Recent progress of 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced polymer composites based on fused deposition modeling: a review
Source abstract
Abstract
3D Printing, utilizing a layer-by-layer deposition of materials, is advantageous to manufacture parts as it involves fewer process steps, provides great flexibility for prototyping, especially of complex parts, and has low material waste. Yet, the mechanical properties of 3D printed parts have always been a concern due to the weak inter-layer bonding and rough surface. 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced polymer composites (CFRPCs) use continuous fiber reinforcements for the polymer matrix, which significantly improve the mechanical properties of printed parts. CFRPCs are widely used in aerospace, automobile, medical industry and other fields due to their excellent specific mechanical properties. Compared with other 3D printing technologies, fused deposition modeling (FDM) has the advantages of low cost and simple operation to fabricate CFRPCs. In this review article, the choices of various continuous fibers and matrix polymers and their effect on the performance of CFRPCs have been discussed. Furthermore, the latest equipment and methods to fabricate CFRPCs will be summarized, and the key parameters affecting the properties of CFRPCs analyzed. At the end, based on the related research, we critically highlight the challenges and opportunities associated with FDM of CFRPCs to point out the direction of future work.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Joshi SC, Sheikh AA (2015) 3D printing in aerospace and its long-term sustainability. Virtual Phys Prototyp 10(4):175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.111151910.1080/17452759.2015.1111519 ↗
2. Wang Y-C, Chen T, Yeh Y-L (2019) Advanced 3D printing technologies for the aircraft industry: a fuzzy systematic approach for assessing the critical factors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105(10):4059–4069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1927-810.1007/s00170-018-1927-8 ↗
3. Murr LE (2016) Frontiers of 3D printing/additive manufacturing: from human organs to aircraft fabrication. J Mater Sci Technol 32(10):987–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2016.08.01110.1016/j.jmst.2016.08.011 ↗
4. Chung K-C, Shu M-H, Wang Y-C, Huang J-C, Lau EM (2020) 3D printing technologies applied to the manufacturing of aircraft components. Mod Phys Lett B 34:7–9. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021798492040018710.1142/s0217984920400187 ↗
5. Pei E, Shen J, Watling J (2015) Direct 3D printing of polymers onto textiles: experimental studies and applications. Rapid Prototyp J 21(5):556–571. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-09-2014-012610.1108/rpj-09-2014-0126 ↗
6. Korger M, Bergschneider J, Lutz M, Mahltig B, Finsterbusch K, Rabe M (2016) Possible applications of 3D printing technology on textile substrates. In: Aumann S, Ehrmann A, Weber MO (eds), 48th conference of the international federation of knitting technologists. IOP conference series-materials science and engineering 141: 012011. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/141/1/01201110.1088/1757-899x/141/1/012011 ↗
7. Vithani K, Goyanes A, Jannin V, Basit AW, Gaisford S, Boyd BJ (2019) An overview of 3D printing technologies for soft materials and potential opportunities for lipid-based drug delivery systems. Pharm Res 36(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-018-2531-110.1007/s11095-018-2531-1 ↗
8. Revilla-Leon M, Ozcan M (2019) Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont 28(2):146–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.1280110.1111/jopr.12801 ↗
9. Dodziuk H (2016) Applications of 3D printing in healthcare. Pol J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13(3):283–293. https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2016.6262510.5114/kitp.2016.62625 ↗
10. Paolini A, Kollmannsberger S, Rank E (2019) Additive manufacturing in construction: a review on processes, applications, and digital planning methods. Addit Manuf 30:100894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10089410.1016/j.addma.2019.100894 ↗
11. Buchanan C, Gardner L (2019) Metal 3D printing in construction: a review of methods, research, applications, opportunities and challenges. Eng Struct 180:332–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.04510.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.045 ↗
12. Koncic J, Scapec J (2018) 3D print additive technology as a form of textile material substitute in clothing design—interdisciplinary approach in designing corsets and fashion accessories. Ind Textila 69(3):190–19610.35530/IT.069.03.1430 ↗
13. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mulhaupt R (2017) Polymers for 3D Printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev 117(15):10212–10290. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0007410.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
14. Wickramasinghe S, Truong D, Phuong T (2020) FDM-based 3D printing of polymer and associated composite: a review on mechanical properties. Defects Treat Polym 12(7):1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1207152910.3390/polym12071529 ↗
15. Rahim TNAT, Abdullah AM, Akil HM (2019) Recent developments in fused deposition modeling-based 3D printing of polymers and their composites. Polym Rev 59(4):589–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2019.159788310.1080/15583724.2019.1597883 ↗
16. Chen Z, Zhao D, Liu B, Nian G, Li X, Yin J, Qu S, Yang W (2019) 3D printing of multifunctional hydrogels. Adv Funct Mater 29(20):1900971. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20190097110.1002/adfm.201900971 ↗
17. Rimington RP, Capel AJ, Christie SDR, Lewis MP (2017) Biocompatible 3D printed polymers via fused deposition modelling direct C2C12 cellular phenotype in vitro. Lab on a Chip 17(17):2982–2993. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7lc00577f10.1039/c7lc00577f ↗
18. Sharma R, Singh R, Penna R, Fraternali F (2018) Investigations for mechanical properties of Hap, PVC and PP based 3D porous structures obtained through biocompatible FDM filaments. Compos Part B-Eng 132:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.021 ↗
19. Ming Y, Duan Y, Wang B, Xiao H, Zhang X (2019) A Novel route to fabricate high-performance 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced thermosetting polymer composites. Materials 12(9):1369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1209136910.3390/ma12091369 ↗
20. Hao W, Liu Y, Zhou H, Chen H, Fang D (2018) Preparation and characterization of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting composites. Polym Test 65:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.11.00410.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.11.004 ↗
21. Zanjanijam AR, Major I, Lyons JG, Lafont U, Devine DM (2020) Fused filament fabrication of PEEK: a review of process-structure-property relationships. Polymers 12(8):1665. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1208166510.3390/polym12081665 ↗
22. Aliheidari N, Christ J, Tripuraneni R, Nadimpalli S, Ameli A (2018) Interlayer adhesion and fracture resistance of polymers printed through melt extrusion additive manufacturing process. Mater Des 156:351–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.00110.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.001 ↗
23. Dizon JRC, Espera AH Jr, Chen Q, Advincula RC (2018) O Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Addit Manuf 20:44–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002 ↗
24. Saroia J, Wang YN, Wei QH, Lei MJ, Li XP, Guo Y, Zhang K (2020) A review on 3D printed matrix polymer composites: its potential and future challenges. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(5):1695–1721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04534-z10.1007/s00170-019-04534-z ↗
25. Hindersmann A (2019) Confusion about infusion: an overview of infusion processes. Compos Part A-Appl Sci Manuf 126:105583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10558310.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105583 ↗
26. Lesiak P, Szelag M, Budaszewski D, Plaga R, Milenko K, Rajan G, Semenova Y, Farrell G, Boczkowska A, Domanski A, Wolinski T (2012) Influence of lamination process on optical fiber sensors embedded in composite material. Measurement 45(9):2275–2280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.03.01010.1016/j.measurement.2012.03.010 ↗
27. Dizon JRC, Valino AD, Souza LR, Espera AH Jr, Chen Q, Advincula RC (2019) Three-dimensional-printed molds and materials for injection molding and rapid tooling applications. Mrs Commun 9(4):1267–1283. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2019.14710.1557/mrc.2019.147 ↗
28. Altaf K, Qayyum JA, Rani AMA, Ahmad F, Megat-Yusoff PSM, Baharom M, Aziz ARA, Jahanzaib M, German RM (2018) Performance analysis of enhanced 3D printed polymer molds for metal injection molding process. Metals 8(6):433. https://doi.org/10.3390/met806043310.3390/met8060433 ↗
29. Valino AD, Dizon JRC, Espera AH, Chen Q, Messman J, Advincula RC (2019) Advances in 3D printing of thermoplastic polymer composites and nanocomposites. Prog PolyM Sci 98:101162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.10116210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101162 ↗
30. Dickson AN, Abourayana HM, Dowling DP (2020) 3D printing of fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused filament fabrication-a review. Polymers 12(10):2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1210218810.3390/polym12102188 ↗
