A review of 3D bio-printing for bone and skin tissue engineering: a commercial approach
Source abstract
Abstract
The ultimate prospect of tissue engineering is to create autologous tissue grafts for future replacement therapies through utilization of cells and biomaterials simultaneously. Bio-printing is a novel technique, a growing field that is leading to the global revolution in medical sciences that has gained significant attention. Bio-printing has the potential to be used in producing human engineered tissues like bone and skin which then ultimately can be used in the clinics. In this paper, the 3D bio-printing applications of the engineered human tissues that are available (skin and bone) are reviewed. It is evident that various tissue engineering techniques have been applied in the fabrication of skin tissue; therefore, it leads to introduce tissue substitutes such as complementary, split-thickness skin graft, allografts, acellular dermal substitutes and cellularized graft-like commercial products, i.e., Dermagraft and Apligraf. Also, some bone scaffolds based on hydroxyapatite and biphasic calcium phosphate are available in the market. The technology of bio-printing has got validated for bone and skin tissue fabrication, and it is hoped that other tissues could be produced by this technique.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Mason C, Dunnill P (2008) A brief definition of regenerative medicine. Regen Med 3(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.2217/17460751.3.1.110.2217/17460751.3.1.1 ↗
2. Abouna GM (2008) Organ shortage crisis: problems and possible solutions. Transpl Proc 40(1):34–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.11.06710.1016/j.transproceed.2007.11.067 ↗
3. Bajaj P, Schweller RM, Khademhosseini A, West JL, Bashir R (2014) 3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16:247–276. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-10515510.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-105155 ↗
4. Mao AS, Mooney DJ (2015) Regenerative medicine: current therapies and future directions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(47):14452–14459. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.150852011210.1073/pnas.1508520112 ↗
5. Orlando G, Booth C, Wang Z, Totonelli G, Ross CL, Moran E, Salvatori M, Maghsoudlou P, Turmaine M, Delario G, Al-Shraideh Y, Farooq U, Farney AC, Rogers J, Iskandar SS, Burns A, Marini FC, De Coppi P, Stratta RJ, Soker S (2013) Discarded human kidneys as a source of ECM scaffold for kidney regeneration technologies. Biomaterials 34(24):5915–5925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.033 ↗
6. Peloso A, Petrosyan A, Da Sacco S, Booth C, Zambon JP, O’Brien T, Aardema C, Robertson J, De Filippo RE, Soker S, Stratta RJ, Perin L, Orlando G (2015) Renal extracellular matrix scaffolds from discarded kidneys maintain glomerular morphometry and vascular resilience and retains critical growth factors. Transplantation 99(9):1807–1816. https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.000000000000081110.1097/tp.0000000000000811 ↗
7. Yu YL, Shao YK, Ding YQ, Lin KZ, Chen B, Zhang HZ, Zhao LN, Wang ZB, Zhang JS, Tang ML, Mei J (2014) Decellularized kidney scaffold-mediated renal regeneration. Biomaterials 35(25):6822–6828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.07410.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.074 ↗
8. Balestrini JL, Gard AL, Liu A, Leiby KL, Schwan J, Kunkemoeller B, Calle EA, Sivarapatna A, Lin T, Dimitrievska S, Cambpell SG, Niklason LE (2015) Production of decellularized porcine lung scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Integr Biol 7(12):1598–1610. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5IB00063G10.1039/C5IB00063G ↗
9. Gilpin SE, Guyette JP, Gonzalez G, Ren X, Asara JM, Mathisen DJ, Vacanti JP, Ott HC (2014) Perfusion decellularization of human and porcine lungs: bringing the matrix to clinical scale. J Heart Lung Transpl 33(3):298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2013.10.03010.1016/j.healun.2013.10.030 ↗
10. Stabler CT, Lecht S, Mondrinos MJ, Goulart E, Lazarovici P, Lelkes PI (2015) Revascularization of decellularized lung scaffolds: principles and progress. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 309(11):L1273–L1285. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00237.201510.1152/ajplung.00237.2015 ↗
