Multi-scale evaluation of mechanical properties of the Bakken shale
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding mechanical properties of shale has been the topic of research in the past decade due to its importance in hydraulic fracturing and rock physics modeling. Since shales are highly heterogeneous in constituent components, detailed understanding of mechanical properties in a multi-scale (nano, micro, macro and field) is vital and can present various results. In this study, we used a combination of analytical methods including high-resolution mineral mapping (MAPS), programmed pyrolysis and nanoindentation to identify mineralogy, geochemistry and nanomechanical characteristics of the Bakken shales in Williston Basin, North Dakota. Nanoindentation measurements were done both parallel and perpendicular to the bedding plane to examine mechanical anisotropy. Data were analyzed via multivariate statistical deconvolution technique (maximum likelihood approach and expectation–maximization algorithms) to reveal different mechanical phases, considering their Young’s modulus and hardness. Based on recognized components in the samples and measured values, Young’s modulus was upscaled through effective medium theory. Results showed that total organic carbon (TOC) content has a decreasing effect on Young’s modulus values. It was found that mechanical anisotropy increases with an increasing TOC content. Finally, upscaled Young’s modulus results were compared with reported measurements on core plugs which was found in a reasonable agreement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Drilling and Well Engineering · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (84)
Show source-provided references
1. Jin L, Hawthorne S, Sorensen J, Pekot L, Kurz B, Smith S, Heebink L, Herdegen V, Bosshart N, Torres J, Dalkhaa C (2017) Advancing CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in unconventional oil play—experimental studies on Bakken shales. Appl Energy 208:171–18310.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.054 ↗
2. Jin L, Hawthorne S, Sorensen J, Kurz B, Pekot L, Smith S, Bosshart N, Azenkeng A, Gorecki C, Harju J (2016) A systematic investigation of gas-based improved oil recovery technologies for the Bakken tight oil formation. In: Unconventional resources technology conference, San Antonio, Texas, 1–3 August 2016. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp 557–57110.15530/urtec-2016-2433692 ↗
3. Wang L, Fu Y, Li J, Sima L, Wu Q, Jin W, Wang T (2017) Experimental study on the wettability of Longmaxi gas shale from Jiaoshiba gas field, Sichuan Basin, China. J Pet Sci Eng 151:488–49510.1016/j.petrol.2017.01.036 ↗
4. Wang L, Fu Y, Li J, Sima L, Wu Q, Jin W, Wang T (2016) Mineral and pore structure characteristics of gas shale in Longmaxi formation: a case study of Jiaoshiba gas field in the southern Sichuan Basin, China. Arab J Geosci 9(19):73310.1007/s12517-016-2763-5 ↗
5. Xiong F, Jiang Z, Li P, Wang X, Bi H, Li Y, Wang Z, Amooie MA, Soltanian MR, Moortgat J (2017) Pore structure of transitional shales in the Ordos Basin, NW China: effects of composition on gas storage capacity. Fuel 206:504–51510.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.083 ↗
6. Xiong F, Jiang Z, Chen J, Wang X, Huang Z, Liu G, Chen F, Li Y, Chen L, Zhang L (2016) The role of the residual bitumen in the gas storage capacity of mature lacustrine shale: a case study of the Triassic Yanchang shale, Ordos Basin, China. Mar Pet Geol 69:205–21510.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.10.022 ↗
7. Zhao P, Wang Z, Sun Z, Cai J, Wang L (2017) Investigation on the pore structure and multifractal characteristics of tight oil reservoirs using NMR measurements: Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusaer Sag, Junggar Basin. Mar Pet Geol 86:1067–108110.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.07.011 ↗
