Research progress of starch-based biodegradable materials: a review
Source abstract
Abstract
With the enhancement of global environmental protection awareness, new eco-friendly packaging materials have gained more and more attention since the new century. Starch is one of the most potential natural biodegradable materials due to its abundant source, low price, and completely degradable characteristics. Starch-based materials with excellent biodegradability can be widely used by improving their properties. This review starts with the structure of starch and summarizes its phase transition during processing related to the packaging materials. Then, we expound on the development stage of starch-based biodegradable materials and starch modification. This part focuses on the research of starch-based composites formed by starch derivatives, including nano-starch. Besides, extrusion molding and other modern molding methods are described in detail. Through the systematic elaboration of the above contents, the connection among structure, phase transition, and processing can be found, which can better broaden the application of starch-based biodegradable materials. Finally, various applications of starch-based materials and prospects for its future research are discussed. It is hoped to provide the basic theory and reference for the research of starch-based biodegradable materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Food composition and properties · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Polman EMN, Gruter G-JM, Parsons JR, Tietema A (2021) Comparison of the aerobic biodegradation of biopolymers and the corresponding bioplastics: A review. Sci Total Environ 753:141953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14195310.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141953 ↗
2. Kakadellis S, Harris ZM (2020) Don’t scrap the waste: The need for broader system boundaries in bioplastic food packaging life-cycle assessment - A critical review. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12283110.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122831 ↗
3. Zuo Y, He X, Li P et al (2019) Preparation and characterization of hydrophobically grafted starches by in situ solid phase polymerization. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1101007210.3390/polym11010072 ↗
4. Punia S (2020) Barley starch: Structure, properties and in vitro digestibility - A review. Int J Biol Macromol 155:868–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.21910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.219 ↗
5. Abdullah ZW, Dong Y (2018) Recent advances and perspectives on starch nanocomposites for packaging applications. J Mater Sci 53:15319–15339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2613-910.1007/s10853-018-2613-9 ↗
6. Baldwin PM (2001) Starch granule-associated proteins and polypeptides: A review. Starch-Starke 53:475–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-379x(200110)53:10%3c475::Aid-star475%3e3.0.Co;2-e10.1002/1521-379x(200110)53:10<475::Aid-star475>3.0.Co;2-e ↗
7. Buléon A, Colonna P, Planchot V, Ball S (1998) Starch granules: Structure and biosynthesis. Int J Biol Macromol 23:85–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-8130(98)00040-310.1016/S0141-8130(98)00040-3 ↗
8. Thakur R, Pristijono P, Scarlett CJ et al (2019) Starch-based films: Major factors affecting their properties. Int J Biol Macromol 132:1079–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.19010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.190 ↗
9. Takeda Y, Shitaozono T, Hizukuri S (1990) Structures of sub-fractions of corn amylose. Carbohydr Res 199:207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(90)84262-S10.1016/0008-6215(90)84262-S ↗
10. Rostamabadi H, Falsafi SR, Jafari SM (2019) Starch-based nanocarriers as cutting-edge natural cargos for nutraceutical delivery. Trends Food Sci Technol 88:397–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.00410.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.004 ↗
11. Meimoun J, Wiatz V, Saint-Loup R et al (2018) Modification of starch by graft copolymerization. Starch/Staerke 70:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.20160035110.1002/star.201600351 ↗
12. Cheetham NWH, Tao L (1998) Variation in crystalline type with amylose content in maize starch granules: an X-ray powder diffraction study. Carbohydr Polym 36:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(98)00007-110.1016/S0144-8617(98)00007-1 ↗
13. Jenkins PJ, Donald AM (1995) The influence of amylose on starch granule structure. Int J Biol Macromol 17:315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-8130(96)81838-110.1016/0141-8130(96)81838-1 ↗
14. Kim H-Y, Park SS, Lim S-T (2015) Preparation, characterization and utilization of starch nanoparticles. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 126:607–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.11.01110.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.11.011 ↗
15. Tester RF, Karkalas J, Qi X (2004) Starch—composition, fine structure and architecture. J Cereal Sci 39:151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2003.12.00110.1016/j.jcs.2003.12.001 ↗
