DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2023-04

Surface modification of titanium dioxide

Tushar Janardan Pawar, David Contreras López, José Luis Olivares Romero, Javier Vallejo Montesinos

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 58· Issue 16
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Henderson MA (1996) Structural sensitivity in the dissociation of water on TiO2 single-crystal surfaces. Langmuir 12:5093–5098. https://doi.org/10.1021/la960360t10.1021/la960360t ↗
2. Henderson MA (2002) The interaction of water with solid surfaces: fundamental aspects revisited. Surf Sci Rep 46:1–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729(01)00020-610.1016/S0167-5729(01)00020-6 ↗
3. Diebold U (2003) The surface science of titanium dioxide. Surf Sci Rep 48:53–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729(02)00100-010.1016/S0167-5729(02)00100-0 ↗
4. Ziental D, Czarczynska-goslinska B, Mlynarczyk DT et al (2020) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: prospects and applications in medicine. Nanomaterials 10:387–41810.3390/nano10020387 ↗
5. Warheit DB, Brown SC (2019) What is the impact of surface modifications and particle size on commercial titanium dioxide particle samples? A review of in vivo pulmonary and oral toxicity studies—Revised 11-6-2018. Toxicol Lett 302:42–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.11.00810.1016/j.toxlet.2018.11.008 ↗
6. Al Jitan S, Palmisano G, Garlisi C (2020) Synthesis and surface modification of TiO2-based photocatalysts for the conversion of CO2. Catalysts 10:227. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1002022710.3390/catal10020227 ↗
7. Hu W, Yang S, Yang S (2020) Surface modification of TiO2 for Perovskite solar cells. Trends Chem 2:148–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2019.11.00210.1016/j.trechm.2019.11.002 ↗
8. Veronovski N (2018) TiO2 applications as a function of controlled surface treatment. In: Dongfang Y (ed) Titanium dioxide—material for a sustainable environment. Intech Open, pp 421–44310.5772/intechopen.72945 ↗
9. Solís-Gómez A, Neira-Velázquez MG, Morales J et al (2014) Improving stability of TiO2 particles in water by RF-plasma polymerization of poly(acrylic acid) on the particle surface. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 451:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.03.02110.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.03.021 ↗
10. González-Rodríguez V, Lizeth Zapata-Tello D, Vallejo-Montesinos J et al (2018) Improving titanium dioxide dispersion in water through surface functionalization by a dicarboxylic acid. J Dispers Sci Technol 10:1039–1045
11. Bozzi A, Yuranova T, Guasaquillo I et al (2005) Self-cleaning of modified cotton textiles by TiO2 at low temperatures under daylight irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 174:156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.03.01910.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.03.019 ↗
12. Gonzalez-Calderon JA, Vallejo-Montesinos J, Mata-Padilla JM et al (2015) Effective method for the synthesis of pimelic acid/TiO2 nanoparticles with a high capacity to nucleate β-crystals in isotactic polypropylene nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 50:7998–8006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9365-610.1007/s10853-015-9365-6 ↗
13. Vallejo-Montesinos J, Muñoz UM, Gonzalez-Calderon JA (2016) Mechanical properties, crystallization and degradation of polypropylene due to nucleating agents, fillers and additives, 1st edn. Nova Science Publisher, New York
14. González A, Pérez E, Almendarez A et al (2016) Calcium pimelate supported on TiO2 nanoparticles as isotactic polypropylene prodegradant. Polym Bull 73:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-015-1469-210.1007/s00289-015-1469-2 ↗
15. Liao C, Li Y, Tjong SC (2020) Visible-light active titanium dioxide nanomaterials with bactericidal properties. Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1001012410.3390/nano10010124 ↗
16. Kiran ASK, Kumar TSS, Sanghavi R et al (2018) Antibacterial and bioactive surface modifications of titanium implants by PCL/TiO2 nanocomposite coatings. Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano810086010.3390/nano8100860 ↗
17. Camarillo R, Tostón S, Martínez F et al (2018) Improving the photo-reduction of CO2 to fuels with catalysts synthesized under high pressure: Cu/TiO2. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 93:1237–1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.547710.1002/jctb.5477 ↗
