Mechanical behavior of mycelium-based particulate composites
Source abstract
Abstract
This work investigates the mechanical behavior of mycelium composites reinforced with biodegradable agro-waste particles. In the composite, the mycelium acts as a supportive matrix which binds reinforcing particles within its filamentous network structure. The compressive behavior of mycelium composites is investigated using an integrated experimental and computational approach. The experimental results indicate that the composite mimics the soft elastic response of pure mycelium at small strains and demonstrates marked stiffening at larger strains due to the densification of stiff particles. The composite also exhibits the characteristic stress softening effect and hysteresis under cyclic compression previously observed for pure mycelium. To gain further insight into the composite behavior, a three-dimensional finite element model based on numerical homogenization technique is presented. Model validation is performed by direct comparison with experiments, and a parametric study of the effect of mycelium density and particle size is discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies · Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Shao Z, Vollrath F (2002) Materials: surprising strength of silkworm silk. Nature 418:74110.1038/418741a ↗
2. Gibson LJ (1985) The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. J Biomech 18:317–32810.1016/0021-9290(85)90287-8 ↗
3. Dixon PG, Gibson LJ (2014) The structure and mechanics of Moso bamboo material. J R Soc Interface 11:2014032110.1098/rsif.2014.0321 ↗
4. Lynch B, Bancelin S, Bonod-Bidaud C, Gueusquin J-B, Ruggiero F, Schanne-Klein M-C, Allain J-M (2017) A novel microstructural interpretation for the biomechanics of mouse skin derived from multiscale characterization. Acta Biomater 50:302–31110.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.051 ↗
5. Wegst UG, Bai H, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Ritchie RO (2015) Bioinspired structural materials. Nat Mater 14:23–3610.1038/nmat4089 ↗
6. Fricker M, Boddy L, Bebber D (2007) Network organisation of mycelial fungi. In: Howard RJ, Gow NAR (eds) Biology of the fungal cell. Springer, Berlin, pp 309–33010.1007/978-3-540-70618-2_13 ↗
7. Michalenko G, Hohl H, Rast D (1976) Chemistry and architecture of the mycelial wall of Agaricus bisporus. Microbiology 92:251–262
8. Howard RJ, Ferrari MA, Roach DH, Money NP (1991) Penetration of hard substrates by a fungus employing enormous turgor pressures. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88:11281–1128410.1073/pnas.88.24.11281 ↗
9. Islam M, Tudryn G, Bucinell R, Schadler L, Picu RC (2017) Morphology and mechanics of fungal mycelium. Sci Rep 7:13070-1–13070-12
10. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1999) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
11. Kim OV, Litvinov RI, Weisel JW, Alber MS (2014) Structural basis for the nonlinear mechanics of fibrin networks under compression. Biomaterials 35:6739–674910.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.056 ↗
12. Dorfmann A, Ogden RW (2004) A constitutive model for the Mullins effect with permanent set in particle-reinforced rubber. Int J Solids Struct 41:1855–187810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.11.014 ↗
13. Mullins L (1969) Softening of rubber by deformation. Rubber Chem Technol 42:339–36210.5254/1.3539210 ↗
14. Holt G, Mcintyre G, Flagg D, Bayer E, Wanjura J, Pelletier M (2012) Fungal mycelium and cotton plant materials in the manufacture of biodegradable molded packaging material: evaluation study of select blends of cotton byproducts. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 6:431–43910.1166/jbmb.2012.1241 ↗
15. Travaglini S, Noble J, Ross P, Dharan C (2013) Mycology matrix composites. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Composites—28th technical conference, State College, PA, pp 1–20
16. Yang Z, Zhang F, Still B, White M, Amstislavski P (2017) Physical and mechanical properties of fungal mycelium-based biofoam. J Mater Civ Eng 29:04017030-1–04017030-9
17. Hill R (1963) Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. J Mech Phys Solids 11:357–37210.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X ↗
18. Kanit T, Forest S, Galliet I, Mounoury V, Jeulin D (2003) Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random composites: statistical and numerical approach. Int J Solids Struct 40:3647–367910.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-4 ↗
19. Islam MR, Tudryn G, Bucinell R, Schadler L, Picu RC (2018) Stochastic continuum model for mycelium-based bio-foam. Mater Design (submitted)10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.046 ↗
20. https://grow.bio/collections/shop/products/hemp-mycelium-material?ref=ecovativeshop (2018)
21. Islam M, Tudryn GJ, Picu RC (2016) Microstructure modeling of random composites with cylindrical inclusions having high volume fraction and broad aspect ratio distribution. Comput Mater Sci 125:309–31810.1016/j.commatsci.2016.08.051 ↗
22. Evans JW (1993) Random and cooperative sequential adsorption. Rev Mod Phys 65:1281–132910.1103/RevModPhys.65.1281 ↗
23. Version A, 6.13 (2013) Analysis User’s Manual. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp, Providence
24. Kari S, Berger H, Rodriguez-Ramos R, Gabbert U (2007) Computational evaluation of effective material properties of composites reinforced by randomly distributed spherical particles. Compos Struct 77:223–23110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.003 ↗
25. http://www.simmetrix.com/products/SimulationModelingSuite/MeshSim/MeshSim.html
26. Zhao L, Schaefer D, Xu H, Modi SJ, LaCourse WR, Marten MR (2005) Elastic properties of the cell wall of Aspergillus nidulans studied with atomic force microscopy. Biotechnol Prog 21:292–29910.1021/bp0497233 ↗
27. Ifuku S, Saimoto H (2012) Chitin nanofibers: preparations, modifications, and applications. Nanoscale 4:3308–331810.1039/c2nr30383c ↗
28. Storåkers B (1986) On material representation and constitutive branching in finite compressible elasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 34:125–14510.1016/0022-5096(86)90033-5 ↗
29. Ogden R, Roxburgh D (1999) A pseudo–elastic model for the Mullins effect in filled rubber. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 455:2861–287710.1098/rspa.1999.0431 ↗
30. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1963) A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. J Mech Phys Solids 11:127–14010.1016/0022-5096(63)90060-7 ↗