Review: 3D woven honeycomb composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Honeycomb is considered an excellent structural material because of its high strength and shear rigidity, excellent energy absorbing property, high impact strength, lower weight, high crushing stress, and almost constant crushing force. Honeycomb being a cellular solid is a well-known core used to build a sandwich structure while making structural composites. Because of this excellent mechanical performance, honeycombs are frequently used in the aircraft industry as a core of sandwich panels and in the automotive industry as efficient impact attenuators. The hollow spaces in the honeycomb structure reduce weight but also ensure required strength, provided they are designed correctly. 3D woven honeycomb composite has a promising future in the lightweight application areas and can be the real substitutes for aluminum and other metal alloys as these structures provide structural integrity. In this review, the basic concept of textile-based 3D woven honeycomb composites, engineering design, manufacturing process, structure-properties relationship, and applications of 3D woven honeycomb fabrics and their composites are discussed in detail. Geometrical modeling of 3D woven honeycomb fabric and theoretical analysis of impact, flexural, and compression behavior of their composites are summarized to appreciate the potential advantages of textile-based honeycomb structural composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Torre L, Kenny JM (2000) Impact testing and simulation of composite sandwich structures for civil transportation. Compos Struct 50:257–26710.1016/S0263-8223(00)00101-X ↗
2. Shin KB, Lee JY, Cho SH (2008) An experimental study of low-velocity impact responses of sandwich panels for Korean low floor bus. Compos Struct 84:228–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.002 ↗
3. Miltz J, Ramon O, Mizrahi S (1989) Mechanical behavior of closed cell plastic foams used as cushioning materials. J Appl Polym Sci 38:281–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1989.07038020910.1002/app.1989.070380209 ↗
4. Paik JK, Lee YW, Thayamballi AK, Curry R, Hockberger W (1997) A novel concept for structural design and construction of vessels: using aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels. Discussion. Authors’ closure. Trans Nav Archit Mar Eng 105:191–219
5. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
6. Wierzbicki T (1983) Crushing analysis of metal honeycombs. Int J Impact Eng 1:157–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(83)90004-010.1016/0734-743X(83)90004-0 ↗
7. Wu E, Jiang WS (1997) Axial crush of metallic honeycombs. Int J Impact Eng 19:439–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-743x(97)00004-310.1016/s0734-743x(97)00004-3 ↗
8. Yamashita M, Gotoh M (2005) Impact behavior of honeycomb structures with various cell specifications—numerical simulation and experiment. Int J Impact Eng 32:618–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.001 ↗
9. Vavilov VP, Klimov AG, Nesteruk D, Shiryaev VV (2003) Detecting water in aviation honeycomb structures by using transient infrared thermographic NDT. In: Cramer KE, Maldague XP (eds) International society for optics and photonics. Florida, pp 345–35510.1117/12.488226 ↗
10. Kleineberg M, Wenner U, Hanke M (2002) Cost effective CFRP-fuselage manufacturing with liquid resin infusion ( LRI ) – technologies. Workshop at german aerospace centre (DLR) on final project of black fuselage. Braunschweig, Germany, pp 147–150
11. Xu S, Beynon JH, Ruan D, Lu G (2012) Experimental study of the out-of-plane dynamic compression of hexagonal honeycombs. Compos Struct 94:2326–2336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.024 ↗
12. Lombardi NJ, Liu J (2011) Glass fiber-reinforced polymer/steel hybrid honeycomb sandwich concept for bridge deck applications. Compos Struct 93:1275–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.007 ↗
13. Zinno A, Prota A, Di Maio E, Bakis CE (2011) Experimental characterization of phenolic-impregnated honeycomb sandwich structures for transportation vehicles. Compos Struct 93:2910–2924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.012 ↗
14. Chen DH (2011) Bending deformation of honeycomb consisting of regular hexagonal cells. Compos Struct 93:736–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.08.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2010.08.006 ↗