8. Zhao P, Mao Z, Huang Z, Zhang C (2016) A new method for estimating total organic carbon content from well logs. AAPG Bull 100:1311–132710.1306/02221615104 ↗
9. Kong L, Ostadhassan M, Li C, Tamimi N (2017) Rock physics and geomechanics of 3-D printed rocks. American Rock Mechanics Association, San Francisco
10. Masri M, Sibai M, Shao J-F, Mainguy M (2014) Experimental investigation of the effect of temperature on the mechanical behavior of Tournemire shale. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:185–19110.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.05.007 ↗
11. Niandou H, Shao J, Henry J, Fourmaintraux D (1997) Laboratory investigation of the mechanical behaviour of Tournemire shale. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:3–1610.1016/S1365-1609(97)80029-9 ↗
12. Khatibi S, Ostadhassan M, Aghajanpour A (2018) Raman spectroscopy: an analytical tool for evaluating organic matter. J Oil Gas Petrochem Sci 1(1):28–3310.30881/jogps.00007 ↗
13. Li C, Ostadhassan M, Kong L (2017) Nanochemo-mechanical characterization of organic shale through AFM and EDS. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2017. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 3837–384010.1190/segam2017-17797862.1 ↗
14. Abedi S, Slim M, Hofmann R, Bryndzia T, Ulm F-J (2016) Nanochemo-mechanical signature of organic-rich shales: a coupled indentation–EDX analysis. Acta Geotech 11:559–57210.1007/s11440-015-0426-4 ↗
15. Alstadt KN, Katti KS, Katti DR (2015) Nanoscale morphology of kerogen and in situ nanomechanical properties of green river oil shale. J Nanomech Micromech 6(1):0401500310.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.0000103 ↗
16. Constantinides G, Chandran KR, Ulm F-J, Van Vliet K (2006) Grid indentation analysis of composite microstructure and mechanics: principles and validation. Mater Sci Eng A 430:189–20210.1016/j.msea.2006.05.125 ↗
17. Constantinides G, Ulm F-J, Van Vliet K (2003) On the use of nanoindentation for cementitious materials. Mater Struct 36:191–19610.1007/BF02479557 ↗
18. Bobko CP (2008) Assessing the mechanical microstructure of shale by nanoindentation: the link between mineral composition and mechanical properties. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
19. Bellet D, Lamagnere P, Vincent A, Brechet Y (1996) Nanoindentation investigation of the Young’s modulus of porous silicon. J Appl Phys 80:3772–377610.1063/1.363305 ↗
20. Chen X, Xiang Y, Vlassak JJ (2006) Novel technique for measuring the mechanical properties of porous materials by nanoindentation. J Mater Res 21:715–72410.1557/jmr.2006.0088 ↗
21. Constantinides G, Ulm F-J (2004) The effect of two types of CSH on the elasticity of cement-based materials: results from nanoindentation and micromechanical modeling. Cem Concr Res 34:67–8010.1016/S0008-8846(03)00230-8 ↗
22. Li W, Sakhaee-Pour A (2016) Macroscale Young’s moduli of shale based on nanoindentations. Petrophysics 57(06):597–603
23. Liu K, Ostadhassan M, Bubach B, Dietrich R, Rasouli V (2018) Nano-dynamic mechanical analysis (nano-DMA) of creep behavior of shales: Bakken case study. J Mater Sci 53:4417–4432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1821-z10.1007/s10853-017-1821-z ↗
24. Liu K, Ostadhassan M (2017) Microstructural and geomechanical analysis of Bakken shale at nanoscale. J Pet Sci Eng 153:133–14410.1016/j.petrol.2017.03.039 ↗
25. Veytskin YB, Tammina VK, Bobko CP, Hartley PG, Clennell MB, Dewhurst DN, Dagastine RR (2017) Micromechanical characterization of shales through nanoindentation and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. Geomech Energy Environ 9:21–3510.1016/j.gete.2016.10.004 ↗
26. Ulm F-J, Vandamme M, Bobko C, Ortega J (2007) Statistical indentation techniques for hydrated nanocomposites: concrete, bone, and shale. J Am Ceram Soc 90:2677–269210.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02012.x ↗
