Meso-modelling of Non-Crimp Fabric composites for coupled drape and failure analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
To date macro-analysis methods have been invariably used to analyse textile composite structures for forming and mechanical performance. Techniques such as geometric ‘mapping’ for the draping of textile fabrics and classical laminate analysis combined with simplified failure criteria to determine mechanical performance have formed the basis of most of these methods. The limited accuracy of the physical laws applied is appropriate to macro-analysis methods in which the fibre-matrix composite is treated as homogeneous medium. Today, however, modern high performance computers are opening new possibilities for composites analysis in which far greater detail of the composite constituent materials may be made. This paper presents Finite Elements techniques for the draping simulation of textile composites, specifically biaxial Non Crimp Fabrics, in which the complex deformation mechanisms of the dry tows and stitching may be properly modelled at the individual tow and stitch meso-level. The resulting ‘deformed’ Finite Element model is then used to provide a basis for accurate simulation of the impregnated composite structure. The modelling techniques for both draping and structural analysis are present, together with validation results for the study of a relatively large-scale hemisphere composite part.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Mack C, Taylor HM (1956) J Textile Inst 47(8):47710.1080/19447027.1956.10750433 ↗
2. Long AC (2001) The 4th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Liege, Belgium, p 99
3. Long AC, Wiggers J, Harrison P (2005) The 8th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Vol. 2, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, p 939
4. Pickett AK, Cunningham JE, de Luca P, Johnson AF, Lefebure P, Mallon P, Sunderland P, Ó Brádaigh CM, Vodermeyer A, Werner W (1996) Numerical Techniques for the Pre-Heating and Forming Simulation of Continuous Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastics. SAMPE, Basel, Switzerland
5. Boisse P, Gasser A, Hivet G (2001) Composites: Part A 32:139510.1016/S1359-835X(01)00039-2 ↗
6. Creech G, Pickett AK, Greve L (2003) The 6th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Salerno, Italy, p 863
7. Wiggers J, Long A, Harrison P, Rudd C (2003) The 6th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Salerno, Italy, p 851
8. Harrison P, Clifford MJ, Long AC (2004) Composites Sci Technol 64:145310.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.015 ↗
9. PAM-CRASH Theory Manual 2000, ESI Group, 99 Rue des Solets, Silic 112, 94513 Rungis-Cedex, France
10. ASTM D1388–96E1. Standard test for Stiffness of Fabrics
11. PAM-FORM, ESI Group, 99 Rue des Solets, Silic 112, 94513 Rungis-Cedex, France
12. Pickett AK, Creech G, de Luca P (2005) Revue Européenne des Éléments finis (REEF). 14(6–7):67710.3166/reef.14.677-691 ↗
13. Kaw K (1997) Mechanics of composite materials. CRC Press LLC, Florida