Factors affecting the hygroexpansion of paper
Source abstract
Abstract
Paper is a widely used packaging material and is nowadays regaining importance, e.g., as bio-based and biodegradable material. Moreover, new technologies such as polymer–fiber composites, printed electronics and the deep drawing of paper are developing. The process stability and also the resulting quality of paper converting processes such as coating, metallization, printing, and the printing of electronics are highly affected by the hygroexpansion of paper. In order to reduce production instability and to choose and develop paper substrates with ideal characteristics, critical parameters need to be known. This paper offers an extensive overview of those parameters, starting at a molecular and microscopic level with the effect of the constituents and morphology of single fibers, before moving on to paper contents, chemical modifications and additives and finally concluding with paper production and fiber network modification. It was found that the major influences are single fiber sorption, inter-fiber contacts, microfibril angle, fiber morphology (length, width, curliness) and fiber orientation. This review gives new ideas and insights for technologists working in research, development and production optimization of paper-based products.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Processing · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. European Forest Sector Outlook Study (2005). United Nations Publications
2. Papierfabriken VD (2017) Papier 2017, Annual Report
3. Tobjörk D, Österbacka R (2011) Paper electronics. Adv Mater 23(17):1935–1961. doi: 10.1002/adma.20100469210.1002/adma.201004692 ↗
4. Uesaka T (1994) General formula for hygroexpansion of paper. J Mater Sci 29(9):2373–2377. doi: 10.1007/BF0036342910.1007/BF00363429 ↗
5. Sampson WW, Yamamoto J (2011) The drying shrinkage of cellulosic fibres and isotropic paper sheets. J Mater Sci 46(2):541–547. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-5006-210.1007/s10853-010-5006-2 ↗
6. Elegir G, Bussini D, Antonsson S, Lindström ME, Zoia L (2007) Laccase-initiated cross-linking of lignocellulose fibres using a ultra-filtered lignin isolated from kraft black liquor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77(4):809–817. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1203-610.1007/s00253-007-1203-6 ↗
7. Larsson PA, Wågberg L (2010) Diffusion-induced dimensional changes in papers and fibrillar films: influence of hydrophobicity and fibre-wall cross-linking. Cellulose 17(5):891–901. doi: 10.1007/s10570-010-9433-710.1007/s10570-010-9433-7 ↗
8. Considine JM, Stoker DL, Laufenberg TL, Evans JW (1994) Compressive creep-behavior of corrugating components affected by humid environment. Tappi J 77(1):87–95
9. Uesaka T (1991) Dimensional stability of paper—upgrading paper performance in end use. J Pulp Pap Sci 17(2):J39–J46
10. Haslach HW (2000) The moisture and rate-dependent mechanical properties of paper: a review. Mech Time Depend Mater 4(3):169–210. doi: 10.1023/A:100983341582710.1023/A:1009833415827 ↗
11. Pulkkinen I, Fiskari J, Alopaeus V (2009) The effect of sample size and shape on the hygroexpansion coefficient—a study made with advanced methods for hygroexpansion measurement. Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry of Southern Africa, pp 26–33
12. Lee JM (2007) An atomic force microscopy study of the local hygro-expansion behavior of cellulose microfibrils. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Releigh
13. Lee JM, Pawlak JJ, Heitmann JA (2012) Dimensional and hygroexpansive behaviors of cellulose microfibrils (MFs) from kraft pulp-based fibers as a function of relative humidity. Holzforschung, pp 6610.1515/hf-2011-0129 ↗
