Synthetic-based blended electrospun scaffolds in tissue engineering applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrospinning, as one of the most common methodologies in nanofibers production, involves applying high voltages to a polymeric solution that is entrapped in a syringe to obtain biomimetic nanofibrous constructs. These microstructures may render resemblance to the extracellular matrix (ECM) and be used as a tissue engineering scaffold. The electrospun scaffolds can provide properties commensurate with the intended tissue, to be employed as a potential substitute for cell stroma and/or drug delivery applications. It seems that polymeric nanofibrous electrospun scaffolds are to meet indispensable requirements to support cells to grow, proliferate and differentiate; it is mostly because of interconnected porous architecture and tunable mechanical backup. Despite their wide diversity, synthetic polymers individually do not provide enough amenities for tissue regeneration and thus need to be blended with other biological macromolecules and polymeric biomaterials. This review will discuss recent decades’ pieces of literature on blend biopolymeric nanofibrous electrospun scaffolds in tissue repair and regeneration.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Bhattarai DP, Aguilar LE, Park CH, Kim CS (2018) A review on properties of natural and synthetic based electrospun fibrous materials for bone tissue engineering. Membranes (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes803006210.3390/membranes8030062 ↗
2. Ameer JM, Anil Kumar PR, Kasoju N (2019) Strategies to tune electrospun scaffold porosity for effective cell response in tissue engineering. J Funct Biomater 10:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb1003003010.3390/jfb10030030 ↗
3. Sell SA, Wolfe PS, Garg K et al (2010) The use of natural polymers in tissue engineering: a focus on electrospun extracellular matrix analogues. Polymers (Basel) 2:522–553. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym204052210.3390/polym2040522 ↗
4. Teixeira MA, Amorim MTP, Felgueiras HP (2020) Poly(vinyl alcohol)-based nanofibrous electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Polymers (Basel) 12:710.3390/polym12010007 ↗
5. Sampath UGTM, Ching YC, Chuah CH et al (2016) Fabrication of porous materials from natural/synthetic biopolymers and their composites. Materials (Basel) 9:1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma912099110.3390/ma9120991 ↗
6. Jafari M, Paknejad Z, Rad MR et al (2017) Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering: a literature review. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 105:431–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3354710.1002/jbm.b.33547 ↗
7. Suh TC, Amanah AY, Gluck JM (2020) Electrospun scaffolds and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for cardiac tissue engineering applications. Bioengineering 7:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering703010510.3390/bioengineering7030105 ↗
8. Kenry LCT (2017) Nanofiber technology: current status and emerging developments. Prog Polym Sci 70:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.002 ↗
9. Xue J, Xie J, Liu W, Xia Y (2017) Electrospun nanofibers: new concepts, materials, and applications. Acc Chem Res 50:1976–1987. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b0021810.1021/acs.accounts.7b00218 ↗
10. Ye K, Kuang H, You Z et al (2019) Electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering with drug loading and release. Pharmaceutics 11:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics1104018210.3390/pharmaceutics11040182 ↗
11. Mohammadalizadeh Z, Karbasi S, Arasteh S (2020) Physical, mechanical and biological evaluation of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)-chitosan/MWNTs as a novel electrospun scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Polym Technol Mater 59:417–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/25740881.2019.164724410.1080/25740881.2019.1647244 ↗
12. Toloue EB, Karbasi S, Salehi H, Rafienia M (2019) Potential of an electrospun composite scaffold of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)-chitosan/alumina nanowires in bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C 99:1075–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.06210.1016/j.msec.2019.02.062 ↗
13. Keikhaei S, Mohammadalizadeh Z, Karbasi S, Salimi A (2019) Evaluation of the effects of β-tricalcium phosphate on physical, mechanical and biological properties of Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)/chitosan electrospun scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Mater Technol 34:615–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2019.161105310.1080/10667857.2019.1611053 ↗
14. Karbasi S, Alizadeh ZM (2017) Effects of multi-wall carbon nanotubes on structural and mechanical properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/chitosan electrospun scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Bull Mater Sci 40:1247–1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-017-1479-910.1007/s12034-017-1479-9 ↗