18. Cojocaru L, Uchida S, Sanehira Y et al (2015) Surface treatment of the compact TiO2 layer for efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells. Chem Lett 44:674–676. https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.15006810.1246/cl.150068 ↗
19. Ariyanti D, Mukhtar S, Ahmed N et al (2020) Surface modification of TiO2 for visible light photocatalysis: experimental and theoretical calculations of its electronic and optical properties. Int J Mod Phys B 34:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021797922040067610.1142/S0217979220400676 ↗
20. Cheng Y, Yang H, Yang Y, Huang J, Ke W, Chen Z, Wang X, Lin C, Lai Y (2018) Progress in TiO2 nanotube coatings for biomedical applications: a review. J Mater Chem B 6:1862–1886. https://doi.org/10.1039/x0xx00000x10.1039/x0xx00000x ↗
21. Wang Q, Huang JY, Li HQ, Zhao AZ, Wang Y, Zhang KQ, Sun HT, Lai YK (2016) Recent advances on smart TiO2 nanotube platforms for sustainable drug delivery applications. Int J Nanomed 2017:151–16510.2147/IJN.S117498 ↗
22. Jafari S, Mahyad B, Hashemzadeh H et al (2020) Biomedical applications of TiO2 nanostructures: recent advances. Int J Nanomed 15:3447–347010.2147/IJN.S249441 ↗
23. Guo Q, Zhou C, Ma Z, Yang X (2019) Fundamentals of TiO2 photocatalysis: concepts, mechanisms, and challenges. Adv Mater 31:e1901997. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20190199710.1002/adma.201901997 ↗
24. Mironyuk IF, Soltys LM, Tatarchuk TR, Tsinurchyn VI (2020) Ways to improve the efficiency of TiO2-based photocatalysts (Review). Phys Chem Solid State 21:300–311. https://doi.org/10.15330/PCSS.21.2.300-31110.15330/PCSS.21.2.300-311 ↗
25. Wen J, Li X, Liu W et al (2015) Photocatalysis fundamentals and surface modification of TiO2 nanomaterials. Cuihua Xuebao/Chin J Catal 36:2049–207010.1016/S1872-2067(15)60999-8 ↗
26. Bumajdad A, Madkour M (2014) Understanding the superior photocatalytic activity of noble metals modified Titania under UV and visible light irradiation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:7146–715810.1039/c3cp54411g ↗
27. Scarisoreanu M, Ilie AG, Goncearenco E et al (2020) Ag, Au and Pt decorated TiO2 biocompatible nanospheres for UV & Vis photocatalytic water treatment. Appl Surf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14521710.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145217 ↗
28. Gołąbiewska A, Lisowski W, Jarek M et al (2017) The effect of metals content on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 modified by Pt/Au bimetallic nanoparticles prepared by sol-gel method. Mol Catal 442:154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2017.09.00410.1016/j.mcat.2017.09.004 ↗
29. Nalbandian MJ, Greenstein KE, Shuai D et al (2015) Tailored synthesis of photoactive TiO2 nanofibers and Au/TiO2 nanofiber composites: structure and reactivity optimization for water treatment applications. Environ Sci Technol 49:1654–1663. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502963t10.1021/es502963t ↗
30. Han R, Liu J, Chen N et al (2019) Synthesis of V-modified TiO2 nanorod-aggregates by a facile microwave-assisted hydrothermal process and photocatalytic degradation towards PCP-Na under solar light. RSC Adv 9:34862–34871. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra05480d10.1039/c9ra05480d ↗
31. Zafar Z, Ali I, Park S, Kim JO (2020) Effect of different iron precursors on the synthesis and photocatalytic activity of Fe–TiO2 nanotubes under visible light. Ceram Int 46:3353–3366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.04510.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.045 ↗
32. Manojkumar P, Lokeshkumar E, Saikiran A et al (2020) Visible light photocatalytic activity of metal (Mo/V/W) doped porous TiO2 coating fabricated on Cp-Ti by plasma electrolytic oxidation. J Alloys Compd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15409210.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154092 ↗
33. Binas V, Stefanopoulos V, Kiriakidis G, Papagiannakopoulos P (2019) Photocatalytic oxidation of gaseous benzene, toluene and xylene under UV and visible irradiation over Mn-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. J Materiomics 5:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2018.12.00310.1016/j.jmat.2018.12.003 ↗
34. Han F, Kambala VSR, Dharmarajan R et al (2018) Photocatalytic degradation of azo dye acid orange 7 using different light sources over Fe3+-doped TiO2 nanocatalysts. Environ Technol Innov 12:27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2018.07.00410.1016/j.eti.2018.07.004 ↗
