journal article·2007-11

Effect of calcium rich and alkaline solutions on the chemical behaviour of hemp fibres

David Sedan, Cécile Pagnoux, Thierry Chotard, Agnès Smith, Danielle Lejolly, Vincent Gloaguen, Pierre Krausz

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Chemical reactivity of hemp fibres placed into a cimentitous matrix was studied by using a lime solution as a simplified cement solution. The hemp fibres contain 56.1 wt.% of cellulose, 20.1 wt.% of pectin, 10.9 wt.% of hemicellulose and 6 wt.% of lignin. These compounds are not solubilised in a basic medium rich in calcium but a part located at the fibre surface should be degraded. This treatment leads also to the decrease of the cristallinity index of the cellulose. Calcium ions adsorb in a large quantity onto the fibre surface due to the high concentration of pectin. The structure of the homogalacturonic part of pectin forms with Ca2+ a stable chelate called “egg-box”, supporting cation adsorption. The fibres are then covered by Ca(OH)2 nodules after immersion in a lime solution.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Bamboo properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Gassan J, Bledzki AK (1999) Prog Polym Sci 24:22110.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5 ↗
2. Gassan J (2002) Compos Part A 33(3):36910.1016/S1359-835X(01)00116-6 ↗
3. Mishra S, Tripathy SS, Misra M, Mohanty MK, Nayak NK (2002) J Reinf Plast Comp 21(1):55
4. O’Donnell A, Dweib MA, Wool RP (2004) Compos Sci Technol 64:113510.1016/j.compscitech.2003.09.024 ↗
5. Hepworth DG, Holson RN, Bruce DM, Farrent JW (2000) Compos Part A 31:127910.1016/S1359-835X(00)00098-1 ↗
6. Zhu WH, Tobias BC, Coutts RSP, Langfors G (1994) Cement Concrete Comp 16(1):310.1016/0958-9465(94)90024-8 ↗
7. Tolêdo Filho Romildo D, Ghavami K, England GL, Scrivener K (2003) Cement Concrete Comp 25:18510.1016/S0958-9465(02)00018-5 ↗
8. Moine C (2005) In: Extraction, caractérisation structurale et valorisation d’une famille d’hémicelluloses du bois. Obtention de matériaux plastiques par modification des xylanes. PhD, Limoges University
9. Tserki V, Zafeiropoulos NE, Simon F, Panayiotou C (2005) Compos Part A 36:111010.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.004 ↗
10. Roncero MB et al (2005) Bioresource Technol 96:2110.1016/j.biortech.2004.03.003 ↗
11. Garcia-Jaldon C, Dupeyre D, Vignon MR (1998) Biomass Bioenerg 14:25110.1016/S0961-9534(97)10039-3 ↗
12. Valadez-Gonzales A, Cervantes-Uc JM, Olayo R, Herrera-Franco PJ (1999) Compos Part B 30:30910.1016/S1359-8368(98)00054-7 ↗
13. Herrera-Franco PJ, Valadez-Gonzales A (2005) Compos Part B 36(8):59710.1016/j.compositesb.2005.04.001 ↗
14. Yang J, Yen HE (2002) Plant Physiol 130:103210.1104/pp.004325 ↗
15. Barkakaty BC (1976) J Appl Polym Sci 20:292110.1002/app.1976.070201101 ↗
16. Cazaurang MN, Peraza S, Cruz-Ramos CA (1990) Cellulose Chem Technol 24:629
17. Pickering KL, Beckermann GW, Alam SN, Foreman NJ (2007) Composites Part A 38:40110.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.020 ↗
18. Ouajai S, Shanks RA (2005) Polym Degrad Stab 89(2):32710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.016 ↗
19. Fengel D, Wegener G (1983) Derivatives of cellulose, wood: chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions. de Gruyter, Berlin, p 6610.1515/9783110839654 ↗
20. Depovere P (1992) In: Chimie Générale. Mc Quarrie/Rock, 3éme édn, De Boeck Université