Toughened carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composites with nanoparticle-modified epoxy matrices
Source abstract
Abstract
In the current work, the microstructure and fracture performance of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites based upon matrices of an anhydride-cured epoxy resin (formulated with a reactive diluent), and containing silica nanoparticles and/or polysiloxane core-shell rubber (CSR) nanoparticles, were investigated. Double cantilever beam tests were performed in order to determine the interlaminar fracture energy of the CFRP composites, while the single-edge-notched bend specimen was employed to evaluate the fracture energy of the bulk polymers. The fracture energy of the bulk epoxy polymers increased from 173 J/m 2 for the unmodified polymer to a maximum of 1237 J/ m 2 with the addition of 16 wt% of CSR nanoparticles. The toughening mechanisms were identified as (a) localised plastic shear yielding and (b) cavitation of the CSR particles followed by plastic void growth of the matrix. The steady-state propagation value of the interlaminar fracture energy of the CFRP composites increased with increasing nanoparticle concentration, from 1246 J/m 2 for the unmodified epoxy matrix to a maximum of 1851 J/m 2 with 4 wt% of silica nanoparticles and 8 wt% of CSR nanoparticles. Crack growth in the CFRP composites was dominated by fibre-bridging toughening mechanisms. The efficiency of the transfer of toughness from the bulk polymers to the carbon fibre composites was considered. The measured fracture energy of both bulk and composite materials decreased at a test temperature of -80 C, compared with room temperature, i.e. 20 C. Nevertheless, the toughening effects of both the silica and CSR nanoparticles on the bulk epoxy polymers and the CFRP composites, compared with the unmodified epoxy polymers, were still evident even at the lower temperature. Indeed, the toughening effect of the silica nanoparticles was greater at -80 C than at room temperature.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Kinloch AJ, Young RJ (1983) Fracture behaviour of polymers. Applied Science Publishers, London
2. Lin M-S, Liu C-C, Lee C-T (1999) Toughened interpenetrating polymer network materials based on unsaturated polyester and epoxy. J Appl Polym Sci 72:585–59210.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990425)72:4<585::AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
3. Rowe EH, Siebert AR, Drake RS (1990) Toughening thermosets with liquid butadiene/acrylonitrile polymers. Mod Plast 47:110–117
4. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ, Tod DA, Hunston DL (1983) Deformation and fracture behaviour of a rubber toughened epoxy: 1. Microstructure and fracture studies. Polymer 24:1341–135410.1016/0032-3861(83)90070-8 ↗
5. Yee AF, Pearson RA (1986) Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies. Part 1: mechanical studies. J Mater Sci 21:2462–2474. doi: 10.1007/BF0111429310.1007/BF01114293 ↗
6. Kawaguchi T, Pearson RA (2003) The effect of particle-matrix adhesion on the mechanical behavior of glass filled epoxies: part 1. A study on yield behavior and cohesive strength. Polymer 44:4229–423810.1016/S0032-3861(03)00371-9 ↗
7. Park S-J, Jin F-L, Lee C (2005) Preparation and physical properties of hollow glass microspheres- reinforced epoxy matrix resins. Mater Sci Eng 402:335–34010.1016/j.msea.2005.05.015 ↗
8. Johnsen BB, Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2007) Toughening mechanisms of nanoparticle-modified epoxy polymers. Polymer 48:530–54110.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.038 ↗
9. Fine T, Pascault J-P (2006) Structured thermoplastic/thermoset blends using block copolymers. Macromol Symp 245–246:375–38510.1002/masy.200651352 ↗
10. Hydro RM, Pearson RA (2007) Epoxies toughened with triblock copolymers. J Polym Sci B 45:1470–148110.1002/polb.21166 ↗
11. Chong HM, Taylor AC (2013) The microstructure and fracture performance of styrene-butadiene-methyl-methacrylate block copolymer-modified epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci 48:6762–6777. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7481-810.1007/s10853-013-7481-8 ↗
12. Ladani RB, Wu S, Kinloch AJ, Ghorbani K, Zhang J, Mouritz AP, Wang CH (2016) Multifunctional properties of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by aligned nanoscale carbon. Mater Des 94:554–56410.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.052 ↗
13. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Kopke U, Fiedler B, Schulte K (2004) Carbon nanotube-reinforced epoxy-composites: enhanced stiffness and fracture toughness at low nanotube content. Compos Sci Technol 64:2363–237110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.002 ↗
14. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC, Kinloch IA (2001) The effect of carbon nanotubes on the fracture toughness and fatigue performance of a thermosetting epoxy polymer. J Mater Sci 46:7525–7535. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5724-010.1007/s10853-011-5724-0 ↗
15. Bagheri R, Pearson RA (1996) Role of particle cavitation in rubber-toughened epoxies: 1. Microvoid toughening. Polymer 37:4259–453810.1016/0032-3861(96)00295-9 ↗
16. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1991) Influence of particle size and particle size distribution on toughening mechanism in rubber-modified epoxies. J Mater Sci 26:3828–3844. doi: 10.1007/BF0118497910.1007/BF01184979 ↗
17. Lu F, Cantwell WJ, Kausch HH (1997) The role of cavitation and debonding in the toughening of core-shell rubber modified epoxy systems. J Mater Sci 32:3055–3059. doi: 10.1023/A:101862601227110.1023/A:1018626012271 ↗
18. Chen J, Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2013) The mechanical properties and toughening mechanisms of an epoxy polymer modified with polysiloxane-based core-shell particles. Polymer 54:4276–428910.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.009 ↗
19. Quan D, Ivankovic A (2015) Effect of core-shell rubber (CSR) nano-particles on mechanical properties and fracture toughness of an epoxy polymer. Polymer 66:16–2810.1016/j.polymer.2015.04.002 ↗
20. Cooper V, Ivankovic A, Karac A, McAuliffe D, Murphy N (2012) Effects of bond gap thickness on the fracture of nano-toughened epoxy adhesive joints. Polymer 53:5540–555310.1016/j.polymer.2012.09.049 ↗
21. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ (1992) Modelling of the toughening mechanisms in rubber-modified epoxy polymers: part I: finite element analysis studies. J Mater Sci 27:2753–2762. doi: 10.1007/BF0054070210.1007/BF00540702 ↗
22. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ (1992) Modelling of the toughening mechanisms in rubber-modified epoxy polymers: part II: a quantitative description of the microstructure-fracture property relationship. J Mater Sci 27:2763–2769. doi: 10.1007/BF0054070310.1007/BF00540703 ↗
23. Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Eger C, Sprenger S, Egan D (2005) The effect of silica nano particles and rubber particles on the toughness of multiphase thermosetting epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci 40:5083–5086. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-7261-110.1007/s10853-005-7261-1 ↗
24. Azimi HR, Pearson RA, Hertzberg RW (1995) Role of crack tip shielding mechanisms in fatigue of hybrid epoxy composites containing rubber and solid glass spheres. J Appl Polym Sci 58:449–46310.1002/app.1995.070580223 ↗
25. Spanoudakis J, Young RJ (1984) Crack propagation in a glass particle-filled epoxy resin part 1 effect of particle volume fraction and size. J Mater Sci 19:473–486. doi: 10.1007/BF0240323410.1007/BF02403234 ↗
26. Spanoudakis J, Young RJ (1984) Crack propagation in a glass particle-filled epoxy resin part 2 effect of particle-matrix adhesion. J Mater Sci 19:487–496. doi: 10.1007/BF0055357210.1007/BF00553572 ↗
27. Lee J, Yee AF (2000) Fracture of glass bead/epoxy composites: on micromechanical deformations. Polymer 41:8363–837310.1016/S0032-3861(00)00187-7 ↗
28. Nakamura Y, Yamaguchi M, Okubo M, Matsumoto T (1992) Effect of particle size on the fracture toughness of epoxy resin filled with spherical silica. Polymer 33:3415–342610.1016/0032-3861(92)91099-N ↗
29. Moloney AC, Kausch HH, Kaiser T, Beer HR (1987) Parameters determining the strength and toughness of particulate filled epoxide resins. J Mater Sci 22:381–393. doi: 10.1007/BF0116074310.1007/BF01160743 ↗
30. Kwon S-C, Adachi T, Araki W (2008) Temperature dependence of fracture toughness of silica/epoxy composites: related to microstructure of nano- and micro-particles packing. Composites B 39:773–78110.1016/j.compositesb.2007.10.008 ↗
31. Lange FF (1970) The interaction of a crack front with a second-phase dispersion. Philos Mag 22:983–99210.1080/14786437008221068 ↗
32. Faber KT, Evans AG (1983) Crack deflection processes—I. Theory. Acta Metall 31:565–57610.1016/0001-6160(83)90046-9 ↗
33. Faber KT, Evans AG (1983) Crack deflection processes—II. Experiment. Acta Metall 31:577–58410.1016/0001-6160(83)90047-0 ↗
34. Liang YL, Pearson RA (2009) Toughening mechanisms in epoxy-silica nanocomposites (ESNs). Polymer 50:4895–490510.1016/j.polymer.2009.08.014 ↗
35. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Lee JS, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) The toughness of epoxy polymers and fibre composites modified with rubber microparticles and silica nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 45:1193–1210. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4064-910.1007/s10853-009-4064-9 ↗
36. Carolan D, Kinloch AJ, Ivankovic A, Sprenger S, Taylor AC (2016) Toughening of epoxy-based hybrid nanocomposites. Polymer 97:179–19010.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.007 ↗
37. ISO-527-1 (1996) Plastics—determination of tensile properties—part 1: test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
38. Williams JG, Ford HR (1964) Stress-strain relationships for some unreinforced plastics. J Mech Eng Sci 6:405–41710.1243/JMES_JOUR_1964_006_055_02 ↗
39. ISO-13586 (2000) Plastics—determination of fracture toughness (GIC and KIC)—Linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
40. ISO-15024 (2001) Fibre-reinforced plastic composites—Determination of mode I interlaminar fracture toughness, GIC, for unidirectionally reinforced materials. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
41. Zhang H, Zhang Z, Friedrich K, Eger C (2006) Property improvements of in situ epoxy nanocomposites with reduced interparticle distance at high nanosilica content. Acta Mater 54:1833–184210.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.009 ↗
42. Fu S-Y, Feng X-Q, Lauke B, Mai Y-M (2008) Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate-polymer composites. Composites B 39:933–96110.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002 ↗
43. Turcsanyi B, Pukanszky B, Tudos F (1988) Composition dependence of tensile yield stress in filled polymers. J Mater Sci Lett 7:160–16210.1007/BF01730605 ↗
44. Pukanszky B, Turcsanyi B, Tudos F (1988) Effect of interfacial interaction on the tensile yield stress of polymer composites. In: Ishida H (ed) Interfaces in polymer, ceramic and metal matrix composites. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 467–477
45. Rey T, Chagnon G, Le Cam J-B, Favier D (2013) Influence of the temperature on the mechanical behaviour of filled and unfilled silicone rubbers. Polym Test 32:492–50110.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.01.008 ↗
46. Guild FJ, Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC (2010) Particle cavitation in rubber toughened epoxies: the role of particle size. J Mater Sci 45:3882–3894. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4447-y10.1007/s10853-010-4447-y ↗
47. Hull D (1999) Fractography: observing measuring and interpreting fracture surface topography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
48. Andrews EH (1968) Fracture in polymers. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh
49. Hamdia KM, Zhuang X, He P, Rabczuk T (2016) Fracture toughness of polymeric nanocomposites: evaluation of models performance using Bayesian method. Compos Sci Technol 126:122–12910.1016/j.compscitech.2016.02.012 ↗
50. Guild FJ, Young RJ (1989) A predictive model for particulate-filled composite materials. Part 1. Hard particles. J Mater Sci 24:298–306. doi: 10.1007/BF0066097110.1007/BF00660971 ↗
51. Guild FJ, Young RJ (1989) A predictive model for particulate-filled composite materials. Part 2. Soft particles. J Mater Sci 24:2454–2460. doi: 10.1007/BF0117451110.1007/BF01174511 ↗
52. Lee J, Yee AF (2001) Inorganic particle toughening I: micro-mechanical deformations in the fracture of glass bead filled epoxies. Polymer 42:577–58810.1016/S0032-3861(00)00397-9 ↗
53. Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC, Techapaitoon M, Teo WS, Sprenger S (2016) From matrix nano-phase and micro-phase tougheners to composite macro-properties. Philos Trans R Soc A 374:20150275. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.027510.1098/rsta.2015.0275 ↗
54. Ye L, Friedrich K (1993) Mode I interlaminar fracture of co-mingled yarn based glass/polypropylene composites. Compos Sci Technol 46:187–19810.1016/0266-3538(93)90174-F ↗
55. Ye L, Friedrich K (1992) Fibre bridging in double cantilever beam specimens and its effect on mode I interlaminar fracture toughness. J Mater Sci Lett 11:1537–153910.1007/BF00729283 ↗
56. Hunston DL, Moulton RJ, Johnston NJ, Bascom WD (1987) Matrix resin effects in composite delamination: mode I fracture aspects. ASTM STP 937:74–94
57. Bradley WL (1991) Understanding the translation of neat resin toughness into delamination toughness in composites. Key Eng Mater 37:161–19810.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.37.161 ↗