15. Aragon J, Navascues N, Mendoza G, Irusta S (2017) Laser-treated electrospun fibers loaded with nano-hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. Int J Pharm 525:112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.04.02210.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.04.022 ↗
16. Aragón J, Salerno S, De Bartolo L et al (2018) Polymeric electrospun scaffolds for bone morphogenetic protein 2 delivery in bone tissue engineering. J Colloid Interface Sci 531:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.02910.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.029 ↗
17. Aldana AA, Abraham GA (2017) Current advances in electrospun gelatin-based scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Int J Pharm 523:441–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.04410.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.044 ↗
18. Semitela Â, Girão AF, Fernandes C et al (2020) Electrospinning of bioactive polycaprolactone-gelatin nanofibres with increased pore size for cartilage tissue engineering applications. J Biomater Appl 35:471–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/088532822094019410.1177/0885328220940194 ↗
19. Rose JB, Sidney LE, Patient J et al (2019) In vitro evaluation of electrospun blends of gelatin and PCL for application as a partial thickness corneal graft. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 107:828–838. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3659810.1002/jbm.a.36598 ↗
20. Tığlı RS, Kazaroğlu NM, Mavış B, Gümüşderelioğlu M (2011) Cellular behavior on epidermal growth factor (EGF)-immobilized PCL/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 22:207–223. https://doi.org/10.1163/092050609X1259150047542410.1163/092050609X12591500475424 ↗
21. Chong E, Phan T, Lim I et al (2007) Evaluation of electrospun PCL/gelatin nanofibrous scaffold for wound healing and layered dermal reconstitution. Acta Biomater 3:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2007.01.00210.1016/j.actbio.2007.01.002 ↗
22. Basar AO, Castro S, Torres-Giner S et al (2017) Novel poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin wound dressings prepared by emulsion electrospinning with controlled release capacity of Ketoprofen anti-inflammatory drug. Mater Sci Eng C 81:459–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.08.02510.1016/j.msec.2017.08.025 ↗
23. Gluck JM, Rahgozar P, Ingle NP et al (2011) Hybrid coaxial electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds with limited immunological response created for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 99 B:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3188510.1002/jbm.b.31885 ↗
24. Powell HM, Boyce ST (2009) Engineered human skin fabricated using electrospun collagen–PCL blends: morphogenesis and mechanical properties. Tissue Eng Part A 15:2177–2187. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2008.047310.1089/ten.tea.2008.0473 ↗
25. Fernández-Pérez J, Kador KE, Lynch AP, Ahearne M (2020) Characterization of extracellular matrix modified poly(ε-caprolactone) electrospun scaffolds with differing fiber orientations for corneal stroma regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.11041510.1016/j.msec.2019.110415 ↗
26. Fadaie M, Mirzaei E, Geramizadeh B, Asvar Z (2018) Incorporation of nanofibrillated chitosan into electrospun PCL nanofibers makes scaffolds with enhanced mechanical and biological properties. Carbohydr Polym 199:628–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.06110.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.061 ↗
27. Bolaina-Lorenzo E, Martinez-Ramos C, Monleón-Pradas M et al (2017) Electrospun polycaprolactone/chitosan scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering: Physicochemical characterization and Schwann cell biocompatibility. Biomed Mater. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/12/1/01500810.1088/1748-605X/12/1/015008 ↗
28. Semnani D, Naghashzargar E, Hadjianfar M et al (2017) Evaluation of PCL/chitosan electrospun nanofibers for liver tissue engineering. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 66:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2016.119093110.1080/00914037.2016.1190931 ↗
29. Gomes S, Rodrigues G, Martins G et al (2017) Evaluation of nanofibrous scaffolds obtained from blends of chitosan, gelatin and polycaprolactone for skin tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 102:1174–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.00410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.004 ↗
30. Sharifi F, Atyabi SM, Norouzian D et al (2018) Polycaprolactone/carboxymethyl chitosan nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering application. Int J Biol Macromol 115:243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.04510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.045 ↗