14. Kiaei M, Tajik M, Vaysi R (2014) Chemical and biometrical properties of plum wood and its application in pulp and paper production. Maderas Ciencia y tecnología 16(3):313–322. doi: 10.4067/S0718-221x201400500002410.4067/S0718-221x2014005000024 ↗
15. Pulkkinen I, Fiskari J, Alopaeus V (2008) The effect of hardwood fiber morphology on the hygroexpansivity of paper. BioResources 4(1):126–14110.15376/biores.4.1.126-141 ↗
16. Pulkkinen I (2010) From eucalypt fiber distributions to technical properties of paper. Dissertation, Aalto University, Espoo
17. Toungara M, Latil P, Dumont PJJ, du Roscoat SR, Orgéas L, Joffre T, Passas R (2014) 3D Observation of the hygroexpansion of wood fibres. In: MécaMat Grenoble
18. Joffre T, Isaksson P, Dumont PJJ, Roscoat SRd, Sticko S, Orgéas L, Gamstedt EK (2016) A method to measure moisture induced swelling properties of a single wood cell. Exp Mech 56(5):723–733. doi: 10.1007/s11340-015-0119-910.1007/s11340-015-0119-9 ↗
19. Mark RE, Habeger C, Borch J, Lyne MB (2001) Handbook of physical testing of paper: volume 1, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9781482290103 ↗
20. Larsson PA (2010) Hygro-and hydroexpansion of paper: influence of fibre-joint formation and fibre sorptivity. Dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
21. Larsson PA, Wågberg L (2008) Influence of fibre–fibre joint properties on the dimensional stability of paper. Cellulose 15(4):515–525. doi: 10.1007/s10570-008-9203-y10.1007/s10570-008-9203-y ↗
22. Ikuta S, Hitosugi F (1996) New expansimeter for paper sample. In: Pulp and paper research conference, Tokyo, Japan, pp 70–73
23. Antonsson S, Mäkelä P, Fellers C, Lindström ME (2009) Comparison of the physical properties between hardwood and softwood pulps. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 24(4):409–414. doi: 10.3183/NPPRJ-2009-24-04-p409-41410.3183/NPPRJ-2009-24-04-p409-414 ↗
24. Manninen M, Kajanto I, Happonen J, Paltakari J (2011) The effect of microfibrillated cellulose addition on drying shrinkage and dimensional stability of wood-free paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 26(3):297–30510.3183/NPPRJ-2011-26-03-p297-305 ↗
25. Mendes AHT, Kim HY, Ferreira PJT, Park SW (2012) The importance of the measurement of paper differential CD shrinkage. O PAPEL 73(2):45–50
26. Lif JO, Fellers C, Soremark C, Sjodahl M (1995) Characterizing the in-plane hygroexpansivity of paper by electronic speckle photography. J Pulp Pap Sci 21(9):J302–J308
27. Barquin A (2011) Effect of high yield pulp on the dimensional stability of wood-free paper for inkjet printing applications. Master Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto
28. Lindner M (2016) Nutzung des elektrischen Oberflächenwiderstandes zur Abschätzung der Hygroexpansion, Substratrauheit und Gasbarriere von aufgedampften Aluminiumschichten auf Papier und Folie. Fraunhofer IVV, Freising
29. Viguie J, Dumont PJJ, Mauret E, du Roscoat SR, Vacher P, Desloges I, Bloch JF (2011) Analysis of the hygroexpansion of a lignocellulosic fibrous material by digital correlation of images obtained by X-ray synchrotron microtomography: application to a folding box board. J Mater Sci 46(14):4756–4769. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5386-y10.1007/s10853-011-5386-y ↗
30. Neagu RC, Gamstedt EK, Lindström M (2005) Influence of wood-fibre hygroexpansion on the dimensional instability of fibre mats and composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 36(6):772–788. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.023 ↗