27. Deirieh A, Ortega J, Ulm F-J, Abousleiman Y (2012) Nanochemomechanical assessment of shale: a coupled WDS-indentation analysis. Acta Geotech 7:271–29510.1007/s11440-012-0185-4 ↗
28. Kumar V, Sondergeld CH, Rai CS (2012) Nano to macro mechanical characterization of shale. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers10.2118/159804-MS ↗
29. Abedi S, Slim M, Ulm F-J (2016) Nanomechanics of organic-rich shales: the role of thermal maturity and organic matter content on texture. Acta Geotech 11:775–78710.1007/s11440-016-0476-2 ↗
30. Liu K, Ostadhassan M, Bubach B (2016) Applications of nano-indentation methods to estimate nanoscale mechanical properties of shale reservoir rocks. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 35:1310–131910.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.068 ↗
31. Yang J, Hatcherian J, Hackley PC, Pomerantz AE (2017) Nanoscale geochemical and geomechanical characterization of organic matter in shale. Nat Commun 8(1):217910.1038/s41467-017-02254-0 ↗
32. Hornby BE, Schwartz LM, Hudson JA (1994) Anisotropic effective-medium modeling of the elastic properties of shales. Geophysics 59:1570–158310.1190/1.1443546 ↗
33. Ostadhassan M, Zeng Z, Jabbari H (2012) Anisotropy analysis in shale using advanced sonic data-Bakken case study. In: American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) annual convention, Long Beach
34. Ostadhassan M, Zeng Z, Zamiran S (2012) Geomechanical modeling of an anisotropic formation-Bakken case study. In: 46th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
35. Sondergeld CH, Ambrose RJ, Rai CS, Moncrieff J (2010) Micro-structural studies of gas shales. In: SPE unconventional gas conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers10.2118/131771-MS ↗
36. Sondergeld CH, Rai CS (2011) Elastic anisotropy of shales. Lead Edge 30:324–33110.1190/1.3567264 ↗
37. Williams M, Jenner E (2002) Interpreting seismic data in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy; or azimuthal anisotropy in the presence of the seismic interpretation. Lead Edge 21:771–77410.1190/1.1503192 ↗
38. Ostadhassan M, Benson S, Zamiran S, Bubach B (2013) Stress analysis and wellbore stability in unconventional reservoirs. In: 47th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association
39. Avseth P, Mukerji T, Mavko G (2010) Quantitative seismic interpretation: applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
40. Jin H, Sonnenbergy SA (2013) Characterization for source rock potential of the Bakken shales in the Williston Basin, North Dakota and Montana. In: Unconventional resources technology conference (URTEC)10.1190/urtec2013-013 ↗
41. LeFever JA, Martiniuk CD, Dancsok EF, Mahnic PA (1991) Petroleum potential of the middle member, Bakken Formation, Williston Basin. In: Williston Basin symposium
42. Smith MG, Bustin RM (1996) Lithofacies and paleoenvironments of the Upper Devonian and Lower Mississippian Bakken Formation, Williston Basin. Bull Can Petrol Geol 44:495–507
43. Abarghani A, Ostadhassan M, Gentzis T, Carvajal-Ortiz H, Bubach B (2018) Organofacies study of the Bakken source rock in North Dakota, USA, based on organic petrology and geochemistry. Int J Coal Geol 188:79–9310.1016/j.coal.2018.02.004 ↗
44. Dow WG (1974) Application of oil-correlation and source-rock data to exploration in Williston Basin. AAPG Bull 58(7):1253–1262
45. Schmoker JW, Hester TC (1983) Organic carbon in Bakken Formation, United States portion of Williston Basin. AAPG Bull 67(12):2165–2174
46. Pollastro RM, Cook TA, Roberts LN, Schenk CJ, Lewan MD, Anna LO, Gaswirth SB, Lillis PG, Klett TR, Charpentier RR (2008) Assessment of undiscovered oil resources in the Devonian–Mississippian Bakken Formation, Williston Basin Province, Montana and North Dakota, 2008 (No. 2008-3021). Geological Survey (US)10.3133/fs20083021 ↗
