journal article·2007-10

Characterization of starch based nanocomposites

Ingvild Kvien, Junji Sugiyama, Martin Votrubec, Kristiina Oksman

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

The goal of this study was to characterize the nanostructure and the properties of starch based nanocomposites with either cellulose nano whiskers (CNW) or layered silicates (LS) (synthetic hectorite) as reinforcements. Modified potato starch was used as matrix with water and sorbitol as plasticizers and with 5 wt.% of either of the reinforcements. Two methods were explored to prepare samples for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) examination; chemical fixation and freeze etching. It was possible to characterize the nanostructure both parallel and perpendicular to the nanocomposite surface by the freeze etching technique. Both nanocomposites showed well-distributed reinforcements in the starch matrix. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis showed that the storage modulus was significantly improved at elevated temperatures, especially for the layered silicate nanocomposite. Both nanocomposites showed a significant improvement in tensile properties compared to the pure matrix.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Mohanty AK, Drzal LT, Misra M (2003) Polym Mater Sci Eng 88:60
2. Lu Y, Weng L, Cao X (2006) Carbohydr Polym 63:19810.1016/j.carbpol.2005.08.027 ↗
3. Lu Y, Weng L, Cao X (2005) Macromol Biosci 5:110110.1002/mabi.200500094 ↗
4. Mathew AP, Dufresne A (2002) Biomacromolecules 3:60910.1021/bm0101769 ↗
5. Anglès MN, Dufresne A (2000) Macromolecules 33:834410.1021/ma0008701 ↗
6. Anglès MN, Dufresne A (2001) Macromolecules 34:292110.1021/ma001555h ↗
7. Liao H-T, Wu C-S (2005) J Appl Polym Sci 97:39710.1002/app.21763 ↗
8. Chen B, Evans JRG (2005) Carbohydr Polym 61:45510.1016/j.carbpol.2005.06.020 ↗
9. Chen M, Chen B, Evans JRG (2005) Nanotechnology 16:233410.1088/0957-4484/16/10/056 ↗
10. Pandey JK, Singh RP (2005) Starch/Stärke 57:810.1002/star.200400313 ↗
11. Park H-M, Lee W-K, Park C-Y, Cho W-J, Ha C-SJ (2003) J Mater Sci 38:909, DOI: 10.1023/A:102230870523110.1023/A:1022308705231 ↗
12. Wilhelm H-M, Sierakowski M-R, Souza GP, Wypych F (2003) Carbohydr Polym 52:10110.1016/S0144-8617(02)00239-4 ↗
13. Ray SS, Okamoto M (2003) Progr Polym Sci 28:153910.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002 ↗
14. Gluert AM (1975) Practical methods in electron microscopy. North Holland Publishing Company
15. Zhu Z, Cao S (2004) Text Res J 74(3):25310.1177/004051750407400312 ↗
16. Rindlav-Westling Å, Stading M, Gatenholm P (2002) Biomacromolecules 3:8410.1021/bm010114i ↗
17. Grote M (1992) Microsc Res Tech 21:24210.1002/jemt.1070210307 ↗
18. Sawyer LC, Grubb DT (1994) Polymer microscopy. Chapman and Hall, London
19. Jansson A, Järnström L (2005) Cellulose 12:2310.1007/s10570-004-6092-6 ↗
20. Bondeson D, Mathew A, Oksman K (2006) Cellulose 13(2):17110.1007/s10570-006-9061-4 ↗
21. Kvien I, Tanem BS, Oksman K (2005) Biomacromolecules 6(6):316010.1021/bm050479t ↗
22. Hermansson AM, Svegmark K (1996) Trends Food Sci Technol 7:34510.1016/S0924-2244(96)10036-4 ↗
23. Heux L, Chauve G, Bonini C (2000) Langmuir 16:821010.1021/la9913957 ↗
24. Gaudin S, Lourdin D, Forssell PM, Colonna P (2000) Carbohydr Polym 43:3310.1016/S0144-8617(99)00206-4 ↗
25. Butler MF, Cameron RE (2000) Polymer 41:224910.1016/S0032-3861(99)00366-3 ↗
26. Mathew AP, Dufresne A (2002) Biomacromolecules 3:110110.1021/bm020065p ↗