31. Chinga-Carrasco G (2011) Cellulose fibres, nanofibrils and microfibrils: the morphological sequence of MFC components from a plant physiology and fibre technology point of view. Nanoscale Res Lett 6(1):417. doi: 10.1186/1556-276x-6-41710.1186/1556-276x-6-417 ↗
32. Yamauchi T (2007) A method to determine lumen volume and collapse degree of pulp fibers by using bottleneck effect of mercury porosimetry. J Wood Sci 53(6):516–519. doi: 10.1007/s10086-007-0895-710.1007/s10086-007-0895-7 ↗
33. Wardrop AB, Preston RD (1947) Organisation of the cell walls of tracheids and wood fibres. Nature 160(4078):911–91310.1038/160911a0 ↗
34. Neagu RC, Gamstedt EK (2007) Modelling of effects of ultrastructural morphology on the hygroelastic properties of wood fibres. J Mater Sci 42(24):10254–10274. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-1199-910.1007/s10853-006-1199-9 ↗
35. Wiedenhoeft AC, Miller RB (2005) Structure and Function of Wood. In: Wood handbook—wood as an engineering material. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Madison, Wisconsin, p 910.1201/b12487-4 ↗
36. Blechschmidt J (2010) Taschenbuch der Papiertechnik: mit 85 Tabellen. Hanser10.3139/9783446423220 ↗
37. Salmén L, de Ruvo A (2007) A model for the prediction of fiber elasticity. Wood Fiber Sci 17(3):336–350
38. Reme PA (2000) Some effects of wood characteristics and the pulping process on mechanical pulp fibres. Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
39. Heyn A (1969) The elementary fibril and supermolecular structure of cellulose in soft wood fiber. J Ultrastruct Res 26(1–2):52–68. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(69)90035-510.1016/s0022-5320(69)90035-5 ↗
40. Meier H (1962) Chemical and morphological aspects of the fine structure of wood. Pure Appl Chem 5(1–2):37–5210.1351/pac196205010037 ↗
41. Jakob HF, Fratzl P, Tschegg SE (1994) Size and arrangement of elementary cellulose fibrils in wood cells: a small-angle X-ray scattering study of picea abies. J Struct Biol 113(1):13–22. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1994.102810.1006/jsbi.1994.1028 ↗
42. Jakob H, Fengel D, Tschegg S, Fratzl P (1995) The elementary cellulose fibril in Picea abies: comparison of transmission electron microscopy, small-angle X-ray scattering, and wide-angle X-ray scattering results. Macromolecules 28(26):8782–8787. doi: 10.1021/ma00130a01010.1021/ma00130a010 ↗
43. Zhang Y, Chen X, Liu J, Gao P, Shi D, Pang S (1997) Size and arrangement of elementary fibrils in crystalline cellulose studied with scanning tunneling microscopy. J Vac Sci Technol Microelectron Nanometer Struct Process Meas Phenom 15(4):1502–1505. doi: 10.1116/1.58948310.1116/1.589483 ↗
44. Muhlethaler K (1960) Die Feinstruktur der Zellulosemikrofibrillen. Beih Z Schweiz Forstver 30:55–64
45. Hansen CM, Björkman A (1998) The ultrastructure of wood from a solubility parameter point of view. Holzforschung Int J Biol Chem Phys Technol Wood 52(4):335–344. doi: 10.1515/hfsg.1998.52.4.33510.1515/hfsg.1998.52.4.335 ↗
46. Wang NL, Liu WY, Lai JP (2014) An attempt to model the influence of gradual transition between cell wall layers on cell wall hygroelastic properties. J Mater Sci 49(5):1984–1993. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7885-510.1007/s10853-013-7885-5 ↗
47. Derome D, Rafsanjani A, Hering S, Dressler M, Patera A, Lanvermann C, Sedighi-Gilani M, Wittel FK, Niemz P (2013) The role of water in the behavior of wood. J Build Phys 36(4):1744259112473926. doi: 10.1177/174425911247392610.1177/1744259112473926 ↗
48. Mohanty AK, Misra M, Hinrichsen G (2000) Biofibres, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: an overview. Macromol Mater Eng 276–277(1):1–24. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1:AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
