Toward the understanding of temperature effect on bonding strength, dimensions and geometry of 3D-printed parts
Source abstract
Abstract
Fused filament fabrication (FFF), which is an additive manufacturing technique, opens alternative possibilities for complex geometries fabrication. However, its use in functional products is limited due to anisotropic strength issues. Indeed, the strength of FFF fabricated parts across successive layers in the build direction (Z direction) can be significantly lower than the strength in X–Y directions. This strength weakness has been attributed to poor bonding between printed layers. This bonding depends on the temperature of the current layer being deposited—at melting temperature (Tm)—and the temperature of the previously deposited layer. It is assumed that depositing a layer at Tm on a layer at temperature around crystallization temperature (Tc) would enable higher material crystallinity and thus better bonding between previous and present layers. On the contrary, if the previous layer temperature is below Tc, material crystallinity will be low and bonding strength weak. This paper aims at studying the significant effect of temperature difference (ΔT) between previous and current deposited layers temperatures on (1) inter-layers bonding strength improvement and (2) part dimensions, geometry and structure stability. A 23% increase in the inter-layers bonding strength for previous layer temperature slightly higher than Tc reported here confirms the above assumption and offers a first solution toward the increase in inter-layers bonding strength in FFF.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Interactive and Immersive Displays
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2015) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv Manuf 3(1):42–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0097-710.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 ↗
2. Holmström J, Partanen J, Tuomi J, Walter M (2010) Rapid manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain: alternative approaches to capacity deployment. J Manuf Technol Manag 21(6):687–697. https://doi.org/10.1108/1741038101106399610.1108/17410381011063996 ↗
3. Iftikhar A et al (2013) Turbine blade manufacturing through rapid tooling (RT) process and its quality inspection. Mater Manuf Process 28(5):534–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2012.74669810.1080/10426914.2012.746698 ↗
4. Yagnik D (2014) Fused deposition modeling—a rapid prototyping technique for product cycle time reduction cost effectively in aerospace applications. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng 5:62–68
5. Chennakesava P, Narayan YS (2014) Fused deposition modeling-insights. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advances in design and manufacturing ICAD&M, vol 14, pp 1345–1350
6. Turner BN, Strong R, Gold SA (2014) A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):192–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2013-001210.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012 ↗
7. Abbott A, Tandon G, Bradford R, Koerner H, Baur J (2018) Process-structure-property effects on ABS bond strength in fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf 19:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-6125(04)70071-710.1016/S1526-6125(04)70071-7 ↗
8. Bellehumeur C, Li L, Sun Q, Gu P (2004) Modeling of bond formation between polymer filaments in the fused deposition modeling process. J Manuf Process 6(2):170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-6125(04)70071-710.1016/S1526-6125(04)70071-7 ↗
9. Oladapo BI, Obisesan OB, Oluwole B, Adebiyi VA, Usman H, Khan A (2020) Mechanical characterization of a polymeric scaffold for bone implant. J Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04638-y10.1007/s10853-020-04638-y ↗
10. Vanaei H et al (2020) Influence of process parameters on thermal and mechanical properties of polylactic acid fabricated by fused filament fabrication. Polym Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2541910.1002/pen.25419 ↗
11. Sweeney M, Campbell LL, Hanson J, Pantoya ML, Christopher GF (2017) Characterizing the feasibility of processing wet granular materials to improve rheology for 3D printing. J Mater Sci 52(22):13040–13053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1404-z10.1007/s10853-017-1404-z ↗
12. Naghieh S, Ravari MK, Badrossamay M, Foroozmehr E, Kadkhodaei M (2016) Numerical investigation of the mechanical properties of the additive manufactured bone scaffolds fabricated by FDM: the effect of layer penetration and post-heating. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 59:241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.03110.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.031 ↗
13. Widden M, Gunn K (2010) Design–build–test of model aerofoils for engineering education using FDM. Virtual Phys Prototyp 5(4):189–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2010.52884110.1080/17452759.2010.528841 ↗
14. Pandey PM, Venkata Reddy N, Dhande SG (2006) Virtual hybrid-FDM system to enhance surface finish. Virtual Phys Prototyp 1(2):101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745275060076390510.1080/17452750600763905 ↗
15. Sun Q, Rizvi G, Bellehumeur C, Gu P (2008) Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp J 14(2):72–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254081086202810.1108/13552540810862028 ↗
16. Costa S, Duarte F, Covas J (2017) Estimation of filament temperature and adhesion development in fused deposition techniques. J Mater Process Technol 245:167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.02.02610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.02.026 ↗
17. Zhou X, Hsieh S-J, Sun Y (2017) Experimental and numerical investigation of the thermal behaviour of polylactic acid during the fused deposition process. Virtual Phys Prototyp 12(3):221–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2017.131721410.1080/17452759.2017.1317214 ↗
18. Polychronopoulos ND, Vlachopoulos J (2020) The role of heating and cooling in viscous sintering of pairs of spheres and pairs of cylinders. Rapid Prototyp J. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2019-016210.1108/RPJ-06-2019-0162 ↗
19. Kamyabi M, Sotudeh-Gharebagh R, Zarghami R, Saleh K (2019) Analysis of non-isothermal viscous flow coalescence at micro scale. Can J Chem Eng 97(9):2565–2572. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.2349910.1002/cjce.23499 ↗
20. Yin J, Lu C, Fu J, Huang Y, Zheng Y (2018) Interfacial bonding during multi-material fused deposition modeling (FDM) process due to inter-molecular diffusion. Mater Des 150:104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.02910.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.029 ↗
21. Levenhagen NP, Dadmun MD (2017) Bimodal molecular weight samples improve the isotropy of 3D printed polymeric samples. Polymer 122:232–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.05710.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.057 ↗
22. Levenhagen NP, Dadmun MD (2018) Interlayer diffusion of surface segregating additives to improve the isotropy of fused deposition modeling products. Polymer 152:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.03110.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.031 ↗
23. de León A, Domínguez-Calvo A, Molina S (2019) Materials with enhanced adhesive properties based on acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS)/thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) blends for fused filament fabrication (FFF). Mater Des 182:108044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10804410.1016/j.matdes.2019.108044 ↗
24. Partain SC (2007) Fused deposition modeling with localized pre-deposition heating using forced air, Montana State University-Bozeman, College of Engineering
25. Kishore V et al (2017) Infrared preheating to improve interlayer strength of big area additive manufacturing (BAAM) components. Addit Manuf 14:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.11.00810.1016/j.addma.2016.11.008 ↗
26. Ravi AK, Deshpande A, Hsu KH (2016) An in-process laser localized pre-deposition heating approach to inter-layer bond strengthening in extrusion based polymer additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process 24:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.08.00710.1016/j.jmapro.2016.08.007 ↗
27. Vadori R, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2013) The effect of mold temperature on the performance of injection molded poly (lactic acid)-based bioplastic. Macromol Mater Eng 298(9):981–990. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20120027410.1002/mame.201200274 ↗
28. Vanaei HR et al (2020) Experimental study of PLA thermal behavior during fused filament fabrication (FFF). J Appl Polym Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4974710.1002/app.49747 ↗
29. Lucas A et al (2019) Conventional rotational molding process and aerodynamic characteristics of an axial-flow hollow blades rotor. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(1–4):1183–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03962-110.1007/s00170-019-03962-1 ↗