31. Jiang Y, Raney JR (2019) 3D Printing of amylopectin-based natural fiber composites. Adv Mater Technol 4(11):1900521. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.20190052110.1002/admt.201900521 ↗
32. Gregor-Svetec D, Leskovsek M, Brodnjak UV, Elesini US, Muck D, Urbas R (2020) Characteristics of HDPE/cardboard dust 3D printable composite filaments. J Mater Process Technol 276:116379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11637910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116379 ↗
33. Badouard C, Traon F, Denoual C, Mayer-Laigle C, Paes G, Bourmaud A (2019) Exploring mechanical properties of fully compostable flax reinforced composite filaments for 3D printing applications. Ind Crops Prod 135:246–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.04910.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.049 ↗
34. Liu H, He H, Peng X, Huang B, Li J (2019) Three-dimensional printing of poly(lactic acid) bio-based composites with sugarcane bagasse fiber: effect of printing orientation on tensile performance. Polym Adv Technol 30(4):910–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.452410.1002/pat.4524 ↗
35. Fan C, Shan Z, Zou G, Zhan L, Yan D (2020) Performance of short fiber interlayered reinforcement thermoplastic resin in additive manufacturing. Materials 13(12):2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1312286810.3390/ma13122868 ↗
36. Kabir SMF, Mathur K, Seyam AFM (2020) A critical review on 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced composites: history, mechanism, materials and properties. Compos Struct 232:111476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11147610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476 ↗
37. Matsuzaki R, Ueda M, Namiki M, Jeong TK, Asahara H, Horiguchi K, Nakamura T, Todoroki A, Hirano Y (2016) Three-dimensional printing of continuous-fiber composites by in-nozzle impregnation. Sci Rep 6:23058. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2305810.1038/srep23058 ↗
38. Isobe T, Tanaka T, Nomura T, Yuasa R (2018) Comparison of strength of 3D printing objects using short fiber and continuous long fiber. In: 13th international conference on textile composites IOP conference series materials science and engineering 406: 012042. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/406/1/01204210.1088/1757-899x/406/1/012042 ↗
39. Mohammadizadeh M, Imeri A, Fidan I, Elkelany M (2019) 3D printed fiber reinforced polymer composites—structural analysis. Compos Part B: Eng 175:107112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10711210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107112 ↗
40. Le Duigou A, Barbe A, Guillou E, Castro M (2019) 3D printing of continuous flax fibre reinforced biocomposites for structural applications. Mater Des 180:107884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10788410.1016/j.matdes.2019.107884 ↗
41. Sang L, Han SF, Peng XS, Jian XG, Wang JY (2019) Development of 3D-printed basalt fiber reinforced thermoplastic honeycombs with enhanced compressive mechanical properties. Compos Part A-Appl Sci Manuf 125:105518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10551810.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105518 ↗
42. Dou H, Cheng Y, Ye W, Zhang D, Li J, Miao Z, Rudykh S (2020) effect of process parameters on tensile mechanical properties of 3D printing continuous carbon fiber-reinforced PLA composites. Materials 13(17):3850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1317385010.3390/ma13173850 ↗
43. Ming Y, Xin Z, Zhang J, Duan Y, Wang B (2020) Fabrication of continuous glass fiber-reinforced dual-cure epoxy composites via UV-assisted fused deposition modeling. Compos Commun 21:100401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2020.10040110.1016/j.coco.2020.100401 ↗
44. Liu TF, Tian XY, Zhang MY, Abliz D, Li DC, Ziegmann G (2018) Interfacial performance and fracture patterns of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber with sizing reinforced PA6 composites. Compos Part A-Appl Sci Manuf 114:368–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.001 ↗
45. Suteja J, Firmanto H, Soesanti A, Christian C (2020) Properties investigation of 3D printed continuous pineapple leaf fiber-reinforced PLA composite. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/089270572094537110.1177/0892705720945371 ↗
46. Qiao J, Li YR, Li LQ (2019) Ultrasound-assisted 3D printing of continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic (FRTP) composites. Addit Manuf 30:100926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10092610.1016/j.addma.2019.100926 ↗
