Electrical and mechanical properties of aluminosilicate inorganic polymer composites with carbon nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
The DC electrical conductance of potassium aluminosilicate inorganic polymers (geopolymers) containing up to 6 wt% single-wall carbon nanotubes has been determined as a function of temperature up to 340 °C. After removal of the processing water during the first heating cycle, the conductance in subsequent heating cycles increases as a function of carbon nanotube content and temperature from 9.75 × 10−4 to 1.87 × 10−3 S m−1 in the composites containing 0 and 0.2 wt% carbon nanotubes, respectively, at 290 °C. By comparison, the electrical conductance of potassium inorganic polymer composites containing graphite was generally lower. The conductance activation energies of the carbon nanotube and graphite composites were similar, and decreased from about 55 to 5 kJ mole−1 with increasing carbon content. The tensile strengths of carbon nanotube and graphite-containing potassium geopolymer composites, determined by the Brazil method on 10–12 replicates, were about 2 MPa, and showed little change with increasing carbon nanotube content up to 0.3 wt%. By contrast, the tensile strengths of an analogous set of sodium composites were up to four times greater, possibly reflecting the necessity for less processing water in the synthesis of the sodium samples.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Davidovits J (1991) J Therm Anal 37:163310.1007/BF01912193 ↗
2. Barbosa VFF, MacKenzie KJD, Thaumaturgo C (2000) Int J Inorg Mater 2:30910.1016/S1466-6049(00)00041-6 ↗
3. Porte A, Jazet M (2008) Fr. Patent 02904677/Fr-A1
4. Davidovits J (2008) Institut Géopolymère, St. Quentin, France
5. Ebbesen TW, Lezec HJ, Hiura H, Bennett JW, Ghaemi HF, Thio T (1996) Nature 382:5410.1038/382054a0 ↗
6. Sun Y, Miyasato T, Kirimoto K, Kusunoki M (2005) Appl Phys Lett 86:22310810.1063/1.1927696 ↗
7. Quin C, Shi X, Bai SQ, Chen LD, Wang LJ (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 420:20810.1016/j.msea.2006.01.055 ↗
8. Astorga HR, Mendoza D (2005) Opt Mater 27:122810.1016/j.optmat.2004.11.014 ↗
9. Gupta S, Patel RJ, Smith N, Giedd RE, Hui D (2007) Diam Relat Mater 16:23610.1016/j.diamond.2006.05.009 ↗
10. Simsek Y, Ozyuzer L, Tugrul Seyhan A, Tanoglu M, Schulte K (2007) J Mater Sci 42:9689. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1943-910.1007/s10853-007-1943-9 ↗
11. Eren San S, Yerli Y, Okutan M, Yilmaz F, Gunaydin O, Hames Y (2007) Mater Sci Eng B 138:28410.1016/j.mseb.2006.12.017 ↗
12. Jiang L, Gao L (2006) J Am Ceram Soc 89:15610.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00687.x ↗
13. Guo S, Sivakumar R, Kitazawa H, Kagawa Y (2007) J Am Ceram Soc 90:166710.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01636.x ↗
14. Shi S-L, Liang J (2006) J Am Ceram Soc 89:353310.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01232.x ↗
15. Zhao Q, Buongiorno M, Bernholc J (2002) Phys Rev B 65:14410510.1103/PhysRevB.65.144105 ↗
16. Wei C, Cho K, Srivastava D (2003) Phys Rev B 67:11540710.1103/PhysRevB.67.115407 ↗
17. Nochaiya T, Tolkidtikul P, Singjai P, Chaipanich A (2008) Adv Mater Res 55–57:54910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.55-57.549 ↗
18. Zhan G-D, Kuntz JD, Wan J, Mukherjee AK (2003) Nature Mater 2:3810.1038/nmat793 ↗
19. Kerber MK, Wereszczak AA, Jenkins MG (1998) Fracture strength. Marcel Dekker, NY, p 147
20. Primak W, Fuchs LH (1956) Phys Rev 103:54110.1103/PhysRev.103.541 ↗
21. Primak W (1956) Phys Rev 103:54410.1103/PhysRev.103.544 ↗
22. Hérold C, Hérold A, Lagrange P (2004) Solid State Sci 6:12510.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2003.10.007 ↗
23. Maniwa Y, Matsuda K, Kyakuno H, Ogasawara S, Hibi T, Kadowaki H, Suzuki S, Achiba Y, Kataura H (2007) Nature Mater 6:13510.1038/nmat1823 ↗
24. Karpilovskii LP, Letskaya NV (1978) Steklo Keram 9:29