journal article·2002-10

Direct electron microscopic observation of transcrystalline layers in microfibrillar reinforced polymer-polymer composites

K. Friedrich, E. Ueda, H. Kamo, M. Evstatiev, B. Krasteva, S. Fakirov

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 37· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

Microfibrillar reinforced composites (MFC) comprising an isotropic matrix from a lower melting polymer, i.e., low density polyethylene (LDPE), reinforced by microfibrils of a higher melting polymer, recycled from bottles, i.e., poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), were processed under industrially relevant conditions via injection molding in a weight ratio of PET/LDPE = 50/50. Dog bone samples with MFC structure were characterized by means of scanning (SEM) and transmission (TEM) electron microscopy. SEM observations on cryogenic fracture surfaces show an isotropic LDPE matrix reinforced by more or less randomly distributed PET microfibrils. By means of TEM on stained ultrathin slices one observes the formation of transcrystalline layers of LDPE matrix on the surface of the PET microfibrils. In these layers the crystalline lamellae are aligned parallel to each other and are placed perpendicularly to the fibril surfaces. This is in contrast to the bulk matrix where the lamellae are quasi-randomly arranged.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. L. Verpoest, M. Desaeger and R. Keunings, in “Controlled Interphases in Composite Materials,” edited by H. Ishida (Elsevier, New York, 1990) p. 653.10.1007/978-94-011-7816-7_60 ↗
2. J. M. Felix and P. Gaterholm, J. Mater. Sci. 29 (1994) 3043.10.1007/BF01117618 ↗
3. E. J. H. Chen and B. S. Hsiao, Polym. Eng. Sci. 32 (1992) 280.10.1002/pen.760320408 ↗
4. J. A. Peacock, B. Fife, D. Niel and C. Y. Batlow, in “Composites Interfaces,” edited by H. Ishida and J. L. Koenig (Elsevier, New York, 1986) p. 143.
5. S. Incardona, C. Migliaresi, H. D. Wagner, A. H. Gilbert and G. Marom, Comp. Sci. Technol. 47 (1993) 43.10.1016/0266-3538(93)90094-W ↗
6. T. Stern, A. Teishev and G. Marom, ibid. 57(1997) 1009.10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00128-5 ↗
7. E. Assouline, E. Wachtel, S. Grigull, A. Lustiger, H. D. Wagner and G. Marom, Polymer 42 (2001) 6231.10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00087-8 ↗
8. M. Evstatiev and S. Fakirov, ibid. 33 (1992) 877.10.1016/0032-3861(92)90354-Y ↗
9. S. Fakirov, M. Evstatiev and S. Petrovich, Macromolecules 26 (1993) 5219.10.1021/ma00071a038 ↗
10. S. Fakirov, M. Evstatiev and K. Friedrich, in “Polymer Blends,” Vol. 2: Performance, edited by D. R. Paul and C. B. Bucknall (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000) ch. sn33, p. 455.
11. D. Sapundjieva, Z. Denchev, M. Evstatiev, S. Fakirov, N. Stribeck and M. Stamm, J. Mater. Sci. 34 (1999) 3063.10.1023/A:1004636629616 ↗
12. O. Samokovliyski, S. Fakirov, N. Stribeck, Z. Denchev, M. Stamm, A. A. Apostolov, M. Evstatiev and R. Gehrke, Macromol. Chem. Phys., submitted.
13. M. Evstatiev, N. Nikolov and S. Fakirov, Polymer 37 (1996) 4455.10.1016/0032-3861(96)00137-1 ↗
14. M. Evstatiev, S. Fakirov and K. Friedrich, in “Structure Development During Polymer Processing,” edited by A. M. Cunha and S. Fakirov (Kluwer, Dordrecht) p. 311.
15. G. Kanig, Kolloid. Z. Z. Polymere 251 (1973) 782.10.1007/BF01499109 ↗
16. K. Friedrich, Pract. Metallography 16 (1979) 321.10.1515/pm-1979-160702 ↗
17. M. Evstatiev, S. Fakirov, B. Krasteva, K. Friedrich, J. A. Covas and A. M. Cunha, Polym. Eng. Sci. 42(4) (2002) 826.10.1002/pen.10994 ↗
18. J. Karger-Kocsis and J. Varga, in “Polypropylene: An A-Z Reference,” edited by J. Karger-Kocsis (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999) p. 348.10.1007/978-94-011-4421-6_50 ↗