47. Chacon JM, Caminero MA, Nunez PJ, Garcia-Plaza E, Garcia-Moreno I, Reverte JM (2019) Additive manufacturing of continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties. Compos Sci Technol 181:18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10768810.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107688 ↗
48. Cuan-Urquizo E, Barocio E, Tejada-Ortigoza V, Pipes RB, Rodriguez CA, Roman-Flores A (2019) Characterization of the mechanical properties of FFF structures and materials: a review on the experimental. Comput Theor Approaches Mater 12(6):895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1206089510.3390/ma12060895 ↗
49. Li H, Wang T, Joshi S, Yu Z (2019) The quantitative analysis of tensile strength of additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid (PLA). Rapid Prototy J 25(10):1624–1636. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-01-2018-000510.1108/rpj-01-2018-0005 ↗
50. Li N, Li Y, Liu S (2016) Rapid prototyping of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites by 3D printing. J Mater Process Technol 238:218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.02510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.025 ↗
51. Liu Y, Kumar S (2012) Recent progress in fabrication, structure, and properties of carbon fibers. Polym Rev 52(3–4):234–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2012.70541010.1080/15583724.2012.705410 ↗
52. Heidari-Rarani M, Rafiee-Afarani M, Zahedi AM (2019) Mechanical characterization of FDM 3D printing of continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Compos Part B-Eng 175:107147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107147 ↗
53. Yang C, Tian X, Liu T, Cao Y, Li D (2017) 3D printing for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites: mechanism and performance. Rapid Prototyp J 23(1):209–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-08-2015-009810.1108/rpj-08-2015-0098 ↗
54. Vasile C (2002) Role of the polymer degradation processes in environmental pollution and waste treatment. Polimery 47(7):517–522. https://doi.org/10.14314/polimery.2002.51710.14314/polimery.2002.517 ↗
55. Vinyas M, Athul SJ, Harursampath D, Thoi TN (2019) Experimental evaluation of the mechanical and thermal properties of 3D printed PLA and its composites. Mater Res Express 6(11):115301. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab43ab10.1088/2053-1591/ab43ab ↗
56. Garg M, White SR, Sottos NR (2019) Rapid degradation of poly(lactic acid) with organometallic catalysts. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 11(49):46226–46232. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1759910.1021/acsami.9b17599 ↗
57. Balla VK, Kate KH, Satyavolu J, Singh P, Tadimeti JGD (2019) Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: processing and prospects. Compos Part B-Eng 174:106956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10695610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 ↗
58. Hinchcliffe SA, Hess KM, Srubar WV (2016) Experimental and theoretical investigation of prestressed natural fiber-reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) composite materials. Compos Part B-Eng 95:346–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.08910.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.089 ↗
59. Zhang H, Liu D, Huang T, Hu Q, Lammer H (2020) Three-dimensional printing of continuous flax fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites by five-axis machine. Materials 13(7):1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1307167810.3390/ma13071678 ↗
60. Pinpathomrat B, Yamada K, Yokoyama A (2020) The effect of UV irradiation on polyamide 6/carbon-fiber composites based on three-dimensional printing. Sn Appl Sci 2(9):101184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03319-410.1007/s42452-020-03319-4 ↗
61. Ibrahim Y, Elkholy A, Schofield JS, Melenka GW, Kempers R (2020) Effective thermal conductivity of 3D-printed continuous fiber polymer composites. Adv Manuf-Polym Compos Sci 6(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/20550340.2019.171002310.1080/20550340.2019.1710023 ↗
62. Composites Material Datasheet (2020) https://markforged.com/datasheets. Accessed 1 Dec 2020
63. Azarov AV, Antonov FK, Golubev MV, Khaziev AR, Ushanov SA (2019) Composite 3D printing for the small size unmanned aerial vehicle structure. Compos Part B-Eng 169:157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.07310.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.073 ↗
64. Yeh Y-L (2020) The standard strength test of 3D printing materials and its application for UAV propellers. Mod Phys Lett B 34:7–9. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021798492040017510.1142/s0217984920400175 ↗
65. Chen QQ, Boisse P, Park CH, Saouab A, Breard J (2011) Intra/inter-ply shear behaviors of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites in thermoforming processes. Compos Struct 93(7):1692–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.01.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2011.01.002 ↗