47. Gaswirth SB, Marra KR, Cook TA, Charpentier RR, Gautier DL, Higley DK, Klett TR, Lewan MD, Lillis PG, Schenk CJ, Tennyson ME (2013) Assessment of undiscovered oil resources in the Bakken and Three Forks Formations, Williston Basin Province, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, 2013, vol 3013, no 4. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet10.3133/fs20133013 ↗
48. Wilmoth A (2014) Test taking: continental resources completes key test in North Dakota’s Bakken shale. http://newsok.com/test-takingcontinental-resources-completes-key-test-in-north-dakotas-bakken-shale/article/3943004/?page=1 . Accessed June 2018
49. Carvajal-Ortiz H, Gentzis T (2015) Critical considerations when assessing hydrocarbon plays using Rock–Eval pyrolysis and organic petrology data: data quality revisited. Int J Coal Geol 152:113–12210.1016/j.coal.2015.06.001 ↗
50. Saif T, Lin Q, Butcher AR, Bijeljic B, Blunt MJ (2017) Multi-scale multi-dimensional microstructure imaging of oil shale pyrolysis using X-ray micro-tomography, automated ultra-high-resolution SEM, MAPS mineralogy and FIB-SEM. Appl Energy 202:628–64710.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.039 ↗
51. Saif T, Lin Q, Bijeljic B, Blunt MJ (2017) Microstructural imaging and characterization of oil shale before and after pyrolysis. Fuel 197:562–57410.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.030 ↗
52. Owen M (2016) Announcing a new technique for SEM super-resolution mineral analysis. http://automatedmineralogy.blogspot.com . Accessed June 2018
53. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7:1564–158310.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
54. Li C, Ostadhassan M, Gentzis T, Kong L, Carvajal-Ortiz H, Bubach B (2018) Nanomechanical characterization of organic matter in the Bakken Formation by microscopy-based method. Mar Pet Geol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.05.01910.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.05.019 ↗
55. Hu C, Li Z (2015) A review on the mechanical properties of cement-based materials measured by nanoindentation. Constr Build Mater 90:80–9010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.008 ↗
56. Ulm F-J, Abousleiman Y (2006) The nanogranular nature of shale. Acta Geotech 1:77–8810.1007/s11440-006-0009-5 ↗
57. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 1–3810.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x ↗
58. McLachlan GJ, Basford KE (1988) Mixture models: inference and applications to clustering. Marcel Dekker, New York
59. Moon TK (1996) The Expectation–Maximization algorithm. IEEE Signal Process Mag 13:47–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/79.54397510.1109/79.543975 ↗
60. Bhat HS, Kumar N (2010) On the derivation of the Bayesian information criterion. School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Oakland
61. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/117634413610.1214/aos/1176344136 ↗
62. Mori T, Tanaka K (1973) Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions. Acta Metall 21:571–57410.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3 ↗
63. Laws N (1977) The determination of stress and strain concentrations at an ellipsoidal inclusion in an anisotropic material. J Elast 7:91–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0004113310.1007/BF00041133 ↗
64. Fritsch A, Dormieux L, Hellmich C, Sanahuja J (2007) Micromechanics of crystal interfaces in polycrystalline solid phases of porous media: fundamentals and application to strength of hydroxyapatite biomaterials. J Mater Sci 42(21):8824–8837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1859-410.1007/s10853-007-1859-4 ↗
65. Eliyahu M, Emmanuel S, Day-Stirrat RJ, Macaulay CI (2015) Mechanical properties of organic matter in shales mapped at the nanometer scale. Mar Pet Geol 59:294–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.09.00710.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.09.007 ↗
