journal article·2017-11

Characterizing the feasibility of processing wet granular materials to improve rheology for 3D printing

Michael Sweeney, Loudon L. Campbell, Jeff Hanson, Michelle L. Pantoya, Gordon F. Christopher

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Rheological measurements and extrusion tests are used to evaluate the viability of high mass fraction (80% solids content) wet granular materials for extrusion-based 3D printing. Such materials have diverse applications from making dense, strong ceramic custom parts to 3D printing uniquely shaped energetic materials. Traditionally, 3D-printed colloidal materials use much lower mass fraction inks, and hence, those technologies will not work for systems requiring higher mass fraction solids content. These wet granular materials are highly non-Newtonian presenting non-homogenous flows, shear thinning, yield stress, and high elasticity. Such behaviors improve some aspects of print quality, but make printing very difficult. In this work, the relationship between the rheological behavior of wet granular materials and the processing parameters that are necessary for successfully extruding these materials for printing is examined. In the future, such characterizations will provide key indicators on how to alter printer design/operating conditions and adjust material behavior in order to improve printability. This study is a fundamental first step to successfully developing 3D printing technology of wet granular materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Schubert C, Van Langeveld MC, Donoso LA (2013) Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. Br J Ophthalmol 98:159–16110.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304446 ↗
2. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Zechmann CM, Unterhinninghofen R, Kauczor H-U, Giesel FL (2010) 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5(4):335–34110.1007/s11548-010-0476-x ↗
3. Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM (2014) Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. ACS Publications, Washington
4. Vaezi M, Seitz H, Yang S (2013) A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5–8):1721–175410.1007/s00170-012-4605-2 ↗
5. Shirazi SFS, Gharehkhani S, Mehrali M, Yarmand H, Metselaar HSC, Kadri NA, Osman NAA (2015) A review on powder-based additive manufacturing for tissue engineering: selective laser sintering and inkjet 3D printing. Sci Technol Adv Mater 16(3):03350210.1088/1468-6996/16/3/033502 ↗
6. Avery MP, Klein S, Richardson R, Bartlett P, Adams G, Dickin F, Simske S (2014) The rheology of dense colloidal pastes used in 3D-printing. In: NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference, vol 1. Society for Imaging Science and Technology, pp 140–14510.2352/ISSN.2169-4451.2014.30.1.art00036_1 ↗
7. Conrad JC, Ferreira SR, Yoshikawa J, Shepherd RF, Ahn BY, Lewis JA (2011) Designing colloidal suspensions for directed materials assembly. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 16(1):71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2010.11.00210.1016/j.cocis.2010.11.002 ↗
8. Lewis JA (2006) Direct ink writing of 3D functional materials. Adv Func Mater 16(17):2193–2204. doi: 10.1002/adfm.20060043410.1002/adfm.200600434 ↗
9. Lewis JA, Smay JE, Stuecker J, Cesarano J (2006) Direct ink writing of three-dimensional ceramic structures. J Am Ceram Soc 89(12):3599–3609. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01382.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01382.x ↗
10. Olhero SM, Ferreira JMF (2002) Particle segregation phenomena occurring during the slip casting process. Ceram Int 28(4):377–386. doi: 10.1016/s0272-8842(01)00105-510.1016/s0272-8842(01)00105-5 ↗
11. Olhero SM, Ferreira JMF (2004) Influence of particle size distribution on rheology and particle packing of silica-based suspensions. Powder Technol 139(1):69–75. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2003.10.00410.1016/j.powtec.2003.10.004 ↗