66. Wu W, Geng P, Li G, Zhao D, Zhang H, Zhao J (2015) Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS. Materials 8(9):5834–5846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma809527110.3390/ma8095271 ↗
67. Nofar M, Sacligil D, Carreau PJ, Kamal MR, Heuzey M-C (2019) Poly (lactic acid) blends: Processing, properties and applications. Int J Biol Macromol 125:307–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.00210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.002 ↗
68. Goh GD, Yap YL, Tan HKJ, Sing SL, Goh GL, Yeong WY (2020) Process-structure-properties in polymer additive manufacturing via material extrusion: a review. Crit Rev Sol State Mater Sci 45(2):113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2018.154997710.1080/10408436.2018.1549977 ↗
69. Guinault A, Sollogoub C (2009) Thermomechanical properties of ABS/PA and ABS/PC blends. Int J Mater Form 2:701–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0531-810.1007/s12289-009-0531-8 ↗
70. Tian X, Liu T, Yang C, Wang Q, Li D (2016) Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Compos Part A-Appl Sci Manuf 88:198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 ↗
71. Tian X, Liu T, Wang Q, Dilmurat A, Li D, Ziegmann G (2017) Recycling and remanufacturing of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. J Clean Prod 142:1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.13910.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.139 ↗
72. Zhu F, Friedrich T, Nugegoda D, Kaslin J, Wlodkowic D (2015) Assessment of the biocompatibility of three-dimensional-printed polymers using multispecies toxicity tests. Biomicrofluidics 9(6):061103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493903110.1063/1.4939031 ↗
73. Mosleh N, Rezadoust AM, Dariushi S (2020) Determining process-window for manufacturing of continuous carbon fiber-reinforced composite using 3D-printing. Mater Manuf Process. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2020.184366410.1080/10426914.2020.1843664 ↗
74. Prusinowski A, Kaczynski R (2020) Investigation of tribological and strength properties of ABS/CF fibrous composites formed in fused deposition modeling. J Frict Wear 41(4):318–325. https://doi.org/10.3103/s106836662004011x10.3103/s106836662004011x ↗
75. Park D-C, Park C-W, Shin D-H, Kim Y-H (2018) A Study on crystallization of thermoplastic aromatic polymer. Compos Res 31(2):63–68. https://doi.org/10.7234/composres.2018.31.2.06310.7234/composres.2018.31.2.063 ↗
76. Luo M, Tian XY, Shang JF, Zhu WJ, Li DC, Qin YJ (2019) Impregnation and interlayer bonding behaviours of 3D-printed continuous carbon-fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone composites. Compos Part A-Appl Sci Manuf 121:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.020 ↗
77. Abdullah F, Okuyama K-i, Morimitsu A, Yamagata N (2020) Effects of thermal cycle and ultraviolet radiation on 3D Printed carbon fiber/polyether ether ketone ablator. Aerospace 7(7):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace707009510.3390/aerospace7070095 ↗
78. Li N, Chen JL, Liu HS, Dong AQ, Wang K, Zhao Y (2019) Effect of preheat treatment on carbon fiber surface properties and fiber/PEEK interfacial behavior. Polym Compos 40:E1407–E1415. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2502010.1002/pc.25020 ↗
79. Chabaud G, Castro M, Denoual C, Le Duigou A (2019) Hygromechanical properties of 3D printed continuous carbon and glass fibre reinforced polyamide composite for outdoor structural applications. Addit Manuf 26:94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.01.00510.1016/j.addma.2019.01.005 ↗
80. Stoof D, Pickering K (2018) Sustainable composite fused deposition modelling filament using recycled pre-consumer polypropylene. Compos Part B-Eng 135:110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.005 ↗
81. Farina I, Singh N, Colangelo F, Luciano R, Bonazzi G, Fraternali F (2019) High-performance nylon-6 sustainable filaments for additive manufacturing. Materials 12(23):3955. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1223395510.3390/ma12233955 ↗
82. Hong J-H, Yu T, Park S-J, Kim Y-H (2020) Repetitive recycling of 3D printing PLA filament as renewable resources on mechanical and thermal loads. Int J Mod Phys B 34:22–24. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021797922040147510.1142/s0217979220401475 ↗
83. Lanzotti A, Martorelli M, Maietta S, Gerbino S, Penta F, Gloria A (2019) A comparison between mechanical properties of specimens 3D printed with virgin and recycled PLA. In: Teti R, Daddona DM (eds) 12th cirp conference on intelligent computation in manufacturing engineering, vol 79. Procedia CIRP. pp 143–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.03010.1016/j.procir.2019.02.030 ↗
