Compressive failure mechanism and buckling analysis of the graded hierarchical bamboo structure
Source abstract
Abstract
Bamboo is a unique unidirectional biocomposite, which consists of vascular bundles (VBs) as the reinforcement and parenchyma cells (PCs) as the matrix. The non-uniform distribution of VBs embedded in the matrix makes bamboo a functionally graded material. In order to investigate the compressive behavior of bamboo as a function of its components, compression tests were performed on specific bamboo samples with different VB volume fraction (V vb), collected from different positions in the culm wall. The results show that both compressive strength and modulus increased linearly with V vb, while the plastic deformation of samples in the compression decreased with increasing V vb. This indicates that VBs dominate the compressive strength and modulus of bamboo, while the ductile performance of the bamboo is determined by the foam-like PCs. Scanning electron microscope observation indicated that VBs buckling were the main cause of failure. The Euler theory was applied to investigate the buckling behavior of bamboo blocks, showing that theoretical buckling strength when only considering the effect of VBs was much lower than with the test results, with the theoretical buckling strength being closer to test results when considering both the effect of VBs and PCs. It is therefore necessary to consider the contribution of PCs to resist buckling in bamboo, as their foam-like structure can effectively prevent the large-scale buckling of VBs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bamboo properties and applications · Tree Root and Stability Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Verma CS, Sharma NK, Chariar VM, Maheshwari S, Hada MK (2014) Comparative study of mechanical properties of bamboo laminae and their laminates with woods and wood based composites. Compos Part B-Eng 60:523–53010.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.061 ↗
2. Xie J, Qi J, Hu T, Hoop CFD, Hse CY, Shupe TF (2016) Effect of fabricated density and bamboo species on physical–mechanical properties of bamboo fiber bundle reinforced composites. J Mater Sci 51:7480–7490. doi: 10.1007/s10853-016-0024-310.1007/s10853-016-0024-3 ↗
3. Wang H, Li W, Ren D, Yu Z, Yu Y (2014) A two-variable model for predicting the effects of moisture content and density on compressive strength parallel to the grain for moso bamboo. J Wood Sci 60:362–36610.1007/s10086-014-1419-x ↗
4. Armandei M, Darwish IF, Ghavami K (2015) Experimental study on variation of mechanical properties of a cantilever beam of bamboo. Constr Build Mater 101:784–79010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.078 ↗
5. Trujillo E, Moesen M, Osorio L, Vuure AWV, Ivens J, Verpoest I (2014) Bamboo fibres for reinforcement in composite materials: strength weibull analysis. Compos Part A-Appl Sci Manuf 61:115–12510.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.003 ↗
6. Sharma B, Gatóo A, Bock M, Ramage M (2015) Engineered bamboo for structural applications. Constr Build Mater 81:66–7310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.077 ↗
7. Ghavami K, Rodrigues CS, Paciornik S (2003) Bamboo: functionally graded composite material. Asian J Civ Eng 4:1–10
8. Tan T, Rahbar N, Allameh SM, Kwofie S, Dissmore D, Ghavami K, Soboyejo WO (2011) Mechanical properties of functionally graded hierarchical bamboo structures. Acta Biomater 7:3796–380310.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.008 ↗
9. Wang YZ, Zhang CL, Chen WQ (2015) An analytical model to predict material gradient and anisotropy in bamboo. Acta Mech. doi: 10.1007/s00707-015-1514-010.1007/s00707-015-1514-0 ↗
10. Amada S, Ichikawa Y, Munekata T, Nagase Y, Shimizu H (1997) Fiber texture and mechanical graded structure of bamboo. Compos Part B-Eng 28:13–2010.1016/S1359-8368(96)00020-0 ↗
11. Xu Q, Harries K, Li X, Liu Q, Gottron J (2014) Mechanical properties of structural bamboo following immersion in water. Eng Struct 81:230–23910.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.044 ↗
12. Shao Z, Fang C, Huang S, Tian G (2010) Tensile properties of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) and its components with respect to its fiber-reinforced composite structure. Wood Sci Techonol 44:655–66610.1007/s00226-009-0290-1 ↗