12. Philips NR, Compton BG, Begley MR (2012) High strength alumina micro-beams fabricated by inkjet printing. J Am Ceram Soc 95(10):3016–3018. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05395.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05395.x ↗
13. Schlordt T, Schwanke S, Keppner F, Fey T, Travitzky N, Greil P (2013) Robocasting of alumina hollow filament lattice structures. J Eur Ceram Soc 33(15–16):3243–3248. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.06.00110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.06.001 ↗
14. Lu XS, Lee Y, Yang SF, Hao Y, Evans JRG, Parini CG (2010) Solvent-based paste extrusion solid freeforming. J Eur Ceram Soc 30(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.07.01910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.07.019 ↗
15. Morissette SL, Lewis JA, Clem PG, Cesarano J, Dimos DB (2001) Direct-write fabrication of Pb (Nb, Zr, Ti) O3 devices: influence of paste rheology on print morphology and component properties. J Am Ceram Soc 84(11):2462–246810.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01036.x ↗
16. Prasad P, Reddy AV, Rajesh PK, Ponnambalam P, Prakasan K (2006) Studies on rheology of ceramic inks and spread of ink droplets for direct ceramic ink jet printing. J Mater Process Technol 176(1–3):222–229. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.001 ↗
17. Sakar-Deliormanli A, Celik E, Polat M (2008) Rheological behavior of PMN gels for solid freeform fabrication. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 324(1–3):159–166. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.04.02910.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.04.029 ↗
18. Tari G, Ferreira JMF, Fonseca AT, Lyckfeldt O (1998) Influence of particle size distribution on colloidal processing of alumina. J Eur Ceram Soc 18(3):249–253. doi: 10.1016/s0955-2219(97)00113-110.1016/s0955-2219(97)00113-1 ↗
19. Travitzky N, Bonet A, Dermeik B, Fey T, Filbert-Demut I, Schlier L, Schlordt T, Greil P (2014) Additive manufacturing of ceramic-based materials. Adv Eng Mater 16(6):729–754. doi: 10.1002/adem.20140009710.1002/adem.201400097 ↗
20. Durairaj R, Ramesh S, Mallik S, Seman A, Ekere N (2009) Rheological characterisation and printing performance of Sn/Ag/Cu solder pastes. Mater Des 30(9):3812–3818. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.02810.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.028 ↗
21. Nguyen HV, Andreassen E, Kristiansen H, Johannessen R, Hoivik N, Aasmundtveit KE (2013) Rheological characterization of a novel isotropic conductive adhesive—epoxy filled with metal-coated polymer spheres. Mater Des 46:784–793. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.03610.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.036 ↗
22. Guillon O, Jamin C, Bordia RK (2010) Effect of drying conditions on patterned ceramic films processed by soft micromolding. J Ceram Soc Jpn 118(1376):321–325. doi: 10.2109/jcersj2.118.32110.2109/jcersj2.118.321 ↗
23. Fordham S (2013) High explosives and propellants. Elsevier, Amsterdam
24. Sullivan KT, Zhu C, Duoss EB, Gash AE, Kolesky DB, Kuntz JD, Lewis JA, Spadaccini CM (2016) Controlling material reactivity using architecture. Adv Mater 28(10):1934–193910.1002/adma.201504286 ↗
25. Borcherding R (1998) An alternative to open burning treatment of solid propellant manufacturing wastes. Waste Manage 17(2):135–14110.1016/S0956-053X(97)10012-5 ↗
26. Clark B, Zhang Z, Christopher G, Pantoya ML (2017) 3D processing and characterization of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) energetic thin films. J Mater Sci 52(2):993–1004. doi: 10.1007/s10853-016-0395-510.1007/s10853-016-0395-5 ↗
27. Meeks KA, Clark BR, Cano JE, Apblett CA, Pantoya ML (2015) Effects of rheological properties on reactivity of energetic thin films. Combust Flame 162(9):3288–329310.1016/j.combustflame.2015.05.018 ↗
