadi K, Rahmatabadi D et al (2023) 4D Printing of polyvinyl chloride (PVC): a detailed analysis of microstructure, programming, and shape memory performance. Macromol Mater Eng 308:2200677. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20220067710.1002/mame.202200677 ↗

45. Anthamatten M, Cavicchi K, Li G, Wang A (2016) Cold, warm, and hot programming of shape memory polymers. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 54:1319–1339. https://doi.org/10.1002/POLB.2404110.1002/POLB.24041 ↗