13. Verma CS, Chariar VM (2013) Stiffness and strength analysis of four layered laminate bamboo composite at macroscopic scale. Compos Part B- Eng 45:369–37610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.048 ↗
14. Long L, Wang Z, Chen K (2015) Analysis of the hollow structure with functionally gradient materials of moso bamboo. J Wood Sci 61:569–57710.1007/s10086-015-1504-9 ↗
15. Shang L, Sun Z, Liu X, Jiang Z (2015) A novel method for measuring mechanical properties of vascular bundles in moso bamboo. J Wood Sci 61:562–56810.1007/s10086-015-1510-y ↗
16. An X (2013) The study on multi-scale tensile mechanical behavior and toughen mechanism for bamboo (in Chinese). Dissertation, Chinese Academy of Forestry
17. Chuma S, Hirohashi M, Ohgama T, Kasahara Y (1990) Composite structure and tensile properties of mousou bamdoo. J Soc Mater Sci (in Japanese) 39:847–85110.2472/jsms.39.847 ↗
18. Ray AK, Mondal S, Das SK, Ramachandrarao P (2005) Bamboo—a functionally graded composite-correlation between microstructure and mechanical strength. J Mater Sci 40:5249–5253. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-4419-910.1007/s10853-005-4419-9 ↗
19. Li HT, Zhang QS, Huang DS, Deeks AJ (2013) Compressive performance of laminated bamboo. Compos Part B-Eng 54:319–32810.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.035 ↗
20. Liu X, Tian G, Shang L, Yang S, Jiang Z (2014) Compression properties of vascular boundless and parenchyma of rattan (Plectocomia assamica Griff). Holzforschung 68:927–93210.1515/hf-2013-0194 ↗
21. Li J, Hunt JF, Gong S, Cai Z (2016) Simplified analytical model and balanced design approach for light-weight wood-based structural panel in bending. Compos Struct 136:16–2410.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.045 ↗
22. Li J, Hunt JF, Gong S, Cai Z (2017) Orthogonal model and experimental data for analyzing wood-fiber-based tri-axial ribbed structural panels in bending. Eur J Wood Prod 75:5–1510.1007/s00107-016-1119-x ↗
23. Dixon PG, Gibson LJ (2014) The structure and mechanics of moso bamboo material. J R Soc Interface 11:2014032110.1098/rsif.2014.0321 ↗
24. Huang DS, Zhou AP, Li HT, Su Y, Chen G (2012) Experimental study on the tensile properties of bamboo related to its distribution of vascular bundles. Key Eng Mater 517:112–11710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.517.112 ↗
25. Habibi MK, Samaei AT, Gheshlaghi B, Jian L, Yang L (2015) Asymmetric flexural behavior from bamboo’s functionally graded hierarchical structure: underlying mechanisms. Acta Biomater 16:178–18610.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.038 ↗
26. Obataya E, Kitin P, Yamauchi H (2007) Bending characteristics of bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) with respect to its fiber foam composite structure. Wood Sci Technol 41:385–40010.1007/s00226-007-0127-8 ↗
27. Jelf PM, Fleck NA (1992) Compression failure mechanisms in unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater 26:2706–272610.1177/002199839202601804 ↗
28. Krause JQ, Silva FDA, Ghavami K, Filho RDT (2016) On the influence of dendrocalamus giganteus, bamboo microstructure on its mechanical behavior. Constr Build Mater 127:199–20910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.104 ↗
29. Wegst UGK (2011) Bending efficiency through property gradients in bamboo, palm, and wood-based composites. J Mech Behav Biomed 4:744–75510.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.02.013 ↗
30. Zhou A, Huang D, Li H, Su Y (2012) Hybrid approach to determine the mechanical parameters of fibers and matrixes of bamboo. Constr Build Mater 35:191–19610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.03.011 ↗
31. Lessard LB, Chang FK (1991) Effect of load distribution on the fiber buckling strength of unidirectional composites. J Compos Mater 25:65–8710.1177/002199839102500103 ↗
32. Li H, Su J, Zhang Q, Deeks AJ, Hui D (2015) Mechanical performance of laminated bamboo column under axial compression. Constr Build Mater 79:374–382
33. Li J, Hunt JF, Gong S, Cai Z (2014) High strength wood-based sandwich panels reinforced with fiberglass and foam. BioResources 9:1898–1913