28. Li X, Huang C, Yang H, Li Y, Cheng Y (2016) Thermal reaction properties of aluminum/copper (II) oxide/poly (vinylidene fluoride) nanocomposite. J Therm Anal Calorim 124(2):899–90710.1007/s10973-015-5194-8 ↗
29. Chiaverini MJ, Kuo KK, Lu FK (2007) Fundamentals of hybrid rocket combustion and propulsion. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA
30. Pospischil M, Specht J, Konig M, Horteis M, Mohr C, Clement F, Biro D (2014) Paste rheology correlating with dispensed finger geometry. IEEE J Photovolt 4(1):498–503. doi: 10.1109/jphotov.2013.227865710.1109/jphotov.2013.2278657 ↗
31. Beckstead M (2002) VKI special course internal aerodynamics in solid rocket propulsion. Rhode-Saint-Genese, Belgium
32. McKinley GH (2005) Visco-elasto-capillary thinning and break-up of complex fluids, Rheol. Rev. 3, 1–48
33. Rodd LE, Scott TP, Cooper-White JJ, McKinley GH (2004) Capillary break-up rheometry of low-viscosity elastic fluids. Appl Rheol 15(1):12–2710.1515/arh-2005-0001 ↗
34. Clasen C, Phillips PM, Palangetic L (2012) Dispensing of rheologically complex fluids: the map of misery. AIChE J 58(10):3242–325510.1002/aic.13704 ↗
35. Mathues W, McIlroy C, Harlen OG, Clasen C (2015) Capillary breakup of suspensions near pinch-off. Phys Fluids 27(9):09330110.1063/1.4930011 ↗
36. Agarwal PK, Bagley EB, Hill CT (1978) Viscosity, modulus, and die swell of glass bead filled polystyrene-acrylonitrile copolymer. Polym Eng Sci 18(4):282–28710.1002/pen.760180408 ↗
37. Papanastasiou TC, Alexandrou A (1987) Isothermal extrusion of non-dilute fiber suspensions. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 25(3):313–32810.1016/0377-0257(87)85032-2 ↗
38. Morris JF (2009) A review of microstructure in concentrated suspensions and its implications for rheology and bulk flow. Rheol Acta 48(8):909–92310.1007/s00397-009-0352-1 ↗
39. Van der Werff J, De Kruif C (1989) Hard-sphere colloidal dispersions: the scaling of rheological properties with particle size, volume fraction, and shear rate. J Rheol 33(3):421–45410.1122/1.550062 ↗
40. Mewis J, Wagner NJ (2012) Colloidal suspension rheology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
41. Mills P, Rognon PG, Chevoir F (2008) Rheology and structure of granular materials near the jamming transition. EPL 81(6):3. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/81/6400510.1209/0295-5075/81/64005 ↗
42. Benarie M (1961) Rheology of granular material II-a method for the determination of the intergranular cohesion. Br J Appl Phys 12(9):51410.1088/0508-3443/12/9/323 ↗
43. Cheng DCH, Kruszewski AP, Senior JR, Roberts TA (1990) The effect of particle-size distribution on the rheology of an industrial suspension. J Mater Sci 25(1A):353–373. doi: 10.1007/bf0054423010.1007/bf00544230 ↗
44. Daniel RC, Poloski AP, Saez AE (2008) Vane rheology of cohesionless glass beads. Powder Technol 181(3):237–248. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2007.05.00310.1016/j.powtec.2007.05.003 ↗
45. de Cagny H, Fall A, Denn MM, Bonn D (2015) Local rheology of suspensions and dry granular materials. J Rheol 59(4):957–969. doi: 10.1122/1.491997010.1122/1.4919970 ↗
46. Liao C-C, Hsiau S-S (2009) Influence of interstitial fluid viscosity on transport phenomenon in sheared granular materials. Chem Eng Sci 64(11):2562–256910.1016/j.ces.2009.02.030 ↗
47. Passman SL, Nunziato JW, Bailey PB, Reed KW (1986) Shearing motion of a fluid-saturated granular material. J Rheol 30(1):167–19210.1122/1.549894 ↗
48. Kuno H, Senna M (1967) Rheological behavior of powder in a rotational viscometer. Rheol Acta 6(3):284–28810.1007/BF01976446 ↗
49. Poloski AP, Bredt PR, Daniel RC, Saez AE (2006) The contribution of frictional contacts to the shear strength of coarse glass bead powders and slurries. Rheol Acta 46(2):249–259. doi: 10.1007/s00397-006-0105-310.1007/s00397-006-0105-3 ↗