35. Safari M, Talebi R, Rostami MH, Dadvar M (2014) Synthesis of iron-doped TiO2 for degradation of reactive Orange16. J Environ Health Sci Eng 12:19–2710.1186/2052-336X-12-19 ↗
36. Ismael M (2020) Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production and degradation of organic pollutants from Fe (III) doped TiO2 nanoparticles. J Environ Chem Eng 8:103676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.10367610.1016/j.jece.2020.103676 ↗
37. Komaraiah D, Radha E, Sivakumar J et al (2019) Structural, optical properties and photocatalytic activity of Fe3+ doped TiO2 thin films deposited by sol-gel spin coating. Surf Interfaces 17:100368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2019.10036810.1016/j.surfin.2019.100368 ↗
38. Valero-Romero MJ, Santaclara JG, Oar-Arteta L et al (2019) Photocatalytic properties of TiO2 and Fe-doped TiO2 prepared by metal organic framework-mediated synthesis. Chem Eng J 360:75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.13210.1016/j.cej.2018.11.132 ↗
39. Hinojosa-Reyes M, Camposeco-Solis R, Ruiz F et al (2019) Promotional effect of metal doping on nanostructured TiO2 during the photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol and naproxen sodium as pollutants. Mater Sci Semicond Process 100:130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2019.04.05010.1016/j.mssp.2019.04.050 ↗
40. Mohseni-Salehi MS, Taheri-Nassaj E, Hosseini-Zori M (2018) Effect of dopant (Co, Ni) concentration and hydroxyapatite compositing on photocatalytic activity of titania towards dye degradation. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 356:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.12.02710.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.12.027 ↗
41. Tang B, Chen H, Peng H et al (2018) Graphene modified TiO2 composite photocatalysts: mechanism, progress and perspective. Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano802010510.3390/nano8020105 ↗
42. Camarillo R, Tostón S, Martínez F, Carlos Jiménez JR (2017) Preparation of TiO2-based catalysts with supercritical fluid technology: characterization and photocatalytic activity in CO2 reduction. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 92:1710–1720. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.516910.1002/jctb.5169 ↗
43. Zhao J, Li Y, Zhu Y et al (2016) Enhanced CO2 photoreduction activity of black TiO2-coated Cu nanoparticles under visible light irradiation: role of metallic Cu. Appl Catal A Gen 510:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2015.11.00110.1016/j.apcata.2015.11.001 ↗
44. Aykut Y, Saquing CD, Pourdeyhimi B et al (2012) Templating quantum dot to phase-transformed electrospun TiO2 nanofibers for enhanced photo-excited electron injection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:3837–3845. https://doi.org/10.1021/am300524a10.1021/am300524a ↗
45. Shu Y, Ji J, Zhou M et al (2022) Selective photocatalytic oxidation of gaseous ammonia at ppb level over Pt and F modified TiO2. Appl Catal B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12068810.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120688 ↗
46. Zhang J, Wu W, Yan S et al (2015) Enhanced photocatalytic activity for the degradation of rhodamine B by TiO2 modified with Gd2O3 calcined at high temperature. Appl Surf Sci 344:249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.07810.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.078 ↗
47. Smirniotis PG, Boningari T, Damma D, Inturi SNR (2018) Single-step rapid aerosol synthesis of N-doped TiO2 for enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Catal Commun 113:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2018.04.01910.1016/j.catcom.2018.04.019 ↗
48. Marques J, Gomes TD, Forte MA et al (2019) A new route for the synthesis of highly-active N-doped TiO2 nanoparticles for visible light photocatalysis using urea as nitrogen precursor. Catal Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.09.00210.1016/j.cattod.2018.09.002 ↗
49. Osin OA, Yu T, Cai X et al (2018) Photocatalytic degradation of 4-nitrophenol by C, N-TiO2: degradation efficiency vs. embryonic toxicity of the resulting compounds. Front Chem. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.0019210.3389/fchem.2018.00192 ↗
50. Reddy KR, Gomes VG, Hassan M (2014) Carbon functionalized TiO2 nanofibers for high efficiency photocatalysis. Mater Res Express. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/1/1/01501210.1088/2053-1591/1/1/015012 ↗