49. Saheb DN, Jog JP (1999) Natural fiber polymer composites: a review. Adv Polym Technol 18(4):351–363. doi: 10.1002/(Sici)1098-2329(199924)18:4<351:Aid-Adv6>3.0.Co;2-X10.1002/(Sici)1098-2329(199924)18:4<351::Aid-Adv6>3.0.Co;2-X ↗
50. Oksman K, Mathew AP, Bismarck A (2014) Handbook of green materials, volume 5: biobased composite materials, their processing properties and industrial applications. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore10.1142/8975 ↗
51. Panshin AJ, De Zeeuw C (1980) Textbook of wood technology: structure, identification, properties, and uses of the commercial woods of the United States and Canada, vol Bd. 1. McGraw-Hill, New York
52. Marklund E, Varna J (2009) Modeling the hygroexpansion of aligned wood fiber composites. Compos Sci Technol 69(7–8):1108–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.006 ↗
53. Belbekhouche S, Bras J, Siqueira G, Chappey C, Lebrun L, Khelifi B, Marais S, Dufresne A (2011) Water sorption behavior and gas barrier properties of cellulose whiskers and microfibrils films. Carbohyd Polym 83(4):1740–1748. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.03610.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.036 ↗
54. Reina JJ, Domínguez E, Heredia A (2001) Water sorption–desorption in conifer cuticles: the role of lignin. Physiol Plant 112(3):372–378. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120310.x10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120310.x ↗
55. Mihranyan A, Llagostera AP, Karmhag R, Strømme M, Ek R (2004) Moisture sorption by cellulose powders of varying crystallinity. Int J Pharm 269(2):433–442. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2003.09.03010.1016/j.ijpharm.2003.09.030 ↗
56. Persson K (2000) Micromechanical modelling of wood and fibre properties. Lund University, Lund
57. Cave I (1978) Modelling moisture-related mechanical properties of wood part I: properties of the wood constituents. Wood Sci Technol 12(1):75–8610.1007/BF00390012 ↗
58. Bergander A, Salmén L (2002) Cell wall properties and their effects on the mechanical properties of fibers. J Mater Sci 37(1):151–156. doi: 10.1023/A:101311592567910.1023/A:1013115925679 ↗
59. Salmen L, Olsson AM, Stevanic JS, Simonovic J, Radotic K (2012) Structural organisation of the wood polymers in the wood fibre structure. BioResources 7(1):521–53210.15376/biores.7.1.521-532 ↗
60. Cuissinat C, Navard P (2006) Swelling and dissolution of cellulose part 1: free floating cotton and wood fibres in N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide–water mixtures. Macromol Symp 244(1):1–18. doi: 10.1002/masy.20065120110.1002/masy.200651201 ↗
61. Salmén L (2004) Micromechanical understanding of the cell-wall structure. CR Biol 327(9–10):873–880. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2004.03.01010.1016/j.crvi.2004.03.010 ↗
62. Nakamura KI, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T (2004) Poisson’s ratio of cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 42(7):1206–1211. doi: 10.1002/polb.1077110.1002/polb.10771 ↗
63. Neville AC (1993) Biology of fibrous composites: development beyond the cell membrane. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511601101 ↗
64. Jacobs A, Dahlman O (2001) Characterization of the molar masses of hemicelluloses from wood and pulps employing size exclusion chromatography and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Biomacromol 2(3):894–90510.1021/bm010050b ↗
65. Hansen CM (2012) Hansen solubility parameters: a user’s handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton
66. Credou J, Berthelot T (2014) Cellulose: from biocompatible to bioactive material. J Mater Chem B 2(30):4767–4788. doi: 10.1039/c4tb00431k10.1039/c4tb00431k ↗
67. Mark RE, Borch J (2001) Handbook of physical testing of paper, vol Bd. 1. Taylor & Francis, Milton Park10.1201/9781482290103 ↗
68. Wüstenberg T (2013) Cellulose und cellulosederivate: grundlagen, Wirkungen und Applikationen. Behr’s Verlag DE, Humburg
69. Pulkkinen I, Fiskari J, Alopaeus V (2009) CPMAS 13C NMR analysis of fully bleached eucalypt pulp samples: links to handsheet hygroexpansivity and strength properties. J Appl Sci 9(22):3991–399810.3923/jas.2009.3991.3998 ↗
70. Joffre T, Neagu RC, Bardage SL, Gamstedt EK (2014) Modelling of the hygroelastic behaviour of normal and compression wood tracheids. J Struct Biol 185(1):89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.10.01410.1016/j.jsb.2013.10.014 ↗
71. Yamamoto H, Sassus F, Ninomiya M, Gril J (2001) A model of anisotropic swelling and shrinking process of wood—part 2. A simulation of shrinking wood. Wood Sci Technol 35(1–2):167–18110.1007/s002260000074 ↗
72. Alince B (2002) Porosity of swollen pulp fibers revisited. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 17(1):71–73. doi: 10.3183/NPPRJ-2002-17-01-p071-07310.3183/NPPRJ-2002-17-01-p071-073 ↗
73. Kocherbitov V, Ulvenlund S, Kober M, Jarring K, Arnebrant T (2008) Hydration of microcrystalline cellulose and milled cellulose studied by sorption calorimetry. J Phys Chem B 112(12):3728–3734. doi: 10.1021/jp711554c10.1021/jp711554c ↗
74. Mazeau K (2015) The hygroscopic power of amorphous cellulose: a modeling study. Carbohyd Polym 117:585–591. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.09510.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.095 ↗
75. Chen WC, Tejado A, Alam MN, van de Ven TG (2015) Hydrophobic cellulose: a material that expands upon drying. Cellulose 22(4):2749–2754. doi: 10.1007/s10570-015-0645-810.1007/s10570-015-0645-8 ↗
76. Salmén L, Fellers C (1989) The nature of volume hydroexpansivity of paper. J Pulp Pap Sci 15(2):J63–J65
77. Roseveare WE (1947) Contributions to the physics of cellulose fibres. P. H. HERMANS. Elsevier, New York-Amsterdam, 1946. In English. 221 pp. Price $4.00. J Polym Sci 2(3):354. doi: 10.1002/pol.1947.12002032110.1002/pol.1947.120020321 ↗
78. Berthold J, Desbrieres J, Rinaudo M, Salmén L (1994) Types of adsorbed water in relation to the ionic groups and their counter-ions for some cellulose derivatives. Polymer 35(26):5729–573610.1016/S0032-3861(05)80048-5 ↗
79. Uetani K, Yano H (2012) Zeta potential time dependence reveals the swelling dynamics of wood cellulose nanofibrils. Langmuir 28(1):818–827. doi: 10.1021/la203404g10.1021/la203404g ↗
80. Cuissinat C, Navard P (2008) Swelling and dissolution of cellulose, part III: plant fibres in aqueous systems. Cellulose 15(1):67–74. doi: 10.1007/s10570-007-9158-410.1007/s10570-007-9158-4 ↗
81. Fahlén J, Salmén L (2003) Cross-sectional structure of the secondary wall of wood fibers as affected by processing. J Mater Sci 38(1):119–126. doi: 10.1023/A:102117411846810.1023/A:1021174118468 ↗
82. Wan J, Wang Y, Xiao Q (2010) Effects of hemicellulose removal on cellulose fiber structure and recycling characteristics of eucalyptus pulp. Bioresour Technol 101(12):4577–4583. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.02610.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.026 ↗
83. Roberts V, Stein V, Reiner T, Lemonidou A, Li X, Lercher JA (2011) Towards quantitative catalytic lignin depolymerization. Chem Eur J 17(21):5939–5948. doi: 10.1002/chem.20100243810.1002/chem.201002438 ↗
84. Cousins WJ (1976) Elastic-modulus of lignin as related to moisture-content. Wood Sci Technol 10(1):9–1710.1007/BF00376380 ↗