16. Zobel HF (1988) Starch Crystal Transformations and Their Industrial Importance. Starch - Stärke 40:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.1988040010210.1002/star.19880400102 ↗
17. Matignon A, Tecante A (2017) Starch retrogradation: From starch components to cereal products. Food Hydrocoll 68:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.10.03210.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.10.032 ↗
18. Putseys JA, Lamberts L, Delcour JA (2010) Amylose-inclusion complexes: Formation, identity and physico-chemical properties. J Cereal Sci 51:238–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2010.01.01110.1016/j.jcs.2010.01.011 ↗
19. Waigh TA, Perry P, Riekel C et al (1998) Chiral side-chain liquid-crystalline polymeric properties of starch. Macromolecules 31:7980–7984. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma971859c10.1021/ma971859c ↗
20. Pérez S, Baldwin PM, Gallant DJ (2009) Chapter 5 - Structural Features of Starch Granules I. In: Third E (ed) BeMiller J, Whistler RBT-S. Food Science and Technology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 149–192
21. Gallant DJ, Bouchet B, Baldwin PM (1997) Microscopy of starch: evidence of a new level of granule organization. Carbohydr Polym 32:177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(97)00008-810.1016/S0144-8617(97)00008-8 ↗
22. Song S, Wang C, Pan Z, Wang X (2008) Preparation and characterization of amphiphilic starch nanocrystals. J Appl Polym Sci 107:418–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2707610.1002/app.27076 ↗
23. Jayakody L, Hoover R (2002) The effect of lintnerization on cereal starch granules. Food Res Int 35:665–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(01)00204-610.1016/S0963-9969(01)00204-6 ↗
24. Gérard C, Colonna P, Buléon A, Planchot V (2002) Order in maize mutant starches revealed by mild acid hydrolysis. Carbohydr Polym 48:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(01)00219-310.1016/S0144-8617(01)00219-3 ↗
25. Wei BX, Hu XT, Li HY et al (2014) Effect of pHs on dispersity of maize starch nanocrystals in aqueous medium. Food Hydrocoll 36:369–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.08.01510.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.08.015 ↗
26. LeCorre D, Bras J, Dufresne A (2011) Influence of botanic origin and amylose content on the morphology of starch nanocrystals. J Nanoparticle Res 13:7193–7208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0634-210.1007/s11051-011-0634-2 ↗
27. Liao LS, Liu HS, Liu XX et al (2014) Development of microstructures and phase transitions of starch. Acta Polym Sin. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.J.1105.2014.1345010.3724/sp.J.1105.2014.13450 ↗
28. Zhu J, Chen H, Lu K et al (2020) Recent progress on starch-based biodegradable materials. Acta Polym Sin 51:983–995. https://doi.org/10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2020.2008910.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2020.20089 ↗
29. Wang SJ, Copeland L (2013) Molecular disassembly of starch granules during gelatinization and its effect on starch digestibility: a review. Food Funct 4:1564–1580. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fo60258c10.1039/c3fo60258c ↗
30. Matveev YI, Van Soest JJG, Nieman C et al (2001) Relationship between thermodynamic and structural properties of low and high amylose maize starches. Carbohydr Polym 44:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00211-310.1016/S0144-8617(00)00211-3 ↗
31. Liu H, Yu L, Xie F, Chen L (2006) Gelatinization of cornstarch with different amylose/amylopectin content. Carbohydr Polym 65:357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.01.02610.1016/j.carbpol.2006.01.026 ↗
32. Burros BC, Young LA, Carroad PA (1987) Kinetics of corn meal gelatinization at high temperature and low moisture. J Food Sci 52:1372–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb14085.x10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb14085.x ↗
33. Ottenhof M-A, Farhat IA (2004) Starch retrogradation. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 21:215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2004.1064805610.1080/02648725.2004.10648056 ↗
34. Buleon A, Veronese G, Putaux JL (2007) Self-association and crystallization of amylose. Aust J Chem 60:706–718. https://doi.org/10.1071/ch0716810.1071/ch07168 ↗
35. Kalichevsky MT, Ring SG (1987) Incompatibility of amylose and amylopectin in aqueous solution. Carbohydr Res 162:323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(87)80229-X10.1016/0008-6215(87)80229-X ↗
36. Fu Z, Wang L, Li D et al (2013) The effect of partial gelatinization of corn starch on its retrogradation. Carbohydr Polym 97:512–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.08910.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.089 ↗
37. Doona CJ, Feeherry FE, Baik M-Y (2006) Water dynamics and retrogradation of ultrahigh pressurized wheat starch. J Agric Food Chem 54:6719–6724. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf061104h10.1021/jf061104h ↗
38. Fisher DK, Thompson DB (1997) Retrogradation of maize starch after thermal treatment within and above the gelatinization temperature range. Cereal Chem 74:344–351. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.1997.74.3.34410.1094/CCHEM.1997.74.3.344 ↗