51. Zhang J, Xing Z, Cui J et al (2018) C, N co-doped porous TiO2 hollow sphere visible light photocatalysts for efficient removal of highly toxic phenolic pollutants. Dalton Trans 47:4877–4884. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8dt00262b10.1039/c8dt00262b ↗
52. Shindume LH, Zhao Z, Wang N et al (2018) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of B, N-codoped TiO2 by a new molten nitrate process. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 19:839–849. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2019.1574510.1166/jnn.2019.15745 ↗
53. Hoşgün HL, Aydın MTA (2019) Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of boron-doped titanium dioxide nanotubes. J Mol Struct 1180:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.12.05610.1016/j.molstruc.2018.12.056 ↗
54. Lee JH, Youn JI, Kim YJ, et al (2015) Photocatalytic characteristics of boron and nitrogen doped titania film synthesized by micro-arc oxidation. Ceram Int 41:11899–11907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.05.15710.1016/j.ceramint.2015.05.157 ↗
55. Ratova M, Klaysri R, Praserthdam P, Kelly PJ (2018) Visible light active photocatalytic C-doped titanium dioxide films deposited via reactive pulsed DC magnetron co-sputtering: properties and photocatalytic activity. Vacuum 149:214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.01.00310.1016/j.vacuum.2018.01.003 ↗
56. Klaysri R, Ratova M, Praserthdam P, Kelly PJ (2017) Deposition of visible light-active C-doped titania films via magnetron sputtering using CO2 as a source of carbon. Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano705011310.3390/nano7050113 ↗
57. Gomathi Devi L, Kavitha R (2014) Review on modified N-TiO2 for green energy applications under UV/visible light: selected results and reaction mechanisms. RSC Adv 4:28265–28299. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA03291H10.1039/C4RA03291H ↗
58. Devi LG, Kavitha R (2013) A review on non metal ion doped titania for the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants under UV/solar light: role of photogenerated charge carrier dynamics in enhancing the activity. Appl Catal B 140–141:559–58710.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.035 ↗
59. Ovodok E, Maltanava H, Poznyak S et al (2018) Sol–gel template synthesis of mesoporous carbon-doped TiO2 with photocatalytic activity under visible light. Mater Today: Proc 5:17422–17430
60. Modanlu S, Shafiekhani A (2019) Synthesis of pure and C/S/N co-doped titania on Al mesh and their photocatalytic usage in Benzene degradation. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53189-z10.1038/s41598-019-53189-z ↗
61. Purbia R, Borah R, Paria S (2017) Carbon-doped mesoporous anatase TiO2 multi-tubes nanostructures for highly improved visible light photocatalytic activity. Inorg Chem 56:10107–10116. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0186410.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01864 ↗
62. Feng X, Wang P, Hou J et al (2018) Significantly enhanced visible light photocatalytic efficiency of phosphorus doped TiO2 with surface oxygen vacancies for ciprofloxacin degradation: synergistic effect and intermediates analysis. J Hazard Mater 351:196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.03.01310.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.03.013 ↗
63. Gul SR, Khan M, Wu B, Yi Z (2017) Combined experimental and theoretical study of visible light active P doped TiO2 photocatalyst. Mater Res Express. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa75e810.1088/2053-1591/aa75e8 ↗
64. Boningari T, Inturi SNR, Suidan M, Smirniotis PG (2018) Novel one-step synthesis of sulfur doped- TiO2 by flame spray pyrolysis for visible light photocatalytic degradation of acetaldehyde. Chem Eng J 339:249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.06310.1016/j.cej.2018.01.063 ↗
65. Gena GD, Freeda TH, Monikanda Prabu K (2018) Photocatalytic performance of fluorine-doped anatase titanium dioxide obtained through the sol–gel method. Int J Sci Res Res Pap Phys Appl Sci 6:1–4
66. Lee DH, Swain B, Shin D et al (2019) One-pot wet chemical synthesis of fluorine-containing TiO2 nanoparticles with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Mater Res Bull 109:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.09.02710.1016/j.materresbull.2018.09.027 ↗
