Direct assembly process: a novel fabrication technique for large strain ionic polymer transducers
Source abstract
Abstract
Ionic polymer transducers (IPT) consist of an ion-exchange membrane plated with flexible conductive electrodes on their outer surface. Compared to other types of electromechanical transducers, ionomeric transducers have the advantage of high-strain output (>9%), low-voltage operation (<5 V), and high sensitivity in the charge-sensing mode. A novel fabrication technique for ionic polymer transducers named the Direct Assembly Process (DAP) was developed in this paper. The DAP allows the use of any type of ionomer, diluent, and conducting powder in the transducer, and permits the exploration of any novel ionomeric design. In this paper the effect of diluent content of the IPT, electrode thickness, and composition were optimized in term of maximum peak strain and strain rate generated by an IPT. Decreasing viscosity and increasing polarity and content of the diluent were demonstrated to increase the strain rate of an IPT. The thickness of the electrode was varied and correlated with the maximum strain generated due to a 2 V step input. This study also demonstrated that RuO2 composition has an optimal loading of 42 vol%, while SWNT electrodes have an optimal performance at around 30 vol%.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dielectric materials and actuators · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Shahinpour M, Bar-Cohen Y, Simpson JO, Smith J (1998) Smart Mater Struct 7(6):R1510.1088/0964-1726/7/6/001 ↗
2. Sadeghipour K, Salomon R, Neogi S (1992) Smart Mater Struct 1:344510.1088/0964-1726/1/2/012 ↗
3. Oguro K, Kawami Y, Takenaka H (1992) J Micromachine Soc 5:27
4. Akle JB, Bennett M, Leo JD (2006) Sensor Actuat A Phys 126(1):17310.1016/j.sna.2005.09.006 ↗
5. Kim K, Shahinpoor M (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12(1):6510.1088/0964-1726/12/1/308 ↗
6. Akle B, Hickner M, Leo D, Mcgrath J (2005) J Mater Sci 40:371510.1007/s10853-005-3312-x ↗
7. Nemat-Nasser S (2002) J Appl Phys 92(5):289910.1063/1.1495888 ↗
8. Oguro K, Fujiwara N, Asaka K, Onishi K, Sewa S (1999) In: Proceeding of the SPIE smart structures and materials conference, vol 3669, pp 63–7110.1117/12.349698 ↗
9. Leo D, Farinholt K, Wallmersperger T (2005) In: Proceeding of the SPIE smart structures and materials conference, vol 5759, pp 170–18110.1117/12.599539 ↗
10. Kim K, Shahinpoor M (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12:6510.1088/0964-1726/12/1/308 ↗
11. Shahinpoor M, Kim K (2002) Sensor Actuat Phys 96:12510.1016/S0924-4247(01)00777-4 ↗
12. Shahinpoor M, Kim K (2002) Polymer J 43:79710.1016/S0032-3861(01)00648-6 ↗
13. Taegeun N, Yong Suk T, Jae-Do N, Jae Wook J, Hoon Mo K, Hyoukryeol C, Sang Sik B (2001) In: Proceeding of the SPIE smart structures and materials conference, vol 4329, pp 458–465
14. Akle B (2005) PhD Thesis, Virginia Tech
15. Akle B, Leo D (2006) Sensor Atuat Phys (in press)
16. Akle JB, Leo JD. J Intel Mat Syst Str (to appear)
17. Supriya L, Akle B, Leo D, Claus R (2005) IEEE Sensors J (in press)
18. Bennett M, Leo D (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12:42410.1088/0964-1726/12/3/314 ↗
19. Tamagawa H, Nogata F, Watanabe T, Abe A, Yagasaki K, Jin JY (2003) J Mater Sci 38:103910.1023/A:1022349914317 ↗
20. Bonhote P, Paula Dias A, Papageorgiou N, Kalyanasundaram K, Gratzel M (1996) Inorg Chem 35:116810.1021/ic951325x ↗
21. Bennett M, Leo D (2004) Sensor Actuat Phys 115:7910.1016/j.sna.2004.03.043 ↗
22. Stauffer D, Aharony A (1992) Introduction to percolation theory, vol 4. Taylor and Francis, London
23. Bennett M, Leo D (2005) In: Proceeding of the SPIE smart structures and materials conference, vol 5759, pp 506–51710.1117/12.599849 ↗
24. Endo M, Takeda T, Kim YJ, Koshiba K, Ishii K (2001) Carbon Sci 1:117