39. Liu X, Yu L, Xie F et al (2010) Kinetics and mechanism of thermal decomposition of cornstarches with different amylose/amylopectin ratios. Starch/Staerke 62:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.20090020210.1002/star.200900202 ↗
40. Liu X, Yu L, Liu H et al (2009) Thermal decomposition of corn starch with different Amylose/Amylopectin ratios in open and sealed systems. Cereal Chem 86:383–385. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-86-4-038310.1094/CCHEM-86-4-0383 ↗
41. Liu X, Yu L, Liu H et al (2008) In situ thermal decomposition of starch with constant moisture in a sealed system. Polym Degrad Stab 93:260–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.09.00410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.09.004 ↗
42. Li Z, Wei C (2020) Morphology, structure, properties and applications of starch ghost: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 163:2084–2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.07710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.077 ↗
43. Atkin NJ, Abeysekera RM, Robards AW (1998) The events leading to the formation of ghost remnants from the starch granule surface and the contribution of the granule surface to the gelatinization endotherm. Carbohydr Polym 36:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(98)00002-210.1016/S0144-8617(98)00002-2 ↗
44. Adler J, Baldwin PM, Melia CD (1995) Starch damage part 2: types of damage in ball-milled potato starch, upon hydration observed by confocal microscopy. Starch - Stärke 47:252–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.1995047070310.1002/star.19950470703 ↗
45. Liu H, Eskin NAM, Cui SW (2003) Interaction of wheat and rice starches with yellow mustard mucilage. Food Hydrocoll 17:863–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00107-310.1016/S0268-005X(03)00107-3 ↗
46. Garcia-Hernandez A, Vernon-Carter EJ, Alvarez-Ramirez J (2017) Impact of ghosts on the mechanical, optical, and barrier properties of corn starch films. Starch - Stärke 69:1600308. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.20160030810.1002/star.201600308 ↗
47. Gómez-Luría D, Vernon-Carter EJ, Alvarez-Ramirez J (2017) Films from corn, wheat, and rice starch ghost phase fractions display overall superior performance than whole starch films. Starch - Stärke 69:1700059. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.20170005910.1002/star.201700059 ↗
48. Jin Z, Wang Y, Li X et al (2019) Research progress on starch-based biodegradable materials. J Chinese Inst Food Sci Technol 19:1–7
49. Zhengwei Z, Penggang R (2008) Research status of starch-based biodegradable plastic. Mater Rev 22:44–47
50. Gómez-Aldapa CA, Velazquez G, Gutierrez MC et al (2020) Effect of polyvinyl alcohol on the physicochemical properties of biodegradable starch films. Mater Chem Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12202710.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122027 ↗
51. Mohammadi Nafchi A, Moradpour M, Saeidi M, Alias A (2013) Thermoplastic starches: Properties, challenges, and prospects. Starch-Starke 65:61–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.20120020110.1002/star.201200201 ↗
52. Zhang KY, Ran XH, Wu H et al (2009) Preparation and characterization of a novel thermoplastic starch using dimethyl sulfoxide as the plasticizer. Chem J Chinese Univ 30:1662–1667
53. Borowski G, Klepka T, Pawłowska M et al (2020) Effect of flax fibers addition on the mechanical properties and biodegradability of biocomposites based on thermoplastic starch. Arch Environ Prot 46:74–82. https://doi.org/10.24425/aep.2020.13347710.24425/aep.2020.133477 ↗
54. Tajuddin S, Xie F, Nicholson TM et al (2011) Rheological properties of thermoplastic starch studied by multipass rheometer. Carbohydr Polym 83:914–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.07310.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.073 ↗
55. Zhou W, Zha D, Zhang X et al (2020) Ordered long polyvinyl alcohol fiber-reinforced thermoplastic starch composite having comparable mechanical properties with polyethylene and polypropylene. Carbohydr Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11691310.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116913 ↗
56. Yimnak K, Thipmanee R, Sane A (2020) Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)/thermoplastic starch/zeolite 5A films: Effects of compounding sequence and plasticizer content. Int J Biol Macromol 164:1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.16910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.169 ↗
57. Sweedman MC, Tizzotti MJ, Schäfer C, Gilbert RG (2013) Structure and physicochemical properties of octenyl succinic anhydride modified starches: A review. Carbohydr Polym 92:905–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.04010.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.040 ↗
58. Majzoobi M, Kaveh Z, Blanchard CL, Farahnaky A (2015) Physical properties of pregelatinized and granular cold water swelling maize starches in presence of acetic acid. Food Hydrocoll 51:375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.06.00210.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.06.002 ↗
59. El Halal SLM, Colussi R, Pinto VZ et al (2015) Structure, morphology and functionality of acetylated and oxidised barley starches. Food Chem 168:247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.04610.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.046 ↗
