Strength degradation of glass fibers at high temperatures
Source abstract
Abstract
This article presents an experimental investigation into the effects of temperature and heating time on the tensile strength and failure mechanisms of glass fibers. The loss in strength of two glass fiber types (E-glass and Advantex®, a boron-free version of E-glass) was investigated at temperatures up to 650 °C and heating times up to 2 h. The tensile properties were measured by fiber bundle testing, and the maximum strength was found to be temperature and time dependent. The higher softening point of the Advantex® fibers is reflected in superior high-temperature performance. A phenomenological model is presented for calculating the residual strength of glass fiber bundles as functions of temperature and time. The strength reduction mechanism was determined by single-fiber testing. Fracture mirror sizes on the E-glass fibers were related to the fiber strength after high-temperature treatment. Based on fracture mirror measurements, it was established that (1) the mirror constant of the glass, which reflects the network structure, does not change during heat treatment and (2) the strength degradation is a result of larger surface flaws present after heat treatment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Feih S, Mathys Z, Gibson AG, Mouritz AP (2007) J Compos Sci Technol 67(3–4):55110.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.038 ↗
2. Feih S, Mathys Z, Gibson AG, Mouritz AP (2007) J Compos Mater 41(19):238710.1177/0021998307075461 ↗
3. Pickering SJ, Kelly RM, Kennerly JR, Rudd CD, Fenwick NJ (2000) J Compos Sci Technol 60(4):50910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00154-2 ↗
4. Thomas WF (1960) Phys Chem Glasses 1(1):4
5. Gupta PK (1988) In: Bunsell AR (ed) Fiber reinforcements for composite materials. Elsevier, New York
6. Owens Corning (2007) Advantex material data information. Owens Corning, Toledo
7. Zinck P, Mäder E, Gerard JF (2001) J Mater Sci 36(21):5245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101241031560110.1023/A:1012410315601 ↗
8. Stoner EG, Edie DD, Durhan SD (1994) J Mater Sci 29(24):6561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0035402210.1007/BF00354022 ↗
9. Feih S, Thraner A, Lilholt H (2005) J Mater Sci 40(7):1615. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-0661-410.1007/s10853-005-0661-4 ↗
10. R’Mili M, Reynaud P (2004) In: Proceedings ECCM-11 VaFTeM workshop, Greece
11. Thouless MD, Sbaizero O, Sigl LS, Evans AG (1989) J Am Ceram Soc 72(4):52510.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06171.x ↗
12. Shand EB (1959) J Am Ceram Soc 42(10):47410.1111/j.1151-2916.1959.tb13560.x ↗
13. Mecholsky JJ, Rice RW, Freiman SW (1974) J Am Ceram Soc 57(10):44010.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb11377.x ↗
14. Castilone RJ, Glaesemann GS, Hanson TA (2002) In: Matthewson MJ, Kurkjian CR (eds) Optical fiber and fiber component mechanical reliability and testing II: Proceedings of SPIE, San Jose, CA, vol 4639, pp 11–2010.1117/12.481339 ↗
15. Wiederhorn SM (1969) J Am Ceram Soc 52(2):9910.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb13350.x ↗
16. Charles RJ (1958) J Appl Phys 29(1):154910.1063/1.1722991 ↗
17. Schmitz GK, Metcalfe AG (1966) Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 5(1):110.1021/i260017a001 ↗
18. Helbling CS, Karbhari VM (2008) J Reinf Plast Compos 27(6):61310.1177/0731684407081769 ↗