11. Kim TH, Jung Y, Kim SH (2018) Nanofibrous electrospun heart decellularized extracellular matrix-based hybrid scaffold as wound dressing for reducing scarring in wound healing. Tissue Eng Part A 24(9–10):830–848. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2017.031810.1089/ten.TEA.2017.0318 ↗
12. Sánchez PL, Fernández-Santos ME, Costanza S, Climent AM, Moscoso I, Gonzalez-Nicolas MA, Sanz-Ruiz R, Rodríguez H, Kren SM, Garrido G, Escalante JL, Bermejo J, Elizaga J, Menarguez J, Yotti R, Pérez del Villar C, Espinosa MA, Guillem MS, Willerson JT, Bernad A, Matesanz R, Taylor DA, Fernández-Avilés F (2015) Acellular human heart matrix: a critical step toward whole heart grafts. Biomaterials 61:279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.05610.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.056 ↗
13. Seo Y, Jung Y, Kim SH (2018) Decellularized heart ECM hydrogel using supercritical carbon dioxide for improved angiogenesis. Acta Biomater 67:270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.04610.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.046 ↗
14. Lee H, Han W, Kim H, Ha DH, Jang J, Kim BS, Cho DW (2017) Development of liver decellularized extracellular matrix bioink for three-dimensional cell printing-based liver tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 18(4):1229–1237. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b0190810.1021/acs.biomac.6b01908 ↗
15. Mattei G, Magliaro C, Pirone A, Ahluwalia A (2017) Decellularized human liver is too heterogeneous for designing a generic extracellular matrix mimic hepatic scaffold. Artif Organs 41(12):E347–E355. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.1292510.1111/aor.12925 ↗
16. Mazza G, Rombouts K, Rennie Hall A, Urbani L, Vinh Luong T, Al-Akkad W, Longato L, Brown D, Maghsoudlou P, Dhillon AP, Fuller B, Davidson B, Moore K, Dhar D, De Coppi P, Malago M, Pinzani M (2015) Decellularized human liver as a natural 3D-scaffold for liver bioengineering and transplantation. Sci Rep 5:13079. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1307910.1038/srep13079 ↗
17. Garreta E, Oria R, Tarantino C, Pla-Roca M, Prado P, Fernández-Avilés F, Campistol JM, Samitier J, Montserrat N (2017) Tissue engineering by decellularization and 3D bioprinting. Mater Today 20(4):166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2016.12.00510.1016/j.mattod.2016.12.005 ↗
18. Moser PT, Ott HC (2014) Recellularization of organs: what is the future for solid organ transplantation? Curr Opin Organ Transpl 19(6):603–609. https://doi.org/10.1097/mot.000000000000013110.1097/mot.0000000000000131 ↗
19. Cheung DYC, Duan B, Butcher JT (2015) Chapter 21—Bioprinting of cardiac tissues. In: Atala A, Yoo JJ (eds) Essentials of 3D biofabrication and translation. Academic Press, Boston, pp 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800972-7.00021-910.1016/B978-0-12-800972-7.00021-9 ↗
20. Groll J, Boland T, Blunk T, Burdick JA, Cho D-W, Dalton PD, Derby B, Forgacs G, Li Q, Mironov VA, Moroni L, Nakamura M, Shu W, Takeuchi S, Vozzi G, Woodfield TBF, Xu T, Yoo JJ, Malda J (2016) Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field. Biofabrication 8(1):013001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/01300110.1088/1758-5090/8/1/013001 ↗
21. Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, Kim D-H (2016) 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv 34(4):422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.01110.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011 ↗
22. Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32(8):773–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.295810.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
23. Ozbolat IT (2015) Bioprinting scale-up tissue and organ constructs for transplantation. Trends Biotechnol 33(7):395–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.04.00510.1016/j.tibtech.2015.04.005 ↗
24. Derakhshanfar S, Mbeleck R, Xu K, Zhang X, Zhong W, Xing M (2018) 3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: a review of recent trends and advances. Bioact Mater 3(2):144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.00810.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.008 ↗