60. Deka D, Sit N (2016) Dual modification of taro starch by microwave and other heat moisture treatments. Int J Biol Macromol 92:416–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.07.04010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.07.040 ↗
61. Ashogbon AO, Akintayo ET (2014) Recent trend in the physical and chemical modification of starches from different botanical sources: A review. Starch-Starke 66:41–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.20130010610.1002/star.201300106 ↗
62. Diao X, Weng Y (2017) Research progress and industrial present status of starch-based plastics. China Plast 31:22–29
63. Punia S (2020) Barley starch modifications: physical, chemical and enzymatic - a review. Int J Biol Macromol 144:578–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.08810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.088 ↗
64. Shanhai D, Daqing XU, Ming M et al (2007) Review on advance of modified starch based on physical methods. Food Sci 28:361–366
65. Kirsh I, Frolova Y, Bannikova O et al (2020) Research of the influence of the ultrasonic treatment on the melts of the polymeric compositions for the creation of packaging materials with antimicrobial properties and biodegradability. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1202027510.3390/polym12020275 ↗
66. Kapelko M, Ziȩba T, Michalski A, Gryszkin A (2015) Effect of cross-linking degree on selected properties of retrograded starch adipate. Food Chem 167:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.09610.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.096 ↗
67. Franssen MCR, Boeriu CG (2014) Chemically Modified Starch. Their Synthesis and Characterization. Elsevier B.V, Allyl- and Epoxy-Starch Derivatives
68. Cysewski P, Gackowska A, Gaca J (2006) Experimental and theoretical studies on formation and degradation of chloro organic compounds. Chemosphere 63:165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.06.06110.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.06.061 ↗
69. Ratnayake WS, Jackson DS (2008) Chapter 5 starch gelatinization. Adv Food Nutr Res 55:221–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-4526(08)00405-110.1016/S1043-4526(08)00405-1 ↗
70. Zhong K, Lin ZT, Zheng XL et al (2013) Starch derivative-based superabsorbent with integration of water-retaining and controlled-release fertilizers. Carbohydr Polym 92:1367–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.03010.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.030 ↗
71. Mehfooz T, Ali TM, Hasnain A (2019) Effect of cross-linking on characteristics of succinylated and oxidized barley starch. J Food Meas Charact 13:1058–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-018-00021-310.1007/s11694-018-00021-3 ↗
72. Congming X (2013) Current advances of chemical and physical starch-based hydrogels. Starch/Staerke 65:82–8810.1002/star.201200113 ↗
73. Yu C, Tang XZ, Liu SW et al (2018) Laponite crosslinked starch/polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels by freezing/thawing process and studying their cadmium ion absorption. Int J Biol Macromol 117:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.15910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.159 ↗
74. Arora B, Yoon A, Sriram M et al (2020) Reactive extrusion: A review of the physicochemical changes in food systems. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.10242910.1016/j.ifset.2020.102429 ↗
75. Xie FW, Yu L, Liu HS, Chen L (2006) Starch modification using reactive extrusion. Starch-Starke 58:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.20050040710.1002/star.200500407 ↗
76. Moad G (2011) Chemical modification of starch by reactive extrusion. Prog Polym Sci 36:218–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.002 ↗
77. Rodriguez Llanos JH, Tadini CC, Gastaldi E (2021) New strategies to fabricate starch/chitosan-based composites by extrusion. J Food Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.11022410.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110224 ↗
78. Yang J, Li F, Li M et al (2017) Fabrication and characterization of hollow starch nanoparticles by gelation process for drug delivery application. Carbohydr Polym 173:223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.00610.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.006 ↗
79. Oliyaei N, Moosavi-Nasab M, Tamaddon AM, Fazaeli M (2020) Encapsulation of fucoxanthin in binary matrices of porous starch and halloysite. Food Hydrocoll 100:105458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.10545810.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105458 ↗
80. Li Y, Zhao X, Wang L et al (2018) Preparation, characterization and in vitro evaluation of melatonin-loaded porous starch for enhanced bioavailability. Carbohydr Polym 202:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.12710.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.127 ↗
81. Chin SF, Yazid S, Pang SC (2014) Preparation and characterization of starch nanoparticles for controlled release of curcumin. Int J Polym Sci 2014:8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/34012110.1155/2014/340121 ↗