66. Mavko G, Mukerji T, Dvorkin J (2009) The rock physics handbook: tools for seismic analysis of porous media. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511626753 ↗
67. Wang Z, Wang H, Cates ME (2001) Effective elastic properties of solid clays. Geophysics 66:428–44010.1190/1.1444934 ↗
68. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1961) Note on a variational approach to the theory of composite elastic materials. J Frankl Inst 271(4):336–34110.1016/0016-0032(61)90032-1 ↗
69. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1962) A variational approach to the theory of the effective magnetic permeability of multiphase materials. J Appl Phys 33(10):3125–313110.1063/1.1728579 ↗
70. Jacob H (1989) Classification, structure, genesis and practical importance of natural solid oil bitumen (“migrabitumen”). Int J Coal Geol 11(1):65–7910.1016/0166-5162(89)90113-4 ↗
71. Berryman JG (2006) Effective medium theories for multicomponent poroelastic composites. J Eng Mech 132:519–531. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:5(519)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:5(519) ↗
72. Han D, Nur A, Morgan D (1986) Effects of porosity and clay content on wave velocities in sandstones. Geophysics 51:2093–210710.1190/1.1442062 ↗
73. Whitney DL, Broz M, Cook RF (2007) Hardness, toughness, and modulus of some common metamorphic minerals. Am Mineral 92:281–28810.2138/am.2007.2212 ↗
74. Ling K, Zeng Z, He J, Pei P, Zhou X, Liu H, Huang L, Ostadhassan M, Jabbari H, Blanksma D, Feilen H, Ahmed S, Benson S, Mann M, LeFever R, Gosnold W (2014) Geomechanical study of Bakken Formation for improved oil recovery. University of North Dakota, Grand Forks. https://doi.org/10.2172/115500610.2172/1155006 ↗
75. Liu K, Ostadhassan M, Bubach B, Ling K, Tokhmechi B, Robert D (2018) Statistical grid nanoindentation analysis to estimate macro-mechanical properties of the Bakken shale. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 53:181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.03.00510.1016/j.jngse.2018.03.005 ↗
76. Amendt D, Busetti S, Wenning Q (2013) Mechanical characterization in unconventional reservoirs: a facies-based methodology. Pertophysics 54(05):457–464
77. Vernik L (1993) Microcrack-induced versus intrinsic elastic anisotropy in mature HC-source shales. Geophysics 58:1703–170610.1190/1.1443385 ↗
78. Vernik L, Milovac J (2011) Rock physics of organic shales. Lead Edge 30:318–323. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.356726310.1190/1.3567263 ↗
79. Pawar G, Meakin P, Huang H (2017) Reactive molecular dynamics simulation of kerogen thermal maturation and cross-linking pathways. Energy Fuels 31:11601–11614. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b0155510.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01555 ↗
80. Atmani L, Bichara C, Pellenq RJ-M, Damme HV, van Duin ACT, Raza Z, Truflandier LA, Obliger A, Kralert PG, Ulm FJ, Leyssale J-M (2017) From cellulose to kerogen: molecular simulation of a geological process. Chem Sci 8:8325–8335. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC03466K10.1039/C7SC03466K ↗
81. Ungerer P, Collell J, Yiannourakou M (2015) Molecular modeling of the volumetric and thermodynamic properties of kerogen: influence of organic type and maturity. Energy Fuels 29:91–105. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef502154k10.1021/ef502154k ↗
82. Bennett KC, Berla LA, Nix WD, Borja RI (2015) Instrumented nanoindentation and 3D mechanistic modeling of a shale at multiple scales. Acta Geotech 10:1–1410.1007/s11440-014-0363-7 ↗
83. Berge PA, Berryman JG, Bonner BP (1993) Influence of microstructure on rock elastic properties. Geophys Res Lett 20(23):2619–262210.1029/93GL03131 ↗
84. Goodarzi M, Rouainia M, Aplin AC (2016) Numerical evaluation of mean-field homogenisation methods for predicting shale elastic response. Comput Geosci 20(5):1109–112210.1007/s10596-016-9579-y ↗