15. Lu C, Zhao M, Jie L et al (2015) Stress distribution on composite honeycomb sandwich structure suffered from bending load. Proced Eng 99:405–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.55410.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.554 ↗
16. Frank XuX, Qiao P (2002) Homogenized elastic properties of honeycomb sandwich with skin effect. Int J Solids Struct 39:2153–2188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00111-710.1016/S0020-7683(02)00111-7 ↗
17. Zhu HX (2010) Size-dependent elastic properties of micro- and nano-honeycombs. J Mech Phys Solids 58:696–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2010.02.00910.1016/j.jmps.2010.02.009 ↗
18. Miller W, Smith CW, Evans KE (2011) Honeycomb cores with enhanced buckling strength. Compos Struct 93:1072–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.09.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2010.09.021 ↗
19. Burlayenko VN, Sadowski T (2010) Effective elastic properties of foam-filled honeycomb cores of sandwich panels. Compos Struct 92:2890–2900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.04.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2010.04.015 ↗
20. Mouritz AP, Bannister MK, Falzon PJ, Leong KH (1999) Review of applications for advanced three-dimensional fibre textile composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 30:1445–1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-210.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-2 ↗
21. Nguyen J, Park SI, Rosen DW et al (2012) Conformal lattice structure design and fabrication. In: Solid freeform fabrication symposium. Austin, pp 138–161
22. Ju J, Summers JD, Ziegert J, Fadel G (2009) Design of Honeycomb Meta-Materials for High Shear Flexure. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. pp 805–81310.1115/DETC2009-87730 ↗
23. Kolla A, Ju J, Summers JD, et al (2010) Design of Chiral Honeycomb Meso-Structures for High Shear Flexure. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. pp 43–4910.1115/DETC2010-28557 ↗
24. Zou Z, Reid SR, Tan PJ et al (2009) Dynamic crushing of honeycombs and features of shock fronts. Int J Impact Eng 36:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.00810.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.008 ↗
25. Ruzzene M (2004) Vibration and sound radiation of sandwich beams with honeycomb truss core. J Sound Vib 277:741–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2003.09.02610.1016/j.jsv.2003.09.026 ↗
26. Ashby MF (2006) The properties of foams and lattices. Phil Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 364:15–30. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.167810.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
27. Zheng X, Lee H, Weisgraber TH et al (2014) Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 344:1373–1377. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.125229110.1126/science.1252291 ↗
28. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA, Ashby MF (2001) Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material. J Mech Phys Solids 49:1747–1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-210.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-2 ↗
29. Ecklund RC, Hayase M, Walkington RJ (1989) Curved SPF/DB sandwich fabrication. U.S. Pat. Trademark Off. 1–6
30. Zhang XD, Sun CT (1996) Formulation of an adaptive sandwich beam. Smart Mater Struct 5:814–823. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/5/6/01210.1088/0964-1726/5/6/012 ↗
31. Dattoma V, Marcuccio R, Pappalettere C, Smith GM (2001) Thermographic investigation of sandwich structure made of composite material. NDT E Int 34:515–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00082-710.1016/S0963-8695(00)00082-7 ↗
32. Baumeister J, Banhart J, Weber M (1997) Aluminium foams for transport industry. Mater Des 18:217–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(97)00050-210.1016/S0261-3069(97)00050-2 ↗
33. Banhart J, Schmoll C, Neumann U (1998) Light-weight aluminium foam structures for ships. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Materials in Oceanic Environment. Pp. 55–63
34. Kee Paik J, Thayamballi AK, Sung Kim G (1999) The strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels. Thin-Walled Struct 35:205–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8231(99)00026-910.1016/S0263-8231(99)00026-9 ↗
35. Sypeck DJ, Wadley HNG (2002) Cellular Metal Truss Core Sandwich Structures. Adv Eng Mater 4:759–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/1527-2648(20021014)4:10%3c759::AID-ADEM759%3e3.0.CO;2-A10.1002/1527-2648(20021014)4:10<759::AID-ADEM759>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