31. Gao S, Guo W, Chen M et al (2017) Fabrication and characterization of electrospun nanofibers composed of decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix and polycaprolactone for meniscus tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B 5:2273–2285. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6tb03299k10.1039/c6tb03299k ↗
32. Liao N, Unnithan AR, Joshi MK et al (2015) Electrospun bioactive poly (ɛ-caprolactone)–cellulose acetate–dextran antibacterial composite mats for wound dressing applications. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 469:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.01.02210.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.01.022 ↗
33. Trinca RB, Westin CB, da Silva JAF, Moraes ÂM (2017) Electrospun multilayer chitosan scaffolds as potential wound dressings for skin lesions. Eur Polym J 88:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.01.02110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.01.021 ↗
34. de Pinho ARG, Odila I, Leferink A et al (2019) Hybrid polyester-hydrogel electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.0023110.3389/fbioe.2019.00231 ↗
35. Wang Z, Qian Y, Li L et al (2016) Evaluation of emulsion electrospun polycaprolactone/hyaluronan/epidermal growth factor nanofibrous scaffolds for wound healing. J Biomater Appl 30:686–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/088532821558690710.1177/0885328215586907 ↗
36. Martins AF, Facchi SP, da Câmara PCF et al (2018) Novel poly(ε-caprolactone)/amino-functionalized tannin electrospun membranes as scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Colloid Interface Sci 525:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.04.06010.1016/j.jcis.2018.04.060 ↗
37. Orash Mahmoud Salehi A, Nourbakhsh MS, Rafienia M et al (2020) Corneal stromal regeneration by hybrid oriented poly (ε-caprolactone)/lyophilized silk fibroin electrospun scaffold. Int J Biol Macromol 161:377–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.04510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.045 ↗
38. Miguel SP, Simões D, Moreira AF et al (2019) Production and characterization of electrospun silk fibroin based asymmetric membranes for wound dressing applications. Int J Biol Macromol 121:524–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.04110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.041 ↗
39. Behtaj S, Karamali F, Masaeli E et al (2020) Electrospun PGS/PCL, PLLA/PCL, PLGA/PCL and pure PCL scaffolds for retinal progenitor cell cultivation. Biochem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2020.10784610.1016/j.bej.2020.107846 ↗
40. Kupka V, Dvoráková E, Manakhov A et al (2020) Well-blended PCL/PEO electrospun nanofibers with functional properties enhanced by plasma processing. Polymers (Basel) 12:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1206140310.3390/polym12061403 ↗
41. Baudequin T, Gaut L, Mueller M et al (2017) The osteogenic and tenogenic differentiation potential of C3H10T1/2 (mesenchymal stem cell model) cultured on PCL/PLA electrospun scaffolds in the absence of specific differentiation medium. Materials (Basel) 10:1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1012138710.3390/ma10121387 ↗
42. Aghdam RM, Najarian S, Shakhesi S et al (2012) Investigating the effect of PGA on physical and mechanical properties of electrospun PCL/PGA blend nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci 124:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3507110.1002/app.35071 ↗
43. Hasan A, Soliman S, El Hajj F et al (2018) Fabrication and in vitro characterization of a tissue engineered PCL-PLLA heart valve. Sci Rep 8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26452-y10.1038/s41598-018-26452-y ↗
44. Castilho M, Feyen D, Flandes-Iparraguirre M et al (2017) Melt electrospinning writing of poly-hydroxymethylglycolide-co-ε-caprolactone-based scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater 6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20170031110.1002/adhm.201700311 ↗
45. De-Paula MMM, Ghannadian P, Afewerki S et al (2018) Understanding the impact of crosslinked PCL/PEG/GelMA electrospun nanofibers on bactericidal activity. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/32232110.1101/322321 ↗
46. Lobo AO, Afewerki S, de Paula MMM et al (2018) Electrospun nanofiber blend with improved mechanical and biological performance. Int J Nanomed 13:7891–7903. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S17561910.2147/IJN.S175619 ↗
47. Mizuno M, Kuboki Y (2001) Osteoblast-related gene expression of bone marrow cells during the osteoblastic differentiation induced by type I collagen. J Biochem 129:133–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a00282410.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a002824 ↗
48. Han J, Chen T-X, Branford-White CJ, Zhu L-M (2009) Electrospun shikonin-loaded PCL/PTMC composite fiber mats with potential biomedical applications. Int J Pharm 382:215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.07.02710.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.07.027 ↗
