journal article·2021-09

A novel butterfly-shaped auxetic structure with negative Poisson’s ratio and enhanced stiffness

ZiWen Zhang, RuiLan Tian, XiaoLong Zhang, FangYi Wei, XinWei Yang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 56· Issue 25
Publisher page

Abstract

Based on the butterfly pattern structure and the star-shaped honeycomb structure, a novel auxetic butterfly-shaped honeycomb structure (BSH) was constructed, which realized the coupling improvement of negative Poisson’s ratio and in-plane stiffness. Under uniaxial tension, the equivalent elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio of the BSH structure were derived by the energy method. The relationship between Poisson's ratio and structural parameters of the BSH structure was discussed to optimize the structural parameters by numerical analysis. Poisson’s ratio and relative elastic modulus were taken as the objective function groups. The Pareto solution set was obtained by the Gamultiobj multi-objective genetic algorithm method. The Pareto solution set was sorted based on the entropy-weight TOPSIS method, and the optimal solution was selected as the solution of the novel structure optimization design. The correctness of the theoretical results was verified by the finite element analysis and experiment results. Furthermore, compared with the traditional re-entrant hexagonal honeycomb structure and the star-shaped honeycomb structure, the relative elastic modulus and auxetic effect of the BSH structure were greatly improved, and the stiffness of the novel structure was improved while maintaining a high auxetic effect.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Structural Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Bilal OR, Ballagi D, Daraio C (2018) Architected lattices for simultaneous broadband attenuation of airborne sound and mechanical vibrations in all directions. Phys Rev Appl 10(5):05406010.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.054060 ↗
2. Bacigalupo A, Gnecco G, Lepidi M, Gambarotta L (2020) Machine-learning techniques for the optimal design of acoustic metamaterials. J Optim Theory App 187(3):630–65310.1007/s10957-019-01614-8 ↗
3. Guo SY, Zhang YP, Ge YQ, Zhang SL, Zeng HB, Zhang H (2019) 2D V-V binary materials: status and challenges. Adv Mater 31(39):190235210.1002/adma.201902352 ↗
4. Jiang XT, Kuklin AV, Baev A, Ge YQ, Agren H, Zhang H, Prasad PN (2020) Two-dimensional MXenes: from morphological to optical, electric, and magnetic properties and applications. Phys Rep 848:1–5810.1016/j.physrep.2019.12.006 ↗
5. Pei JJ, Yang J, Yildirim T, Zhang H, Lu YR (2019) Many-body complexes in 2D semiconductors. Adv Mater 31(2):170694510.1002/adma.201706945 ↗
6. He JS, Tao LL, Zhang H, Zhou B, Li JB (2019) Emerging 2D materials beyond grapheme for ultrashort pulse generation in fiber lasers. Nanoscale 11(6):2577–259310.1039/C8NR09368G ↗
7. Zhang X, Yang D (2016) Mechanical properties of auxetic cellular material consisting of re-entrant hexagonal honeycombs. Materials 9(11):90010.3390/ma9110900 ↗
8. Carneiro VH, Meireles J, Puga H (2013) Auxetic materials—a review. Mater Sci-Poland 31(4):561–57110.2478/s13536-013-0140-6 ↗
9. Prawoto Y (2012) Seeing auxetic materials from the mechanics point of view: a structural review on the negative Poisson’s ratio. Comput Mater Sci 58:140–15310.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.012 ↗
10. Avalle M, Belingardi G (2019) A mechanical model of cellular solids for energy absorption. Adv Eng Mater 21:180045710.1002/adem.201800457 ↗
11. Chica L, Alzate A (2019) Cellular concrete review: new trends for application in construction. Constr Build Mater 200:637–64710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.136 ↗
12. Li D, Dong L, Yin JH, Lakes RS (2016) Negative Poisson’s ratio in 2D Voronoi cellular solids by biaxial compression: a numerical study. J Mater Sci 51(14):7029–7037https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9992-610.1007/s10853-016-9992-6 ↗
13. Lv WT, Li D, Dong L (2020) Study on mechanical properties of a hierarchical octet-truss structure. Compos Struct 249:11264010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112640 ↗
14. Lv WT, Li D, Dong L (2021) Study on blast resistance of a composite sandwich panel with isotropic foam core with negative Poisson’s ratio. Int J Mech Sci 191:10610510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106105 ↗
15. Li D, Gao RC, Dong L, Lam WK, Zhang FP (2020) A novel 3D re-entrant unit cell structure with negative Poisson’s ratio and tunable stiffness. Smart Mater Struct 29(4):04501510.1088/1361-665X/ab6696 ↗
16. Evans KE, Caddock BD (1989) Microporous materials with negative Poisson’s ratios. II. Mechanisms and interpretation. J Phys D Appl Phys 22(12):1877–188710.1088/0022-3727/22/12/011 ↗
17. Wei LL, Zhao X, Yu Q, Zhu GH (2020) A novel star auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane crushing strength. Thin Wall Struct 149:10662310.1016/j.tws.2020.106623 ↗
18. Jeong S, Yoo HH (2019) Shape optimization of bowtie-shaped auxetic structures using beam theory. Compos Struct 224:1–1310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111020 ↗