36. Bitzer T (1997) Honeycomb technology. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht10.1007/978-94-011-5856-5 ↗
37. Crupi V, Epasto G, Guglielmino E (2012) Collapse modes in aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 43:6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.12.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.12.002 ↗
38. Bitzer TN (1995) Recent honeycomb core developments. In: Proceedings of the 3. Sandwich Construction conference. Southampton, pp. 555–563
39. Fan X, Verpoest I, Vandepitte D (2006) Finite element analysis of out-of-plane compressive properties of thermoplastic honeycomb. J Sandw Struct Mater 8:437–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/109963620606586210.1177/1099636206065862 ↗
40. Pflug J, Xinyu F, Lavalaye J et al (2002) Continuously produced honeycomb sandwich materials for automotive applications. SAE Technical Papers
41. Amine S (2005) Equivalent numerical model for honeycomb subjected to high speed impact. McGill University
42. Bitzer TN (1997) Honeycomb technology: materials, design, manufacturing, applications and testing. Springer Science & Business Media10.1007/978-94-011-5856-5 ↗
43. Takenaka K, Sato E (1991) Woven fabric having multi-layer structure and composite material comprising the woven fabric. U.S. Pat. Trademark Off
44. Saeki E, Sugisawa M, Yamaguchi T, Wada A (1998) Mechanical properties of additive manufacturing honeycomb structures. J Mater Civ Eng 10:143–15210.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1998)10:3(143) ↗
45. Schwaber DM (1973) Impact behavior of polymeric foams: a review. Polym Plast Technol Eng 2:231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/0360255730854501910.1080/03602557308545019 ↗
46. Johnson W, Reid S, Reddy TY (1977) The compression of crossed layers of thin tubes. Int J Mech Sci 19:423–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(77)90042-X10.1016/0020-7403(77)90042-X ↗
47. Rao KK, Rao KJ, Sarwade AG, Chandra MS (2012) Strength analysis on honeycomb sandwich panels of different materials. Int J Eng Res Appl 2:365–374
48. Lee HS, Hong SH, Lee JR, Kim YK (2002) Mechanical behavior and failure process during compressive and shear deformation of honeycomb composite at elevated temperatures. J Mater Sci 37:1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101434422814110.1023/A:1014344228141 ↗
49. Hearle JWS, Chen X (2009) 3D woven preforms and properties for textile composites. In: ICCM International Conferences on Composite Materials. pp. 27–31
50. Chen X (2015) Advances in 3D textiles. Elsevier
51. Behera BK, Mishra R (2008) 3-Dimensional weaving. Indian J Fibre Text Res 33:274–287
52. Gereke T, Cherif C (2019) A review of numerical models for 3D woven composite reinforcements. Compos Struct 209:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.08510.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.085 ↗
53. Li M, Wang S, Zhang Z, Wu B (2009) Effect of structure on the mechanical behaviors of three-dimensional spacer fabric composites. Appl Compos Mater 16:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-008-9072-410.1007/s10443-008-9072-4 ↗
54. Khatkar V, Behera BK, Manjunath RN (2020) Textile structural composites for automotive leaf spring application. Compos Part B Eng 182:107662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10766210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107662 ↗
55. Neje G, Behera BK (2019) Investigation of mechanical performance of 3D woven spacer sandwich composites with different cell geometries. Compos Part B Eng 160:306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.03610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.036 ↗
56. Manjunath RN, Khatkar V, Behera BK (2020) Influence of augmented tuning of core architecture in 3D woven sandwich structures on flexural and compression properties of their composites. Adv Compos Mater 29:317–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2019.168092510.1080/09243046.2019.1680925 ↗
57. Manjunath RN, Behera BK (2018) Emerging trends in three-dimensional woven preforms for composite reinforcements. Advanced textile engineering materials. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp 463–49710.1002/9781119488101.ch12 ↗
58. Behera BK, Dash BP (2014) An experimental investigation into the mechanical behaviour of 3D woven fabrics for structural composites. Fibers Polym 15:1950–1955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-1950-910.1007/s12221-014-1950-9 ↗