49. Joseph B, Augustine R, Kalarikkal N et al (2019) Recent advances in electrospun polycaprolactone based scaffolds for wound healing and skin bioengineering applications. Mater Today Commun 19:319–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.02.00910.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.02.009 ↗
50. Kim G-M, Le KHT, Giannitelli SM et al (2013) Electrospinning of PCL/PVP blends for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med 24:1425–1442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4893-610.1007/s10856-013-4893-6 ↗
51. Munj HR, Tomasko DL (2017) Polycaprolactone-polymethyl methacrylate electrospun blends for biomedical applications. Polym Sci Ser A 59:695–707. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965545X1705012110.1134/S0965545X17050121 ↗
52. Vogt L, Rivera LR, Liverani L et al (2019) Poly(ε-caprolactone)/poly(glycerol sebacate) electrospun scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering using benign solvents. Mater Sci Eng C 103:109712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.09110.1016/j.msec.2019.04.091 ↗
53. Salehi S, Fathi M, Javanmard SH et al (2014) Generation of PGS/PCL blend nanofibrous scaffolds mimicking corneal stroma structure. Macromol Mater Eng 299:455–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20130018710.1002/mame.201300187 ↗
54. Rai R, Tallawi M, Grigore A, Boccaccini AR (2012) Synthesis, properties and biomedical applications of poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS): a review. Prog Polym Sci 37:1051–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.02.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.02.001 ↗
55. Zhou X, Pan Y, Liu R et al (2019) Biocompatibility and biodegradation properties of polycaprolactone/polydioxanone composite scaffolds prepared by blend or co-electrospinning. J Bioact Compat Polym 34:115–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/088391151983556910.1177/0883911519835569 ↗
56. Han D, Song J, Ding X et al (2007) Fabrication and characterization of self-doped poly(aniline-co-anthranilic acid) nanorods in bundles. Mater Chem Phys 105:380–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.05.00210.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.05.002 ↗
57. Guler Z, Silva JC, Sezai Sarac A (2017) RGD functionalized poly(ε-caprolactone)/poly(m-anthranilic acid) electrospun nanofibers as high-performing scaffolds for bone tissue engineering RGD functionalized PCL/P3ANA nanofibers. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 66:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2016.119092910.1080/00914037.2016.1190929 ↗
58. Balu R, Kumar TSS, Ramalingam M, Ramakrishna S (2011) Electrospun polycaprolactone/poly (1, 4-butylene adipate-co-polycaprolactam) blends: potential biodegradable scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. J Biomater Tissue Eng. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbt.2011.100410.1166/jbt.2011.1004 ↗
59. Xue Y, Yatsenko T, Patel A et al (2017) PEGylated poly(ester amide) elastomer scaffolds for soft tissue engineering. Polym Adv Technol 28:1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.400210.1002/pat.4002 ↗
60. Kai D, Jiang S, Low ZW, Loh XJ (2015) Engineering highly stretchable lignin-based electrospun nanofibers for potential biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B 3:6194–6204. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5tb00765h10.1039/c5tb00765h ↗
61. Zhang J, Duan Y, Wei D et al (2011) Co-electrospun fibrous scaffold-adsorbed DNA for substrate-mediated gene delivery. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 96 A:212–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3296210.1002/jbm.a.32962 ↗
62. de Cassan D, Becker A, Glasmacher B et al (2020) Blending chitosan-g-poly(caprolactone) with poly(caprolactone) by electrospinning to produce functional fiber mats for tissue engineering applications. J Appl Polym Sci 137:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4865010.1002/app.48650 ↗
63. Arbade GK, Srivastava J, Tripathi V et al (2020) Enhancement of hydrophilicity, biocompatibility and biodegradability of poly(ε-caprolactone) electrospun nanofiber scaffolds using poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone-co-glycolide) as additives for soft tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 31:1648–1670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2020.176979910.1080/09205063.2020.1769799 ↗
64. Nguyen TH, Lee BT (2012) The effect of cross-linking on the microstructure, mechanical properties and biocompatibility of electrospun polycaprolactone-gelatin/PLGA-gelatin/PLGA-chitosan hybrid composite. Sci Technol Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/13/3/03500210.1088/1468-6996/13/3/035002 ↗