67. Liu D, Tian R, Wang J et al (2017) Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of methylene blue using F doped TiO2 photoelectrode under visible light irradiation. Chemosphere 185:574–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.07110.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.071 ↗
68. Gao Q, Si F, Zhang S et al (2019) Hydrogenated F-doped TiO2 for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution and pollutant degradation. Int J Hydrog Energy 44:8011–8019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.23310.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.233 ↗
69. Li C, Sun Z, Ma R et al (2017) Fluorine doped anatase TiO2 with exposed reactive (001) facets supported on porous diatomite for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 243:281–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.02.05310.1016/j.micromeso.2017.02.053 ↗
70. Wang Q, Zhu S, Liang Y et al (2017) Synthesis of Br-doped TiO2 hollow spheres with enhanced photocatalytic activity. J Nanopart Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-3765-210.1007/s11051-017-3765-2 ↗
71. Wang Q, Zhu S, Liang Y et al (2017) One-step synthesis of size-controlled Br-doped TiO2 nanoparticles with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Mater Res Bull 86:248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.10.02610.1016/j.materresbull.2016.10.026 ↗
72. Nguyen TP, Nguyen DLT, Nguyen VH et al (2020) Recent advances in TiO2-based photocatalysts for reduction of co2 to fuels. Nanomaterials 10:1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1002033710.3390/nano10020337 ↗
73. Low J, Cheng B, Yu J (2017) Surface modification and enhanced photocatalytic CO 2 reduction performance of TiO2: a review. Appl Surf Sci 392:658–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.09310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.093 ↗
74. Sarkar A, Gracia-Espino E, Wågberg T et al (2016) Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 with H2O over modified TiO2 nanofibers: Understanding the reduction pathway. Nano Res 9:1956–1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-016-1087-910.1007/s12274-016-1087-9 ↗
75. Pham TD, Lee BK (2017) Novel capture and photocatalytic conversion of CO2 into solar fuels by metals co-doped TiO2 deposited on PU under visible light. Appl Catal A Gen 529:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2016.10.01910.1016/j.apcata.2016.10.019 ↗
76. Pham TD, Lee BK (2017) Novel photocatalytic activity of Cu@V co-doped TiO2/PU for CO2 reduction with H2O vapor to produce solar fuels under visible light. J Catal 345:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.10.03010.1016/j.jcat.2016.10.030 ↗
77. Parameswari A, Soujanya Y, Sastry GN (2019) Functionalized rutile TiO2 (110) as a sorbent to capture CO2 through noncovalent interactions: a computational investigation. J Phys Chem C 123:3491–3504. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0931110.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09311 ↗
78. Fang W, Khrouz L, Zhou Y et al (2017) Reduced {001}- TiO2−x photocatalysts: noble-metal-free CO2 photoreduction for selective CH4 evolution. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:13875–13881. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cp01212h10.1039/c7cp01212h ↗
79. Liao Y, Cao SW, Yuan Y et al (2014) Efficient CO2 capture and photoreduction by amine-functionalized TiO2. Chem Eur J 20:10220–10222. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20140332110.1002/chem.201403321 ↗
80. Feng X, Pan F, Zhao H et al (2018) Atomic layer deposition enabled MgO surface coating on porous TiO2 for improved CO2 photoreduction. Appl Catal B 238:274–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.02710.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.027 ↗
81. Zhang W, Xue J, Shen Q et al (2021) Black single-crystal TiO2 nanosheet array films with oxygen vacancy on 001 facets for boosting photocatalytic CO2 reduction. J Alloys Compd 870:54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15940010.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159400 ↗
82. Xie S, Wang Y, Zhang Q et al (2013) Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 with H2O: significant enhancement of the activity of Pt-TiO2 in CH4 formation by addition of MgO. Chem Commun 49:2451–2453. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc00107e10.1039/c3cc00107e ↗
83. Yu J, Ma T, Liu G, Cheng B (2011) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of bimodal mesoporous titania powders by C60 modification. Dalton Trans 40:6635–6644. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1dt10274e10.1039/c1dt10274e ↗