25. Jakab K, Norotte C, Marga F, Murphy K, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Forgacs G (2010) Tissue engineering by self-assembly and bio-printing of living cells. Biofabrication 2(2):022001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/2/02200110.1088/1758-5082/2/2/022001 ↗
26. Moroni L, de Wijn JR, van Blitterswijk CA (2006) 3D fiber-deposited scaffolds for tissue engineering: influence of pores geometry and architecture on dynamic mechanical properties. Biomaterials 27(7):974–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.02310.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.023 ↗
27. Zhu W, Ock J, Ma X, Li W, Chen S (2015) “Chapter 2—3D printing and nanomanufacturing. In: Zhang LG, Fisher JP, Leong KW (eds) 3D bioprinting and nanotechnology in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Academic Press, New York, pp 25–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800547-7.00002-310.1016/B978-0-12-800547-7.00002-3 ↗
28. Shanjani Y, Pan CC, Elomaa L, Yang Y (2015) A novel bioprinting method and system for forming hybrid tissue engineering constructs. Biofabrication 7(4):045008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/04500810.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045008 ↗
29. Lim G, Choi D, Richardson EB (2014) 3-D printing in organ transplantation. Hanyang Med Rev 34(4):158–164. https://doi.org/10.7599/hmr.2014.34.4.15810.7599/hmr.2014.34.4.158 ↗
30. Snyder JE, Hamid Q, Wang C, Chang R, Emami K, Wu H, Sun W (2011) Bioprinting cell-laden matrigel for radioprotection study of liver by pro-drug conversion in a dual-tissue microfluidic chip. Biofabrication 3(3):034112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/3/3/03411210.1088/1758-5082/3/3/034112 ↗
31. Perkins JD (2007) Are we reporting the same thing? Liver Transpl: Off Publ Am Assoc Study Liver Dis Int Liver Transpl Soc 13(3):465–46610.1002/lt.21105 ↗
32. Midha S, Dalela M, Sybil D, Patra P, Mohanty S (2019) Advances in three-dimensional bioprinting of bone: progress and challenges. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 13(6):925–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.284710.1002/term.2847 ↗
33. Moreno Madrid AP, Vrech SM, Sanchez MA, Rodriguez AP (2019) Advances in additive manufacturing for bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng, C 100:631–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.03710.1016/j.msec.2019.03.037 ↗
34. Ashammakhi N, Hasan A, Kaarela O, Byambaa B, Sheikhi A, Gaharwar AK, Khademhosseini A (2019) Advancing frontiers in bone bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater 8(7):1801048. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20180104810.1002/adhm.201801048 ↗
35. Atala A, Forgacs G (2019) Three-dimensional bioprinting in regenerative medicine: reality, hype, and future. Stem Cells Transl Med 8(8):744–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-008910.1002/sctm.19-0089 ↗
36. Dasgupta Q, Black LD (2019) A fresh slate for 3D bioprinting. Science 365(6452):446. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay047810.1126/science.aay0478 ↗
37. Kuss M, Duan B (2019) Chapter 2—Extrusion-based bioprinting. In: Cho D-W (ed) Biofabrication and 3D tissue modeling. The Royal Society of Chemistry, London, pp 22–48. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788012683-0002210.1039/9781788012683-00022 ↗
38. Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, McClinton A, Laurencin CT (2019) Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials 226:119536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11953610.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 ↗
39. Miri AK, Khalilpour A, Cecen B, Maharjan S, Shin SR, Khademhosseini A (2019) Multiscale bioprinting of vascularized models. Biomaterials 198:204–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.00610.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.006 ↗
40. Moldovan F (2019) Recent trends in bioprinting. Procedia Manuf 32:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.18810.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.188 ↗
41. Shafiee A, Ghadiri E, Ramesh H, Kengla C, Kassis J, Calvert P, Williams D, Khademhosseini A, Narayan R, Forgacs G, Atala A (2019) Physics of bioprinting. Appl Phys Rev 6(2):021315. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.508720610.1063/1.5087206 ↗