85. Schuerch C (1952) The solvent properties of liquids and their relation to the solubility, swelling, isolation and fractionation of lignin. J Am Chem Soc 74(20):5061–5067. doi: 10.1021/ja01140a02010.1021/ja01140a020 ↗
86. Eriksson I, Haglind I, Lidbrandt O, Sahnén L (1991) Fiber swelling favoured by lignin softening. Wood Sci Technol 25(2):135–144. doi: 10.1007/bf0022681310.1007/bf00226813 ↗
87. Antonsson S (2007) The Use of lignin derivatives to improve selected paper properties. Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
88. Barnett JR, Bonham VA (2004) Cellulose microfibril angle in the cell wall of wood fibres. Biol Rev 79(2):461–472. doi: 10.1017/S146479310300637710.1017/S1464793103006377 ↗
89. Meylan BA, Butterfield BG (1978) Helical orientation of the microfibrils in tracheids, fibres and vessels. Wood Sci Technol 12(3):219–222. doi: 10.1007/BF0037286710.1007/BF00372867 ↗
90. Andersson S, Serimaa R, Torkkeli M, Paakkari T, Saranpää P, Pesonen E (2000) Microfibril angle of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] compression wood: comparison of measuring techniques. J Wood Sci 46(5):343–349. doi: 10.1007/bf0077639410.1007/bf00776394 ↗
91. Leonardon M, Altaner CM, Vihermaa L, Jarvis MC (2010) Wood shrinkage: influence of anatomy, cell wall architecture, chemical composition and cambial age. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 68(1):87–94. doi: 10.1007/s00107-009-0355-810.1007/s00107-009-0355-8 ↗
92. Reiterer A, Jakob HF, Stanzl-Tschegg SE, Fratzl P (1998) Spiral angle of elementary cellulose fibrils in cell walls of Picea abies determined by small-angle X-ray scattering. Wood Sci Technol 32(5):335–345. doi: 10.1007/bf0070279010.1007/bf00702790 ↗
93. Sahlberg U, Salmén L, Oscarsson A (1997) The fibrillar orientation in the S2-layer of wood fibres as determined by X-ray diffraction analysis. Wood Sci Technol 31(2):77–86. doi: 10.1007/bf0070592310.1007/bf00705923 ↗
94. Donaldson L, Xu P (2005) Microfibril orientation across the secondary cell wall of Radiata pine tracheids. Trees 19(6):644–653. doi: 10.1007/s00468-005-0428-110.1007/s00468-005-0428-1 ↗
95. Vainio A, Sirvio M, Paulapuro H (2007) Observations on the microfibril angle of Finnish papermaking fibres. In: 61st Appita annual conference and exhibition, Gold Coast, Australia 6–9 May 2007: Proceedings, 2007. Appita Inc., p 397
96. Courchene CE, Peter GF, Litvay J (2006) Cellulose microfibril angle as a determinant of paper strength and hygroexpansivity in Pinus taeda L. Wood Fiber Sci 38(1):112–120
97. Burgert I, Frühmann K, Keckes J, Fratzl P, Stanzl-Tschegg S (2004) Structure–function relationships of four compression wood types: micromechanical properties at the tissue and fibre level. Trees 18(4):480–485. doi: 10.1007/s00468-004-0334-y10.1007/s00468-004-0334-y ↗
98. Eder M, Jungnikl K, Burgert I (2008) A close-up view of wood structure and properties across a growth ring of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L] Karst.). Trees 23(1):79–84. doi: 10.1007/s00468-008-0256-110.1007/s00468-008-0256-1 ↗
99. Gindl W, Gupta HS, Schöberl T, Lichtenegger HC, Fratzl P (2004) Mechanical properties of spruce wood cell walls by nanoindentation. Appl Phys A 79(8):2069–2073. doi: 10.1007/s00339-004-2864-y10.1007/s00339-004-2864-y ↗
100. Jäger A, Bader T, Hofstetter K, Eberhardsteiner J (2011) The relation between indentation modulus, microfibril angle, and elastic properties of wood cell walls. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 42(6):677–685. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.02.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2011.02.007 ↗