84. Wang F, Zhang K (2012) Physicochemical and photocatalytic activities of self-assembling TiO2 nanoparticles on nanocarbons surface. Curr Appl Phys 12:346–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2011.07.03010.1016/j.cap.2011.07.030 ↗
85. Sampaio MJ, Silva CG, Marques RRN et al (2011) Carbon nanotube- TiO2 thin films for photocatalytic applications. Catal Today 161:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.11.08110.1016/j.cattod.2010.11.081 ↗
86. Min S, Wang F, Lu G (2016) Graphene-induced spatial charge separation for selective water splitting over TiO2 photocatalyst. Catal Commun 80:28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2016.03.01510.1016/j.catcom.2016.03.015 ↗
87. Zhang W, Guo H, Sun H, Zeng RC (2016) Hydrothermal synthesis and photoelectrochemical performance enhancement of TiO2/graphene composite in photo-generated cathodic protection. Appl Surf Sci 382:128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.12410.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.124 ↗
88. Lei J, Chen Y, Shen F et al (2015) Surface modification of TiO2 with g-C3N4 for enhanced UV and visible photocatalytic activity. J Alloys Compd 631:328–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.08010.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.080 ↗
89. Zhao D, Chen C, Wang Y et al (2008) Surface modification of TiO2 by phosphate: effect on photocatalytic activity and mechanism implication. J Phys Chem C 112:5993–6001. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp712049c10.1021/jp712049c ↗
90. Kim TK, Lee MN, Lee SH et al (2005) Development of surface coating technology of TiO2 powder and improvement of photocatalytic activity by surface modification. Thin Solid Films 475:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2004.07.02110.1016/j.tsf.2004.07.021 ↗
91. Ishikawa Y, Matsumoto Y, Nishida Y et al (2003) Surface treatment of silicon carbide using TiO2 (IV) photocatalyst. J Am Chem Soc 125:6558–6562. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja020359i10.1021/ja020359i ↗
92. Jalili MM, Davoudi K, Zafarmand Sedigh E, Farrokhpay S (2016) Surface treatment of TiO2 nanoparticles to improve dispersion in non-polar solvents. Adv Powder Technol 27:2168–2174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2016.07.03010.1016/j.apt.2016.07.030 ↗
93. Ruzicka JY, Abu Bakar F, Hoeck C et al (2015) Toward control of gold cluster aggregation on TiO2 via surface treatments. J Phys Chem C 119:24465–24474. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0773210.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07732 ↗
94. Méndez-Medrano MG, Kowalska E, Lehoux A et al (2016) Surface modification of TiO2 with Ag nanoparticles and CuO nanoclusters for application in photocatalysis. J Phys Chem C 120:5143–5154. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1070310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10703 ↗
95. Cha BJ, Woo TG, Han SW et al (2018) Surface modification of TiO2 for obtaining high resistance against poisoning during photocatalytic decomposition of toluene. Catalysts 8:54. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal811050010.3390/catal8110500 ↗
96. Ryu J, Choi W (2004) Effects of TiO2 surface modifications on photocatalytic oxidation of arsenite: she role of superoxides. Environ Sci Technol 38:2928–2933. https://doi.org/10.1021/es034725p10.1021/es034725p ↗
97. Lee J, Choi W, Yoon J (2005) Photocatalytic degradation of N-nitrosodimethylamine: Mechanism, product distribution, and TiO2 surface modification. Environ Sci Technol 39:6800–6807. https://doi.org/10.1021/es048177710.1021/es0481777 ↗
98. Wang X, Wang X, Zhao J et al (2017) Solar light-driven photocatalytic destruction of cyanobacteria by F-Ce-TiO2/expanded perlite floating composites. Chem Eng J 320:253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.06210.1016/j.cej.2017.03.062 ↗
99. Wang X, Wang X, Zhao J et al (2017) An alternative to in situ photocatalytic degradation of microcystin-LR by worm-like N, P co-doped TiO2/expanded graphite by carbon layer (NPT-EGC) floating composites. Appl Catal B 206:479–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.04610.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.046 ↗
100. Park H, Park Y, Kim W, Choi W (2013) Surface modification of TiO2 photocatalyst for environmental applications. J Photochem Photobiol, C 15:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.10.00110.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.10.001 ↗