42. Zhang B, Gao L, Ma L, Luo Y, Yang H, Cui Z (2019) 3D bioprinting: a novel avenue for manufacturing tissues and organs. Engineering 5(4):777–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.03.00910.1016/j.eng.2019.03.009 ↗
43. Zhou D, Chen J, Liu B, Zhang X, Li X, Xu T (2019) Bioinks for jet-based bioprinting. Bioprinting 16:e00060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e0006010.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00060 ↗
44. Unagolla JM, Jayasuriya AC (2019) Hydrogel-based 3D bioprinting: a comprehensive review on cell-laden hydrogels, bioink formulations, and future perspectives. Appl Mater Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.10047910.1016/j.apmt.2019.100479 ↗
45. Liu P, Shen H, Zhi Y, Si J, Shi J, Guo L, Shen SG (2019) 3D bioprinting and in vitro study of bilayered membranous construct with human cells-laden alginate/gelatin composite hydrogels. Colloids Surf, B 181:1026–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.06.06910.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.06.069 ↗
46. Cheng L, Yao B, Hu T, Cui X, Shu X, Tang S, Wang R, Wang Y, Liu Y, Song W, Fu X, Li H, Huang S (2019) Properties of an alginate-gelatin-based bioink and its potential impact on cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Int J Biol Macromol 135:1107–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.01710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.017 ↗
47. Gonzalez-Fernandez T, Rathan S, Hobbs C, Pitacco P, Freeman FE, Cunniffe GM, Dunne NJ, McCarthy HO, Nicolosi V, O’Brien FJ, Kelly DJ (2019) Pore-forming bioinks to enable spatio-temporally defined gene delivery in bioprinted tissues. J Control Release 301:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.03.00610.1016/j.jconrel.2019.03.006 ↗
48. Kim W, Kim G (2019) A functional bioink and its application in myoblast alignment and differentiation. Chem Eng J 366:150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.07110.1016/j.cej.2019.02.071 ↗
49. Oliveira EP, Malysz-Cymborska I, Golubczyk D, Kalkowski L, Kwiatkowska J, Reis RL, Oliveira JM, Walczak P (2019) Advances in bioinks and in vivo imaging of biomaterials for CNS applications. Acta Biomater 95:60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.00610.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.006 ↗
50. Kajave NS, Schmitt T, Nguyen T-U, Kishore V (2019) Dual crosslinking strategy to generate mechanically viable cell-laden printable constructs using methacrylated collagen bioinks. Materials Science and Engineering: C 107:110290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.11029010.1016/j.msec.2019.110290 ↗
51. Zhu K, Shin SR, van Kempen T, Li Y-C, Ponraj V, Nasajpour A, Mandla S, Hu N, Liu X, Leijten J, Lin Y-D, Hussain MA, Zhang YS, Tamayol A, Khademhosseini A (2017) Gold nanocomposite bioink for printing 3D cardiac constructs. Adv Func Mater 27(12):1605352. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20160535210.1002/adfm.201605352 ↗
52. Johnson BN, Lancaster KZ, Zhen G, He J, Gupta MK, Kong YL, Engel EA, Krick KD, Ju A, Meng F, Enquist LW, Jia X, McAlpine MC (2015) 3D printed anatomical nerve regeneration pathways. Adv Funct Mater 25(39):6205–6217. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20150176010.1002/adfm.201501760 ↗
53. Homan KA, Kolesky DB, Skylar-Scott MA, Herrmann J, Obuobi H, Moisan A, Lewis JA (2016) Bioprinting of 3D convoluted renal proximal tubules on perfusable chips. Sci Rep 6:34845. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34845. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep34845#supplementary-information10.1038/srep34845 ↗
54. Kesti M, Eberhardt C, Pagliccia G, Kenkel D, Grande D, Boss A, Zenobi-Wong M (2015) Bioprinting complex cartilaginous structures with clinically compliant biomaterials. Adv Funct Mater 25(48):7406–7417. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20150342310.1002/adfm.201503423 ↗
55. Mannoor MS, Jiang Z, James T, Kong YL, Malatesta KA, Soboyejo WO, Verma N, Gracias DH, McAlpine MC (2013) 3D printed bionic ears. Nano Lett 13(6):2634–2639. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl400774410.1021/nl4007744 ↗