82. Pérez-Masiá R, López-Nicolás R, Periago MJ et al (2015) Encapsulation of folic acid in food hydrocolloids through nanospray drying and electrospraying for nutraceutical applications. Food Chem 168:124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.05110.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.051 ↗
83. Kong L, Ziegler GR (2014) Fabrication of pure starch fibers by electrospinning. Food Hydrocoll 36:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.08.02110.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.08.021 ↗
84. Haaj SB, Magnin A, Petrier C, Boufi S (2013) Starch nanoparticles formation via high power ultrasonication. Carbohydr Polym 92:1625–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.02210.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.022 ↗
85. Chin SF, Pang SC, Tay SH (2011) Size controlled synthesis of starch nanoparticles by a simple nanoprecipitation method. Carbohydr Polym 86:1817–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.01210.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.012 ↗
86. Boufi S, Bel Haaj S, Magnin A et al (2018) Ultrasonic assisted production of starch nanoparticles: Structural characterization and mechanism of disintegration. Ultrason Sonochem 41:327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.09.03310.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.09.033 ↗
87. Lan X, Xie S, Wu J et al (2016) Thermal and enzymatic degradation induced ultrastructure changes in canna starch: Further insights into short-range and long-range structural orders. Food Hydrocoll 58:335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.02.01810.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.02.018 ↗
88. Ashogbon AO (2020) Dual modification of various starches: Synthesis, properties and applications. Food Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.12832510.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128325 ↗
89. Virtanen T, Autio K, Suortti T, Poutanen K (1993) Heat-induced changes in native and acid-modified oat starch pastes. J Cereal Sci 17:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1993.101410.1006/jcrs.1993.1014 ↗
90. Wang LF, Wang YJ (2001) Structures and physicochemical properties of acid-thinned corn, potato and rice starches. Starch-Starke 53:570–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-379x(200111)53:11%3c570::Aid-star570%3e3.0.Co;2-s10.1002/1521-379x(200111)53:11<570::Aid-star570>3.0.Co;2-s ↗
91. You S, Izydorczyk MS (2007) Comparison of the physicochemical properties of barley starches after partial α-amylolysis and acid/alcohol hydrolysis. Carbohydr Polym 69:489–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.01.00210.1016/j.carbpol.2007.01.002 ↗
92. Li Y, Li C, Gu Z et al (2017) Effect of modification with 1,4-α-glucan branching enzyme on the rheological properties of cassava starch. Int J Biol Macromol 103:630–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.04510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.045 ↗
93. Dey A, Sit N (2017) Modification of foxtail millet starch by combining physical, chemical and enzymatic methods. Int J Biol Macromol 95:314–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.06710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.067 ↗
94. Li H, Gui Y, Li J et al (2020) Modification of rice starch using a combination of autoclaving and triple enzyme treatment: Structural, physicochemical and digestibility properties. Int J Biol Macromol 144:500–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.11210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.112 ↗
95. Guo L, Tao H, Cui B, Janaswamy S (2019) The effects of sequential enzyme modifications on structural and physicochemical properties of sweet potato starch granules. Food Chem 277:504–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.01410.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.014 ↗
96. Sun J, He R-M, Gao F-Y et al (2019) High-efficient preparation of cross-linked cassava starch by microwave-ultrasound-assisted and its physicochemical properties. Starch - Stärke 71:1800273. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.20180027310.1002/star.201800273 ↗
97. Benavent-Gil Y, Rosell CM (2017) Comparison of porous starches obtained from different enzyme types and levels. Carbohydr Polym 157:533–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.04710.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.047 ↗
98. Jumaidin R, Khiruddin MAA, Asyul Sutan Saidi Z et al (2020) Effect of cogon grass fibre on the thermal, mechanical and biodegradation properties of thermoplastic cassava starch biocomposite. Int J Biol Macromol 146:746–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.01110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.011 ↗
99. El Halal SLM, Colussi R, Biduski B et al (2017) Morphological, mechanical, barrier and properties of films based on acetylated starch and cellulose from barley. J Sci Food Agric 97:411–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.777310.1002/jsfa.7773 ↗
100. Sharma R, Jafari SM, Sharma S (2020) Antimicrobial bio-nanocomposites and their potential applications in food packaging. Food Control 112:107086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.10708610.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107086 ↗