Synergy in carbon black-filled natural rubber nanocomposites. Part I: Mechanical, dynamic mechanical properties, and morphology
Source abstract
Abstract
Natural rubber (NR)/nanoclay and NR/carbon nanofiber (CNF) nanocomposites were consolidated with different loadings and grades of carbon blacks (CBs) to obtain ternary nanocomposites. It was observed that the mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of these nanocomposites were much better compared with those of either NR/clay or NR/CNF nanocomposites or the NR/black control microcomposite. Thus, not only the grueling and at times conflicting property requirements of modern day applications were met, but also the tendency of saturation of property enhancements at high loadings could be mitigated. These nanocomposites exhibited 18% increment in tear strength, 40% in modulus at 300% elongation, and 326% in room temperature storage modulus, over the control microcomposite. Viscous loss properties were influenced favorably, as well. This indicated the presence of a much sought after synergy between CB and nanofillers. Transmission electron micrographs of the nanocomposites showed that CB formed “nano-blocks” of reinforcement—close association of nanofiller and black—driven by zeta potential differences between the black and the nanofillers. This unique ternary architectural base, with the space between nanofillers (clay/fiber) occupied by small CB aggregates forming networks or “nano-channels”, accounted for the synergistic improvements.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Kojima Y, Usuki A, Kawasumi M, Okada A, Kurauchi T, Kamigaito O (1993) J Appl Polym Sci 49:125910.1002/app.1993.070490715 ↗
2. Messersmith PB, Giannelis EP (1995) J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 33:104710.1002/pola.1995.080330707 ↗
3. Gonsalves K, Chen Y (1996) Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 435:5510.1557/PROC-435-55 ↗
4. Usuki A, Kawasumi M, Kojima Y, Okada A, Kurauchi T, Kamigaito O (1993) J Mater Res 8:117410.1557/JMR.1993.1174 ↗
5. Okada A, Kojima Y, Kawasumi M, Fukushima Y, Kurauchi T, Kamigaito O (1993) J Mater Res 8:117910.1557/JMR.1993.1179 ↗
6. Giannelis EP (1996) Adv Mater 8:2910.1002/adma.19960080104 ↗
7. Ray SS, Okamoto M (2003) Prog Polym Sci 28:153910.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002 ↗
8. Utracki LA, Sepehr M, Boccaleri E (2007) Polym Adv Technol 18:110.1002/pat.852 ↗
9. Maiti M, Bhattacharya M, Bhowmick AK (2008) Rubb Chem Technol 81:38410.5254/1.3548215 ↗
10. Iijima S (1991) Nature 354:5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
11. Ajayan PM, Schadler LS (2001) Polym Prep 42:35
12. Barrera E (2000) JOM 52:3810.1007/s11837-000-0197-7 ↗
13. Burton DJ, Glasgow DG, Lake ML, Kwag C, Finegan JC (2001) Proceedings of the 46th international SAMPE symposium and exhibition: materials and processes odyssey, California, USA
14. Kumar S, Doshi H, Srinivasaro M, Park JO, Schiraldi DA (2002) Polymer 43:170110.1016/S0032-3861(01)00744-3 ↗
15. Lozano K (2000) JOM 52:3410.1007/s11837-000-0196-8 ↗
16. Carneiro OS, Maia JM (2000) Polym Compos 21:96010.1002/pc.10249 ↗
17. Bhattacharya M, Maiti M, Bhowmick AK (2008) Polym Eng Sci 49:8110.1002/pen.21224 ↗
18. Bhattacharya M, Maiti M, Bhowmick AK (2008) Rubb Chem Technol 81:78210.5254/1.3548232 ↗
19. Donnet JB, Voet A (1976) CB: physics, chemistry, and elastomer reinforc. Dekker, New York
20. Wolff S (1996) Rubb Chem Technol 69(3):32510.5254/1.3538376 ↗
21. Maiti M, Sadhu S, Bhowmick AK (2005) J Appl Polym Sci 96:44310.1002/app.21463 ↗
22. Jia QX, Wu YP, Ping X, Xin Y, Wang YQ, Zhang LQ (2005) Polym Polym Comp 13:709
23. European Patent: EP0500338 (A1) (1992) Inventor(s): Yuichi S, Susumu W, Sumio T, For Sumitomo Rubber Ind
24. Etika KC, Liu L, Hess LA, Grunlan JC (2009) Carbon 47:312810.1016/j.carbon.2009.07.031 ↗
25. Konishi Y, Cakmak M (2005) Polymer 46:481110.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.082 ↗
26. Sumfleth J, Prado LASA, Sriyai M, Schulte K (2008) Polymer 49:510510.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.016 ↗
27. Kvandea I, Øyeb G, Hammera N, Rønninga M, Raaenc S, Holmena A, Sjo¨blomb J, Chen D (2008) Carbon 46:75910.1016/j.carbon.2008.01.033 ↗
28. Sabah E, Mart U, Çnar M, Çelik MS (2007) Sep Sci Technol 42:227510.1080/15275920701313616 ↗
29. Gates WP (2004) Appl Clay Sci 27:110.1016/j.clay.2003.12.001 ↗
30. Lin JJ, Chu CC, Chiang ML, Tsai WC (2006) J Phys Chem B110(37):1811510.1021/jp0636773 ↗
31. Xu R, Wu C, Xu H (2007) Carbon 45:280610.1016/j.carbon.2007.09.010 ↗
32. Brochard-Wyart F, de Gennes P (2000) Eur Phys J E 1:9310.1007/s101890050011 ↗
33. Flores F, Graebling D, Allal A, Guerret-Pi’ecourt C (2007) J Phys D Appl Phys 40:291110.1088/0022-3727/40/9/037 ↗
34. Anderson BJ, Zukoski CF (2007) Macromolecules 40:513310.1021/ma0624346 ↗
35. Feller JF, Bruzaud S, Grohens Y (2004) Mater Lett 58:73910.1016/j.matlet.2003.07.010 ↗
36. Moore VC, Strano MS, Haroz EH, Hauge RH, Smalley RE, Schmidt J, Talmon Y (2003) Nano Lett 3:137910.1021/nl034524j ↗
37. Tohver V, Smay JE, Braem A, Braun PV, Lewis JA (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:895010.1073/pnas.151063098 ↗
38. Liu L, Grunlan JC (2007) Adv Funct Mater 17:234310.1002/adfm.200600785 ↗
39. Bhowmick AK, Bhattacharya M, Mitra S (2009) Paper # 103 at the 176th fall technical meeting of Rubber Division, ACS, 14th October 2009, Pittsburgh, USA