journal article·2007-06

Effect of microstructure on the modulus of PAN-based carbon fibers during high temperature treatment and hot stretching graphitization

Dongfeng Li, Haojing Wang, Xinkui Wang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The changes of microstructure and Young’s modulus of PAN-based carbon fibers during the high temperature treatment (2400–3000 °C, stretching 0%) and hot stretching graphitization (0–5%, 2400 °C) were compared. It was observed that although the Young’s modulus of the fibers could be increased by the two graphitization techniques, the microstructure parameters determined by X-ray diffraction were different for the same value of modulus. The relationship between microstructure and modulus showed that Young’s modulus not only depended on the preferred orientation, but also related to the crystallite size (L c and L a) and shape (L a/L c). On the other hand, it was found that crystallite size of the fibers was mainly affected by heat treatment temperature and the crystallite shape could be altered by hot stretching graphitization. Further investigation indicated that the fibers were composed of turbostratic carbon structure even after heat treated to 3000 °C, which could be detected from the absence of 101 and 112 peaks in X-ray diffraction pattern, and the interlayer spacing (d002) and preferred orientation (Z) were only 0.3430 nm and 14.71°, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Graphene research and applications · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Chand S (2000) J Mater Sci 35:130310.1023/A:1004780301489 ↗
2. Rubin L (1993) In: Buckley JD, Edie DD (eds) Carbon–carbon materials and composites. Noyes publications, New Jersey, p 267
3. Chung DDL (1994) In: Carbon fiber composites. Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton, p 8110.1016/B978-0-08-050073-7.50009-9 ↗
4. Dorey G (1987) J Phys D: Appl Phys 20:24510.1088/0022-3727/20/3/002 ↗
5. Ozbek S, Isaac DH (1994) Mater Manuf Process 9:19910.1080/10426919408934899 ↗
6. Ozbek S, Isaac DH (2000) Carbon 38:200710.1016/S0008-6223(00)00060-9 ↗
7. Bacon R (1973) In: Walker PL Jr, Thrower PA (eds) Chemistry and physics of carbon, vol 9. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 1
8. Huang Y, Young RJ (1995) Carbon 33:9710.1016/0008-6223(94)00109-D ↗
9. Edie DD (1998) Carbon 36:34510.1016/S0008-6223(97)00185-1 ↗
10. Fitzer E (1989) Carbon 27:62110.1016/0008-6223(89)90197-8 ↗
11. Endo M (1988) J Mater Sci 23:59810.1007/BF01174692 ↗
12. Johnson DJ, Tyson CN (1969) J Appl Phys 2:787
13. Kogure K, Sines G, Gerard LJ (1994) Carbon 32:71510.1016/0008-6223(94)90094-9 ↗
14. Johnson DJ (1987) J Phys D: Appl Phys 20:28610.1088/0022-3727/20/3/007 ↗
15. Ogale AA, Lin C, Anderson DP, Kearns KM (2002) Carbon 40:130910.1016/S0008-6223(01)00300-1 ↗
16. Johnson DJ (1980) Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 294:44310.1098/rsta.1980.0053 ↗
17. Johnson DJ (1987) In: Walker PL Jr, Thrower PA (eds) Chemistry and physics of carbon, vol 20. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 1
18. Ruland W (1968) In: Walker PL Jr (ed) Chemistry and physics of carbon, vol 4. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 1
19. Cuesta A, Dhamelincout P, Laureyns A, Martinez-Alonso, Tascon JMD (1998) J Mater Chem 8:287510.1039/a805841e ↗
20. Jones SP, Fain CC, Fdid DD (1997) Carbon 35:153310.1016/S0008-6223(97)00106-1 ↗
21. Tuinstra F, Koenig JL (1970) J Chem Phys 53:112610.1063/1.1674108 ↗
22. Melanitis N, Tetlow PL, Galiotis C (1996) J Mater Sci 31:85110.1007/BF00352882 ↗
23. Murakami M, Nishiki N, Nakamura K, Ehara J, Okada H, Kouzaki T, Watanabe K, Hoshi T, Yoshimura S (1992) Carbon 30:25510.1016/0008-6223(92)90088-E ↗
24. Richards BP (1968) J Appl Crystallogr 1:3510.1107/S0021889868004978 ↗