19. Grima JN, Evans KE (2006) Auxetic behavior from rotating triangles. J Mater Sci 41(10):3193–3196 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-6339-8.10.1007/s10853-006-6339-8. ↗
20. Dubrovski PD, Novak N, Borovinsek M, Vesenjak M, Ren ZR (2019) In-plane behavior of auxetic non-woven fabric based on rotating square unit geometry under tensile load. Polymers-Basel 11(6):104010.3390/polym11061040 ↗
21. Chen YJ, Scarpa F, Liu YJ, Leng JS (2013) Elasticity of anti-tetrachiral anisotropic lattices. Int J Solids Struct 50(6):996–100410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.12.004 ↗
22. Mizzi L (2015) Influence of translational disorder on the mechanical properties of hexachiral honeycomb systems. Compos Part B-Eng 80:84–9110.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.057 ↗
23. Scarpa F, Panayiotou P, Tomlinson G (2000) Numerical and experimental uniaxial loading on in-plane auxetic honeycombs. J Strain Anal Eng 35(5):383–38810.1243/0309324001514152 ↗
24. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Schajer GS (1982) The mechanics of two-dimension cellular materials. Proc R Soc A-Math Phys 382(1782):25–42
25. Fu MH, Zheng BB, Li WH (2017) A novel chiral three-dimensional material with negative Poisson’s ratio and the equivalent elastic parameters. Compos Struct 176:442–44810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.027 ↗
26. Li K, Gao XL, Subhash G (2005) Effects of cell shape and cell wall thickness variations on the elastic properties of two-dimensional cellular solids. Int J Solids Struct 42(5):1777–179510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.08.005 ↗
27. Li C, Shen HS, Wang H (2020) Nonlinear dynamic response of sandwich plates with functionally graded auxetic 3D lattice core. Nonlinear Dyn 100(4):3235–325210.1007/s11071-020-05686-4 ↗
28. Zhang GD, Khandelwal K (2020) Computational design of finite strain auxetic metamaterials via topology optimization and nonlinear homogenization. Comput Methods Appl Mech 356:490–52710.1016/j.cma.2019.07.027 ↗
29. Gumruk R, Mines RAW, Karadeniz S (2013) Static mechanical behaviours of stainless steel micro-lattice structures under different loading conditions. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 586:392–40610.1016/j.msea.2013.07.070 ↗
30. Li D, Yin JH, Dong L, Lakes RS (2018) Strong re-entrant cellular structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Mater Sci 53(5):3493–349910.1007/s10853-017-1809-8 ↗
31. Jones D (2001) Handbook of viscoelastic vibration damping. Wiley, New York
32. Fu M, Chen Y, Hu LL (2017) A novel auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane stiffness and buckling strength. Compos Struct 160:574–58510.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.090 ↗
33. Wang H, Lu ZX, Yang ZY, Li X (2019) A novel re-entrant auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane impact resistance. Compos Struct 208:758–77010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.024 ↗
34. Wang CY, Li Y, Zhao WZ, Zou SC, Zhou G, Wang YL (2018) Structure design and multi-objective optimization of a novel crash box based on biomimetic structure. Int J Mech Sci 138:489–50110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.01.032 ↗
35. Valentini L, Bon SB, Pugno NM (2017) Graphene and carbon nanotube auxetic rubber bionic composites with negative variation of the electrical resistance and comparison with their nonbionic counterparts. Adv Funct Mater 27(24):160652610.1002/adfm.201606526 ↗
36. Gao Q, Zhao X, Wang CZ, Wang LM, Ma ZD (2018) Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization for an auxetic cylindrical structure under axial impact loading. Mater Des 143:120–13010.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.063 ↗
37. Vinay VC, Varma DSM (2019) Fabrication and testing of auxetic foams for rehabilitation applications. J Indian I Sci 99(3):511–51810.1007/s41745-019-00122-y ↗
38. Airoldi A, Bettini P, Panichelli P, Oktem MF, Sala G (2015) Chiral topologies for composite morphing structures-part I: development of a chiral rib for deformable airfoils. Phys Status Solidi B 252(7):1435–144510.1002/pssb.201451689 ↗
39. Ahmed MF, Li Y, Zeng CC (2019) Stretchable and compressible piezoresistive sensors from auxetic foam and silver nanowire. Mater Chem Phys 229:167–17310.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.03.015 ↗
40. Smardzewski J, Jasinska D, Janus-Michalska M (2014) Structure and properties of composite seat with auxetic springs. Compos Struct 113:354–36110.1016/j.compstruct.2014.03.041 ↗
41. Theocaris PS, Stavroulakis GE, Panagiotopoulos PD (1997) Negative Poisson’s ratios in composites with star-shaped inclusions: a numerical homogenization approach. Arch Appl Mech 67(4):274–28610.1007/s004190050117 ↗
42. Ren X, Das R, Tran P, Ngo TD, Xie YM (2018) Auxetic metamaterials and structures: a review. Smart Mater Struct 27(2):02300110.1088/1361-665X/aaa61c ↗
43. Chen Y, Fu MH (2018) Mechanical properties of a novel zero Poisson’s ratio honeycomb. Adv Eng Mater 20(2):170045210.1002/adem.201700452 ↗