56. Khan Y, Pavinatto FJ, Lin MC, Liao A, Swisher SL, Mann K, Subramanian V, Maharbiz MM, Arias AC (2016) Inkjet-printed flexible gold electrode arrays for bioelectronic interfaces. Adv Funct Mater 26(7):1004–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20150331610.1002/adfm.201503316 ↗
57. Shin SR, Farzad R, Tamayol A, Manoharan V, Mostafalu P, Zhang YS, Akbari M, Jung SM, Kim D, Comotto M, Annabi N, Al-Hazmi FE, Dokmeci MR, Khademhosseini A (2016) A bioactive carbon nanotube-based ink for printing 2D and 3D flexible electronics. Adv Mater 28(17):3280–3289. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150642010.1002/adma.201506420 ↗
58. Coruh A, Yontar Y (2012) Application of split-thickness dermal grafts in deep partial- and full-thickness burns: a new source of auto-skin grafting. J Burn Care Res: Off Publ Am Burn Assoc 33(3):e94–e100. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e31823499e910.1097/BCR.0b013e31823499e9 ↗
59. Leon-Villapalos J, Eldardiri M, Dziewulski P (2010) The use of human deceased donor skin allograft in burn care. Cell Tissue Bank 11(1):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-009-9152-110.1007/s10561-009-9152-1 ↗
60. Metcalfe AD, Ferguson MWJ (2007) Tissue engineering of replacement skin: the crossroads of biomaterials, wound healing, embryonic development, stem cells and regeneration. J R Soc Interface 4(14):413–437. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2006.017910.1098/rsif.2006.0179 ↗
61. Pourchet LJ, Thepot A, Albouy M, Courtial EJ, Boher A, Blum LJ, Marquette CA (2017) Human skin 3D bioprinting using scaffold-free approach. Adv Healthc Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20160110110.1002/adhm.201601101 ↗
62. Cubo N, Garcia M, del Cañizo JF, Velasco D, Jorcano JL (2016) 3D bioprinting of functional human skin: production andin vivoanalysis. Biofabrication 9(1):015006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/01500610.1088/1758-5090/9/1/015006 ↗
63. Zhao X, Lang Q, Yildirimer L, Lin ZY, Cui W, Annabi N, Ng KW, Dokmeci MR, Ghaemmaghami AM, Khademhosseini A (2016) photocrosslinkable gelatin hydrogel for epidermal tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater 5(1):108–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20150000510.1002/adhm.201500005 ↗
64. Lee V, Singh G, Trasatti JP, Bjornsson C, Xu X, Tran TN, Yoo S-S, Dai G, Karande P (2014) Design and fabrication of human skin by three-dimensional bioprinting. Tissue Eng Part C, Methods 20(6):473–484. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2013.033510.1089/ten.TEC.2013.0335 ↗
65. Xiong S, Zhang X, Lu P, Wu Y, Wang Q, Sun H, Heng BC, Bunpetch V, Zhang S, Ouyang H (2017) A gelatin-sulfonated silk composite scaffold based on 3D printing technology enhances skin regeneration by stimulating epidermal growth and dermal neovascularization. Sci Rep 7(1):4288. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04149-y10.1038/s41598-017-04149-y ↗
66. Rutz AL, Hyland KE, Jakus AE, Burghardt WR, Shah RN (2015) A multimaterial bioink method for 3D printing tunable, cell-compatible hydrogels. Adv Mater 27(9):1607–1614. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20140507610.1002/adma.201405076 ↗
67. Ng WL, Yeong WY, Naing MW (2016) Polyelectrolyte gelatin-chitosan hydrogel optimized for 3D bioprinting in skin tissue engineering. Int J Biopr 2(1):10. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.2016.01.00910.18063/ijb.2016.01.009 ↗
68. Min D, Lee W, Bae IH, Lee TR, Croce P, Yoo SS (2018) Bioprinting of biomimetic skin containing melanocytes. Exp Dermatol 27(5):453–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.1337610.1111/exd.13376 ↗
69. Li J, Chi J, Liu J, Gao C, Wang K, Shan T, Li Y, Shang W, Gu F (2017) 3D printed gelatin-alginate bioactive scaffolds combined with mice bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: a biocompatibility study. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 10(6):6299–6307
70. Huang S, Yao B, Xie J, Fu X (2016) 3D bioprinted extracellular matrix mimics facilitate directed differentiation of epithelial progenitors for sweat gland regeneration. Acta Biomater 32:170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.03910.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.039 ↗