65. Zia KM, Anjum S, Zuber M et al (2014) Synthesis and molecular characterization of chitosan based polyurethane elastomers using aromatic diisocyanate. Int J Biol Macromol 66:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.01.07310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.01.073 ↗
66. Solanki A, Das M, Thakore S (2018) A review on carbohydrate embedded polyurethanes: an emerging area in the scope of biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym 181:1003–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.04910.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.049 ↗
67. Lei W, Fang C, Zhou X et al (2017) Thermal properties of polyurethane elastomer with different flexible molecular chain based on para-phenylene diisocyanate. J Mater Sci Technol 33:1424–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2017.05.01410.1016/j.jmst.2017.05.014 ↗
68. Joseph J, Patel RM, Wenham A, Smith JR (2018) Biomedical applications of polyurethane materials and coatings. Trans IMF 96:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00202967.2018.145020910.1080/00202967.2018.1450209 ↗
69. Marzec M, Kucińska-Lipka J, Kalaszczyńska I, Janik H (2017) Development of polyurethanes for bone repair. Mater Sci Eng C 80:736–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.07.04710.1016/j.msec.2017.07.047 ↗
70. Bercea M, Gradinaru LM, Mandru M et al (2019) Intermolecular interactions and self-assembling of polyurethane with poly(vinyl alcohol) in aqueous solutions. J Mol Liq 274:562–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.01810.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.018 ↗
71. Naureen B, Haseeb ASMA, Basirun WJ, Muhamad F (2021) Recent advances in tissue engineering scaffolds based on polyurethane and modified polyurethane. Mater Sci Eng C 118:111228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11122810.1016/j.msec.2020.111228 ↗
72. Gostev AA, Shundrina IK, Pastukhov VI et al (2020) In vivo stability of polyurethane-based electrospun vascular grafts in terms of chemistry and mechanics. Polymers (Basel) 12:845. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1204084510.3390/polym12040845 ↗
73. Chao CY, Mani MP, Jaganathan SK (2018) Engineering electrospun multicomponent polyurethane scaffolding platform comprising grapeseed oil and honey/propolis for bone tissue regeneration. PLoS ONE 13:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.020569910.1371/journal.pone.0205699 ↗
74. Jaganathan SK, Mani MP, Ayyar M, Supriyanto E (2017) Engineered electrospun polyurethane and castor oil nanocomposite scaffolds for cardiovascular applications. J Mater Sci 52:10673–10685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1286-010.1007/s10853-017-1286-0 ↗
75. Mani MP, Jaganathan SK, Ismail AF (2019) Appraisal of electrospun textile scaffold comprising polyurethane decorated with ginger nanofibers for wound healing applications. J Ind Text 49:648–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/152808371879591110.1177/1528083718795911 ↗
76. Mani MP, Jaganathan SK (2020) Fabrication and characterization of electrospun polyurethane blended with dietary grapes for skin tissue engineering. J Ind Text 50:655–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/152808371984062810.1177/1528083719840628 ↗
77. Manikandan A, Mani MP, Jaganathan SK et al (2017) Formation of functional nanofibrous electrospun polyurethane and murivenna oil with improved haemocompatibility for wound healing. Polym Test 61:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.008 ↗
78. Jia L, Prabhakaran MP, Qin X et al (2013) Biocompatibility evaluation of protein-incorporated electrospun polyurethane-based scaffolds with smooth muscle cells for vascular tissue engineering. J Mater Sci 48:5113–5124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7359-910.1007/s10853-013-7359-9 ↗
79. Huang C, Chen R, Ke Q et al (2011) Electrospun collagen-chitosan-TPU nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineered tubular grafts. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 82:307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.09.00210.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.09.002 ↗
80. Le AN-M, Tran NM-P, Phan TB et al (2020) Poloxamer additive as luminal surface modification to modulate wettability and bioactivities of small-diameter polyurethane/polycaprolactone electrospun hollow tube for vascular prosthesis applications. Mater Today Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10177110.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101771 ↗
81. Ahmed F, Alexandridis P, Shankaran H, Neelamegham S (2001) The ability of poloxamers to inhibit platelet aggregation depends on their physicochemical properties. Thromb Haemost 86:1532–1539. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-161675910.1055/s-0037-1616759 ↗
82. Bil M, Kijeńska-Gawrońska E, Głodkowska-Mrówka E et al (2020) Design and in vitro evaluation of electrospun shape memory polyurethanes for self-fitting tissue engineering grafts and drug delivery systems. Mater Sci Eng C 110:110675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11067510.1016/j.msec.2020.110675 ↗