84. Yao Y, Li M, Lackner M, Herfried L (2020) A continuous fiber-reinforced additive manufacturing processing based on PET fiber and PLA. Materials 13(14):3044. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1314304410.3390/ma13143044 ↗
85. Chiang C-H, Koenig JL (1980) Chemical reactions occurring at the interface of epoxy matrix and aminosilane coupling agents in fiber-reinforced composites. Polym Compos 1(2):88–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.75001020710.1002/pc.750010207 ↗
86. Ming YK, Zhang SQ, Han W, Wang B, Duan YG, Xiao H (2020) Investigation on process parameters of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber-reinforced thermosetting epoxy composites. Addit Manuf 33:101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10118410.1016/j.addma.2020.101184 ↗
87. Wang B, Zhou X, Yin J, Wang L (2013) Investigation on Some matrix-dominated properties of hybrid multiscale composites based on carbon fiber/carbon nanotube modified epoxy. J Appl Polym Sci 128(2):990–996. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3819110.1002/app.38191 ↗
88. Szebenyi G, Magyar B, Ivanyicki T (2017) Comparison of static and fatigue interlaminar testing methods for continuous fiber reinforced polymer composites. Polym Test 63:307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.08.03310.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.08.033 ↗
89. Wang B, Han W, Ming Y, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Duan Y, Wang H, Zhao H (2020) Preparation and tribological study of graphene coating on glass fiber-reinforced composite using modified percolating-assisted resin film infusion method. Materials 13(4):851. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1304085110.3390/ma13040851 ↗
90. Rahimizadeh A, Kalman J, Fayazbakhsh K, Lessard L (2019) Recycling of fiberglass wind turbine blades into reinforced filaments for use in additive manufacturing. Compos Part B-Eng 175:107101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10710110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107101 ↗
91. Romani A, Mantelli A, Suriano R, Levi M, Turri S (2020) Additive re-manufacturing of mechanically recycled end-of-life glass fiber-reinforced polymers for value-added circular design. Materials 13(16):3545. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1316354510.3390/ma13163545 ↗
92. Hou Z, Tian X, Zhang J, Li D (2018) 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced composite corrugated structure. Compos Struct 184:1005–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.08010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.080 ↗
93. Technical Datasheet (2020) http://www.safilin.fr/en/our-collections/#sweet_home. Accessed 25 July 2020
94. Zhang J, Zhou Z, Zhang F, Tan Y, Tu Y, Yang B (2020) Performance of 3D-printed continuous-carbon-fiber-reinforced plastics with pressure. Materials 13(2):471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1302047110.3390/ma13020471 ↗
95. Hu QX, Duan YC, Zhang HG, Liu DL, Yan BA, Peng FJ (2018) Manufacturing and 3D printing of continuous carbon fiber prepreg filament. J Mater Sci 53(3):1887–1898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1624-210.1007/s10853-017-1624-2 ↗
96. Iragi M, Pascual-Gonzalez C, Esnaola A, Lopes CS, Aretxabaleta L (2019) Ply and interlaminar behaviours of 3D printed continuous carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic laminates; effects of processing conditions and microstructure. Addit Manuf 30:100884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10088410.1016/j.addma.2019.100884 ↗
97. Zhang K, Zhang W, Ding X (2019) Multi-axis additive manufacturing process for continuous fibre reinforced composite parts. In: Kerrigan K, Mativenga P, ElDessouky H (eds) 2nd cirp conference on composite material parts manufacturing, vol 85. Procedia CIRP. pp 114–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.09.02210.1016/j.procir.2019.09.022 ↗
98. Urhal P, Weightman A, Diver C, Bartolo P (2019) Robot assisted additive manufacturing: a review. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 59:335–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.00510.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.005 ↗
99. Bhatt PM, Kabir AM, Malhan RK, Shah B, Shembekar AV, Yoon YJ, Gupta SK, Ieee (2019) A robotic cell for multi-resolution additive manufacturing. In: Howard A, Althoefer K, Arai F et al. (eds) 2019 international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation ICRA. pp 2800–280710.1109/ICRA.2019.8793730 ↗
100. Liu X, Chi B, Jiao Z, Tan J, Liu F, Yang W (2017) A large-scale double-stage-screw 3D printer for fused deposition of plastic pellets. J Appl Polym Sci 134(31):45147. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4514710.1002/app.45147 ↗