59. Vassiliadis S, Kallivretaki A, Domvoglou D, Provatidis C (2011) Mechanical analysis of woven fabrics: the state of the art. In: Vassiliadis S (ed) Advances in modern woven fabrics technology. InTech, pp 41–6410.5772/25255 ↗
60. Bogdanovich AE (2007) Advancements in manufacturing and applications of 3-D woven preforms and composites. In: ICCM International Conferences on Composite Materials
61. Jayan VR, Tripathi L, Behera PK et al (2021) Prediction of internal geometry and tensile behavior of 3D woven solid structures by mathematical coding. J Ind Text. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083721100134810.1177/15280837211001348 ↗
62. Tripathi L, Chowdhury S, Behera B (2020) Modeling and simulation of impact behavior of 3D woven solid structure for ballistic application. J Ind Text. https://doi.org/10.1177/152808372098046710.1177/1528083720980467 ↗
63. Chen X, Spola M, Paya JG, Sellabona1 PM (1999) Experimental Studies on the Structure and Mechanical Properties of Multi-layer and Angle-interlock Woven Structures. J Text Inst 90: 91–99. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0040500990865869310.1080/00405009908658693 ↗
64. Li D, Zhao C, Jiang L, Jiang N (2014) Experimental study on the bending properties and failure mechanism of 3D integrated woven spacer composites at room and cryogenic temperature. Compos Struct 111:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.02610.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.026 ↗
65. Tripathi L, Chowdhury S, Behera BK (2020) Modelling and simulation of compression behaviour of 3D woven hollow composite structures using FEM analysis. Text leather Rev 3:6–18. https://doi.org/10.31881/TLR.2020.0310.31881/TLR.2020.03 ↗
66. Grosicki ZJ (2004) Development of weaves from elementary bases. In: Grosicki ZJ (ed) Watson’s textile design and colour. Elsevier, pp 36–6110.1016/B978-1-85573-995-6.50006-2 ↗
67. Gong X (2011) Investigation of different geometric structure parameter for honeycomb textile composites on their mechanical performance. University of Manchester, United Kingdom
68. Chen X, Sun Y, Gong X (2008) Design, manufacture, and experimental analysis of 3D honeycomb textile composites part I: design and manufacture. Text Res J 78:771–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051750708785510.1177/0040517507087855 ↗
69. Tripathi L, Neje G, Behera BK (2020) Geometrical modeling of 3D woven honeycomb fabric for manufacturing of lightweight sandwich composite material. J Ind Text. https://doi.org/10.1177/152808372093147210.1177/1528083720931472 ↗
70. Crane RM, Camponeschi ET (1986) Experimental and analytical characterization of multidimensionally braided graphite/epoxy composites. Exp Mech 26:259–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0232005110.1007/BF02320051 ↗
71. Whitney JM, Stansbarger DL, Howell HB (1971) Analysis of the rail shear test-applications and limitations. J Compos Mater 5:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983710050010310.1177/002199837100500103 ↗
72. Gong JC, Sankar BV (1991) Impact properties of three-dimensional braided graphite/epoxy composites. J Compos Mater 25:715–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983910250060610.1177/002199839102500606 ↗
73. Dexter HB (1994) Innovative textile reinforced composite materials for aircraft structures. In: 28th Int. SAMPE Tech. Conf. pp. 404–416
74. Bartels VT (2003) Thermal comfort of aeroplane seats: influence of different seat materials and the use of laboratory test methods. Appl Ergon 34:393–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00058-910.1016/S0003-6870(03)00058-9 ↗
75. Sun B, Hu† H, Gu B, (2010) Responses of 3D biaxial spacer weft-knitted composite circular plate under impact loading. Part I: unit-cell and elasto-plastic constitutive model. J Text Inst 101:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0040500080219630410.1080/00405000802196304 ↗
76. Chen X, Ma YL, Zhang H (2004) CAD/CAM for cellular woven structures. J Text Inst Part 1 Fibre Sci Text Technol 95:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1533/joti.2003.001910.1533/joti.2003.0019 ↗
77. Chen X, Taylor LW, Tsai L-J (2011) An overview on fabrication of three-dimensional woven textile preforms for composites. Text Res J 81:932–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051751039247110.1177/0040517510392471 ↗
78. Chen X, Wang H (2006) Modelling and computer-aided design of 3D hollow woven reinforcement for composites. J Text Inst 97:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1533/joti.2005.021510.1533/joti.2005.0215 ↗