50. Rognon PG, Roux JN, Naaim M, Chevoir F (2008) Dense flows of cohesive granular materials. J Fluid Mech 596:21–47. doi: 10.1017/s002211200700932910.1017/s0022112007009329 ↗
51. Williams PR, Williams DJ (1989) Rheometry for concentrated cohesive suspensions. J Coast Res 6(1):151–164
52. Bouzid M, Trulsson M, Claudin P, Clement E, Andreotti B (2013) Nonlocal rheology of granular flows across yield conditions. Phys Rev Lett 111(23):154–155. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.23830110.1103/PhysRevLett.111.238301 ↗
53. Balendran B, Nematnasser S (1993) Viscoplastic flow of planar granular-materials. Mech Mater 16(1–2):1–12. doi: 10.1016/0167-6636(93)90022-j10.1016/0167-6636(93)90022-j ↗
54. Higashi N, Sumita I (2009) Experiments on granular rheology: effects of particle size and fluid viscosity. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. doi: 10.1029/2008jb00599910.1029/2008jb005999 ↗
55. Schwarze R, Gladkyy A, Uhlig F, Luding S (2013) Rheology of weakly wetted granular materials: a comparison of experimental and numerical data. Granular Matter 15(4):455–465. doi: 10.1007/s10035-013-0430-z10.1007/s10035-013-0430-z ↗
56. Kawasaki T, Ikeda A, Berthier L (2014) Thinning or thickening? Multiple rheological regimes in dense suspensions of soft particles. EPL 107(2):1. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/107/2800910.1209/0295-5075/107/28009 ↗
57. Majidi S, Motlagh GH, Bahramian B, Kaffashi B, Nojoumi SA, Haririan I (2013) Rheological evaluation of wet masses for the preparation of pharmaceutical pellets by capillary and rotational rheometers. Pharm Dev Technol 18(1):112–120. doi: 10.3109/10837450.2011.64068710.3109/10837450.2011.640687 ↗
58. Mackaplow MB, Rosen LA, Michaels JN (2000) Effect of primary particle size on granule growth and endpoint determination in high-shear wet granulation. Powder Technol 108(1):32–45. doi: 10.1016/s0032-5910(99)00203-x10.1016/s0032-5910(99)00203-x ↗
59. Ho R, Dilworth SE, Williams DR, Heng JYY (2011) Role of surface chemistry and energetics in high shear wet granulation. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(16):9642–9649. doi: 10.1021/ie200926310.1021/ie2009263 ↗
60. Parker MD, York P, Rowe RC (1990) Binder-substrate interactions in wet granulation.1. The effect of binder characteristics. Int J Pharm 64(2–3):207–216. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(90)90270-e10.1016/0378-5173(90)90270-e ↗
61. Pantoya ML, Granier JJ (2005) Combustion behavior of highly energetic thermites: nano versus micron composites. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 30(1):53–6210.1002/prep.200400085 ↗
62. Sharma V, Jaishankar A, Wang Y-C, McKinley GH (2011) Rheology of globular proteins: apparent yield stress, high shear rate viscosity and interfacial viscoelasticity of bovine serum albumin solutions. Soft Matter 7(11):5150–5160. doi: 10.1039/C0SM01312A10.1039/C0SM01312A ↗
63. Plazek DJ, Chelko AJ (1977) Temperature dependence of the steady state recoverable compliance of amorphous polymers. Polymer 18(1):15–1810.1016/0032-3861(77)90255-5 ↗
64. Shah RD, Kabadi M, Pope DG, Augsburger LL (1995) Physicomechanical characterization of the extrusion–spheronization process.2. Rheological determinants for successful extrusion and spheronization. Pharm Res 12(4):496–507. doi: 10.1023/a:101623750974010.1023/a:1016237509740 ↗
65. Soh JLP, Liew CV, Heng PWS (2006) Torque rheological parameters to predict pellet quality in extrusion–spheronization. Int J Pharm 315(1–2):99–109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.02.02310.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.02.023 ↗
66. Mascia S, Patel MJ, Rough SL, Martin PJ, Wilson DI (2006) Liquid phase migration in the extrusion and squeezing of microcrystalline cellulose pastes. Eur J Pharm Sci 29(1):22–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2006.04.01110.1016/j.ejps.2006.04.011 ↗