83. Caracciolo PC, Rial-Hermida MI, Montini-Ballarin F et al (2017) Surface-modified bioresorbable electrospun scaffolds for improving hemocompatibility of vascular grafts. Mater Sci Eng C 75:1115–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.15110.1016/j.msec.2017.02.151 ↗
84. Wang H, Feng Y, An B et al (2012) Fabrication of PU/PEGMA crosslinked hybrid scaffolds by in situ UV photopolymerization favoring human endothelial cells growth for vascular tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23:1499–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4613-710.1007/s10856-012-4613-7 ↗
85. Wang H, Feng Y, Fang Z et al (2012) Co-electrospun blends of PU and PEG as potential biocompatible scaffolds for small-diameter vascular tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 32:2306–2315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.07.00110.1016/j.msec.2012.07.001 ↗
86. Karahaliloğlu Z (2017) Electrospun PU-PEG and PU-PC hybrid scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering. Fibers Polym 18:2135–2145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-017-7368-410.1007/s12221-017-7368-4 ↗
87. Jiang L, Jiang Y, Stiadle J et al (2019) Electrospun nanofibrous thermoplastic polyurethane/poly(glycerol sebacate) hybrid scaffolds for vocal fold tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C 94:740–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.02710.1016/j.msec.2018.10.027 ↗
88. Ye K, Liu D, Kuang H et al (2019) Three-dimensional electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds displaying bone morphogenetic protein-2-derived peptides for the promotion of osteogenic differentiation of stem cells and bone regeneration. J Colloid Interface Sci 534:625–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.09.07110.1016/j.jcis.2018.09.071 ↗
89. Persson M, Lehenkari PP, Berglin L et al (2018) Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in a 3D woven scaffold. Sci Rep 8:10457. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28699-x10.1038/s41598-018-28699-x ↗
90. Lee S, Joshi MK, Tiwari AP et al (2018) Lactic acid assisted fabrication of bioactive three-dimensional PLLA/β-TCP fibrous scaffold for biomedical application. Chem Eng J 347:771–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.15810.1016/j.cej.2018.04.158 ↗
91. Hoveizi E, Nabiuni M, Parivar K et al (2014) Functionalisation and surface modification of electrospun polylactic acid scaffold for tissue engineering. Cell Biol Int 38:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbin.1017810.1002/cbin.10178 ↗
92. Kang Y, Chen P, Shi X et al (2018) Multilevel structural stereocomplex polylactic acid/collagen membranes by pattern electrospinning for tissue engineering. Polymer (Guildf) 156:250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.10.00910.1016/j.polymer.2018.10.009 ↗
93. Patel DK, Dutta SD, Hexiu J et al (2020) Bioactive electrospun nanocomposite scaffolds of poly(lactic acid)/cellulose nanocrystals for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 162:1429–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.24610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.246 ↗
94. Huan S, Liu G, Cheng W et al (2018) Electrospun poly(lactic acid)-based fibrous nanocomposite reinforced by cellulose nanocrystals: impact of fiber uniaxial alignment on microstructure and mechanical properties. Biomacromolecules 19:1037–1046. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0002310.1021/acs.biomac.8b00023 ↗
95. Zadeh KM, Luyt AS, Zarif L et al (2019) Electrospun polylactic acid/date palm polyphenol extract nanofibres for tissue engineering applications. Emergent Mater 2:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-019-00042-810.1007/s42247-019-00042-8 ↗
96. Gao Y, Shao W, Qian W et al (2018) Biomineralized poly (L-lactic-co-glycolic acid)-tussah silk fibroin nanofiber fabric with hierarchical architecture as a scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 84:195–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.04710.1016/j.msec.2017.11.047 ↗
97. Kanmaz D, Aylin Karahan Toprakci H, Olmez H, Toprakci O (2018) Electrospun polylactic acid based nanofibers for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Res India 15:224–240. https://doi.org/10.13005/msri/15030410.13005/msri/150304 ↗
98. Shin H, Jo S, Mikos AG (2003) Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 24:4353–4364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00339-910.1016/S0142-9612(03)00339-9 ↗
99. Paragkumar NT, Edith D, Six J-L (2006) Surface characteristics of PLA and PLGA films. Appl Surf Sci 253:2758–2764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.05.04710.1016/j.apsusc.2006.05.047 ↗
100. Zhao R, Li X, Sun B et al (2015) Nitrofurazone-loaded electrospun PLLA/sericin-based dual-layer fiber mats for wound dressing applications. RSC Adv 5:16940–16949. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA16208K10.1039/C4RA16208K ↗