71. Ng WL, Yeong WY, Win Naing M (2014) Potential of bioprinted films for skin tissue engineering. In: Paper presented at the 1st international conference on progress in additive manufacturing10.3850/978-981-09-0446-3_065 ↗
72. Rimann M, Bono E, Annaheim H, Bleisch M, Graf-Hausner U (2016) Standardized 3D bioprinting of soft tissue models with human primary cells. J Lab Autom 21(4):496–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/221106821456714610.1177/2211068214567146 ↗
73. Skardal A, Mack D, Kapetanovic E, Atala A, Jackson JD, Yoo J, Soker S (2012) Bioprinted amniotic fluid-derived stem cells accelerate healing of large skin wounds. Stem cells Transl Med 1(11):792–802. https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2012-008810.5966/sctm.2012-0088 ↗
74. Kim BS, Lee J-S, Gao G, Cho D-W (2017) Direct 3D cell-printing of human skin with functional transwell system. Biofabrication 9(2):025034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa71c810.1088/1758-5090/aa71c8 ↗
75. Michael S, Sorg H, Peck C-T, Koch L, Deiwick A, Chichkov B, Vogt PM, Reimers K (2013) Tissue engineered skin substitutes created by laser-assisted bioprinting form skin-like structures in the dorsal skin fold chamber in mice. PLoS ONE 8(3):e5774110.1371/journal.pone.0057741 ↗
76. Binder KW (2011) In situ bioprinting of the skin. Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem
77. Thayer PS, Orrhult LS, Martínez H (2018) Bioprinting of cartilage and skin tissue analogs utilizing a novel passive mixing unit technique for bioink precellularization. J Vis Exp JoVE 3(131):56372. https://doi.org/10.3791/5637210.3791/56372 ↗
78. Albanna M, Binder KW, Murphy SV, Kim J, Qasem SA, Zhao W, Tan J, El-Amin IB, Dice DD, Marco J, Green J, Xu T, Skardal A, Holmes JH, Jackson JD, Atala A, Yoo JJ (2019) In situ bioprinting of autologous skin cells accelerates wound healing of extensive excisional full-thickness wounds. Sci Rep 9(1):1856. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38366-w10.1038/s41598-018-38366-w ↗
79. Admane P, Gupta AC, Jois P, Roy S, Chandrasekharan Lakshmanan C, Kalsi G, Bandyopadhyay B, Ghosh S (2019) Direct 3D bioprinted full-thickness skin constructs recapitulate regulatory signaling pathways and physiology of human skin. Bioprinting 15:e00051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e0005110.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00051 ↗
80. Mao JS, Zhao LG, Yin YJ, Yao KD (2003) Structure and properties of bilayer chitosan-gelatin scaffolds. Biomaterials 24(6):1067–107410.1016/S0142-9612(02)00442-8 ↗
81. Leukers B, Gülkan H, Irsen SH, Milz S, Tille C, Schieker M, Seitz H (2005) Hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering made by 3D printing. J Mater Sci Mater Med 16(12):1121–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-005-4716-510.1007/s10856-005-4716-5 ↗
82. Cox SC, Thornby JA, Gibbons GJ, Williams MA, Mallick KK (2015) 3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng, C 47:237–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.02410.1016/j.msec.2014.11.024 ↗
83. Brunello G, Sivolella S, Meneghello R, Ferroni L, Gardin C, Piattelli A, Zavan B, Bressan E (2016) Powder-based 3D printing for bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv 34(5):740–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.03.00910.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.03.009 ↗
84. Murphy C, Kolan K, Li W, Semon J, Day D, Leu M (2017) 3D bioprinting of stem cells and polymer/bioactive glass composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biopr 3(1):11. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.2017.01.00510.18063/ijb.2017.01.005 ↗
85. Byambaa B, Annabi N, Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, Jia W, Kazemzadeh-Narbat M, Shin SR, Tamayol A, Khademhosseini A (2017) Bioprinted osteogenic and vasculogenic patterns for engineering 3D bone tissue. Adv Healthc Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20170001510.1002/adhm.201700015 ↗
86. Kim MS, Kim G (2014) Three-dimensional electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL)/alginate hybrid composite scaffolds. Carbohydr Polym 114:213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.008 ↗
87. Holmes B, Bulusu K, Plesniak M, Zhang LG (2016) A synergistic approach to the design, fabrication and evaluation of 3D printed micro and nano featured scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue repair. Nanotechnology 27(6):064001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/27/6/06400110.1088/0957-4484/27/6/064001 ↗