79. Buchanan S, Grigorash A, Quinn JP et al (2010) Modelling the geometry of the repeat unit cell of three-dimensional weave architectures. J Text Inst 101:679–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/0040500090274658610.1080/00405000902746586 ↗
80. Chawla A, Mukherjee S, Kumar D et al (2003) Prediction of crushing behaviour of honeycomb structures. Int J Crashworthiness 8:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.022710.1533/ijcr.2003.0227 ↗
81. Foo CC, Seah LK, Chai GB (2008) Low-velocity impact failure of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels. Compos Struct 85:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.016 ↗
82. Chen DH, Ozaki S (2009) Stress concentration due to defects in a honeycomb structure. Compos Struct 89:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.010 ↗
83. Besant T, Davies GA, Hitchings D (2001) Finite element modelling of low velocity impact of composite sandwich panels. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 32:1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00084-710.1016/S1359-835X(01)00084-7 ↗
84. Uğur L, Duzcukoglu H, Sahin OS, Akkuş H (2020) Investigation of impact force on aluminium honeycomb structures by finite element analysis. J Sandw Struct Mater 22:87–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/109963621773323510.1177/1099636217733235 ↗
85. Clarke G, Wowk D, Marsden C (2017) Characterization of low velocity impact damage in metallic honeycomb sandwich aircraft panels using finite element analysis. PhD Dissertation, Royal Military College of Canada
86. Ivañez I, Sanchez-Saez S (2013) Numerical modelling of the low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich beams with honeycomb core. Compos Struct 106:716–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.025 ↗
87. Shaw MC, Sata T (1966) The plastic behavior of cellular materials. Int J Mech Sci 8:469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(66)90019-110.1016/0020-7403(66)90019-1 ↗
88. Papka SD, Kyriakides S (1998) Experiments and full-scale numerical simulations of in-plane crushing of a honeycomb. Acta Mater 46:2765–2776. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00453-910.1016/S1359-6454(97)00453-9 ↗
89. Ruan D, Lu G, Chen F, Siores E (2002) Compressive behaviour of aluminium foams at low and medium strain rates. Compos Struct 57:331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00100-910.1016/S0263-8223(02)00100-9 ↗
90. Aktay L, Çakıroğlu C, Güden M (2011) Quasi-static axial crushing behavior of honeycomb-filled thin-walled aluminum tubes. Open Mater Sci J 5:184–193. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874088X0110501018410.2174/1874088X01105010184 ↗
91. Hong S-T, Pan J, Tyan T, Prasad P (2005) Honeycomb specimens under combined compressive and shear displacement conditions. SAE Trans 114:111–118. https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-036010.4271/2005-01-0360 ↗
92. Zhao H, Gary G (1998) Crushing behaviour of aluminium honeycombs under impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 21:827–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-743x(98)00034-710.1016/s0734-743x(98)00034-7 ↗
93. Zhang J, Ashby MF (1992) The out-of-plane properties of honeycombs. Int J Mech Sci 34:475–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(92)90013-710.1016/0020-7403(92)90013-7 ↗
94. Thwaites S, Clark NH (1995) Non-destructive testing of honeycomb sandwich structures using elastic waves. J Sound Vib 187:253–269. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1995.051910.1006/jsvi.1995.0519 ↗
95. Prall D, Lakes RS (1997) Properties of a chiral honeycomb with a poisson’s ratio of -1. Int J Mech Sci 39:305–31410.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-2 ↗
96. Wu CL, Weeks CA, Sun CT (1995) Improving honeycomb-core sandwich structures for impact resistance. J Adv Mater 26:41–47
97. Varma M (2007) Transverse compressive properties of honeycomb core under oblique loading. PhD Dissertation, Wichita State University
98. Hong ST, Pan J, Tyan T, Prasad P (2002) Influence of shear loads on crush of honeycomb materials. SAE Technical Papers. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA
99. McFARLAND RK (1963) Hexagonal cell structures under post-buckling axial load. Aiaa J 1:1380–1385. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.179810.2514/3.1798 ↗
100. Scarpa F, Smith FC, Chambers B, Burriesci G (2003) Mechanical and electromagnetic behaviour of auxetic honeycomb structures. Aeronaut J 107:175–18310.1017/S000192400001191X ↗