88. Gao G, Schilling AF, Yonezawa T, Wang J, Dai G, Cui X (2014) Bioactive nanoparticles stimulate bone tissue formation in bioprinted three-dimensional scaffold and human mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol J 9(10):1304–1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.20140030510.1002/biot.201400305 ↗
89. Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, Kengla C, Yoo JJ, Atala A (2016) A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol 34(3):312–319. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.341310.1038/nbt.3413 ↗
90. Wang J, Yang M, Zhu Y, Wang L, Tomsia AP, Mao C (2014) Phage nanofibers induce vascularized osteogenesis in 3D printed bone scaffolds. Adv Mater 26(29):4961–4966. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20140015410.1002/adma.201400154 ↗
91. Costantini M, Idaszek J, Szoke K, Jaroszewicz J, Dentini M, Barbetta A, Brinchmann JE, Swieszkowski W (2016) 3D bioprinting of BM-MSCs-loaded ECM biomimetic hydrogels for in vitro neocartilage formation. Biofabrication 8(3):035002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/03500210.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035002 ↗
92. Kim HH, Park JB, Kang MJ, Park YH (2014) Surface-modified silk hydrogel containing hydroxyapatite nanoparticle with hyaluronic acid-dopamine conjugate. Int J Biol Macromol 70:516–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.06.05210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.06.052 ↗
93. Bendtsen ST, Quinnell SP, Wei M (2017) Development of a novel alginate-polyvinyl alcohol-hydroxyapatite hydrogel for 3D bioprinting bone tissue engineered scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 105(5):1457–1468. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3603610.1002/jbm.a.36036 ↗
94. Nyberg E, Rindone A, Dorafshar A, Grayson WL (2017) Comparison of 3D-printed poly-varepsilon-caprolactone scaffolds functionalized with tricalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, bio-oss, or decellularized bone matrix. Tissue Eng Part A 23(11–12):503–514. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2016.041810.1089/ten.TEA.2016.0418 ↗
95. Buyuksungur S, Endogan Tanir T, Buyuksungur A, Bektas EI, Torun Kose G, Yucel D, Beyzadeoglu T, Cetinkaya E, Yenigun C, Tonuk E, Hasirci V, Hasirci N (2017) 3D printed poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds modified with hydroxyapatite and poly(propylene fumarate) and their effects on the healing of rabbit femur defects. Biomater Sci 5(10):2144–2158. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00514h10.1039/c7bm00514h ↗
96. Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A (2013) Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today 16(12):496–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.01710.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 ↗
97. Daly AC, Pitacco P, Nulty J, Cunniffe GM, Kelly DJ (2018) 3D printed microchannel networks to direct vascularisation during endochondral bone repair. Biomaterials 162:34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.05710.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.057 ↗
98. Fedorovich NE, Schuurman W, Wijnberg HM, Prins HJ, van Weeren PR, Malda J, Alblas J, Dhert WJ (2012) Biofabrication of osteochondral tissue equivalents by printing topologically defined, cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part C, Methods 18(1):33–44. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.006010.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0060 ↗
99. Huang B, Bártolo PJ (2018) Rheological characterization of polymer/ceramic blends for 3D printing of bone scaffolds. Polym Test 68:365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.03310.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.033 ↗
100. Hung BP, Naved BA, Nyberg EL, Dias M, Holmes CA, Elisseeff JH, Dorafshar AH, Grayson WL (2016) Three-dimensional printing of bone extracellular matrix for craniofacial regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2(10):1806–1816. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0010110.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00101 ↗